Is there a change-of-variables solution for integrals from negative infinity to a constant?












3












$begingroup$


I found a fantastic and generalizable substitution technique for computing definite integrals that go to infinity from either negative infinity or a constant, regardless of the function (sorry for the external link):



http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Cubature#Infinite_intervals



But what's killing me is that I need the same sort of thing for a function going from negative infinity to a constant, and I can't convince myself that some obvious transformation of either of these two is correct. Doing u-substitution on any given integrand to take care of a (negative) infinite bound is simple enough, but a general transformation rule like one of the ones in the link - totally independent of the function itself - would be invaluable.



Edit 1 (Might be a Wild Goose Chase)



So the second formula up in that link, is:



$int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{-1}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



If $a$ represents our generic real-number constant, the above could certainly be broken up as:



$int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{-1}^a f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt+int_{a}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



Which tempts me to jump to the conclusion that the first term on the RHS can be used as our general negative-infinity-to-constant formula:



$int_{-infty}^{a}f(x)dx=int_{-1}^a f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



In order for this to be true, however, the second RHS term would have to complement it by being a valid formula to integrate from any constant up to infinity, IE:



$int_{a}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{a}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



...but the first formula given at the above link is also supposed to be such a formula, solving for that exact LHS term! So the two would have to be equivalent - IE:



$int_{a}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{a}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt=int_{0}^1 f(a+frac{t}{1-t})frac{1}{(1-t)^2}dt$



And here I'm stuck, because I can't figure out whether or not that's plausible for all convergent $f(x)$. I have a bad feeling about that whole approach because it relies on the assumption that dividing up a finite space at a given point is the same as dividing up an equivalent infinite space at the exact same point, proportionally.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    I found a fantastic and generalizable substitution technique for computing definite integrals that go to infinity from either negative infinity or a constant, regardless of the function (sorry for the external link):



    http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Cubature#Infinite_intervals



    But what's killing me is that I need the same sort of thing for a function going from negative infinity to a constant, and I can't convince myself that some obvious transformation of either of these two is correct. Doing u-substitution on any given integrand to take care of a (negative) infinite bound is simple enough, but a general transformation rule like one of the ones in the link - totally independent of the function itself - would be invaluable.



    Edit 1 (Might be a Wild Goose Chase)



    So the second formula up in that link, is:



    $int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{-1}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



    If $a$ represents our generic real-number constant, the above could certainly be broken up as:



    $int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{-1}^a f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt+int_{a}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



    Which tempts me to jump to the conclusion that the first term on the RHS can be used as our general negative-infinity-to-constant formula:



    $int_{-infty}^{a}f(x)dx=int_{-1}^a f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



    In order for this to be true, however, the second RHS term would have to complement it by being a valid formula to integrate from any constant up to infinity, IE:



    $int_{a}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{a}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



    ...but the first formula given at the above link is also supposed to be such a formula, solving for that exact LHS term! So the two would have to be equivalent - IE:



    $int_{a}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{a}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt=int_{0}^1 f(a+frac{t}{1-t})frac{1}{(1-t)^2}dt$



    And here I'm stuck, because I can't figure out whether or not that's plausible for all convergent $f(x)$. I have a bad feeling about that whole approach because it relies on the assumption that dividing up a finite space at a given point is the same as dividing up an equivalent infinite space at the exact same point, proportionally.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      I found a fantastic and generalizable substitution technique for computing definite integrals that go to infinity from either negative infinity or a constant, regardless of the function (sorry for the external link):



      http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Cubature#Infinite_intervals



      But what's killing me is that I need the same sort of thing for a function going from negative infinity to a constant, and I can't convince myself that some obvious transformation of either of these two is correct. Doing u-substitution on any given integrand to take care of a (negative) infinite bound is simple enough, but a general transformation rule like one of the ones in the link - totally independent of the function itself - would be invaluable.



      Edit 1 (Might be a Wild Goose Chase)



      So the second formula up in that link, is:



      $int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{-1}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



      If $a$ represents our generic real-number constant, the above could certainly be broken up as:



      $int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{-1}^a f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt+int_{a}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



      Which tempts me to jump to the conclusion that the first term on the RHS can be used as our general negative-infinity-to-constant formula:



      $int_{-infty}^{a}f(x)dx=int_{-1}^a f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



      In order for this to be true, however, the second RHS term would have to complement it by being a valid formula to integrate from any constant up to infinity, IE:



      $int_{a}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{a}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



      ...but the first formula given at the above link is also supposed to be such a formula, solving for that exact LHS term! So the two would have to be equivalent - IE:



      $int_{a}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{a}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt=int_{0}^1 f(a+frac{t}{1-t})frac{1}{(1-t)^2}dt$



      And here I'm stuck, because I can't figure out whether or not that's plausible for all convergent $f(x)$. I have a bad feeling about that whole approach because it relies on the assumption that dividing up a finite space at a given point is the same as dividing up an equivalent infinite space at the exact same point, proportionally.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I found a fantastic and generalizable substitution technique for computing definite integrals that go to infinity from either negative infinity or a constant, regardless of the function (sorry for the external link):



      http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Cubature#Infinite_intervals



      But what's killing me is that I need the same sort of thing for a function going from negative infinity to a constant, and I can't convince myself that some obvious transformation of either of these two is correct. Doing u-substitution on any given integrand to take care of a (negative) infinite bound is simple enough, but a general transformation rule like one of the ones in the link - totally independent of the function itself - would be invaluable.



      Edit 1 (Might be a Wild Goose Chase)



      So the second formula up in that link, is:



      $int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{-1}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



      If $a$ represents our generic real-number constant, the above could certainly be broken up as:



      $int_{-infty}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{-1}^a f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt+int_{a}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



      Which tempts me to jump to the conclusion that the first term on the RHS can be used as our general negative-infinity-to-constant formula:



      $int_{-infty}^{a}f(x)dx=int_{-1}^a f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



      In order for this to be true, however, the second RHS term would have to complement it by being a valid formula to integrate from any constant up to infinity, IE:



      $int_{a}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{a}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt$



      ...but the first formula given at the above link is also supposed to be such a formula, solving for that exact LHS term! So the two would have to be equivalent - IE:



      $int_{a}^{infty}f(x)dx=int_{a}^1 f(frac{t}{1-t^2})frac{1+t^2}{(1-t^2)^2}dt=int_{0}^1 f(a+frac{t}{1-t})frac{1}{(1-t)^2}dt$



      And here I'm stuck, because I can't figure out whether or not that's plausible for all convergent $f(x)$. I have a bad feeling about that whole approach because it relies on the assumption that dividing up a finite space at a given point is the same as dividing up an equivalent infinite space at the exact same point, proportionally.







      integration infinity substitution






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 4 '15 at 20:16







      DHW

















      asked Aug 4 '15 at 18:44









      DHWDHW

      1215




      1215






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          From the wikipedia page for integration by substitution, you need a differentiable function $varphi$ with integrable derivative. If $f$ is continuous, then



          $$ int_{varphi(a)}^{varphi(b)} f(x) dx = int_a^b f(varphi(x)) varphi'(x) dx$$



          As long as $varphi(a) = -infty$ and $varphi(b) = c$, it should work.
          Some functions you can use are:



          $$ varphi(x) = c + 1 - frac{1}{x} $$
          $$ int_{-infty}^{c} f(x) dx = int_0^1 fleft(c + 1 - frac{1}{x} right) frac{1}{x^2} dx$$
          $$ varphi(x) = c + log(x) $$
          $$ int_{-infty}^{c} f(x) dx = int_0^1 f(c + log(x)) frac{1}{x} dx$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1384456%2fis-there-a-change-of-variables-solution-for-integrals-from-negative-infinity-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            From the wikipedia page for integration by substitution, you need a differentiable function $varphi$ with integrable derivative. If $f$ is continuous, then



            $$ int_{varphi(a)}^{varphi(b)} f(x) dx = int_a^b f(varphi(x)) varphi'(x) dx$$



            As long as $varphi(a) = -infty$ and $varphi(b) = c$, it should work.
            Some functions you can use are:



            $$ varphi(x) = c + 1 - frac{1}{x} $$
            $$ int_{-infty}^{c} f(x) dx = int_0^1 fleft(c + 1 - frac{1}{x} right) frac{1}{x^2} dx$$
            $$ varphi(x) = c + log(x) $$
            $$ int_{-infty}^{c} f(x) dx = int_0^1 f(c + log(x)) frac{1}{x} dx$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              From the wikipedia page for integration by substitution, you need a differentiable function $varphi$ with integrable derivative. If $f$ is continuous, then



              $$ int_{varphi(a)}^{varphi(b)} f(x) dx = int_a^b f(varphi(x)) varphi'(x) dx$$



              As long as $varphi(a) = -infty$ and $varphi(b) = c$, it should work.
              Some functions you can use are:



              $$ varphi(x) = c + 1 - frac{1}{x} $$
              $$ int_{-infty}^{c} f(x) dx = int_0^1 fleft(c + 1 - frac{1}{x} right) frac{1}{x^2} dx$$
              $$ varphi(x) = c + log(x) $$
              $$ int_{-infty}^{c} f(x) dx = int_0^1 f(c + log(x)) frac{1}{x} dx$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                From the wikipedia page for integration by substitution, you need a differentiable function $varphi$ with integrable derivative. If $f$ is continuous, then



                $$ int_{varphi(a)}^{varphi(b)} f(x) dx = int_a^b f(varphi(x)) varphi'(x) dx$$



                As long as $varphi(a) = -infty$ and $varphi(b) = c$, it should work.
                Some functions you can use are:



                $$ varphi(x) = c + 1 - frac{1}{x} $$
                $$ int_{-infty}^{c} f(x) dx = int_0^1 fleft(c + 1 - frac{1}{x} right) frac{1}{x^2} dx$$
                $$ varphi(x) = c + log(x) $$
                $$ int_{-infty}^{c} f(x) dx = int_0^1 f(c + log(x)) frac{1}{x} dx$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                From the wikipedia page for integration by substitution, you need a differentiable function $varphi$ with integrable derivative. If $f$ is continuous, then



                $$ int_{varphi(a)}^{varphi(b)} f(x) dx = int_a^b f(varphi(x)) varphi'(x) dx$$



                As long as $varphi(a) = -infty$ and $varphi(b) = c$, it should work.
                Some functions you can use are:



                $$ varphi(x) = c + 1 - frac{1}{x} $$
                $$ int_{-infty}^{c} f(x) dx = int_0^1 fleft(c + 1 - frac{1}{x} right) frac{1}{x^2} dx$$
                $$ varphi(x) = c + log(x) $$
                $$ int_{-infty}^{c} f(x) dx = int_0^1 f(c + log(x)) frac{1}{x} dx$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 13 '18 at 3:39









                slek120slek120

                101




                101






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1384456%2fis-there-a-change-of-variables-solution-for-integrals-from-negative-infinity-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...