Lower semi continuous envelope is lower semi continuous












2












$begingroup$


Let X be a topological space and $F:X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}}$. The lower semi continuous envelope of $F$ is defined by $sc^-F(u)=sup{phi(u);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F}$. Show that $sc^-F$ is lower semi continuous.



Here is my proof, but it seems a bit too easy, so it would be great if somebody could check if it is correct.



Let $u_k rightarrow u$ in $X$. The set $M:={phi(u);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F}$ is a family of l.s.c. functions, because every $phi in M$ is l.s.c. Then for every $phi in M$ we obtain: $phi(u) leq liminf ; phi(u_k) \
leq liminf ; sup {phi(u_k);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$



Because this is true for every $phi in M$ it is also true for the supremum of all $phi$ in $M$ (at this point I'm not really sure if it is correct) an we get



$sup{phi(u);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = sc^-F(u) leq liminf ; sc^-F(u_k)$.



So the envelope of $F$ is l.s.c.






real-analysis calculus-of-variations semicontinuous-functions







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $X$ is not first-countable, it would be worth mentioning that $u_k$ is a net and how $liminf$ is understood here. Otherwise, it looks ok to me. Alternatively, a proof via epigraphs is more straightforward (as intersection of closed sets is closed).
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:03










  • $begingroup$
    The set $M$ you define is not what you want it to be (it's a set of function values, not of functions).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We haven't mentioned epigraphs in the lecture so I don't know how to prove this assumption this way. Thanks for the comments, I'll add it to the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – mathstu
    Dec 7 '18 at 9:20
















2












$begingroup$


Let X be a topological space and $F:X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}}$. The lower semi continuous envelope of $F$ is defined by $sc^-F(u)=sup{phi(u);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F}$. Show that $sc^-F$ is lower semi continuous.



Here is my proof, but it seems a bit too easy, so it would be great if somebody could check if it is correct.



Let $u_k rightarrow u$ in $X$. The set $M:={phi(u);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F}$ is a family of l.s.c. functions, because every $phi in M$ is l.s.c. Then for every $phi in M$ we obtain: $phi(u) leq liminf ; phi(u_k) \
leq liminf ; sup {phi(u_k);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$



Because this is true for every $phi in M$ it is also true for the supremum of all $phi$ in $M$ (at this point I'm not really sure if it is correct) an we get



$sup{phi(u);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = sc^-F(u) leq liminf ; sc^-F(u_k)$.



So the envelope of $F$ is l.s.c.






real-analysis calculus-of-variations semicontinuous-functions







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If $X$ is not first-countable, it would be worth mentioning that $u_k$ is a net and how $liminf$ is understood here. Otherwise, it looks ok to me. Alternatively, a proof via epigraphs is more straightforward (as intersection of closed sets is closed).
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:03










  • $begingroup$
    The set $M$ you define is not what you want it to be (it's a set of function values, not of functions).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We haven't mentioned epigraphs in the lecture so I don't know how to prove this assumption this way. Thanks for the comments, I'll add it to the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – mathstu
    Dec 7 '18 at 9:20














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let X be a topological space and $F:X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}}$. The lower semi continuous envelope of $F$ is defined by $sc^-F(u)=sup{phi(u);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F}$. Show that $sc^-F$ is lower semi continuous.



Here is my proof, but it seems a bit too easy, so it would be great if somebody could check if it is correct.



Let $u_k rightarrow u$ in $X$. The set $M:={phi(u);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F}$ is a family of l.s.c. functions, because every $phi in M$ is l.s.c. Then for every $phi in M$ we obtain: $phi(u) leq liminf ; phi(u_k) \
leq liminf ; sup {phi(u_k);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$



Because this is true for every $phi in M$ it is also true for the supremum of all $phi$ in $M$ (at this point I'm not really sure if it is correct) an we get



$sup{phi(u);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = sc^-F(u) leq liminf ; sc^-F(u_k)$.



So the envelope of $F$ is l.s.c.






real-analysis calculus-of-variations semicontinuous-functions







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let X be a topological space and $F:X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}}$. The lower semi continuous envelope of $F$ is defined by $sc^-F(u)=sup{phi(u);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F}$. Show that $sc^-F$ is lower semi continuous.



Here is my proof, but it seems a bit too easy, so it would be great if somebody could check if it is correct.



Let $u_k rightarrow u$ in $X$. The set $M:={phi(u);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F}$ is a family of l.s.c. functions, because every $phi in M$ is l.s.c. Then for every $phi in M$ we obtain: $phi(u) leq liminf ; phi(u_k) \
leq liminf ; sup {phi(u_k);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$



Because this is true for every $phi in M$ it is also true for the supremum of all $phi$ in $M$ (at this point I'm not really sure if it is correct) an we get



$sup{phi(u);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = sc^-F(u) leq liminf ; sc^-F(u_k)$.



So the envelope of $F$ is l.s.c.






real-analysis calculus-of-variations semicontinuous-functions




real-analysis calculus-of-variations semicontinuous-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 6 '18 at 10:26









A.Γ.

22.7k32656




22.7k32656










asked Dec 6 '18 at 10:05









mathstumathstu

315




315












  • $begingroup$
    If $X$ is not first-countable, it would be worth mentioning that $u_k$ is a net and how $liminf$ is understood here. Otherwise, it looks ok to me. Alternatively, a proof via epigraphs is more straightforward (as intersection of closed sets is closed).
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:03










  • $begingroup$
    The set $M$ you define is not what you want it to be (it's a set of function values, not of functions).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We haven't mentioned epigraphs in the lecture so I don't know how to prove this assumption this way. Thanks for the comments, I'll add it to the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – mathstu
    Dec 7 '18 at 9:20


















  • $begingroup$
    If $X$ is not first-countable, it would be worth mentioning that $u_k$ is a net and how $liminf$ is understood here. Otherwise, it looks ok to me. Alternatively, a proof via epigraphs is more straightforward (as intersection of closed sets is closed).
    $endgroup$
    – A.Γ.
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:03










  • $begingroup$
    The set $M$ you define is not what you want it to be (it's a set of function values, not of functions).
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Dec 6 '18 at 11:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    We haven't mentioned epigraphs in the lecture so I don't know how to prove this assumption this way. Thanks for the comments, I'll add it to the proof.
    $endgroup$
    – mathstu
    Dec 7 '18 at 9:20
















$begingroup$
If $X$ is not first-countable, it would be worth mentioning that $u_k$ is a net and how $liminf$ is understood here. Otherwise, it looks ok to me. Alternatively, a proof via epigraphs is more straightforward (as intersection of closed sets is closed).
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Dec 6 '18 at 11:03




$begingroup$
If $X$ is not first-countable, it would be worth mentioning that $u_k$ is a net and how $liminf$ is understood here. Otherwise, it looks ok to me. Alternatively, a proof via epigraphs is more straightforward (as intersection of closed sets is closed).
$endgroup$
– A.Γ.
Dec 6 '18 at 11:03












$begingroup$
The set $M$ you define is not what you want it to be (it's a set of function values, not of functions).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 6 '18 at 11:15




$begingroup$
The set $M$ you define is not what you want it to be (it's a set of function values, not of functions).
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Dec 6 '18 at 11:15




1




1




$begingroup$
We haven't mentioned epigraphs in the lecture so I don't know how to prove this assumption this way. Thanks for the comments, I'll add it to the proof.
$endgroup$
– mathstu
Dec 7 '18 at 9:20




$begingroup$
We haven't mentioned epigraphs in the lecture so I don't know how to prove this assumption this way. Thanks for the comments, I'll add it to the proof.
$endgroup$
– mathstu
Dec 7 '18 at 9:20










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

It is correct but the notation can be improved:




Then for every $phi in M$ we obtain: $phi(u) leq liminf ; phi(u_k) \
leq liminf ; sup {phi(u_k);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$




Here I strongly suggest to choose different variables for $phi$ inside the set (or outside).
For example:



$ liminf phi(u_k) leq liminf ; sup {psi(u_k);|; psi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; psi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028297%2flower-semi-continuous-envelope-is-lower-semi-continuous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    It is correct but the notation can be improved:




    Then for every $phi in M$ we obtain: $phi(u) leq liminf ; phi(u_k) \
    leq liminf ; sup {phi(u_k);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$




    Here I strongly suggest to choose different variables for $phi$ inside the set (or outside).
    For example:



    $ liminf phi(u_k) leq liminf ; sup {psi(u_k);|; psi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; psi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      It is correct but the notation can be improved:




      Then for every $phi in M$ we obtain: $phi(u) leq liminf ; phi(u_k) \
      leq liminf ; sup {phi(u_k);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$




      Here I strongly suggest to choose different variables for $phi$ inside the set (or outside).
      For example:



      $ liminf phi(u_k) leq liminf ; sup {psi(u_k);|; psi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; psi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        It is correct but the notation can be improved:




        Then for every $phi in M$ we obtain: $phi(u) leq liminf ; phi(u_k) \
        leq liminf ; sup {phi(u_k);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$




        Here I strongly suggest to choose different variables for $phi$ inside the set (or outside).
        For example:



        $ liminf phi(u_k) leq liminf ; sup {psi(u_k);|; psi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; psi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It is correct but the notation can be improved:




        Then for every $phi in M$ we obtain: $phi(u) leq liminf ; phi(u_k) \
        leq liminf ; sup {phi(u_k);|; phi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; phi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$




        Here I strongly suggest to choose different variables for $phi$ inside the set (or outside).
        For example:



        $ liminf phi(u_k) leq liminf ; sup {psi(u_k);|; psi :X rightarrow overline{mathbb{R}} ; mathrm{is ; l.s.c. ; and} ; psi leq F} = liminf ; sc^-F(u_k).$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 6 '18 at 10:56









        supinfsupinf

        6,3261028




        6,3261028






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028297%2flower-semi-continuous-envelope-is-lower-semi-continuous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Image
            Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
            Read more

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
            Read more

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

            Image
            1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
            Read more