Equivalence of the condition that the supremum of i.i.d. RVs are finite a.s.
$begingroup$
I am proving the following :
Suppose ${X_n : ninmathbb{N}}$ are i.i.d. random variables. Then $P(sup_{ninmathbb{N}}X_n < infty) = 1$ if and only if $ sum_{ninmathbb{N}}{P(X_n > M)} < infty$ for some $M>0.$
I guess by the form of the problem, that Borel-Canteli lemma will be used at some point, but I could not thought of a good way to connect it to the problem.
Any idea or hint will be really helpful. Thanks.
(edit)
Assume $sum_{ninmathbb{N}}{P(X_n > M)} < infty.$ In fact, as they are i.i.d., $P(X_n > M) = P(X_1>M)$ for all $n.$ Thus $P(X_1>M) = 0$ and $P(sup_{ninmathbb{N}}X_n > M) le sum_{ninmathbb{N}}{P(X_n > M)} = 0.$
Conversely, I've realized that ${sup_{ninmathbb{N}}{X_n} < infty} = bigcup_{m=1}^{infty}bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}{X_n le m}.$
probability-theory measure-theory random-variables independence borel-cantelli-lemmas
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am proving the following :
Suppose ${X_n : ninmathbb{N}}$ are i.i.d. random variables. Then $P(sup_{ninmathbb{N}}X_n < infty) = 1$ if and only if $ sum_{ninmathbb{N}}{P(X_n > M)} < infty$ for some $M>0.$
I guess by the form of the problem, that Borel-Canteli lemma will be used at some point, but I could not thought of a good way to connect it to the problem.
Any idea or hint will be really helpful. Thanks.
(edit)
Assume $sum_{ninmathbb{N}}{P(X_n > M)} < infty.$ In fact, as they are i.i.d., $P(X_n > M) = P(X_1>M)$ for all $n.$ Thus $P(X_1>M) = 0$ and $P(sup_{ninmathbb{N}}X_n > M) le sum_{ninmathbb{N}}{P(X_n > M)} = 0.$
Conversely, I've realized that ${sup_{ninmathbb{N}}{X_n} < infty} = bigcup_{m=1}^{infty}bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}{X_n le m}.$
probability-theory measure-theory random-variables independence borel-cantelli-lemmas
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Are you sure the random variables $(X_n)$ are supposed to be i.i.d., or only independent?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 10 '18 at 15:20
$begingroup$
I am 100 % sure that they are supposed to be i.i.d., as it was exam problem.
$endgroup$
– Euduardo
Dec 10 '18 at 15:22
$begingroup$
Well then the exam is slightly absurd, but why not.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
$begingroup$
You're right Did. Now I understand independence is enough, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Euduardo
Dec 11 '18 at 5:09
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am proving the following :
Suppose ${X_n : ninmathbb{N}}$ are i.i.d. random variables. Then $P(sup_{ninmathbb{N}}X_n < infty) = 1$ if and only if $ sum_{ninmathbb{N}}{P(X_n > M)} < infty$ for some $M>0.$
I guess by the form of the problem, that Borel-Canteli lemma will be used at some point, but I could not thought of a good way to connect it to the problem.
Any idea or hint will be really helpful. Thanks.
(edit)
Assume $sum_{ninmathbb{N}}{P(X_n > M)} < infty.$ In fact, as they are i.i.d., $P(X_n > M) = P(X_1>M)$ for all $n.$ Thus $P(X_1>M) = 0$ and $P(sup_{ninmathbb{N}}X_n > M) le sum_{ninmathbb{N}}{P(X_n > M)} = 0.$
Conversely, I've realized that ${sup_{ninmathbb{N}}{X_n} < infty} = bigcup_{m=1}^{infty}bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}{X_n le m}.$
probability-theory measure-theory random-variables independence borel-cantelli-lemmas
$endgroup$
I am proving the following :
Suppose ${X_n : ninmathbb{N}}$ are i.i.d. random variables. Then $P(sup_{ninmathbb{N}}X_n < infty) = 1$ if and only if $ sum_{ninmathbb{N}}{P(X_n > M)} < infty$ for some $M>0.$
I guess by the form of the problem, that Borel-Canteli lemma will be used at some point, but I could not thought of a good way to connect it to the problem.
Any idea or hint will be really helpful. Thanks.
(edit)
Assume $sum_{ninmathbb{N}}{P(X_n > M)} < infty.$ In fact, as they are i.i.d., $P(X_n > M) = P(X_1>M)$ for all $n.$ Thus $P(X_1>M) = 0$ and $P(sup_{ninmathbb{N}}X_n > M) le sum_{ninmathbb{N}}{P(X_n > M)} = 0.$
Conversely, I've realized that ${sup_{ninmathbb{N}}{X_n} < infty} = bigcup_{m=1}^{infty}bigcap_{n=1}^{infty}{X_n le m}.$
probability-theory measure-theory random-variables independence borel-cantelli-lemmas
probability-theory measure-theory random-variables independence borel-cantelli-lemmas
edited Dec 10 '18 at 15:10
Euduardo
asked Dec 10 '18 at 14:15
EuduardoEuduardo
1638
1638
1
$begingroup$
Are you sure the random variables $(X_n)$ are supposed to be i.i.d., or only independent?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 10 '18 at 15:20
$begingroup$
I am 100 % sure that they are supposed to be i.i.d., as it was exam problem.
$endgroup$
– Euduardo
Dec 10 '18 at 15:22
$begingroup$
Well then the exam is slightly absurd, but why not.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
$begingroup$
You're right Did. Now I understand independence is enough, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Euduardo
Dec 11 '18 at 5:09
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Are you sure the random variables $(X_n)$ are supposed to be i.i.d., or only independent?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 10 '18 at 15:20
$begingroup$
I am 100 % sure that they are supposed to be i.i.d., as it was exam problem.
$endgroup$
– Euduardo
Dec 10 '18 at 15:22
$begingroup$
Well then the exam is slightly absurd, but why not.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
$begingroup$
You're right Did. Now I understand independence is enough, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Euduardo
Dec 11 '18 at 5:09
1
1
$begingroup$
Are you sure the random variables $(X_n)$ are supposed to be i.i.d., or only independent?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 10 '18 at 15:20
$begingroup$
Are you sure the random variables $(X_n)$ are supposed to be i.i.d., or only independent?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 10 '18 at 15:20
$begingroup$
I am 100 % sure that they are supposed to be i.i.d., as it was exam problem.
$endgroup$
– Euduardo
Dec 10 '18 at 15:22
$begingroup$
I am 100 % sure that they are supposed to be i.i.d., as it was exam problem.
$endgroup$
– Euduardo
Dec 10 '18 at 15:22
$begingroup$
Well then the exam is slightly absurd, but why not.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
$begingroup$
Well then the exam is slightly absurd, but why not.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
$begingroup$
You're right Did. Now I understand independence is enough, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Euduardo
Dec 11 '18 at 5:09
$begingroup$
You're right Did. Now I understand independence is enough, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Euduardo
Dec 11 '18 at 5:09
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose $P(sup_n X_n < infty) = 1$. Since ${sup_n X_n < infty} = bigcup_{M=1}^infty {sup_n X_n le M}$, we have $lim_{M to infty} P(sup_n X_n le M) = 1$.
But if $P(X_i > M) > 0$, $P(sup_n X_n > M) = 1$. So for some $M$ we must have $P(X_i > M) = 0$.
Conversely, if $P(sup_n X_n < infty) < 1$, then for all $M$ we have $P(sup_n X_n > M) > 0$,
and $P(X_i > M) > 0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you go from $P[X_i >M] >0$ to $P[sup_n X_n >M] = 1$?
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 17:07
$begingroup$
Second Borel-Cantelli lemma.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Using the fact that $X_n$ are iid, I see. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 18:23
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033962%2fequivalence-of-the-condition-that-the-supremum-of-i-i-d-rvs-are-finite-a-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose $P(sup_n X_n < infty) = 1$. Since ${sup_n X_n < infty} = bigcup_{M=1}^infty {sup_n X_n le M}$, we have $lim_{M to infty} P(sup_n X_n le M) = 1$.
But if $P(X_i > M) > 0$, $P(sup_n X_n > M) = 1$. So for some $M$ we must have $P(X_i > M) = 0$.
Conversely, if $P(sup_n X_n < infty) < 1$, then for all $M$ we have $P(sup_n X_n > M) > 0$,
and $P(X_i > M) > 0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you go from $P[X_i >M] >0$ to $P[sup_n X_n >M] = 1$?
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 17:07
$begingroup$
Second Borel-Cantelli lemma.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Using the fact that $X_n$ are iid, I see. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 18:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $P(sup_n X_n < infty) = 1$. Since ${sup_n X_n < infty} = bigcup_{M=1}^infty {sup_n X_n le M}$, we have $lim_{M to infty} P(sup_n X_n le M) = 1$.
But if $P(X_i > M) > 0$, $P(sup_n X_n > M) = 1$. So for some $M$ we must have $P(X_i > M) = 0$.
Conversely, if $P(sup_n X_n < infty) < 1$, then for all $M$ we have $P(sup_n X_n > M) > 0$,
and $P(X_i > M) > 0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How do you go from $P[X_i >M] >0$ to $P[sup_n X_n >M] = 1$?
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 17:07
$begingroup$
Second Borel-Cantelli lemma.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Using the fact that $X_n$ are iid, I see. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 18:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $P(sup_n X_n < infty) = 1$. Since ${sup_n X_n < infty} = bigcup_{M=1}^infty {sup_n X_n le M}$, we have $lim_{M to infty} P(sup_n X_n le M) = 1$.
But if $P(X_i > M) > 0$, $P(sup_n X_n > M) = 1$. So for some $M$ we must have $P(X_i > M) = 0$.
Conversely, if $P(sup_n X_n < infty) < 1$, then for all $M$ we have $P(sup_n X_n > M) > 0$,
and $P(X_i > M) > 0$.
$endgroup$
Suppose $P(sup_n X_n < infty) = 1$. Since ${sup_n X_n < infty} = bigcup_{M=1}^infty {sup_n X_n le M}$, we have $lim_{M to infty} P(sup_n X_n le M) = 1$.
But if $P(X_i > M) > 0$, $P(sup_n X_n > M) = 1$. So for some $M$ we must have $P(X_i > M) = 0$.
Conversely, if $P(sup_n X_n < infty) < 1$, then for all $M$ we have $P(sup_n X_n > M) > 0$,
and $P(X_i > M) > 0$.
answered Dec 10 '18 at 15:11
Robert IsraelRobert Israel
324k23214468
324k23214468
$begingroup$
How do you go from $P[X_i >M] >0$ to $P[sup_n X_n >M] = 1$?
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 17:07
$begingroup$
Second Borel-Cantelli lemma.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Using the fact that $X_n$ are iid, I see. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 18:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How do you go from $P[X_i >M] >0$ to $P[sup_n X_n >M] = 1$?
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 17:07
$begingroup$
Second Borel-Cantelli lemma.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Using the fact that $X_n$ are iid, I see. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 18:23
$begingroup$
How do you go from $P[X_i >M] >0$ to $P[sup_n X_n >M] = 1$?
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 17:07
$begingroup$
How do you go from $P[X_i >M] >0$ to $P[sup_n X_n >M] = 1$?
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 17:07
$begingroup$
Second Borel-Cantelli lemma.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Second Borel-Cantelli lemma.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Dec 10 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Using the fact that $X_n$ are iid, I see. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 18:23
$begingroup$
Using the fact that $X_n$ are iid, I see. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– copper.hat
Dec 10 '18 at 18:23
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033962%2fequivalence-of-the-condition-that-the-supremum-of-i-i-d-rvs-are-finite-a-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Are you sure the random variables $(X_n)$ are supposed to be i.i.d., or only independent?
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 10 '18 at 15:20
$begingroup$
I am 100 % sure that they are supposed to be i.i.d., as it was exam problem.
$endgroup$
– Euduardo
Dec 10 '18 at 15:22
$begingroup$
Well then the exam is slightly absurd, but why not.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 10 '18 at 15:23
$begingroup$
You're right Did. Now I understand independence is enough, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Euduardo
Dec 11 '18 at 5:09