Solution for Linear Transformation question seems wrong.












0












$begingroup$


I'm studying with a Linear Algebra book which presents the following question:



Be $A:Erightarrow F$ a linear transformation. If the vectors $Av_1,ldots,Av_n in F$ are LI, then prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n in E$ are also linear.



Below is the official solution:



Assume $c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_n=0$. Applying $A$ (which is linear), yields $c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0$. Since $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$ are LI, then $c_1=c_2=ldots=c_n=0$. Thus, $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are LI.



It seems to me that this solution does not take me anywhere. It already assumed a LI set $v_1,ldots,v_n$ and applied $A$ to it, to conclude that the same set is LI. But what if $A$ is singular?



I think it's more reasonable to linearly combine $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$:



$$
c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0
$$



Thus,



$$
Aleft(c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_nright)=0
$$



And then to conclude that, iff $A$ is nonsingular, then $v_1,ldots,v_n$ is LI. Otherwise, we can't be sure.



Am I missing something?



Thanks in advance.






linear-algebra linear-transformations







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How singula nature of $A$ affects the linear independency?The proof seems fine to me
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Dec 10 '18 at 12:56


















0












$begingroup$


I'm studying with a Linear Algebra book which presents the following question:



Be $A:Erightarrow F$ a linear transformation. If the vectors $Av_1,ldots,Av_n in F$ are LI, then prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n in E$ are also linear.



Below is the official solution:



Assume $c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_n=0$. Applying $A$ (which is linear), yields $c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0$. Since $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$ are LI, then $c_1=c_2=ldots=c_n=0$. Thus, $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are LI.



It seems to me that this solution does not take me anywhere. It already assumed a LI set $v_1,ldots,v_n$ and applied $A$ to it, to conclude that the same set is LI. But what if $A$ is singular?



I think it's more reasonable to linearly combine $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$:



$$
c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0
$$



Thus,



$$
Aleft(c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_nright)=0
$$



And then to conclude that, iff $A$ is nonsingular, then $v_1,ldots,v_n$ is LI. Otherwise, we can't be sure.



Am I missing something?



Thanks in advance.






linear-algebra linear-transformations







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How singula nature of $A$ affects the linear independency?The proof seems fine to me
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Dec 10 '18 at 12:56
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm studying with a Linear Algebra book which presents the following question:



Be $A:Erightarrow F$ a linear transformation. If the vectors $Av_1,ldots,Av_n in F$ are LI, then prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n in E$ are also linear.



Below is the official solution:



Assume $c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_n=0$. Applying $A$ (which is linear), yields $c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0$. Since $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$ are LI, then $c_1=c_2=ldots=c_n=0$. Thus, $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are LI.



It seems to me that this solution does not take me anywhere. It already assumed a LI set $v_1,ldots,v_n$ and applied $A$ to it, to conclude that the same set is LI. But what if $A$ is singular?



I think it's more reasonable to linearly combine $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$:



$$
c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0
$$



Thus,



$$
Aleft(c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_nright)=0
$$



And then to conclude that, iff $A$ is nonsingular, then $v_1,ldots,v_n$ is LI. Otherwise, we can't be sure.



Am I missing something?



Thanks in advance.






linear-algebra linear-transformations







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm studying with a Linear Algebra book which presents the following question:



Be $A:Erightarrow F$ a linear transformation. If the vectors $Av_1,ldots,Av_n in F$ are LI, then prove that $v_1,ldots,v_n in E$ are also linear.



Below is the official solution:



Assume $c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_n=0$. Applying $A$ (which is linear), yields $c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0$. Since $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$ are LI, then $c_1=c_2=ldots=c_n=0$. Thus, $v_1,ldots,v_n$ are LI.



It seems to me that this solution does not take me anywhere. It already assumed a LI set $v_1,ldots,v_n$ and applied $A$ to it, to conclude that the same set is LI. But what if $A$ is singular?



I think it's more reasonable to linearly combine $Av_1,ldots,Av_n$:



$$
c_1Av_1+ldots+c_nAv_n=0
$$



Thus,



$$
Aleft(c_1v_1+ldots+c_nv_nright)=0
$$



And then to conclude that, iff $A$ is nonsingular, then $v_1,ldots,v_n$ is LI. Otherwise, we can't be sure.



Am I missing something?



Thanks in advance.






linear-algebra linear-transformations




linear-algebra linear-transformations






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 10 '18 at 12:50









César PachecoCésar Pacheco

81




81












  • $begingroup$
    How singula nature of $A$ affects the linear independency?The proof seems fine to me
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Dec 10 '18 at 12:56




















  • $begingroup$
    How singula nature of $A$ affects the linear independency?The proof seems fine to me
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Dec 10 '18 at 12:56


















$begingroup$
How singula nature of $A$ affects the linear independency?The proof seems fine to me
$endgroup$
– Tom.
Dec 10 '18 at 12:56






$begingroup$
How singula nature of $A$ affects the linear independency?The proof seems fine to me
$endgroup$
– Tom.
Dec 10 '18 at 12:56












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

We want to check if $v_i$ are linearly independent, hence we form the equation that we use to check linearly independence.



$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i v_i = 0$$



At this moment, I still do not know if all the $c_i$ must be $0$.



Now, let's multiply by $A$.



$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i (Av_i) = 0$$



Now, I know that all the $c_i$'s are zero since we are told that ${Av_1, ldots, Av_n}$ is linearly independent. Hence ${ v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is linearly independent.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
    $endgroup$
    – César Pacheco
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:16











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033877%2fsolution-for-linear-transformation-question-seems-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

We want to check if $v_i$ are linearly independent, hence we form the equation that we use to check linearly independence.



$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i v_i = 0$$



At this moment, I still do not know if all the $c_i$ must be $0$.



Now, let's multiply by $A$.



$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i (Av_i) = 0$$



Now, I know that all the $c_i$'s are zero since we are told that ${Av_1, ldots, Av_n}$ is linearly independent. Hence ${ v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is linearly independent.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
    $endgroup$
    – César Pacheco
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:16
















1












$begingroup$

We want to check if $v_i$ are linearly independent, hence we form the equation that we use to check linearly independence.



$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i v_i = 0$$



At this moment, I still do not know if all the $c_i$ must be $0$.



Now, let's multiply by $A$.



$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i (Av_i) = 0$$



Now, I know that all the $c_i$'s are zero since we are told that ${Av_1, ldots, Av_n}$ is linearly independent. Hence ${ v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is linearly independent.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
    $endgroup$
    – César Pacheco
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:16














1












1








1





$begingroup$

We want to check if $v_i$ are linearly independent, hence we form the equation that we use to check linearly independence.



$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i v_i = 0$$



At this moment, I still do not know if all the $c_i$ must be $0$.



Now, let's multiply by $A$.



$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i (Av_i) = 0$$



Now, I know that all the $c_i$'s are zero since we are told that ${Av_1, ldots, Av_n}$ is linearly independent. Hence ${ v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is linearly independent.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



We want to check if $v_i$ are linearly independent, hence we form the equation that we use to check linearly independence.



$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i v_i = 0$$



At this moment, I still do not know if all the $c_i$ must be $0$.



Now, let's multiply by $A$.



$$sum_{i=1}^n c_i (Av_i) = 0$$



Now, I know that all the $c_i$'s are zero since we are told that ${Av_1, ldots, Av_n}$ is linearly independent. Hence ${ v_1, ldots, v_n}$ is linearly independent.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 10 '18 at 12:58









Siong Thye GohSiong Thye Goh

101k1466118




101k1466118












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
    $endgroup$
    – César Pacheco
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:16


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
    $endgroup$
    – César Pacheco
    Dec 10 '18 at 13:16
















$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– César Pacheco
Dec 10 '18 at 13:16




$begingroup$
Thanks a lot. Your explanation helped me see the problem with my reasoning.
$endgroup$
– César Pacheco
Dec 10 '18 at 13:16


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3033877%2fsolution-for-linear-transformation-question-seems-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Image
Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
Read more

Puebla de Zaragoza

Image
Para otros usos de este término, véase Puebla (desambiguación). Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localidad De arriba a abajo de izquierda a derecha: Estrella de Puebla, Volcán Popocatépetl, Catedral de Puebla, Monumento a Ignacio Zaragoza, Estadio Cuauhtémoc, Angelópolis y Vista panorámica de la ciudad. Escudo Otros nombres: El relicario de América/ La ciudad de los Ángeles/ La Angelópolis Lema: Muy noble y muy leal ciudad de Puebla de los Ángeles Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localización de Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza en México Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localización de Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza en Puebla Mapa interactivo Coordenadas 19°03′05″N 98°13′04″O  /  19.051388888889, -98.217777777778 Coordenadas: 19°03′05″N 98°13′04″O  /  19.051388888889, -98.217777777778 Idioma oficial Español Entidad Localidad  • País   México  • Estado Puebla  • Municipio Puebla Presidente municipal Claudia Rivera Vivanc
Read more

Musa

Image
Para el género de plantas, véase Musa (planta). Apolo y la Nueve Musas En la mitología griega, las musas (en griego antiguo μοῦσαι « mousai» ) son, según los escritores más antiguos, las divinidades inspiradoras de las Artes: cada una de ellas está relacionada con ramas artísticas y del conocimiento. Son hijas de Zeus y de Mnemósine, compañeras del séquito de Apolo, dios olímpico de la música y patrón de las bellas artes, quien tuvo romances con cada una de ellas, dejando descendientes. Bajaban a la tierra a susurrar ideas e inspirar a aquellos mortales que las invocaran. En la época más arcaica eran las ninfas inspiradoras de las fuentes, en las cuales eran adoradas. Finalmente, alrededor de los siglos VIII-VII a. C. [ 1 ] ​ prevaleció en todo el territorio de la Hélade la adoración de las nueve Musas, que son Calíope, Clío, Erato, Euterpe, Melpómene, Polimnia, Talía, Terpsícore y Urania. El culto a las musas era originalmente de Tracia y Beocia, y fueron de vital impo
Read more