Liouville function
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am having some trouble trying to solve this question.
I have been learning some number theory and I have come across this question. To be honest I am kinda lost.
I have seen this being solved
Let $n in mathbb{Z}$ with $n > 0$. Let $F(n) = sum_{d mid n} lambda(d)$. Prove that $$F(n) = begin{cases}1, quad text{if }n text{ is a perfect square}\ 0, quad text{otherwise} end{cases} $$
but I have no idea how to solve the first one.
Any help would be appreciated.
number-theory
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am having some trouble trying to solve this question.
I have been learning some number theory and I have come across this question. To be honest I am kinda lost.
I have seen this being solved
Let $n in mathbb{Z}$ with $n > 0$. Let $F(n) = sum_{d mid n} lambda(d)$. Prove that $$F(n) = begin{cases}1, quad text{if }n text{ is a perfect square}\ 0, quad text{otherwise} end{cases} $$
but I have no idea how to solve the first one.
Any help would be appreciated.
number-theory
Have you managed to prove that $lambda$ is multiplicative yet?
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:24
No not yet. That is what I am trying to do right now but I cannot seen to figure out how.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:31
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am having some trouble trying to solve this question.
I have been learning some number theory and I have come across this question. To be honest I am kinda lost.
I have seen this being solved
Let $n in mathbb{Z}$ with $n > 0$. Let $F(n) = sum_{d mid n} lambda(d)$. Prove that $$F(n) = begin{cases}1, quad text{if }n text{ is a perfect square}\ 0, quad text{otherwise} end{cases} $$
but I have no idea how to solve the first one.
Any help would be appreciated.
number-theory
I am having some trouble trying to solve this question.
I have been learning some number theory and I have come across this question. To be honest I am kinda lost.
I have seen this being solved
Let $n in mathbb{Z}$ with $n > 0$. Let $F(n) = sum_{d mid n} lambda(d)$. Prove that $$F(n) = begin{cases}1, quad text{if }n text{ is a perfect square}\ 0, quad text{otherwise} end{cases} $$
but I have no idea how to solve the first one.
Any help would be appreciated.
number-theory
number-theory
edited Nov 14 at 23:42
asked Nov 14 at 23:23
Hidaw
473621
473621
Have you managed to prove that $lambda$ is multiplicative yet?
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:24
No not yet. That is what I am trying to do right now but I cannot seen to figure out how.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:31
add a comment |
Have you managed to prove that $lambda$ is multiplicative yet?
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:24
No not yet. That is what I am trying to do right now but I cannot seen to figure out how.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:31
Have you managed to prove that $lambda$ is multiplicative yet?
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:24
Have you managed to prove that $lambda$ is multiplicative yet?
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:24
No not yet. That is what I am trying to do right now but I cannot seen to figure out how.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:31
No not yet. That is what I am trying to do right now but I cannot seen to figure out how.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:31
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
By the definition that you posted, $lambda(n)=(-1)^{omega(n)}$, where $omega(n)$ is the number of prime factors of $n$, counting multiplicity. Since $omega(mn)=omega(m)+omega(n)$ for all $m,ninmathbb N$, we have that
$$lambda(mn)=(-1)^{omega(mn)}=(-1)^{omega(m)+omega(n)}=(-1)^{omega(m)}(-1)^{omega(n)}=lambda(m)lambda(n)$$
which proves that $lambda$ is completely multiplicative. As for your summation problem, I will offer you the following hint (a list of suggested steps for solving it) and let you fill in the rest:
First prove that if $f(n)$ is a multiplicative function (not necessarily completely multiplicative), then $F(n)=sum_{d|n}f(d)$ is also multiplicative
Then notice that if $n=prod p_i^{m_i}$ is the prime factorization of $n$ and $f$ is a multiplicative function, then $f(n)=prod f(p_i^{m_i})$
Finally, evaluate $F(n)$ for $n=p^k$ where $p$ is some prime, and then express a general formula for $F(n)$ for any $n$ by decomposing $n$ into its prime factorization
Thank you so very much! That makes so much sense. I really appreciate it.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:41
1
@Hidaw Glad to help!
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:42
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
By the definition that you posted, $lambda(n)=(-1)^{omega(n)}$, where $omega(n)$ is the number of prime factors of $n$, counting multiplicity. Since $omega(mn)=omega(m)+omega(n)$ for all $m,ninmathbb N$, we have that
$$lambda(mn)=(-1)^{omega(mn)}=(-1)^{omega(m)+omega(n)}=(-1)^{omega(m)}(-1)^{omega(n)}=lambda(m)lambda(n)$$
which proves that $lambda$ is completely multiplicative. As for your summation problem, I will offer you the following hint (a list of suggested steps for solving it) and let you fill in the rest:
First prove that if $f(n)$ is a multiplicative function (not necessarily completely multiplicative), then $F(n)=sum_{d|n}f(d)$ is also multiplicative
Then notice that if $n=prod p_i^{m_i}$ is the prime factorization of $n$ and $f$ is a multiplicative function, then $f(n)=prod f(p_i^{m_i})$
Finally, evaluate $F(n)$ for $n=p^k$ where $p$ is some prime, and then express a general formula for $F(n)$ for any $n$ by decomposing $n$ into its prime factorization
Thank you so very much! That makes so much sense. I really appreciate it.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:41
1
@Hidaw Glad to help!
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:42
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
By the definition that you posted, $lambda(n)=(-1)^{omega(n)}$, where $omega(n)$ is the number of prime factors of $n$, counting multiplicity. Since $omega(mn)=omega(m)+omega(n)$ for all $m,ninmathbb N$, we have that
$$lambda(mn)=(-1)^{omega(mn)}=(-1)^{omega(m)+omega(n)}=(-1)^{omega(m)}(-1)^{omega(n)}=lambda(m)lambda(n)$$
which proves that $lambda$ is completely multiplicative. As for your summation problem, I will offer you the following hint (a list of suggested steps for solving it) and let you fill in the rest:
First prove that if $f(n)$ is a multiplicative function (not necessarily completely multiplicative), then $F(n)=sum_{d|n}f(d)$ is also multiplicative
Then notice that if $n=prod p_i^{m_i}$ is the prime factorization of $n$ and $f$ is a multiplicative function, then $f(n)=prod f(p_i^{m_i})$
Finally, evaluate $F(n)$ for $n=p^k$ where $p$ is some prime, and then express a general formula for $F(n)$ for any $n$ by decomposing $n$ into its prime factorization
Thank you so very much! That makes so much sense. I really appreciate it.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:41
1
@Hidaw Glad to help!
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:42
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
By the definition that you posted, $lambda(n)=(-1)^{omega(n)}$, where $omega(n)$ is the number of prime factors of $n$, counting multiplicity. Since $omega(mn)=omega(m)+omega(n)$ for all $m,ninmathbb N$, we have that
$$lambda(mn)=(-1)^{omega(mn)}=(-1)^{omega(m)+omega(n)}=(-1)^{omega(m)}(-1)^{omega(n)}=lambda(m)lambda(n)$$
which proves that $lambda$ is completely multiplicative. As for your summation problem, I will offer you the following hint (a list of suggested steps for solving it) and let you fill in the rest:
First prove that if $f(n)$ is a multiplicative function (not necessarily completely multiplicative), then $F(n)=sum_{d|n}f(d)$ is also multiplicative
Then notice that if $n=prod p_i^{m_i}$ is the prime factorization of $n$ and $f$ is a multiplicative function, then $f(n)=prod f(p_i^{m_i})$
Finally, evaluate $F(n)$ for $n=p^k$ where $p$ is some prime, and then express a general formula for $F(n)$ for any $n$ by decomposing $n$ into its prime factorization
By the definition that you posted, $lambda(n)=(-1)^{omega(n)}$, where $omega(n)$ is the number of prime factors of $n$, counting multiplicity. Since $omega(mn)=omega(m)+omega(n)$ for all $m,ninmathbb N$, we have that
$$lambda(mn)=(-1)^{omega(mn)}=(-1)^{omega(m)+omega(n)}=(-1)^{omega(m)}(-1)^{omega(n)}=lambda(m)lambda(n)$$
which proves that $lambda$ is completely multiplicative. As for your summation problem, I will offer you the following hint (a list of suggested steps for solving it) and let you fill in the rest:
First prove that if $f(n)$ is a multiplicative function (not necessarily completely multiplicative), then $F(n)=sum_{d|n}f(d)$ is also multiplicative
Then notice that if $n=prod p_i^{m_i}$ is the prime factorization of $n$ and $f$ is a multiplicative function, then $f(n)=prod f(p_i^{m_i})$
Finally, evaluate $F(n)$ for $n=p^k$ where $p$ is some prime, and then express a general formula for $F(n)$ for any $n$ by decomposing $n$ into its prime factorization
answered Nov 14 at 23:39
Frpzzd
19.8k638101
19.8k638101
Thank you so very much! That makes so much sense. I really appreciate it.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:41
1
@Hidaw Glad to help!
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:42
add a comment |
Thank you so very much! That makes so much sense. I really appreciate it.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:41
1
@Hidaw Glad to help!
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:42
Thank you so very much! That makes so much sense. I really appreciate it.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:41
Thank you so very much! That makes so much sense. I really appreciate it.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:41
1
1
@Hidaw Glad to help!
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:42
@Hidaw Glad to help!
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:42
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998959%2fliouville-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Have you managed to prove that $lambda$ is multiplicative yet?
– Frpzzd
Nov 14 at 23:24
No not yet. That is what I am trying to do right now but I cannot seen to figure out how.
– Hidaw
Nov 14 at 23:31