Find $f$ such that : $f$ is absolutely integrable, $f'$ is absolutely integrable and such that $f$ is not...











up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1












I am trying to find a function $f: mathbb{R}^+ to mathbb{R}^+$ that fullfils the following conditions





  • $$f in mathcal{C}^1(mathbb{R}^+,mathbb{R}^+)$$


  • $$int_{mathbb{R}^+} f in mathbb{R}^+$$


  • $$int_{mathbb{R}^+} mid f' mid in mathbb{R}$$


  • $$f text{is not $frac{1}{2}$-Hölder}$$





I've tried functions with smooth spikes but I am unable to express this function as combinations of usual functions.



Moreover, I know from this post that if $f'^2$ is integrable then $f$ is necessarily $frac{1}{2}-$Hölder.



Thank you.



Note: all the integrals are taken in the Riemann sense.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • what does your second integral mean?
    – zhw.
    Nov 11 at 17:11












  • @zhw I am sorry, this was a typo. It should be better now.
    – IBPsilly
    Nov 11 at 17:38















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1












I am trying to find a function $f: mathbb{R}^+ to mathbb{R}^+$ that fullfils the following conditions





  • $$f in mathcal{C}^1(mathbb{R}^+,mathbb{R}^+)$$


  • $$int_{mathbb{R}^+} f in mathbb{R}^+$$


  • $$int_{mathbb{R}^+} mid f' mid in mathbb{R}$$


  • $$f text{is not $frac{1}{2}$-Hölder}$$





I've tried functions with smooth spikes but I am unable to express this function as combinations of usual functions.



Moreover, I know from this post that if $f'^2$ is integrable then $f$ is necessarily $frac{1}{2}-$Hölder.



Thank you.



Note: all the integrals are taken in the Riemann sense.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • what does your second integral mean?
    – zhw.
    Nov 11 at 17:11












  • @zhw I am sorry, this was a typo. It should be better now.
    – IBPsilly
    Nov 11 at 17:38













up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1






1





I am trying to find a function $f: mathbb{R}^+ to mathbb{R}^+$ that fullfils the following conditions





  • $$f in mathcal{C}^1(mathbb{R}^+,mathbb{R}^+)$$


  • $$int_{mathbb{R}^+} f in mathbb{R}^+$$


  • $$int_{mathbb{R}^+} mid f' mid in mathbb{R}$$


  • $$f text{is not $frac{1}{2}$-Hölder}$$





I've tried functions with smooth spikes but I am unable to express this function as combinations of usual functions.



Moreover, I know from this post that if $f'^2$ is integrable then $f$ is necessarily $frac{1}{2}-$Hölder.



Thank you.



Note: all the integrals are taken in the Riemann sense.










share|cite|improve this question















I am trying to find a function $f: mathbb{R}^+ to mathbb{R}^+$ that fullfils the following conditions





  • $$f in mathcal{C}^1(mathbb{R}^+,mathbb{R}^+)$$


  • $$int_{mathbb{R}^+} f in mathbb{R}^+$$


  • $$int_{mathbb{R}^+} mid f' mid in mathbb{R}$$


  • $$f text{is not $frac{1}{2}$-Hölder}$$





I've tried functions with smooth spikes but I am unable to express this function as combinations of usual functions.



Moreover, I know from this post that if $f'^2$ is integrable then $f$ is necessarily $frac{1}{2}-$Hölder.



Thank you.



Note: all the integrals are taken in the Riemann sense.







calculus real-analysis integration indefinite-integrals sobolev-spaces






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 13 at 8:05









RGS

8,85111129




8,85111129










asked Nov 11 at 16:33









IBPsilly

564




564












  • what does your second integral mean?
    – zhw.
    Nov 11 at 17:11












  • @zhw I am sorry, this was a typo. It should be better now.
    – IBPsilly
    Nov 11 at 17:38


















  • what does your second integral mean?
    – zhw.
    Nov 11 at 17:11












  • @zhw I am sorry, this was a typo. It should be better now.
    – IBPsilly
    Nov 11 at 17:38
















what does your second integral mean?
– zhw.
Nov 11 at 17:11






what does your second integral mean?
– zhw.
Nov 11 at 17:11














@zhw I am sorry, this was a typo. It should be better now.
– IBPsilly
Nov 11 at 17:38




@zhw I am sorry, this was a typo. It should be better now.
– IBPsilly
Nov 11 at 17:38










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Counterexample: Let $I_n$ be the interval $[n,n+1/2^n].$ On the first half of $I_n,$ define the function $g_n$ to be an isosceles triangle of height $n2^{n/2}.$ On the second half of $I_n,$ define $g_n$ to be the mirror image of the first triangle, but this time pointing downward. Set $g_n=0$ elsewhere. Then $g_n$ is continuous on $[0,infty).$ We have



$$int_{I_n}g_n = 0,,,int_{I_n}|g_n| = frac{n}{2^{{n/2}+1}}.$$



Now set $f_n(x) = int_0^x g_n,$ $xin [0,infty).$ Then $f_n$ is supported in $I_n,$ is positive on the interior of $I_n,$ and peaks at the midpoint $n+1/2^{n+1}.$ Verify that



$$frac{f_n(n+1/2^{n+1})-f(n)}{(n+1/2^{n+1}-n)^{1/2}}=frac{n}{2^{n/2+2}}2^{n/2+1/2} = frac{n}{2^{3/2}} to infty.$$



What this says is that the Holder $1/2$-norm of $f_n$ tends to $infty$ as $nto infty.$ That's what we need.



So now let's put this all together. Define $g=sum_{n=1}^{infty} g_n$ and $f(x)= int_0^x g.$ Then $f$ has all the properties needed for a counterexample. There's some details left to be checked, so please ask questions if you like.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2994090%2ffind-f-such-that-f-is-absolutely-integrable-f-is-absolutely-integrable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Counterexample: Let $I_n$ be the interval $[n,n+1/2^n].$ On the first half of $I_n,$ define the function $g_n$ to be an isosceles triangle of height $n2^{n/2}.$ On the second half of $I_n,$ define $g_n$ to be the mirror image of the first triangle, but this time pointing downward. Set $g_n=0$ elsewhere. Then $g_n$ is continuous on $[0,infty).$ We have



    $$int_{I_n}g_n = 0,,,int_{I_n}|g_n| = frac{n}{2^{{n/2}+1}}.$$



    Now set $f_n(x) = int_0^x g_n,$ $xin [0,infty).$ Then $f_n$ is supported in $I_n,$ is positive on the interior of $I_n,$ and peaks at the midpoint $n+1/2^{n+1}.$ Verify that



    $$frac{f_n(n+1/2^{n+1})-f(n)}{(n+1/2^{n+1}-n)^{1/2}}=frac{n}{2^{n/2+2}}2^{n/2+1/2} = frac{n}{2^{3/2}} to infty.$$



    What this says is that the Holder $1/2$-norm of $f_n$ tends to $infty$ as $nto infty.$ That's what we need.



    So now let's put this all together. Define $g=sum_{n=1}^{infty} g_n$ and $f(x)= int_0^x g.$ Then $f$ has all the properties needed for a counterexample. There's some details left to be checked, so please ask questions if you like.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Counterexample: Let $I_n$ be the interval $[n,n+1/2^n].$ On the first half of $I_n,$ define the function $g_n$ to be an isosceles triangle of height $n2^{n/2}.$ On the second half of $I_n,$ define $g_n$ to be the mirror image of the first triangle, but this time pointing downward. Set $g_n=0$ elsewhere. Then $g_n$ is continuous on $[0,infty).$ We have



      $$int_{I_n}g_n = 0,,,int_{I_n}|g_n| = frac{n}{2^{{n/2}+1}}.$$



      Now set $f_n(x) = int_0^x g_n,$ $xin [0,infty).$ Then $f_n$ is supported in $I_n,$ is positive on the interior of $I_n,$ and peaks at the midpoint $n+1/2^{n+1}.$ Verify that



      $$frac{f_n(n+1/2^{n+1})-f(n)}{(n+1/2^{n+1}-n)^{1/2}}=frac{n}{2^{n/2+2}}2^{n/2+1/2} = frac{n}{2^{3/2}} to infty.$$



      What this says is that the Holder $1/2$-norm of $f_n$ tends to $infty$ as $nto infty.$ That's what we need.



      So now let's put this all together. Define $g=sum_{n=1}^{infty} g_n$ and $f(x)= int_0^x g.$ Then $f$ has all the properties needed for a counterexample. There's some details left to be checked, so please ask questions if you like.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Counterexample: Let $I_n$ be the interval $[n,n+1/2^n].$ On the first half of $I_n,$ define the function $g_n$ to be an isosceles triangle of height $n2^{n/2}.$ On the second half of $I_n,$ define $g_n$ to be the mirror image of the first triangle, but this time pointing downward. Set $g_n=0$ elsewhere. Then $g_n$ is continuous on $[0,infty).$ We have



        $$int_{I_n}g_n = 0,,,int_{I_n}|g_n| = frac{n}{2^{{n/2}+1}}.$$



        Now set $f_n(x) = int_0^x g_n,$ $xin [0,infty).$ Then $f_n$ is supported in $I_n,$ is positive on the interior of $I_n,$ and peaks at the midpoint $n+1/2^{n+1}.$ Verify that



        $$frac{f_n(n+1/2^{n+1})-f(n)}{(n+1/2^{n+1}-n)^{1/2}}=frac{n}{2^{n/2+2}}2^{n/2+1/2} = frac{n}{2^{3/2}} to infty.$$



        What this says is that the Holder $1/2$-norm of $f_n$ tends to $infty$ as $nto infty.$ That's what we need.



        So now let's put this all together. Define $g=sum_{n=1}^{infty} g_n$ and $f(x)= int_0^x g.$ Then $f$ has all the properties needed for a counterexample. There's some details left to be checked, so please ask questions if you like.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Counterexample: Let $I_n$ be the interval $[n,n+1/2^n].$ On the first half of $I_n,$ define the function $g_n$ to be an isosceles triangle of height $n2^{n/2}.$ On the second half of $I_n,$ define $g_n$ to be the mirror image of the first triangle, but this time pointing downward. Set $g_n=0$ elsewhere. Then $g_n$ is continuous on $[0,infty).$ We have



        $$int_{I_n}g_n = 0,,,int_{I_n}|g_n| = frac{n}{2^{{n/2}+1}}.$$



        Now set $f_n(x) = int_0^x g_n,$ $xin [0,infty).$ Then $f_n$ is supported in $I_n,$ is positive on the interior of $I_n,$ and peaks at the midpoint $n+1/2^{n+1}.$ Verify that



        $$frac{f_n(n+1/2^{n+1})-f(n)}{(n+1/2^{n+1}-n)^{1/2}}=frac{n}{2^{n/2+2}}2^{n/2+1/2} = frac{n}{2^{3/2}} to infty.$$



        What this says is that the Holder $1/2$-norm of $f_n$ tends to $infty$ as $nto infty.$ That's what we need.



        So now let's put this all together. Define $g=sum_{n=1}^{infty} g_n$ and $f(x)= int_0^x g.$ Then $f$ has all the properties needed for a counterexample. There's some details left to be checked, so please ask questions if you like.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 14 at 22:19









        zhw.

        70.4k42975




        70.4k42975






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2994090%2ffind-f-such-that-f-is-absolutely-integrable-f-is-absolutely-integrable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...