Prove that a horizontal asymptote can never be crossed












4












$begingroup$


This is a lot simpler of a problem than others posted here, but I was bored in class and decided to work out why a horizontal asymptote exists. Bear in mind that I am still fairly low on the “math ladder.”



So to accomplish this I worked off of one example equation that could be made into a general case later on, with the chosen one being $$y = frac{2x+6}{x+1}$$
Now, proving any vertical asymptote is simple (by definition it creates a “divide by zero” error when plugged into the equation), but a horizontal asymptote “proof” requires some manipulation. So, doing a little shuffling of the equation to isolate the variables slightly... $$y = frac{x(2+frac{6}{x})}{x(1+frac{1}{x})}$$
The $x$ on the top and bottom of the function will cancel out, and we are left with $$y = frac{2+frac{6}{x}}{1+frac{1}{x}}$$
With a little more rearranging by multiplying the function by the denominator, you get $$yleft(1+frac{1}{x}right) = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
You likely see what is wrong with this, but let’s distribute the $y$ to simplify further: $$y+frac{y}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
Now everything is ready to plug in. Say that there is a value that corresponds to $y = 2$ (the horizontal asymptote of this graph, found by dividing $p$ by $q$, or $2/1$, because $operatorname{deg} p = operatorname{deg} q$). Then the equation should be able to be used to find this value. However, if $2$ is substituted for $y$...
$$2+frac{2}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
$$frac{2}{x} = frac{6}{x}$$
$$2 = 6$$
Therefore $y$ cannot be equal to $2$. I believe that is referred to as a “proof by contradiction” but correct me if I’m wrong. Or if the whole proof is wrong, for that matter. Anyways, I’d love to generalize this but I’m hitting a roadblock due to not knowing of a comprehensive standard form for all rational expressions. I’ve tried it on numerous equations but I’m not sure how to explain what I think is going on. Every time you plug the asymptote into the reworked equation you end up with a contradiction, and any other numbers (minus holes) returns a value that can be found on the graph.



Can anyone help with this? I just felt like sharing this little 10 minute project because it intrigued me, but being able to generalize it to see what’s going on between each variable and coefficient (specifically, how/why the leading terms and degrees affect the H.A) would be helpful for overall understanding of the topic. Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Jake R is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In factoring out the $x$ in the second equation, you're assuming that $x neq 0$. You may need to consider what happens at this point.
    $endgroup$
    – 1123581321
    Mar 27 at 5:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What about $y=frac{x}{1+x^2}$ which has a horizontal asymptote $y=0$, but it attains this value at $x=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jose27
    Mar 27 at 5:10










  • $begingroup$
    For any rational function where the numerator and denominator are both linear, the horizontal asymptote can be found easily: $y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d} = frac{a + b/x}{c + d/x}$, which tends to $frac{a}{c}$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
    $endgroup$
    – 1123581321
    Mar 27 at 5:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can reach the conclusion that $y$ cannot be equal to 2 just by looking at the 3rd equation (since $frac{1}{x}$ cannot be zero).
    $endgroup$
    – 1123581321
    Mar 27 at 5:14






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is unnecessarily complicated. Solve for $x$ and you will get this: $x=frac{6-y}{y-2}$. Which implies the function is discontinuous at $y=2$ i.e. horizontal asymptote. QED.
    $endgroup$
    – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
    Mar 27 at 5:23
















4












$begingroup$


This is a lot simpler of a problem than others posted here, but I was bored in class and decided to work out why a horizontal asymptote exists. Bear in mind that I am still fairly low on the “math ladder.”



So to accomplish this I worked off of one example equation that could be made into a general case later on, with the chosen one being $$y = frac{2x+6}{x+1}$$
Now, proving any vertical asymptote is simple (by definition it creates a “divide by zero” error when plugged into the equation), but a horizontal asymptote “proof” requires some manipulation. So, doing a little shuffling of the equation to isolate the variables slightly... $$y = frac{x(2+frac{6}{x})}{x(1+frac{1}{x})}$$
The $x$ on the top and bottom of the function will cancel out, and we are left with $$y = frac{2+frac{6}{x}}{1+frac{1}{x}}$$
With a little more rearranging by multiplying the function by the denominator, you get $$yleft(1+frac{1}{x}right) = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
You likely see what is wrong with this, but let’s distribute the $y$ to simplify further: $$y+frac{y}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
Now everything is ready to plug in. Say that there is a value that corresponds to $y = 2$ (the horizontal asymptote of this graph, found by dividing $p$ by $q$, or $2/1$, because $operatorname{deg} p = operatorname{deg} q$). Then the equation should be able to be used to find this value. However, if $2$ is substituted for $y$...
$$2+frac{2}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
$$frac{2}{x} = frac{6}{x}$$
$$2 = 6$$
Therefore $y$ cannot be equal to $2$. I believe that is referred to as a “proof by contradiction” but correct me if I’m wrong. Or if the whole proof is wrong, for that matter. Anyways, I’d love to generalize this but I’m hitting a roadblock due to not knowing of a comprehensive standard form for all rational expressions. I’ve tried it on numerous equations but I’m not sure how to explain what I think is going on. Every time you plug the asymptote into the reworked equation you end up with a contradiction, and any other numbers (minus holes) returns a value that can be found on the graph.



Can anyone help with this? I just felt like sharing this little 10 minute project because it intrigued me, but being able to generalize it to see what’s going on between each variable and coefficient (specifically, how/why the leading terms and degrees affect the H.A) would be helpful for overall understanding of the topic. Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Jake R is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In factoring out the $x$ in the second equation, you're assuming that $x neq 0$. You may need to consider what happens at this point.
    $endgroup$
    – 1123581321
    Mar 27 at 5:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What about $y=frac{x}{1+x^2}$ which has a horizontal asymptote $y=0$, but it attains this value at $x=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jose27
    Mar 27 at 5:10










  • $begingroup$
    For any rational function where the numerator and denominator are both linear, the horizontal asymptote can be found easily: $y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d} = frac{a + b/x}{c + d/x}$, which tends to $frac{a}{c}$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
    $endgroup$
    – 1123581321
    Mar 27 at 5:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can reach the conclusion that $y$ cannot be equal to 2 just by looking at the 3rd equation (since $frac{1}{x}$ cannot be zero).
    $endgroup$
    – 1123581321
    Mar 27 at 5:14






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is unnecessarily complicated. Solve for $x$ and you will get this: $x=frac{6-y}{y-2}$. Which implies the function is discontinuous at $y=2$ i.e. horizontal asymptote. QED.
    $endgroup$
    – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
    Mar 27 at 5:23














4












4








4





$begingroup$


This is a lot simpler of a problem than others posted here, but I was bored in class and decided to work out why a horizontal asymptote exists. Bear in mind that I am still fairly low on the “math ladder.”



So to accomplish this I worked off of one example equation that could be made into a general case later on, with the chosen one being $$y = frac{2x+6}{x+1}$$
Now, proving any vertical asymptote is simple (by definition it creates a “divide by zero” error when plugged into the equation), but a horizontal asymptote “proof” requires some manipulation. So, doing a little shuffling of the equation to isolate the variables slightly... $$y = frac{x(2+frac{6}{x})}{x(1+frac{1}{x})}$$
The $x$ on the top and bottom of the function will cancel out, and we are left with $$y = frac{2+frac{6}{x}}{1+frac{1}{x}}$$
With a little more rearranging by multiplying the function by the denominator, you get $$yleft(1+frac{1}{x}right) = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
You likely see what is wrong with this, but let’s distribute the $y$ to simplify further: $$y+frac{y}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
Now everything is ready to plug in. Say that there is a value that corresponds to $y = 2$ (the horizontal asymptote of this graph, found by dividing $p$ by $q$, or $2/1$, because $operatorname{deg} p = operatorname{deg} q$). Then the equation should be able to be used to find this value. However, if $2$ is substituted for $y$...
$$2+frac{2}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
$$frac{2}{x} = frac{6}{x}$$
$$2 = 6$$
Therefore $y$ cannot be equal to $2$. I believe that is referred to as a “proof by contradiction” but correct me if I’m wrong. Or if the whole proof is wrong, for that matter. Anyways, I’d love to generalize this but I’m hitting a roadblock due to not knowing of a comprehensive standard form for all rational expressions. I’ve tried it on numerous equations but I’m not sure how to explain what I think is going on. Every time you plug the asymptote into the reworked equation you end up with a contradiction, and any other numbers (minus holes) returns a value that can be found on the graph.



Can anyone help with this? I just felt like sharing this little 10 minute project because it intrigued me, but being able to generalize it to see what’s going on between each variable and coefficient (specifically, how/why the leading terms and degrees affect the H.A) would be helpful for overall understanding of the topic. Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Jake R is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




This is a lot simpler of a problem than others posted here, but I was bored in class and decided to work out why a horizontal asymptote exists. Bear in mind that I am still fairly low on the “math ladder.”



So to accomplish this I worked off of one example equation that could be made into a general case later on, with the chosen one being $$y = frac{2x+6}{x+1}$$
Now, proving any vertical asymptote is simple (by definition it creates a “divide by zero” error when plugged into the equation), but a horizontal asymptote “proof” requires some manipulation. So, doing a little shuffling of the equation to isolate the variables slightly... $$y = frac{x(2+frac{6}{x})}{x(1+frac{1}{x})}$$
The $x$ on the top and bottom of the function will cancel out, and we are left with $$y = frac{2+frac{6}{x}}{1+frac{1}{x}}$$
With a little more rearranging by multiplying the function by the denominator, you get $$yleft(1+frac{1}{x}right) = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
You likely see what is wrong with this, but let’s distribute the $y$ to simplify further: $$y+frac{y}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
Now everything is ready to plug in. Say that there is a value that corresponds to $y = 2$ (the horizontal asymptote of this graph, found by dividing $p$ by $q$, or $2/1$, because $operatorname{deg} p = operatorname{deg} q$). Then the equation should be able to be used to find this value. However, if $2$ is substituted for $y$...
$$2+frac{2}{x} = 2+frac{6}{x}$$
$$frac{2}{x} = frac{6}{x}$$
$$2 = 6$$
Therefore $y$ cannot be equal to $2$. I believe that is referred to as a “proof by contradiction” but correct me if I’m wrong. Or if the whole proof is wrong, for that matter. Anyways, I’d love to generalize this but I’m hitting a roadblock due to not knowing of a comprehensive standard form for all rational expressions. I’ve tried it on numerous equations but I’m not sure how to explain what I think is going on. Every time you plug the asymptote into the reworked equation you end up with a contradiction, and any other numbers (minus holes) returns a value that can be found on the graph.



Can anyone help with this? I just felt like sharing this little 10 minute project because it intrigued me, but being able to generalize it to see what’s going on between each variable and coefficient (specifically, how/why the leading terms and degrees affect the H.A) would be helpful for overall understanding of the topic. Thanks!







proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Jake R is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Jake R is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 27 at 5:15









Robert Howard

2,2933935




2,2933935






New contributor




Jake R is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 27 at 5:02









Jake RJake R

212




212




New contributor




Jake R is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Jake R is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Jake R is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    In factoring out the $x$ in the second equation, you're assuming that $x neq 0$. You may need to consider what happens at this point.
    $endgroup$
    – 1123581321
    Mar 27 at 5:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What about $y=frac{x}{1+x^2}$ which has a horizontal asymptote $y=0$, but it attains this value at $x=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jose27
    Mar 27 at 5:10










  • $begingroup$
    For any rational function where the numerator and denominator are both linear, the horizontal asymptote can be found easily: $y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d} = frac{a + b/x}{c + d/x}$, which tends to $frac{a}{c}$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
    $endgroup$
    – 1123581321
    Mar 27 at 5:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can reach the conclusion that $y$ cannot be equal to 2 just by looking at the 3rd equation (since $frac{1}{x}$ cannot be zero).
    $endgroup$
    – 1123581321
    Mar 27 at 5:14






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is unnecessarily complicated. Solve for $x$ and you will get this: $x=frac{6-y}{y-2}$. Which implies the function is discontinuous at $y=2$ i.e. horizontal asymptote. QED.
    $endgroup$
    – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
    Mar 27 at 5:23


















  • $begingroup$
    In factoring out the $x$ in the second equation, you're assuming that $x neq 0$. You may need to consider what happens at this point.
    $endgroup$
    – 1123581321
    Mar 27 at 5:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What about $y=frac{x}{1+x^2}$ which has a horizontal asymptote $y=0$, but it attains this value at $x=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jose27
    Mar 27 at 5:10










  • $begingroup$
    For any rational function where the numerator and denominator are both linear, the horizontal asymptote can be found easily: $y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d} = frac{a + b/x}{c + d/x}$, which tends to $frac{a}{c}$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
    $endgroup$
    – 1123581321
    Mar 27 at 5:11






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can reach the conclusion that $y$ cannot be equal to 2 just by looking at the 3rd equation (since $frac{1}{x}$ cannot be zero).
    $endgroup$
    – 1123581321
    Mar 27 at 5:14






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    This is unnecessarily complicated. Solve for $x$ and you will get this: $x=frac{6-y}{y-2}$. Which implies the function is discontinuous at $y=2$ i.e. horizontal asymptote. QED.
    $endgroup$
    – Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
    Mar 27 at 5:23
















$begingroup$
In factoring out the $x$ in the second equation, you're assuming that $x neq 0$. You may need to consider what happens at this point.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
Mar 27 at 5:09




$begingroup$
In factoring out the $x$ in the second equation, you're assuming that $x neq 0$. You may need to consider what happens at this point.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
Mar 27 at 5:09




2




2




$begingroup$
What about $y=frac{x}{1+x^2}$ which has a horizontal asymptote $y=0$, but it attains this value at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
Mar 27 at 5:10




$begingroup$
What about $y=frac{x}{1+x^2}$ which has a horizontal asymptote $y=0$, but it attains this value at $x=0$.
$endgroup$
– Jose27
Mar 27 at 5:10












$begingroup$
For any rational function where the numerator and denominator are both linear, the horizontal asymptote can be found easily: $y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d} = frac{a + b/x}{c + d/x}$, which tends to $frac{a}{c}$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
Mar 27 at 5:11




$begingroup$
For any rational function where the numerator and denominator are both linear, the horizontal asymptote can be found easily: $y = frac{ax + b}{cx + d} = frac{a + b/x}{c + d/x}$, which tends to $frac{a}{c}$ as $x$ tends to infinity.
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
Mar 27 at 5:11




1




1




$begingroup$
You can reach the conclusion that $y$ cannot be equal to 2 just by looking at the 3rd equation (since $frac{1}{x}$ cannot be zero).
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
Mar 27 at 5:14




$begingroup$
You can reach the conclusion that $y$ cannot be equal to 2 just by looking at the 3rd equation (since $frac{1}{x}$ cannot be zero).
$endgroup$
– 1123581321
Mar 27 at 5:14




2




2




$begingroup$
This is unnecessarily complicated. Solve for $x$ and you will get this: $x=frac{6-y}{y-2}$. Which implies the function is discontinuous at $y=2$ i.e. horizontal asymptote. QED.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Mar 27 at 5:23




$begingroup$
This is unnecessarily complicated. Solve for $x$ and you will get this: $x=frac{6-y}{y-2}$. Which implies the function is discontinuous at $y=2$ i.e. horizontal asymptote. QED.
$endgroup$
– Bertrand Wittgenstein's Ghost
Mar 27 at 5:23










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

You indeed proved that your function never crosses the asymptote $y=2$. Specifically, you proved following statement




There does not exists $xin mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$




To so this, you indeed used a "proof by contradiction". If there exists a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$

then
$$
2x+6 = 2(x+1)implies 6=2
$$

which is absurd.



But is what you proved sufficient to conclude that the function has a horizontal asymptote described by the line $y=2$? Let's take a look at a different function;
$$
y = frac{x^2+1}{x^2}.
$$

For this function, there does not exist a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{x^2+1}{x^2} = 0.
$$

But this does not mean that the horizontal asymptote is described by $y=0$. Your horizontal asymptote should instead by the line $y=1$.



Ask yourself the following: how would you got about defining a horizontal asymptote? What properties do you think it should have?



Usually, we want an asymptote to somehow capture the behaviour of the function as $x$ gets very large. If you want more information on how to make this statement precise, let me know in the comments and I can add detail.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the tips! I’ll be sure to check them out later.
    $endgroup$
    – Jake R
    Mar 28 at 15:14



















2












$begingroup$

Let's stick to rational functions, even if it's not explicitly mentioned that this is what you want to use. So we want to construct such function $f(x)$, that has some asymptote at $pminfty$ and that you cross this asymptote. How would be approaching this? First, note that we can choose $f(pminfty)=0$. If you want a different asymptote, just add a constant.



So we write $$f(x)=frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}$$ where $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials. If the degree of $Q$ is greater than the degree of $P$, this asymptotically will go to $0$. For simplicity, just choose $Q(x)=x^n$. Now if we choose $n-1$ different real, non-zero numbers $x_1, x_2,...,x_{n-1}$, we can construct $P(x)=(x-x_1)(x-x_2)...(x-x_n-1)$, a polynomial with degree $n-1$, with $n-1$ real, non-zero roots. With these choices, $f(x)$ defined above has a horizontal asymptote, and the function is crossing the horizontal line at $n-1$ different points.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This idea that the graph cannot cross a horizontal asymptote is a myth. As Andrei pointed out, it is false even for rational functions. The function $f(x)=sin x/(x^2+1)$ crosses its asymptote $y=0$ infinitely many times.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Mar 27 at 7:22












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Jake R is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164121%2fprove-that-a-horizontal-asymptote-can-never-be-crossed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

You indeed proved that your function never crosses the asymptote $y=2$. Specifically, you proved following statement




There does not exists $xin mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$




To so this, you indeed used a "proof by contradiction". If there exists a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$

then
$$
2x+6 = 2(x+1)implies 6=2
$$

which is absurd.



But is what you proved sufficient to conclude that the function has a horizontal asymptote described by the line $y=2$? Let's take a look at a different function;
$$
y = frac{x^2+1}{x^2}.
$$

For this function, there does not exist a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{x^2+1}{x^2} = 0.
$$

But this does not mean that the horizontal asymptote is described by $y=0$. Your horizontal asymptote should instead by the line $y=1$.



Ask yourself the following: how would you got about defining a horizontal asymptote? What properties do you think it should have?



Usually, we want an asymptote to somehow capture the behaviour of the function as $x$ gets very large. If you want more information on how to make this statement precise, let me know in the comments and I can add detail.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the tips! I’ll be sure to check them out later.
    $endgroup$
    – Jake R
    Mar 28 at 15:14
















2












$begingroup$

You indeed proved that your function never crosses the asymptote $y=2$. Specifically, you proved following statement




There does not exists $xin mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$




To so this, you indeed used a "proof by contradiction". If there exists a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$

then
$$
2x+6 = 2(x+1)implies 6=2
$$

which is absurd.



But is what you proved sufficient to conclude that the function has a horizontal asymptote described by the line $y=2$? Let's take a look at a different function;
$$
y = frac{x^2+1}{x^2}.
$$

For this function, there does not exist a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{x^2+1}{x^2} = 0.
$$

But this does not mean that the horizontal asymptote is described by $y=0$. Your horizontal asymptote should instead by the line $y=1$.



Ask yourself the following: how would you got about defining a horizontal asymptote? What properties do you think it should have?



Usually, we want an asymptote to somehow capture the behaviour of the function as $x$ gets very large. If you want more information on how to make this statement precise, let me know in the comments and I can add detail.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the tips! I’ll be sure to check them out later.
    $endgroup$
    – Jake R
    Mar 28 at 15:14














2












2








2





$begingroup$

You indeed proved that your function never crosses the asymptote $y=2$. Specifically, you proved following statement




There does not exists $xin mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$




To so this, you indeed used a "proof by contradiction". If there exists a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$

then
$$
2x+6 = 2(x+1)implies 6=2
$$

which is absurd.



But is what you proved sufficient to conclude that the function has a horizontal asymptote described by the line $y=2$? Let's take a look at a different function;
$$
y = frac{x^2+1}{x^2}.
$$

For this function, there does not exist a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{x^2+1}{x^2} = 0.
$$

But this does not mean that the horizontal asymptote is described by $y=0$. Your horizontal asymptote should instead by the line $y=1$.



Ask yourself the following: how would you got about defining a horizontal asymptote? What properties do you think it should have?



Usually, we want an asymptote to somehow capture the behaviour of the function as $x$ gets very large. If you want more information on how to make this statement precise, let me know in the comments and I can add detail.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



You indeed proved that your function never crosses the asymptote $y=2$. Specifically, you proved following statement




There does not exists $xin mathbb{R}$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$




To so this, you indeed used a "proof by contradiction". If there exists a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{2x+6}{x+1} = 2.
$$

then
$$
2x+6 = 2(x+1)implies 6=2
$$

which is absurd.



But is what you proved sufficient to conclude that the function has a horizontal asymptote described by the line $y=2$? Let's take a look at a different function;
$$
y = frac{x^2+1}{x^2}.
$$

For this function, there does not exist a number $x$ such that
$$
frac{x^2+1}{x^2} = 0.
$$

But this does not mean that the horizontal asymptote is described by $y=0$. Your horizontal asymptote should instead by the line $y=1$.



Ask yourself the following: how would you got about defining a horizontal asymptote? What properties do you think it should have?



Usually, we want an asymptote to somehow capture the behaviour of the function as $x$ gets very large. If you want more information on how to make this statement precise, let me know in the comments and I can add detail.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 27 at 5:26

























answered Mar 27 at 5:19









QuokaQuoka

1,570316




1,570316












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the tips! I’ll be sure to check them out later.
    $endgroup$
    – Jake R
    Mar 28 at 15:14


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the tips! I’ll be sure to check them out later.
    $endgroup$
    – Jake R
    Mar 28 at 15:14
















$begingroup$
Thanks for the tips! I’ll be sure to check them out later.
$endgroup$
– Jake R
Mar 28 at 15:14




$begingroup$
Thanks for the tips! I’ll be sure to check them out later.
$endgroup$
– Jake R
Mar 28 at 15:14











2












$begingroup$

Let's stick to rational functions, even if it's not explicitly mentioned that this is what you want to use. So we want to construct such function $f(x)$, that has some asymptote at $pminfty$ and that you cross this asymptote. How would be approaching this? First, note that we can choose $f(pminfty)=0$. If you want a different asymptote, just add a constant.



So we write $$f(x)=frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}$$ where $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials. If the degree of $Q$ is greater than the degree of $P$, this asymptotically will go to $0$. For simplicity, just choose $Q(x)=x^n$. Now if we choose $n-1$ different real, non-zero numbers $x_1, x_2,...,x_{n-1}$, we can construct $P(x)=(x-x_1)(x-x_2)...(x-x_n-1)$, a polynomial with degree $n-1$, with $n-1$ real, non-zero roots. With these choices, $f(x)$ defined above has a horizontal asymptote, and the function is crossing the horizontal line at $n-1$ different points.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This idea that the graph cannot cross a horizontal asymptote is a myth. As Andrei pointed out, it is false even for rational functions. The function $f(x)=sin x/(x^2+1)$ crosses its asymptote $y=0$ infinitely many times.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Mar 27 at 7:22
















2












$begingroup$

Let's stick to rational functions, even if it's not explicitly mentioned that this is what you want to use. So we want to construct such function $f(x)$, that has some asymptote at $pminfty$ and that you cross this asymptote. How would be approaching this? First, note that we can choose $f(pminfty)=0$. If you want a different asymptote, just add a constant.



So we write $$f(x)=frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}$$ where $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials. If the degree of $Q$ is greater than the degree of $P$, this asymptotically will go to $0$. For simplicity, just choose $Q(x)=x^n$. Now if we choose $n-1$ different real, non-zero numbers $x_1, x_2,...,x_{n-1}$, we can construct $P(x)=(x-x_1)(x-x_2)...(x-x_n-1)$, a polynomial with degree $n-1$, with $n-1$ real, non-zero roots. With these choices, $f(x)$ defined above has a horizontal asymptote, and the function is crossing the horizontal line at $n-1$ different points.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This idea that the graph cannot cross a horizontal asymptote is a myth. As Andrei pointed out, it is false even for rational functions. The function $f(x)=sin x/(x^2+1)$ crosses its asymptote $y=0$ infinitely many times.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Mar 27 at 7:22














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Let's stick to rational functions, even if it's not explicitly mentioned that this is what you want to use. So we want to construct such function $f(x)$, that has some asymptote at $pminfty$ and that you cross this asymptote. How would be approaching this? First, note that we can choose $f(pminfty)=0$. If you want a different asymptote, just add a constant.



So we write $$f(x)=frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}$$ where $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials. If the degree of $Q$ is greater than the degree of $P$, this asymptotically will go to $0$. For simplicity, just choose $Q(x)=x^n$. Now if we choose $n-1$ different real, non-zero numbers $x_1, x_2,...,x_{n-1}$, we can construct $P(x)=(x-x_1)(x-x_2)...(x-x_n-1)$, a polynomial with degree $n-1$, with $n-1$ real, non-zero roots. With these choices, $f(x)$ defined above has a horizontal asymptote, and the function is crossing the horizontal line at $n-1$ different points.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Let's stick to rational functions, even if it's not explicitly mentioned that this is what you want to use. So we want to construct such function $f(x)$, that has some asymptote at $pminfty$ and that you cross this asymptote. How would be approaching this? First, note that we can choose $f(pminfty)=0$. If you want a different asymptote, just add a constant.



So we write $$f(x)=frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}$$ where $P$ and $Q$ are polynomials. If the degree of $Q$ is greater than the degree of $P$, this asymptotically will go to $0$. For simplicity, just choose $Q(x)=x^n$. Now if we choose $n-1$ different real, non-zero numbers $x_1, x_2,...,x_{n-1}$, we can construct $P(x)=(x-x_1)(x-x_2)...(x-x_n-1)$, a polynomial with degree $n-1$, with $n-1$ real, non-zero roots. With these choices, $f(x)$ defined above has a horizontal asymptote, and the function is crossing the horizontal line at $n-1$ different points.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 27 at 5:38









AndreiAndrei

13.2k21230




13.2k21230












  • $begingroup$
    This idea that the graph cannot cross a horizontal asymptote is a myth. As Andrei pointed out, it is false even for rational functions. The function $f(x)=sin x/(x^2+1)$ crosses its asymptote $y=0$ infinitely many times.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Mar 27 at 7:22


















  • $begingroup$
    This idea that the graph cannot cross a horizontal asymptote is a myth. As Andrei pointed out, it is false even for rational functions. The function $f(x)=sin x/(x^2+1)$ crosses its asymptote $y=0$ infinitely many times.
    $endgroup$
    – GReyes
    Mar 27 at 7:22
















$begingroup$
This idea that the graph cannot cross a horizontal asymptote is a myth. As Andrei pointed out, it is false even for rational functions. The function $f(x)=sin x/(x^2+1)$ crosses its asymptote $y=0$ infinitely many times.
$endgroup$
– GReyes
Mar 27 at 7:22




$begingroup$
This idea that the graph cannot cross a horizontal asymptote is a myth. As Andrei pointed out, it is false even for rational functions. The function $f(x)=sin x/(x^2+1)$ crosses its asymptote $y=0$ infinitely many times.
$endgroup$
– GReyes
Mar 27 at 7:22










Jake R is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Jake R is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Jake R is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Jake R is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164121%2fprove-that-a-horizontal-asymptote-can-never-be-crossed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa