Compact Manifold with odd dimension has Euler numer 0. (Proof using differential topology)
$begingroup$
So I am trying to prove this, as an excercise for a course in differential topology, the previous part of the excercise was to find $chi(S^n)$, which is $1+(-1)^n$, it is likely that this fact is meant to use in this part.
I really do not know how to begin, and all proofs I have found, use algebraic topology.
Any help would be appreciated
differential-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I am trying to prove this, as an excercise for a course in differential topology, the previous part of the excercise was to find $chi(S^n)$, which is $1+(-1)^n$, it is likely that this fact is meant to use in this part.
I really do not know how to begin, and all proofs I have found, use algebraic topology.
Any help would be appreciated
differential-topology
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What definition of Euler characteristic do you use?
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 14 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
We just define the Euler characteristic as the Index sum at the zeros of a vector field in $M$, a compact differentiable manifold. (Our Poincare-Hopf just tells you that the index sum is vector field invariant).
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 21:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So I am trying to prove this, as an excercise for a course in differential topology, the previous part of the excercise was to find $chi(S^n)$, which is $1+(-1)^n$, it is likely that this fact is meant to use in this part.
I really do not know how to begin, and all proofs I have found, use algebraic topology.
Any help would be appreciated
differential-topology
$endgroup$
So I am trying to prove this, as an excercise for a course in differential topology, the previous part of the excercise was to find $chi(S^n)$, which is $1+(-1)^n$, it is likely that this fact is meant to use in this part.
I really do not know how to begin, and all proofs I have found, use algebraic topology.
Any help would be appreciated
differential-topology
differential-topology
asked Dec 14 '18 at 20:43
Bajo FondoBajo Fondo
410315
410315
$begingroup$
What definition of Euler characteristic do you use?
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 14 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
We just define the Euler characteristic as the Index sum at the zeros of a vector field in $M$, a compact differentiable manifold. (Our Poincare-Hopf just tells you that the index sum is vector field invariant).
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 21:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What definition of Euler characteristic do you use?
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 14 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
We just define the Euler characteristic as the Index sum at the zeros of a vector field in $M$, a compact differentiable manifold. (Our Poincare-Hopf just tells you that the index sum is vector field invariant).
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 21:50
$begingroup$
What definition of Euler characteristic do you use?
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 14 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
What definition of Euler characteristic do you use?
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 14 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
We just define the Euler characteristic as the Index sum at the zeros of a vector field in $M$, a compact differentiable manifold. (Our Poincare-Hopf just tells you that the index sum is vector field invariant).
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 21:50
$begingroup$
We just define the Euler characteristic as the Index sum at the zeros of a vector field in $M$, a compact differentiable manifold. (Our Poincare-Hopf just tells you that the index sum is vector field invariant).
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 21:50
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
HINT: Let $vec v$ be a "good" vector field on your compact manifold $M$. (So it has isolated zeroes, each with index $pm 1$, although we really don't need this.) If $p$ is a zero of $vec v$ with index $k$, what is the index of $-vec v$ at $p$?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ok.. I get it... Since $v$ and $-v$ share the same zeros you have that if $v$ has index $k$ at $p$, then $deg(dg^{-1}ovog)$ is $k$ ($g:U to V subset M$ parametrization). Then the index of $-v$ at $p$ is $deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=deg(-dg^{-1}ovog)$. Take $f(x)=-x$, then the index of $-v$ is $deg(fo(dg^{-1}o-vog))=deg(f)deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=(-1)^nk=-k$. Then add up all of then and you will have that $sum iota = -sum iota$, hence $sum iota =0$. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 23:40
2
$begingroup$
Looks right, except that you need to learn some MathJax :)
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 14 '18 at 23:51
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039861%2fcompact-manifold-with-odd-dimension-has-euler-numer-0-proof-using-differential%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
HINT: Let $vec v$ be a "good" vector field on your compact manifold $M$. (So it has isolated zeroes, each with index $pm 1$, although we really don't need this.) If $p$ is a zero of $vec v$ with index $k$, what is the index of $-vec v$ at $p$?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ok.. I get it... Since $v$ and $-v$ share the same zeros you have that if $v$ has index $k$ at $p$, then $deg(dg^{-1}ovog)$ is $k$ ($g:U to V subset M$ parametrization). Then the index of $-v$ at $p$ is $deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=deg(-dg^{-1}ovog)$. Take $f(x)=-x$, then the index of $-v$ is $deg(fo(dg^{-1}o-vog))=deg(f)deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=(-1)^nk=-k$. Then add up all of then and you will have that $sum iota = -sum iota$, hence $sum iota =0$. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 23:40
2
$begingroup$
Looks right, except that you need to learn some MathJax :)
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 14 '18 at 23:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
HINT: Let $vec v$ be a "good" vector field on your compact manifold $M$. (So it has isolated zeroes, each with index $pm 1$, although we really don't need this.) If $p$ is a zero of $vec v$ with index $k$, what is the index of $-vec v$ at $p$?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ok.. I get it... Since $v$ and $-v$ share the same zeros you have that if $v$ has index $k$ at $p$, then $deg(dg^{-1}ovog)$ is $k$ ($g:U to V subset M$ parametrization). Then the index of $-v$ at $p$ is $deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=deg(-dg^{-1}ovog)$. Take $f(x)=-x$, then the index of $-v$ is $deg(fo(dg^{-1}o-vog))=deg(f)deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=(-1)^nk=-k$. Then add up all of then and you will have that $sum iota = -sum iota$, hence $sum iota =0$. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 23:40
2
$begingroup$
Looks right, except that you need to learn some MathJax :)
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 14 '18 at 23:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
HINT: Let $vec v$ be a "good" vector field on your compact manifold $M$. (So it has isolated zeroes, each with index $pm 1$, although we really don't need this.) If $p$ is a zero of $vec v$ with index $k$, what is the index of $-vec v$ at $p$?
$endgroup$
HINT: Let $vec v$ be a "good" vector field on your compact manifold $M$. (So it has isolated zeroes, each with index $pm 1$, although we really don't need this.) If $p$ is a zero of $vec v$ with index $k$, what is the index of $-vec v$ at $p$?
answered Dec 14 '18 at 22:24
Ted ShifrinTed Shifrin
64.2k44692
64.2k44692
$begingroup$
Ok.. I get it... Since $v$ and $-v$ share the same zeros you have that if $v$ has index $k$ at $p$, then $deg(dg^{-1}ovog)$ is $k$ ($g:U to V subset M$ parametrization). Then the index of $-v$ at $p$ is $deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=deg(-dg^{-1}ovog)$. Take $f(x)=-x$, then the index of $-v$ is $deg(fo(dg^{-1}o-vog))=deg(f)deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=(-1)^nk=-k$. Then add up all of then and you will have that $sum iota = -sum iota$, hence $sum iota =0$. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 23:40
2
$begingroup$
Looks right, except that you need to learn some MathJax :)
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 14 '18 at 23:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Ok.. I get it... Since $v$ and $-v$ share the same zeros you have that if $v$ has index $k$ at $p$, then $deg(dg^{-1}ovog)$ is $k$ ($g:U to V subset M$ parametrization). Then the index of $-v$ at $p$ is $deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=deg(-dg^{-1}ovog)$. Take $f(x)=-x$, then the index of $-v$ is $deg(fo(dg^{-1}o-vog))=deg(f)deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=(-1)^nk=-k$. Then add up all of then and you will have that $sum iota = -sum iota$, hence $sum iota =0$. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 23:40
2
$begingroup$
Looks right, except that you need to learn some MathJax :)
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 14 '18 at 23:51
$begingroup$
Ok.. I get it... Since $v$ and $-v$ share the same zeros you have that if $v$ has index $k$ at $p$, then $deg(dg^{-1}ovog)$ is $k$ ($g:U to V subset M$ parametrization). Then the index of $-v$ at $p$ is $deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=deg(-dg^{-1}ovog)$. Take $f(x)=-x$, then the index of $-v$ is $deg(fo(dg^{-1}o-vog))=deg(f)deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=(-1)^nk=-k$. Then add up all of then and you will have that $sum iota = -sum iota$, hence $sum iota =0$. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 23:40
$begingroup$
Ok.. I get it... Since $v$ and $-v$ share the same zeros you have that if $v$ has index $k$ at $p$, then $deg(dg^{-1}ovog)$ is $k$ ($g:U to V subset M$ parametrization). Then the index of $-v$ at $p$ is $deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=deg(-dg^{-1}ovog)$. Take $f(x)=-x$, then the index of $-v$ is $deg(fo(dg^{-1}o-vog))=deg(f)deg(dg^{-1}o-vog)=(-1)^nk=-k$. Then add up all of then and you will have that $sum iota = -sum iota$, hence $sum iota =0$. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 23:40
2
2
$begingroup$
Looks right, except that you need to learn some MathJax :)
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 14 '18 at 23:51
$begingroup$
Looks right, except that you need to learn some MathJax :)
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
Dec 14 '18 at 23:51
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039861%2fcompact-manifold-with-odd-dimension-has-euler-numer-0-proof-using-differential%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What definition of Euler characteristic do you use?
$endgroup$
– Zircht
Dec 14 '18 at 21:44
$begingroup$
We just define the Euler characteristic as the Index sum at the zeros of a vector field in $M$, a compact differentiable manifold. (Our Poincare-Hopf just tells you that the index sum is vector field invariant).
$endgroup$
– Bajo Fondo
Dec 14 '18 at 21:50