Show that $lim_{ntoinfty}(frac 1n−frac 1{n+1})=0$ using epsilon-delta definition. [closed]












-1















Show that $lim_{ntoinfty}left(frac 1n−frac 1{n+1}right)=0$ using epsilon-delta definition.











share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, abiessu, Foobaz John, Yves Daoust, RRL Nov 24 at 19:52


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, abiessu, Foobaz John, Yves Daoust, RRL

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Consider using MathJAX to format the mathematical symbols in your question, as it isn't entirely clear what you're trying to ask otherwise.
    – Decaf-Math
    Nov 24 at 19:07










  • Can you show $lim_{ntoinfty}left(frac 1nright)=0$?
    – Henry
    Nov 24 at 19:12
















-1















Show that $lim_{ntoinfty}left(frac 1n−frac 1{n+1}right)=0$ using epsilon-delta definition.











share|cite|improve this question















closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, abiessu, Foobaz John, Yves Daoust, RRL Nov 24 at 19:52


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, abiessu, Foobaz John, Yves Daoust, RRL

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Consider using MathJAX to format the mathematical symbols in your question, as it isn't entirely clear what you're trying to ask otherwise.
    – Decaf-Math
    Nov 24 at 19:07










  • Can you show $lim_{ntoinfty}left(frac 1nright)=0$?
    – Henry
    Nov 24 at 19:12














-1












-1








-1








Show that $lim_{ntoinfty}left(frac 1n−frac 1{n+1}right)=0$ using epsilon-delta definition.











share|cite|improve this question
















Show that $lim_{ntoinfty}left(frac 1n−frac 1{n+1}right)=0$ using epsilon-delta definition.








real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 24 at 19:09









abiessu

6,65721541




6,65721541










asked Nov 24 at 19:05









user619263

203




203




closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, abiessu, Foobaz John, Yves Daoust, RRL Nov 24 at 19:52


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, abiessu, Foobaz John, Yves Daoust, RRL

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by José Carlos Santos, abiessu, Foobaz John, Yves Daoust, RRL Nov 24 at 19:52


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – José Carlos Santos, abiessu, Foobaz John, Yves Daoust, RRL

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Consider using MathJAX to format the mathematical symbols in your question, as it isn't entirely clear what you're trying to ask otherwise.
    – Decaf-Math
    Nov 24 at 19:07










  • Can you show $lim_{ntoinfty}left(frac 1nright)=0$?
    – Henry
    Nov 24 at 19:12


















  • Consider using MathJAX to format the mathematical symbols in your question, as it isn't entirely clear what you're trying to ask otherwise.
    – Decaf-Math
    Nov 24 at 19:07










  • Can you show $lim_{ntoinfty}left(frac 1nright)=0$?
    – Henry
    Nov 24 at 19:12
















Consider using MathJAX to format the mathematical symbols in your question, as it isn't entirely clear what you're trying to ask otherwise.
– Decaf-Math
Nov 24 at 19:07




Consider using MathJAX to format the mathematical symbols in your question, as it isn't entirely clear what you're trying to ask otherwise.
– Decaf-Math
Nov 24 at 19:07












Can you show $lim_{ntoinfty}left(frac 1nright)=0$?
– Henry
Nov 24 at 19:12




Can you show $lim_{ntoinfty}left(frac 1nright)=0$?
– Henry
Nov 24 at 19:12










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














$$|frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{n+1}-0|=frac{1}{n(n+1)}$$



$$<frac{1}{n^2}$$



Given $epsilon>0$, we look for $Nin Bbb N$ such that



$$nge Nimplies frac{1}{n(n+1)}<epsilon$$ It is easier to look for $N$ s.t



$$nge Nimplies frac{1}{n^2}<epsilon$$



or
$$nge Nimplies n>sqrt{frac{1}{epsilon}}$$



We can take $$N=lfloor sqrt{frac{1}{epsilon}}rfloor +1.$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • You could even say $0 lt frac 1n−frac 1{n+1} lt frac1n$ to avoid square roots
    – Henry
    Nov 24 at 19:13












  • @Henry Yes right. i used absolute value.
    – hamam_Abdallah
    Nov 24 at 19:14



















1














Think about what it means to show that $lim_{ntoinfty}a_n = L$. By definition,




For any $epsilon > 0$, there exists a $Ninmathbb N$ such that for all $nge N$, we have $$|a_n - L| < epsilon.$$




From here, you need to show that there exists some natural number $N$ such that $$left|left({1over n} - {1over n+1}right) - 0right| < epsilon.$$ You can say that $$begin{align}left|left({1over n} - {1over n+1}right) - 0right| &= left|{(n+1) - nover n(n+1)}right| \&= {1over n^2 + n}\ &le cdots \ &<epsilonend{align}$$ From here, your goal is to complete the scratchwork by being able to create another valid inequality at the $cdots$ section. This is usually done by trying to isolate $n$ in terms of $epsilon$. How can you reduce the number of $n$'s appearing in the 3rd to last line that allows you to have just one $n$?






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • ok ... How can I do it ?
    – user619263
    Nov 24 at 19:24










  • @user619263 hint: note that $displaystyle {1over 5} le {1over 4}$, and $displaystyle {1over 7} le {1over 2}$. What do you notice about the fractions and the inequality in each case? Which side of the inequality does the fraction with the bigger denominator go?
    – Decaf-Math
    Nov 24 at 19:40


















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














$$|frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{n+1}-0|=frac{1}{n(n+1)}$$



$$<frac{1}{n^2}$$



Given $epsilon>0$, we look for $Nin Bbb N$ such that



$$nge Nimplies frac{1}{n(n+1)}<epsilon$$ It is easier to look for $N$ s.t



$$nge Nimplies frac{1}{n^2}<epsilon$$



or
$$nge Nimplies n>sqrt{frac{1}{epsilon}}$$



We can take $$N=lfloor sqrt{frac{1}{epsilon}}rfloor +1.$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • You could even say $0 lt frac 1n−frac 1{n+1} lt frac1n$ to avoid square roots
    – Henry
    Nov 24 at 19:13












  • @Henry Yes right. i used absolute value.
    – hamam_Abdallah
    Nov 24 at 19:14
















1














$$|frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{n+1}-0|=frac{1}{n(n+1)}$$



$$<frac{1}{n^2}$$



Given $epsilon>0$, we look for $Nin Bbb N$ such that



$$nge Nimplies frac{1}{n(n+1)}<epsilon$$ It is easier to look for $N$ s.t



$$nge Nimplies frac{1}{n^2}<epsilon$$



or
$$nge Nimplies n>sqrt{frac{1}{epsilon}}$$



We can take $$N=lfloor sqrt{frac{1}{epsilon}}rfloor +1.$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • You could even say $0 lt frac 1n−frac 1{n+1} lt frac1n$ to avoid square roots
    – Henry
    Nov 24 at 19:13












  • @Henry Yes right. i used absolute value.
    – hamam_Abdallah
    Nov 24 at 19:14














1












1








1






$$|frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{n+1}-0|=frac{1}{n(n+1)}$$



$$<frac{1}{n^2}$$



Given $epsilon>0$, we look for $Nin Bbb N$ such that



$$nge Nimplies frac{1}{n(n+1)}<epsilon$$ It is easier to look for $N$ s.t



$$nge Nimplies frac{1}{n^2}<epsilon$$



or
$$nge Nimplies n>sqrt{frac{1}{epsilon}}$$



We can take $$N=lfloor sqrt{frac{1}{epsilon}}rfloor +1.$$






share|cite|improve this answer














$$|frac{1}{n}-frac{1}{n+1}-0|=frac{1}{n(n+1)}$$



$$<frac{1}{n^2}$$



Given $epsilon>0$, we look for $Nin Bbb N$ such that



$$nge Nimplies frac{1}{n(n+1)}<epsilon$$ It is easier to look for $N$ s.t



$$nge Nimplies frac{1}{n^2}<epsilon$$



or
$$nge Nimplies n>sqrt{frac{1}{epsilon}}$$



We can take $$N=lfloor sqrt{frac{1}{epsilon}}rfloor +1.$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 24 at 19:13

























answered Nov 24 at 19:11









hamam_Abdallah

38k21634




38k21634












  • You could even say $0 lt frac 1n−frac 1{n+1} lt frac1n$ to avoid square roots
    – Henry
    Nov 24 at 19:13












  • @Henry Yes right. i used absolute value.
    – hamam_Abdallah
    Nov 24 at 19:14


















  • You could even say $0 lt frac 1n−frac 1{n+1} lt frac1n$ to avoid square roots
    – Henry
    Nov 24 at 19:13












  • @Henry Yes right. i used absolute value.
    – hamam_Abdallah
    Nov 24 at 19:14
















You could even say $0 lt frac 1n−frac 1{n+1} lt frac1n$ to avoid square roots
– Henry
Nov 24 at 19:13






You could even say $0 lt frac 1n−frac 1{n+1} lt frac1n$ to avoid square roots
– Henry
Nov 24 at 19:13














@Henry Yes right. i used absolute value.
– hamam_Abdallah
Nov 24 at 19:14




@Henry Yes right. i used absolute value.
– hamam_Abdallah
Nov 24 at 19:14











1














Think about what it means to show that $lim_{ntoinfty}a_n = L$. By definition,




For any $epsilon > 0$, there exists a $Ninmathbb N$ such that for all $nge N$, we have $$|a_n - L| < epsilon.$$




From here, you need to show that there exists some natural number $N$ such that $$left|left({1over n} - {1over n+1}right) - 0right| < epsilon.$$ You can say that $$begin{align}left|left({1over n} - {1over n+1}right) - 0right| &= left|{(n+1) - nover n(n+1)}right| \&= {1over n^2 + n}\ &le cdots \ &<epsilonend{align}$$ From here, your goal is to complete the scratchwork by being able to create another valid inequality at the $cdots$ section. This is usually done by trying to isolate $n$ in terms of $epsilon$. How can you reduce the number of $n$'s appearing in the 3rd to last line that allows you to have just one $n$?






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • ok ... How can I do it ?
    – user619263
    Nov 24 at 19:24










  • @user619263 hint: note that $displaystyle {1over 5} le {1over 4}$, and $displaystyle {1over 7} le {1over 2}$. What do you notice about the fractions and the inequality in each case? Which side of the inequality does the fraction with the bigger denominator go?
    – Decaf-Math
    Nov 24 at 19:40
















1














Think about what it means to show that $lim_{ntoinfty}a_n = L$. By definition,




For any $epsilon > 0$, there exists a $Ninmathbb N$ such that for all $nge N$, we have $$|a_n - L| < epsilon.$$




From here, you need to show that there exists some natural number $N$ such that $$left|left({1over n} - {1over n+1}right) - 0right| < epsilon.$$ You can say that $$begin{align}left|left({1over n} - {1over n+1}right) - 0right| &= left|{(n+1) - nover n(n+1)}right| \&= {1over n^2 + n}\ &le cdots \ &<epsilonend{align}$$ From here, your goal is to complete the scratchwork by being able to create another valid inequality at the $cdots$ section. This is usually done by trying to isolate $n$ in terms of $epsilon$. How can you reduce the number of $n$'s appearing in the 3rd to last line that allows you to have just one $n$?






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • ok ... How can I do it ?
    – user619263
    Nov 24 at 19:24










  • @user619263 hint: note that $displaystyle {1over 5} le {1over 4}$, and $displaystyle {1over 7} le {1over 2}$. What do you notice about the fractions and the inequality in each case? Which side of the inequality does the fraction with the bigger denominator go?
    – Decaf-Math
    Nov 24 at 19:40














1












1








1






Think about what it means to show that $lim_{ntoinfty}a_n = L$. By definition,




For any $epsilon > 0$, there exists a $Ninmathbb N$ such that for all $nge N$, we have $$|a_n - L| < epsilon.$$




From here, you need to show that there exists some natural number $N$ such that $$left|left({1over n} - {1over n+1}right) - 0right| < epsilon.$$ You can say that $$begin{align}left|left({1over n} - {1over n+1}right) - 0right| &= left|{(n+1) - nover n(n+1)}right| \&= {1over n^2 + n}\ &le cdots \ &<epsilonend{align}$$ From here, your goal is to complete the scratchwork by being able to create another valid inequality at the $cdots$ section. This is usually done by trying to isolate $n$ in terms of $epsilon$. How can you reduce the number of $n$'s appearing in the 3rd to last line that allows you to have just one $n$?






share|cite|improve this answer












Think about what it means to show that $lim_{ntoinfty}a_n = L$. By definition,




For any $epsilon > 0$, there exists a $Ninmathbb N$ such that for all $nge N$, we have $$|a_n - L| < epsilon.$$




From here, you need to show that there exists some natural number $N$ such that $$left|left({1over n} - {1over n+1}right) - 0right| < epsilon.$$ You can say that $$begin{align}left|left({1over n} - {1over n+1}right) - 0right| &= left|{(n+1) - nover n(n+1)}right| \&= {1over n^2 + n}\ &le cdots \ &<epsilonend{align}$$ From here, your goal is to complete the scratchwork by being able to create another valid inequality at the $cdots$ section. This is usually done by trying to isolate $n$ in terms of $epsilon$. How can you reduce the number of $n$'s appearing in the 3rd to last line that allows you to have just one $n$?







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 24 at 19:20









Decaf-Math

3,179825




3,179825












  • ok ... How can I do it ?
    – user619263
    Nov 24 at 19:24










  • @user619263 hint: note that $displaystyle {1over 5} le {1over 4}$, and $displaystyle {1over 7} le {1over 2}$. What do you notice about the fractions and the inequality in each case? Which side of the inequality does the fraction with the bigger denominator go?
    – Decaf-Math
    Nov 24 at 19:40


















  • ok ... How can I do it ?
    – user619263
    Nov 24 at 19:24










  • @user619263 hint: note that $displaystyle {1over 5} le {1over 4}$, and $displaystyle {1over 7} le {1over 2}$. What do you notice about the fractions and the inequality in each case? Which side of the inequality does the fraction with the bigger denominator go?
    – Decaf-Math
    Nov 24 at 19:40
















ok ... How can I do it ?
– user619263
Nov 24 at 19:24




ok ... How can I do it ?
– user619263
Nov 24 at 19:24












@user619263 hint: note that $displaystyle {1over 5} le {1over 4}$, and $displaystyle {1over 7} le {1over 2}$. What do you notice about the fractions and the inequality in each case? Which side of the inequality does the fraction with the bigger denominator go?
– Decaf-Math
Nov 24 at 19:40




@user619263 hint: note that $displaystyle {1over 5} le {1over 4}$, and $displaystyle {1over 7} le {1over 2}$. What do you notice about the fractions and the inequality in each case? Which side of the inequality does the fraction with the bigger denominator go?
– Decaf-Math
Nov 24 at 19:40



Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa