How to prove that if $lim a_n = L$ then $lim a_n^r = L^r$
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am trying to prove that:
Given that the sequence: $(a_n)_{n=1}^infty$ has a limit $L$ (where $forall n in mathbb N, a_n>0$), the sequence $(a_n^r)_{n=1}^infty$ (where $r>0$, $r in mathbb{R}$) has a limit $L^r$.
I can prove in for instance for $r=frac{1}{2}$:
Given $forall epsilon > 0$ $|a_n-L|<epsilon$, one can show that $forall epsilon >0$, $$|sqrt{a_n}-sqrt{L}|=left|frac{(sqrt{a_n}-sqrt{L})(sqrt{a_n}+sqrt{L})}{(sqrt{a_n}+sqrt{L})}right|=left|frac{a_n-L}{(sqrt{a_n}+sqrt{L})}right|<epsilon.$$
But, I don't know how to make it general.
Is it true that $a_n^r-L^r leq (a_n-L)^r$,
for $a_n$, $L$ and $r$ that satisfy the above requirements?
edit: I have encountered the question in a course in which functions and continuity are thought after sequences, so my intention in the question was to use only sequences (and of course, completeness of reals, the property of Archimedes, real numbers axioms, definition of sequences limits, arithmetic sequences limits etc..)
calculus real-analysis sequences-and-series limits continuity
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am trying to prove that:
Given that the sequence: $(a_n)_{n=1}^infty$ has a limit $L$ (where $forall n in mathbb N, a_n>0$), the sequence $(a_n^r)_{n=1}^infty$ (where $r>0$, $r in mathbb{R}$) has a limit $L^r$.
I can prove in for instance for $r=frac{1}{2}$:
Given $forall epsilon > 0$ $|a_n-L|<epsilon$, one can show that $forall epsilon >0$, $$|sqrt{a_n}-sqrt{L}|=left|frac{(sqrt{a_n}-sqrt{L})(sqrt{a_n}+sqrt{L})}{(sqrt{a_n}+sqrt{L})}right|=left|frac{a_n-L}{(sqrt{a_n}+sqrt{L})}right|<epsilon.$$
But, I don't know how to make it general.
Is it true that $a_n^r-L^r leq (a_n-L)^r$,
for $a_n$, $L$ and $r$ that satisfy the above requirements?
edit: I have encountered the question in a course in which functions and continuity are thought after sequences, so my intention in the question was to use only sequences (and of course, completeness of reals, the property of Archimedes, real numbers axioms, definition of sequences limits, arithmetic sequences limits etc..)
calculus real-analysis sequences-and-series limits continuity
You may use the continuity of$e^x$ function....
– dmtri
Nov 14 at 10:40
Essentially this question: math.stackexchange.com/q/83460 ?
– user587192
Nov 14 at 14:03
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I am trying to prove that:
Given that the sequence: $(a_n)_{n=1}^infty$ has a limit $L$ (where $forall n in mathbb N, a_n>0$), the sequence $(a_n^r)_{n=1}^infty$ (where $r>0$, $r in mathbb{R}$) has a limit $L^r$.
I can prove in for instance for $r=frac{1}{2}$:
Given $forall epsilon > 0$ $|a_n-L|<epsilon$, one can show that $forall epsilon >0$, $$|sqrt{a_n}-sqrt{L}|=left|frac{(sqrt{a_n}-sqrt{L})(sqrt{a_n}+sqrt{L})}{(sqrt{a_n}+sqrt{L})}right|=left|frac{a_n-L}{(sqrt{a_n}+sqrt{L})}right|<epsilon.$$
But, I don't know how to make it general.
Is it true that $a_n^r-L^r leq (a_n-L)^r$,
for $a_n$, $L$ and $r$ that satisfy the above requirements?
edit: I have encountered the question in a course in which functions and continuity are thought after sequences, so my intention in the question was to use only sequences (and of course, completeness of reals, the property of Archimedes, real numbers axioms, definition of sequences limits, arithmetic sequences limits etc..)
calculus real-analysis sequences-and-series limits continuity
I am trying to prove that:
Given that the sequence: $(a_n)_{n=1}^infty$ has a limit $L$ (where $forall n in mathbb N, a_n>0$), the sequence $(a_n^r)_{n=1}^infty$ (where $r>0$, $r in mathbb{R}$) has a limit $L^r$.
I can prove in for instance for $r=frac{1}{2}$:
Given $forall epsilon > 0$ $|a_n-L|<epsilon$, one can show that $forall epsilon >0$, $$|sqrt{a_n}-sqrt{L}|=left|frac{(sqrt{a_n}-sqrt{L})(sqrt{a_n}+sqrt{L})}{(sqrt{a_n}+sqrt{L})}right|=left|frac{a_n-L}{(sqrt{a_n}+sqrt{L})}right|<epsilon.$$
But, I don't know how to make it general.
Is it true that $a_n^r-L^r leq (a_n-L)^r$,
for $a_n$, $L$ and $r$ that satisfy the above requirements?
edit: I have encountered the question in a course in which functions and continuity are thought after sequences, so my intention in the question was to use only sequences (and of course, completeness of reals, the property of Archimedes, real numbers axioms, definition of sequences limits, arithmetic sequences limits etc..)
calculus real-analysis sequences-and-series limits continuity
calculus real-analysis sequences-and-series limits continuity
edited Nov 17 at 13:51
asked Nov 14 at 10:35
user135172
42729
42729
You may use the continuity of$e^x$ function....
– dmtri
Nov 14 at 10:40
Essentially this question: math.stackexchange.com/q/83460 ?
– user587192
Nov 14 at 14:03
add a comment |
You may use the continuity of$e^x$ function....
– dmtri
Nov 14 at 10:40
Essentially this question: math.stackexchange.com/q/83460 ?
– user587192
Nov 14 at 14:03
You may use the continuity of$e^x$ function....
– dmtri
Nov 14 at 10:40
You may use the continuity of$e^x$ function....
– dmtri
Nov 14 at 10:40
Essentially this question: math.stackexchange.com/q/83460 ?
– user587192
Nov 14 at 14:03
Essentially this question: math.stackexchange.com/q/83460 ?
– user587192
Nov 14 at 14:03
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
We know that a sequence is a function whose domain is natural numbers.Let f be that function, now apply this.
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:47
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
What tedium.
Simply prove continuous functions preserve limits.
That is if f:R -> R is continuous and the sequence
a$_n$ -> a, then the sequence f(a$_n$) -> f(a).
To finish, note that for x > 0, x$^r$ is continuous.
You've pushed the parcel onto a separate question. Why is $x^r$ continuous, and how is it even defined?
– Umberto P.
Nov 14 at 14:59
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:46
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
We know that a sequence is a function whose domain is natural numbers.Let f be that function, now apply this.
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:47
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
We know that a sequence is a function whose domain is natural numbers.Let f be that function, now apply this.
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:47
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
We know that a sequence is a function whose domain is natural numbers.Let f be that function, now apply this.
We know that a sequence is a function whose domain is natural numbers.Let f be that function, now apply this.
answered Nov 14 at 11:04
Crazy for maths
4948
4948
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:47
add a comment |
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:47
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:47
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:47
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
What tedium.
Simply prove continuous functions preserve limits.
That is if f:R -> R is continuous and the sequence
a$_n$ -> a, then the sequence f(a$_n$) -> f(a).
To finish, note that for x > 0, x$^r$ is continuous.
You've pushed the parcel onto a separate question. Why is $x^r$ continuous, and how is it even defined?
– Umberto P.
Nov 14 at 14:59
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:46
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
What tedium.
Simply prove continuous functions preserve limits.
That is if f:R -> R is continuous and the sequence
a$_n$ -> a, then the sequence f(a$_n$) -> f(a).
To finish, note that for x > 0, x$^r$ is continuous.
You've pushed the parcel onto a separate question. Why is $x^r$ continuous, and how is it even defined?
– Umberto P.
Nov 14 at 14:59
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:46
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
What tedium.
Simply prove continuous functions preserve limits.
That is if f:R -> R is continuous and the sequence
a$_n$ -> a, then the sequence f(a$_n$) -> f(a).
To finish, note that for x > 0, x$^r$ is continuous.
What tedium.
Simply prove continuous functions preserve limits.
That is if f:R -> R is continuous and the sequence
a$_n$ -> a, then the sequence f(a$_n$) -> f(a).
To finish, note that for x > 0, x$^r$ is continuous.
answered Nov 14 at 11:07
William Elliot
6,7632518
6,7632518
You've pushed the parcel onto a separate question. Why is $x^r$ continuous, and how is it even defined?
– Umberto P.
Nov 14 at 14:59
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:46
add a comment |
You've pushed the parcel onto a separate question. Why is $x^r$ continuous, and how is it even defined?
– Umberto P.
Nov 14 at 14:59
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:46
You've pushed the parcel onto a separate question. Why is $x^r$ continuous, and how is it even defined?
– Umberto P.
Nov 14 at 14:59
You've pushed the parcel onto a separate question. Why is $x^r$ continuous, and how is it even defined?
– Umberto P.
Nov 14 at 14:59
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:46
The meaning is to prove it without using theory of continuous functions.. I encountered this question in a course where functions limits is thought after sequences limits..
– user135172
Nov 17 at 13:46
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998108%2fhow-to-prove-that-if-lim-a-n-l-then-lim-a-nr-lr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You may use the continuity of$e^x$ function....
– dmtri
Nov 14 at 10:40
Essentially this question: math.stackexchange.com/q/83460 ?
– user587192
Nov 14 at 14:03