Limit of a sequence where $U_n = frac{(log n )^p}{n}$
What is the limit of this sequence where , $U_n = frac{(log n )^p}{n}$ where $p ge 0$.
I have done this problem when $p$ is an integer.
Sorry but I am not too much familiar with writing questions in stack exchange.
sequences-and-series limits
add a comment |
What is the limit of this sequence where , $U_n = frac{(log n )^p}{n}$ where $p ge 0$.
I have done this problem when $p$ is an integer.
Sorry but I am not too much familiar with writing questions in stack exchange.
sequences-and-series limits
See if you can exploit propositions 2.1 and 2.2 from here
– rtybase
Nov 25 '18 at 10:07
1
If you know the results for $p in mathbb N$, note that for general $p$, there is a $kin mathbb N$ s.t. $k leqslant p<k+1$, and to get the limit, try the squeezing theorem.
– xbh
Nov 25 '18 at 13:19
add a comment |
What is the limit of this sequence where , $U_n = frac{(log n )^p}{n}$ where $p ge 0$.
I have done this problem when $p$ is an integer.
Sorry but I am not too much familiar with writing questions in stack exchange.
sequences-and-series limits
What is the limit of this sequence where , $U_n = frac{(log n )^p}{n}$ where $p ge 0$.
I have done this problem when $p$ is an integer.
Sorry but I am not too much familiar with writing questions in stack exchange.
sequences-and-series limits
sequences-and-series limits
edited Nov 25 '18 at 9:55
user616975
asked Nov 25 '18 at 9:46
Supriyo Banerjee
595
595
See if you can exploit propositions 2.1 and 2.2 from here
– rtybase
Nov 25 '18 at 10:07
1
If you know the results for $p in mathbb N$, note that for general $p$, there is a $kin mathbb N$ s.t. $k leqslant p<k+1$, and to get the limit, try the squeezing theorem.
– xbh
Nov 25 '18 at 13:19
add a comment |
See if you can exploit propositions 2.1 and 2.2 from here
– rtybase
Nov 25 '18 at 10:07
1
If you know the results for $p in mathbb N$, note that for general $p$, there is a $kin mathbb N$ s.t. $k leqslant p<k+1$, and to get the limit, try the squeezing theorem.
– xbh
Nov 25 '18 at 13:19
See if you can exploit propositions 2.1 and 2.2 from here
– rtybase
Nov 25 '18 at 10:07
See if you can exploit propositions 2.1 and 2.2 from here
– rtybase
Nov 25 '18 at 10:07
1
1
If you know the results for $p in mathbb N$, note that for general $p$, there is a $kin mathbb N$ s.t. $k leqslant p<k+1$, and to get the limit, try the squeezing theorem.
– xbh
Nov 25 '18 at 13:19
If you know the results for $p in mathbb N$, note that for general $p$, there is a $kin mathbb N$ s.t. $k leqslant p<k+1$, and to get the limit, try the squeezing theorem.
– xbh
Nov 25 '18 at 13:19
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
We have that
$$frac{(log n )^p}{n}=e^{plog(log n)-log n} to 0$$
indeed
$$plog(log n)-log n=log nleft(pfrac{log(log n)}{log n}-1right)to -infty$$
since
$$frac{log(log n)}{log n} to 0$$
which can be easily proved by $frac{log x}x to 0$ as $x to infty$ by $x=log y$ and $y to infty$.
Why the downvote, something wrong?
– gimusi
Nov 25 '18 at 18:53
Can we write $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)g(n)$ = $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)$ × $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $g(n)$. When one of the sequence diverges? I don't know...
– Supriyo Banerjee
Nov 26 '18 at 3:08
1
Note that here we are using something different that is $$lim_{nto infty} f(n)=lim_{nto infty} g(n)cdot h(n)$$ and using the fact that $g(n)to infty$ and $h(n)to -1$ and that’s leads to a not indeterminate form.
– gimusi
Nov 26 '18 at 6:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012636%2flimit-of-a-sequence-where-u-n-frac-log-n-pn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
We have that
$$frac{(log n )^p}{n}=e^{plog(log n)-log n} to 0$$
indeed
$$plog(log n)-log n=log nleft(pfrac{log(log n)}{log n}-1right)to -infty$$
since
$$frac{log(log n)}{log n} to 0$$
which can be easily proved by $frac{log x}x to 0$ as $x to infty$ by $x=log y$ and $y to infty$.
Why the downvote, something wrong?
– gimusi
Nov 25 '18 at 18:53
Can we write $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)g(n)$ = $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)$ × $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $g(n)$. When one of the sequence diverges? I don't know...
– Supriyo Banerjee
Nov 26 '18 at 3:08
1
Note that here we are using something different that is $$lim_{nto infty} f(n)=lim_{nto infty} g(n)cdot h(n)$$ and using the fact that $g(n)to infty$ and $h(n)to -1$ and that’s leads to a not indeterminate form.
– gimusi
Nov 26 '18 at 6:28
add a comment |
We have that
$$frac{(log n )^p}{n}=e^{plog(log n)-log n} to 0$$
indeed
$$plog(log n)-log n=log nleft(pfrac{log(log n)}{log n}-1right)to -infty$$
since
$$frac{log(log n)}{log n} to 0$$
which can be easily proved by $frac{log x}x to 0$ as $x to infty$ by $x=log y$ and $y to infty$.
Why the downvote, something wrong?
– gimusi
Nov 25 '18 at 18:53
Can we write $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)g(n)$ = $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)$ × $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $g(n)$. When one of the sequence diverges? I don't know...
– Supriyo Banerjee
Nov 26 '18 at 3:08
1
Note that here we are using something different that is $$lim_{nto infty} f(n)=lim_{nto infty} g(n)cdot h(n)$$ and using the fact that $g(n)to infty$ and $h(n)to -1$ and that’s leads to a not indeterminate form.
– gimusi
Nov 26 '18 at 6:28
add a comment |
We have that
$$frac{(log n )^p}{n}=e^{plog(log n)-log n} to 0$$
indeed
$$plog(log n)-log n=log nleft(pfrac{log(log n)}{log n}-1right)to -infty$$
since
$$frac{log(log n)}{log n} to 0$$
which can be easily proved by $frac{log x}x to 0$ as $x to infty$ by $x=log y$ and $y to infty$.
We have that
$$frac{(log n )^p}{n}=e^{plog(log n)-log n} to 0$$
indeed
$$plog(log n)-log n=log nleft(pfrac{log(log n)}{log n}-1right)to -infty$$
since
$$frac{log(log n)}{log n} to 0$$
which can be easily proved by $frac{log x}x to 0$ as $x to infty$ by $x=log y$ and $y to infty$.
answered Nov 25 '18 at 18:32
gimusi
1
1
Why the downvote, something wrong?
– gimusi
Nov 25 '18 at 18:53
Can we write $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)g(n)$ = $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)$ × $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $g(n)$. When one of the sequence diverges? I don't know...
– Supriyo Banerjee
Nov 26 '18 at 3:08
1
Note that here we are using something different that is $$lim_{nto infty} f(n)=lim_{nto infty} g(n)cdot h(n)$$ and using the fact that $g(n)to infty$ and $h(n)to -1$ and that’s leads to a not indeterminate form.
– gimusi
Nov 26 '18 at 6:28
add a comment |
Why the downvote, something wrong?
– gimusi
Nov 25 '18 at 18:53
Can we write $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)g(n)$ = $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)$ × $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $g(n)$. When one of the sequence diverges? I don't know...
– Supriyo Banerjee
Nov 26 '18 at 3:08
1
Note that here we are using something different that is $$lim_{nto infty} f(n)=lim_{nto infty} g(n)cdot h(n)$$ and using the fact that $g(n)to infty$ and $h(n)to -1$ and that’s leads to a not indeterminate form.
– gimusi
Nov 26 '18 at 6:28
Why the downvote, something wrong?
– gimusi
Nov 25 '18 at 18:53
Why the downvote, something wrong?
– gimusi
Nov 25 '18 at 18:53
Can we write $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)g(n)$ = $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)$ × $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $g(n)$. When one of the sequence diverges? I don't know...
– Supriyo Banerjee
Nov 26 '18 at 3:08
Can we write $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)g(n)$ = $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $f(n)$ × $lim$ $x tends to infinity$ $g(n)$. When one of the sequence diverges? I don't know...
– Supriyo Banerjee
Nov 26 '18 at 3:08
1
1
Note that here we are using something different that is $$lim_{nto infty} f(n)=lim_{nto infty} g(n)cdot h(n)$$ and using the fact that $g(n)to infty$ and $h(n)to -1$ and that’s leads to a not indeterminate form.
– gimusi
Nov 26 '18 at 6:28
Note that here we are using something different that is $$lim_{nto infty} f(n)=lim_{nto infty} g(n)cdot h(n)$$ and using the fact that $g(n)to infty$ and $h(n)to -1$ and that’s leads to a not indeterminate form.
– gimusi
Nov 26 '18 at 6:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012636%2flimit-of-a-sequence-where-u-n-frac-log-n-pn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
See if you can exploit propositions 2.1 and 2.2 from here
– rtybase
Nov 25 '18 at 10:07
1
If you know the results for $p in mathbb N$, note that for general $p$, there is a $kin mathbb N$ s.t. $k leqslant p<k+1$, and to get the limit, try the squeezing theorem.
– xbh
Nov 25 '18 at 13:19