Metric $d(sigma,tau)$ in $S_{n}$
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Let $S_{n}$ denote the set of permutations of the sequence from $(1,2,dots,n)$.
Let us define a metric on $S_{n}$ for any $sigma, tauin S_{n}$, such that $$d(sigma,tau)=sum_{i=1}^{n}vertsigma(i)-tau(i)vert$$. What are the values of $d(sigma,tau)$ can be?
Any ideas from which point should I start?
combinatorics metric-spaces permutations
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Let $S_{n}$ denote the set of permutations of the sequence from $(1,2,dots,n)$.
Let us define a metric on $S_{n}$ for any $sigma, tauin S_{n}$, such that $$d(sigma,tau)=sum_{i=1}^{n}vertsigma(i)-tau(i)vert$$. What are the values of $d(sigma,tau)$ can be?
Any ideas from which point should I start?
combinatorics metric-spaces permutations
3
I would start with $sigma$ a cycle and $tau$ the identity.
– Steve D
Oct 12 '17 at 16:04
Can it ever be negative? Can it ever be non-integer? How large can it be for a fixed $n$? The best way to get a grip on this is to do a few calculations yourself.
– Teddy38
Oct 12 '17 at 16:06
1
First, observe that $dleft(sigma, tauright) = dleft(1, tau circ sigma^{-1}right)$, where $1$ denotes $operatorname{id}$. Thus, it suffices to understand $dleft(1, piright)$ for all permutations $pi$. But $dleft(1, piright)$ is the total displacement of $pi$, and equals twice the depth of $pi$, studied in arXiv:1202.4765v3. From Proposition 3.2 in that paper, you can conclude that $dleft(sigma, tauright)$ is an even integer between $0$ and $2leftlfloor n^2/4rightrfloor$. Suspecting that all such integers are actually reached.
– darij grinberg
Nov 15 at 0:29
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Let $S_{n}$ denote the set of permutations of the sequence from $(1,2,dots,n)$.
Let us define a metric on $S_{n}$ for any $sigma, tauin S_{n}$, such that $$d(sigma,tau)=sum_{i=1}^{n}vertsigma(i)-tau(i)vert$$. What are the values of $d(sigma,tau)$ can be?
Any ideas from which point should I start?
combinatorics metric-spaces permutations
Let $S_{n}$ denote the set of permutations of the sequence from $(1,2,dots,n)$.
Let us define a metric on $S_{n}$ for any $sigma, tauin S_{n}$, such that $$d(sigma,tau)=sum_{i=1}^{n}vertsigma(i)-tau(i)vert$$. What are the values of $d(sigma,tau)$ can be?
Any ideas from which point should I start?
combinatorics metric-spaces permutations
combinatorics metric-spaces permutations
asked Oct 12 '17 at 15:23
Bakhytbek
4711
4711
3
I would start with $sigma$ a cycle and $tau$ the identity.
– Steve D
Oct 12 '17 at 16:04
Can it ever be negative? Can it ever be non-integer? How large can it be for a fixed $n$? The best way to get a grip on this is to do a few calculations yourself.
– Teddy38
Oct 12 '17 at 16:06
1
First, observe that $dleft(sigma, tauright) = dleft(1, tau circ sigma^{-1}right)$, where $1$ denotes $operatorname{id}$. Thus, it suffices to understand $dleft(1, piright)$ for all permutations $pi$. But $dleft(1, piright)$ is the total displacement of $pi$, and equals twice the depth of $pi$, studied in arXiv:1202.4765v3. From Proposition 3.2 in that paper, you can conclude that $dleft(sigma, tauright)$ is an even integer between $0$ and $2leftlfloor n^2/4rightrfloor$. Suspecting that all such integers are actually reached.
– darij grinberg
Nov 15 at 0:29
add a comment |
3
I would start with $sigma$ a cycle and $tau$ the identity.
– Steve D
Oct 12 '17 at 16:04
Can it ever be negative? Can it ever be non-integer? How large can it be for a fixed $n$? The best way to get a grip on this is to do a few calculations yourself.
– Teddy38
Oct 12 '17 at 16:06
1
First, observe that $dleft(sigma, tauright) = dleft(1, tau circ sigma^{-1}right)$, where $1$ denotes $operatorname{id}$. Thus, it suffices to understand $dleft(1, piright)$ for all permutations $pi$. But $dleft(1, piright)$ is the total displacement of $pi$, and equals twice the depth of $pi$, studied in arXiv:1202.4765v3. From Proposition 3.2 in that paper, you can conclude that $dleft(sigma, tauright)$ is an even integer between $0$ and $2leftlfloor n^2/4rightrfloor$. Suspecting that all such integers are actually reached.
– darij grinberg
Nov 15 at 0:29
3
3
I would start with $sigma$ a cycle and $tau$ the identity.
– Steve D
Oct 12 '17 at 16:04
I would start with $sigma$ a cycle and $tau$ the identity.
– Steve D
Oct 12 '17 at 16:04
Can it ever be negative? Can it ever be non-integer? How large can it be for a fixed $n$? The best way to get a grip on this is to do a few calculations yourself.
– Teddy38
Oct 12 '17 at 16:06
Can it ever be negative? Can it ever be non-integer? How large can it be for a fixed $n$? The best way to get a grip on this is to do a few calculations yourself.
– Teddy38
Oct 12 '17 at 16:06
1
1
First, observe that $dleft(sigma, tauright) = dleft(1, tau circ sigma^{-1}right)$, where $1$ denotes $operatorname{id}$. Thus, it suffices to understand $dleft(1, piright)$ for all permutations $pi$. But $dleft(1, piright)$ is the total displacement of $pi$, and equals twice the depth of $pi$, studied in arXiv:1202.4765v3. From Proposition 3.2 in that paper, you can conclude that $dleft(sigma, tauright)$ is an even integer between $0$ and $2leftlfloor n^2/4rightrfloor$. Suspecting that all such integers are actually reached.
– darij grinberg
Nov 15 at 0:29
First, observe that $dleft(sigma, tauright) = dleft(1, tau circ sigma^{-1}right)$, where $1$ denotes $operatorname{id}$. Thus, it suffices to understand $dleft(1, piright)$ for all permutations $pi$. But $dleft(1, piright)$ is the total displacement of $pi$, and equals twice the depth of $pi$, studied in arXiv:1202.4765v3. From Proposition 3.2 in that paper, you can conclude that $dleft(sigma, tauright)$ is an even integer between $0$ and $2leftlfloor n^2/4rightrfloor$. Suspecting that all such integers are actually reached.
– darij grinberg
Nov 15 at 0:29
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
This is not an answer but too long for a comment:
Let $D_n$ be the range of $d$ under $S_n$. A quick and dirty implementation in python
import itertools
n = 4
domain = range(1, n+1)
perm = list(itertools.permutations(domain))
values = set()
for i in perm:
for j in perm:
x = 0
for k in range (0, n):
x += abs(i[k] -j[k])
values.add(x)
return values
yields that
$$
begin{align*}
D_1 &= {0} \
D_2 &= {0,2 } \
D_3 &= {0,2,4 } \
D_4 &= {0,2,4, 6, 8} \
D_5 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12 } \
D_6 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18 } \
D_7 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24 }
end{align*}
$$
It's also easy to show that $D_n subseteq D_{n+1}$ and that ${0,2, ldots, 2 cdot (n-1) } subseteq D_{n+1}$ (for all $n$). However, I'm not sure where the extra values in the steps $3 mapsto 4$, $4 mapsto 5$, $5 mapsto 6$, $6 mapsto 7$ come from.
1
If you take the difference between the identity and "reverse" permutations you get a value of $2n^2 in D_{2n}$ and $2n(n+1) in D_{2n+1}$ which seems to match the maximum values you got.
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 15 at 0:13
The maximum value is OEIS A007590
– Surb
Nov 15 at 7:24
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The value of $d(sigma,tau)$ can be any even integer between $0$ and $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$. In fact, given an even integer $k$ within these bounds, one can explicitly construct a permutation $sigma$ with $d(sigma,Id)=k$, where $Id$ denotes the identity permutation (we will abuse the notation slightly and use the same name for all identity permutations, regardless of the value of $n$).
We will prove this in an induction-like fashion:
- If $nleq 2$, the problem is trivial. From now on, we'll assume $ngeq 3$.
- If $k < 2(n-1)$, we can deduce that $kleq 2(n-1)-2$ (due to $k$ being an even integer) and a short calculation tells us that:
$$begin{eqnarray}
0 & leq & (n-3)^2 \
0 & leq & (n-1)^2 - 4n + 8\
2(n-1) - 2 & leq & frac{1}{2}(n-1)^2 \
k & leq & leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}(n-1)^2rightrfloor \
end{eqnarray}$$
where the floor function could have been introduced thanks to the left-hand side of the inequality being an integer. The last inequality allows us to apply the induction hypothesis to obtain a permutation $sigma$ on $(n-1)$ elements having $d(sigma,Id)=k$ and extend it by setting $sigma(n)=n$ to obtain a permutation on $n$ elements with the desired property. - Finally, if $kgeq 2(n-1)$, we find a permutation $sigma'$ on $(n-2)$ elements with $d(sigma',Id)=k-2(n-1)$ by the induction hypothesis. This can be done because $$begin{eqnarray}
k-2(n-1) & leq & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor - 2(n-1)\
& = & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}left(n^2 - 4n + 4right)rightrfloor\
& = & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}left(n-2right)^2rightrfloor
end{eqnarray}$$
Now, we can define our permutation $sigma$ as $sigma(1)=n$, $sigma(n)=1$ and $sigma(i)=sigma'(i-1)+1$ for $1<i<n$. Doing so gives us $d(sigma,Id)=(n-1)+d(sigma',Id)+(n-1)=k$.
This completes the proof that any even value between $0$ and $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$ is a distance between some pair of permutations.
Note that this chain of reasoning does not show that a value larger than $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$ cannot be obtained by some permutation, nor that only even values are reachable; neither of which is too hard to prove.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
This is not an answer but too long for a comment:
Let $D_n$ be the range of $d$ under $S_n$. A quick and dirty implementation in python
import itertools
n = 4
domain = range(1, n+1)
perm = list(itertools.permutations(domain))
values = set()
for i in perm:
for j in perm:
x = 0
for k in range (0, n):
x += abs(i[k] -j[k])
values.add(x)
return values
yields that
$$
begin{align*}
D_1 &= {0} \
D_2 &= {0,2 } \
D_3 &= {0,2,4 } \
D_4 &= {0,2,4, 6, 8} \
D_5 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12 } \
D_6 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18 } \
D_7 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24 }
end{align*}
$$
It's also easy to show that $D_n subseteq D_{n+1}$ and that ${0,2, ldots, 2 cdot (n-1) } subseteq D_{n+1}$ (for all $n$). However, I'm not sure where the extra values in the steps $3 mapsto 4$, $4 mapsto 5$, $5 mapsto 6$, $6 mapsto 7$ come from.
1
If you take the difference between the identity and "reverse" permutations you get a value of $2n^2 in D_{2n}$ and $2n(n+1) in D_{2n+1}$ which seems to match the maximum values you got.
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 15 at 0:13
The maximum value is OEIS A007590
– Surb
Nov 15 at 7:24
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
This is not an answer but too long for a comment:
Let $D_n$ be the range of $d$ under $S_n$. A quick and dirty implementation in python
import itertools
n = 4
domain = range(1, n+1)
perm = list(itertools.permutations(domain))
values = set()
for i in perm:
for j in perm:
x = 0
for k in range (0, n):
x += abs(i[k] -j[k])
values.add(x)
return values
yields that
$$
begin{align*}
D_1 &= {0} \
D_2 &= {0,2 } \
D_3 &= {0,2,4 } \
D_4 &= {0,2,4, 6, 8} \
D_5 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12 } \
D_6 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18 } \
D_7 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24 }
end{align*}
$$
It's also easy to show that $D_n subseteq D_{n+1}$ and that ${0,2, ldots, 2 cdot (n-1) } subseteq D_{n+1}$ (for all $n$). However, I'm not sure where the extra values in the steps $3 mapsto 4$, $4 mapsto 5$, $5 mapsto 6$, $6 mapsto 7$ come from.
1
If you take the difference between the identity and "reverse" permutations you get a value of $2n^2 in D_{2n}$ and $2n(n+1) in D_{2n+1}$ which seems to match the maximum values you got.
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 15 at 0:13
The maximum value is OEIS A007590
– Surb
Nov 15 at 7:24
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
This is not an answer but too long for a comment:
Let $D_n$ be the range of $d$ under $S_n$. A quick and dirty implementation in python
import itertools
n = 4
domain = range(1, n+1)
perm = list(itertools.permutations(domain))
values = set()
for i in perm:
for j in perm:
x = 0
for k in range (0, n):
x += abs(i[k] -j[k])
values.add(x)
return values
yields that
$$
begin{align*}
D_1 &= {0} \
D_2 &= {0,2 } \
D_3 &= {0,2,4 } \
D_4 &= {0,2,4, 6, 8} \
D_5 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12 } \
D_6 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18 } \
D_7 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24 }
end{align*}
$$
It's also easy to show that $D_n subseteq D_{n+1}$ and that ${0,2, ldots, 2 cdot (n-1) } subseteq D_{n+1}$ (for all $n$). However, I'm not sure where the extra values in the steps $3 mapsto 4$, $4 mapsto 5$, $5 mapsto 6$, $6 mapsto 7$ come from.
This is not an answer but too long for a comment:
Let $D_n$ be the range of $d$ under $S_n$. A quick and dirty implementation in python
import itertools
n = 4
domain = range(1, n+1)
perm = list(itertools.permutations(domain))
values = set()
for i in perm:
for j in perm:
x = 0
for k in range (0, n):
x += abs(i[k] -j[k])
values.add(x)
return values
yields that
$$
begin{align*}
D_1 &= {0} \
D_2 &= {0,2 } \
D_3 &= {0,2,4 } \
D_4 &= {0,2,4, 6, 8} \
D_5 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12 } \
D_6 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18 } \
D_7 &= {0,2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24 }
end{align*}
$$
It's also easy to show that $D_n subseteq D_{n+1}$ and that ${0,2, ldots, 2 cdot (n-1) } subseteq D_{n+1}$ (for all $n$). However, I'm not sure where the extra values in the steps $3 mapsto 4$, $4 mapsto 5$, $5 mapsto 6$, $6 mapsto 7$ come from.
edited Nov 14 at 23:57
answered Nov 14 at 23:52
Stefan Mesken
14.4k32046
14.4k32046
1
If you take the difference between the identity and "reverse" permutations you get a value of $2n^2 in D_{2n}$ and $2n(n+1) in D_{2n+1}$ which seems to match the maximum values you got.
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 15 at 0:13
The maximum value is OEIS A007590
– Surb
Nov 15 at 7:24
add a comment |
1
If you take the difference between the identity and "reverse" permutations you get a value of $2n^2 in D_{2n}$ and $2n(n+1) in D_{2n+1}$ which seems to match the maximum values you got.
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 15 at 0:13
The maximum value is OEIS A007590
– Surb
Nov 15 at 7:24
1
1
If you take the difference between the identity and "reverse" permutations you get a value of $2n^2 in D_{2n}$ and $2n(n+1) in D_{2n+1}$ which seems to match the maximum values you got.
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 15 at 0:13
If you take the difference between the identity and "reverse" permutations you get a value of $2n^2 in D_{2n}$ and $2n(n+1) in D_{2n+1}$ which seems to match the maximum values you got.
– Daniel Schepler
Nov 15 at 0:13
The maximum value is OEIS A007590
– Surb
Nov 15 at 7:24
The maximum value is OEIS A007590
– Surb
Nov 15 at 7:24
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The value of $d(sigma,tau)$ can be any even integer between $0$ and $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$. In fact, given an even integer $k$ within these bounds, one can explicitly construct a permutation $sigma$ with $d(sigma,Id)=k$, where $Id$ denotes the identity permutation (we will abuse the notation slightly and use the same name for all identity permutations, regardless of the value of $n$).
We will prove this in an induction-like fashion:
- If $nleq 2$, the problem is trivial. From now on, we'll assume $ngeq 3$.
- If $k < 2(n-1)$, we can deduce that $kleq 2(n-1)-2$ (due to $k$ being an even integer) and a short calculation tells us that:
$$begin{eqnarray}
0 & leq & (n-3)^2 \
0 & leq & (n-1)^2 - 4n + 8\
2(n-1) - 2 & leq & frac{1}{2}(n-1)^2 \
k & leq & leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}(n-1)^2rightrfloor \
end{eqnarray}$$
where the floor function could have been introduced thanks to the left-hand side of the inequality being an integer. The last inequality allows us to apply the induction hypothesis to obtain a permutation $sigma$ on $(n-1)$ elements having $d(sigma,Id)=k$ and extend it by setting $sigma(n)=n$ to obtain a permutation on $n$ elements with the desired property. - Finally, if $kgeq 2(n-1)$, we find a permutation $sigma'$ on $(n-2)$ elements with $d(sigma',Id)=k-2(n-1)$ by the induction hypothesis. This can be done because $$begin{eqnarray}
k-2(n-1) & leq & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor - 2(n-1)\
& = & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}left(n^2 - 4n + 4right)rightrfloor\
& = & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}left(n-2right)^2rightrfloor
end{eqnarray}$$
Now, we can define our permutation $sigma$ as $sigma(1)=n$, $sigma(n)=1$ and $sigma(i)=sigma'(i-1)+1$ for $1<i<n$. Doing so gives us $d(sigma,Id)=(n-1)+d(sigma',Id)+(n-1)=k$.
This completes the proof that any even value between $0$ and $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$ is a distance between some pair of permutations.
Note that this chain of reasoning does not show that a value larger than $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$ cannot be obtained by some permutation, nor that only even values are reachable; neither of which is too hard to prove.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The value of $d(sigma,tau)$ can be any even integer between $0$ and $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$. In fact, given an even integer $k$ within these bounds, one can explicitly construct a permutation $sigma$ with $d(sigma,Id)=k$, where $Id$ denotes the identity permutation (we will abuse the notation slightly and use the same name for all identity permutations, regardless of the value of $n$).
We will prove this in an induction-like fashion:
- If $nleq 2$, the problem is trivial. From now on, we'll assume $ngeq 3$.
- If $k < 2(n-1)$, we can deduce that $kleq 2(n-1)-2$ (due to $k$ being an even integer) and a short calculation tells us that:
$$begin{eqnarray}
0 & leq & (n-3)^2 \
0 & leq & (n-1)^2 - 4n + 8\
2(n-1) - 2 & leq & frac{1}{2}(n-1)^2 \
k & leq & leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}(n-1)^2rightrfloor \
end{eqnarray}$$
where the floor function could have been introduced thanks to the left-hand side of the inequality being an integer. The last inequality allows us to apply the induction hypothesis to obtain a permutation $sigma$ on $(n-1)$ elements having $d(sigma,Id)=k$ and extend it by setting $sigma(n)=n$ to obtain a permutation on $n$ elements with the desired property. - Finally, if $kgeq 2(n-1)$, we find a permutation $sigma'$ on $(n-2)$ elements with $d(sigma',Id)=k-2(n-1)$ by the induction hypothesis. This can be done because $$begin{eqnarray}
k-2(n-1) & leq & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor - 2(n-1)\
& = & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}left(n^2 - 4n + 4right)rightrfloor\
& = & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}left(n-2right)^2rightrfloor
end{eqnarray}$$
Now, we can define our permutation $sigma$ as $sigma(1)=n$, $sigma(n)=1$ and $sigma(i)=sigma'(i-1)+1$ for $1<i<n$. Doing so gives us $d(sigma,Id)=(n-1)+d(sigma',Id)+(n-1)=k$.
This completes the proof that any even value between $0$ and $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$ is a distance between some pair of permutations.
Note that this chain of reasoning does not show that a value larger than $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$ cannot be obtained by some permutation, nor that only even values are reachable; neither of which is too hard to prove.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
The value of $d(sigma,tau)$ can be any even integer between $0$ and $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$. In fact, given an even integer $k$ within these bounds, one can explicitly construct a permutation $sigma$ with $d(sigma,Id)=k$, where $Id$ denotes the identity permutation (we will abuse the notation slightly and use the same name for all identity permutations, regardless of the value of $n$).
We will prove this in an induction-like fashion:
- If $nleq 2$, the problem is trivial. From now on, we'll assume $ngeq 3$.
- If $k < 2(n-1)$, we can deduce that $kleq 2(n-1)-2$ (due to $k$ being an even integer) and a short calculation tells us that:
$$begin{eqnarray}
0 & leq & (n-3)^2 \
0 & leq & (n-1)^2 - 4n + 8\
2(n-1) - 2 & leq & frac{1}{2}(n-1)^2 \
k & leq & leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}(n-1)^2rightrfloor \
end{eqnarray}$$
where the floor function could have been introduced thanks to the left-hand side of the inequality being an integer. The last inequality allows us to apply the induction hypothesis to obtain a permutation $sigma$ on $(n-1)$ elements having $d(sigma,Id)=k$ and extend it by setting $sigma(n)=n$ to obtain a permutation on $n$ elements with the desired property. - Finally, if $kgeq 2(n-1)$, we find a permutation $sigma'$ on $(n-2)$ elements with $d(sigma',Id)=k-2(n-1)$ by the induction hypothesis. This can be done because $$begin{eqnarray}
k-2(n-1) & leq & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor - 2(n-1)\
& = & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}left(n^2 - 4n + 4right)rightrfloor\
& = & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}left(n-2right)^2rightrfloor
end{eqnarray}$$
Now, we can define our permutation $sigma$ as $sigma(1)=n$, $sigma(n)=1$ and $sigma(i)=sigma'(i-1)+1$ for $1<i<n$. Doing so gives us $d(sigma,Id)=(n-1)+d(sigma',Id)+(n-1)=k$.
This completes the proof that any even value between $0$ and $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$ is a distance between some pair of permutations.
Note that this chain of reasoning does not show that a value larger than $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$ cannot be obtained by some permutation, nor that only even values are reachable; neither of which is too hard to prove.
The value of $d(sigma,tau)$ can be any even integer between $0$ and $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$. In fact, given an even integer $k$ within these bounds, one can explicitly construct a permutation $sigma$ with $d(sigma,Id)=k$, where $Id$ denotes the identity permutation (we will abuse the notation slightly and use the same name for all identity permutations, regardless of the value of $n$).
We will prove this in an induction-like fashion:
- If $nleq 2$, the problem is trivial. From now on, we'll assume $ngeq 3$.
- If $k < 2(n-1)$, we can deduce that $kleq 2(n-1)-2$ (due to $k$ being an even integer) and a short calculation tells us that:
$$begin{eqnarray}
0 & leq & (n-3)^2 \
0 & leq & (n-1)^2 - 4n + 8\
2(n-1) - 2 & leq & frac{1}{2}(n-1)^2 \
k & leq & leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}(n-1)^2rightrfloor \
end{eqnarray}$$
where the floor function could have been introduced thanks to the left-hand side of the inequality being an integer. The last inequality allows us to apply the induction hypothesis to obtain a permutation $sigma$ on $(n-1)$ elements having $d(sigma,Id)=k$ and extend it by setting $sigma(n)=n$ to obtain a permutation on $n$ elements with the desired property. - Finally, if $kgeq 2(n-1)$, we find a permutation $sigma'$ on $(n-2)$ elements with $d(sigma',Id)=k-2(n-1)$ by the induction hypothesis. This can be done because $$begin{eqnarray}
k-2(n-1) & leq & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor - 2(n-1)\
& = & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}left(n^2 - 4n + 4right)rightrfloor\
& = & leftlfloor frac{1}{2}left(n-2right)^2rightrfloor
end{eqnarray}$$
Now, we can define our permutation $sigma$ as $sigma(1)=n$, $sigma(n)=1$ and $sigma(i)=sigma'(i-1)+1$ for $1<i<n$. Doing so gives us $d(sigma,Id)=(n-1)+d(sigma',Id)+(n-1)=k$.
This completes the proof that any even value between $0$ and $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$ is a distance between some pair of permutations.
Note that this chain of reasoning does not show that a value larger than $leftlfloorfrac{1}{2}n^2rightrfloor$ cannot be obtained by some permutation, nor that only even values are reachable; neither of which is too hard to prove.
answered Nov 18 at 16:07
Peter Košinár
8,10111433
8,10111433
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2469241%2fmetric-d-sigma-tau-in-s-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
I would start with $sigma$ a cycle and $tau$ the identity.
– Steve D
Oct 12 '17 at 16:04
Can it ever be negative? Can it ever be non-integer? How large can it be for a fixed $n$? The best way to get a grip on this is to do a few calculations yourself.
– Teddy38
Oct 12 '17 at 16:06
1
First, observe that $dleft(sigma, tauright) = dleft(1, tau circ sigma^{-1}right)$, where $1$ denotes $operatorname{id}$. Thus, it suffices to understand $dleft(1, piright)$ for all permutations $pi$. But $dleft(1, piright)$ is the total displacement of $pi$, and equals twice the depth of $pi$, studied in arXiv:1202.4765v3. From Proposition 3.2 in that paper, you can conclude that $dleft(sigma, tauright)$ is an even integer between $0$ and $2leftlfloor n^2/4rightrfloor$. Suspecting that all such integers are actually reached.
– darij grinberg
Nov 15 at 0:29