How to find the Laurent series of $g(z)=frac{1}{e^{2z}-1}$, for $0<|z|<pi/2$?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
How to find the Laurent series representation of $g(z)=frac{1}{e^{2z}-1}$, for $0<|z|<pi/2$? Use geometric series?
complex-analysis complex-numbers
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
How to find the Laurent series representation of $g(z)=frac{1}{e^{2z}-1}$, for $0<|z|<pi/2$? Use geometric series?
complex-analysis complex-numbers
1
Very similar question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/893708/…
– Robert Z
Nov 15 at 7:51
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
How to find the Laurent series representation of $g(z)=frac{1}{e^{2z}-1}$, for $0<|z|<pi/2$? Use geometric series?
complex-analysis complex-numbers
How to find the Laurent series representation of $g(z)=frac{1}{e^{2z}-1}$, for $0<|z|<pi/2$? Use geometric series?
complex-analysis complex-numbers
complex-analysis complex-numbers
asked Nov 15 at 7:46
user398843
536215
536215
1
Very similar question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/893708/…
– Robert Z
Nov 15 at 7:51
add a comment |
1
Very similar question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/893708/…
– Robert Z
Nov 15 at 7:51
1
1
Very similar question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/893708/…
– Robert Z
Nov 15 at 7:51
Very similar question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/893708/…
– Robert Z
Nov 15 at 7:51
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
For the sake of simplification just let $z:=2z$ and you can re-produce the final results for the $2z$ case afterwards.
Now, since $frac{1}{e^z-1}$ has a simple pole at $0$, its Laurent Series must not
have a coefficient on $z^k$ for $k<-1$.
Let the coefficient of $z^k$ be $a_k$. Then, it should be :
$$bigg(frac{a_{-1}}{z}+a_0+a_1z+a_2 z^{2} + a_3z^3+ mathcal Obig(z^4big)bigg)bigg(z+frac{z^2}{2!}+frac{z^3}{3!}+frac{z^4}{4!}+frac{z^5}{5!}+mathcal Obig(z^6big)bigg)=1$$
Now, if you carry out the multiplications, you can equate the coefficients and find relations for the.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
For the sake of simplification just let $z:=2z$ and you can re-produce the final results for the $2z$ case afterwards.
Now, since $frac{1}{e^z-1}$ has a simple pole at $0$, its Laurent Series must not
have a coefficient on $z^k$ for $k<-1$.
Let the coefficient of $z^k$ be $a_k$. Then, it should be :
$$bigg(frac{a_{-1}}{z}+a_0+a_1z+a_2 z^{2} + a_3z^3+ mathcal Obig(z^4big)bigg)bigg(z+frac{z^2}{2!}+frac{z^3}{3!}+frac{z^4}{4!}+frac{z^5}{5!}+mathcal Obig(z^6big)bigg)=1$$
Now, if you carry out the multiplications, you can equate the coefficients and find relations for the.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
For the sake of simplification just let $z:=2z$ and you can re-produce the final results for the $2z$ case afterwards.
Now, since $frac{1}{e^z-1}$ has a simple pole at $0$, its Laurent Series must not
have a coefficient on $z^k$ for $k<-1$.
Let the coefficient of $z^k$ be $a_k$. Then, it should be :
$$bigg(frac{a_{-1}}{z}+a_0+a_1z+a_2 z^{2} + a_3z^3+ mathcal Obig(z^4big)bigg)bigg(z+frac{z^2}{2!}+frac{z^3}{3!}+frac{z^4}{4!}+frac{z^5}{5!}+mathcal Obig(z^6big)bigg)=1$$
Now, if you carry out the multiplications, you can equate the coefficients and find relations for the.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
For the sake of simplification just let $z:=2z$ and you can re-produce the final results for the $2z$ case afterwards.
Now, since $frac{1}{e^z-1}$ has a simple pole at $0$, its Laurent Series must not
have a coefficient on $z^k$ for $k<-1$.
Let the coefficient of $z^k$ be $a_k$. Then, it should be :
$$bigg(frac{a_{-1}}{z}+a_0+a_1z+a_2 z^{2} + a_3z^3+ mathcal Obig(z^4big)bigg)bigg(z+frac{z^2}{2!}+frac{z^3}{3!}+frac{z^4}{4!}+frac{z^5}{5!}+mathcal Obig(z^6big)bigg)=1$$
Now, if you carry out the multiplications, you can equate the coefficients and find relations for the.
For the sake of simplification just let $z:=2z$ and you can re-produce the final results for the $2z$ case afterwards.
Now, since $frac{1}{e^z-1}$ has a simple pole at $0$, its Laurent Series must not
have a coefficient on $z^k$ for $k<-1$.
Let the coefficient of $z^k$ be $a_k$. Then, it should be :
$$bigg(frac{a_{-1}}{z}+a_0+a_1z+a_2 z^{2} + a_3z^3+ mathcal Obig(z^4big)bigg)bigg(z+frac{z^2}{2!}+frac{z^3}{3!}+frac{z^4}{4!}+frac{z^5}{5!}+mathcal Obig(z^6big)bigg)=1$$
Now, if you carry out the multiplications, you can equate the coefficients and find relations for the.
answered Nov 15 at 9:26
Rebellos
12.2k21041
12.2k21041
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999386%2fhow-to-find-the-laurent-series-of-gz-frac1e2z-1-for-0z-pi-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Very similar question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/893708/…
– Robert Z
Nov 15 at 7:51