Fix setuid and setgid bits in /usr?











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I did something stupid:





chown -R root:root /usr
chmod -R g-w /usr


Apparently, the best thing I can do is reinstall the system. However, my system works fine so far - is there anything immediately dangerous not fixing this asap? I have Ubuntu 18.04 (no Internet connection), it is just used as a local NAS.



The reason I did this was due to a warning when doing updates:





WARN: uid is 0 but '/usr' is owned by 1000
WARN: /usr is group writable!


I asked and someone in a forum suggested the above commands with "it is perfectly safe". Lesson learned: Don't trust people on the Internet, even if they sound totally convinced.



The reason, apparently, why /usr was group writable and not owned by root is because of my specific DIY-Nas Ubuntu (Odroid):





drwxrwxr-x  10 odroid odroid     4096 Apr 12  2018 usr


Perhaps I should have not used the -R recursive option. It doesn't matter now.



The last few hours, I looked through various posts to find out what I did. It looks like running any chown on /usr breaks setuid and setgid bits, so I would need to manually compare to an existing system to restore all of those once I have fix the ownership again. For fixing sudo command, I already did this:





chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo && chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo


Besides this, I don't see any more problems. When I log in to Ubuntu interface, I get a permission warning from some Bluetooth Software, but it is not immidiatly relevant.
I understand that there is some software in /usr that has a group other than root (see list here, for example), for reasons of security - but will there be any really negative effects on my nas-system, especially related to file handling/archive things, e.g. corrupted or inaccessible files?



Note that I created a new stackexchange account because I am too embarrassed.. anyway, many thanks for suggestions!










share|improve this question









New contributor




Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite












    I did something stupid:





    chown -R root:root /usr
    chmod -R g-w /usr


    Apparently, the best thing I can do is reinstall the system. However, my system works fine so far - is there anything immediately dangerous not fixing this asap? I have Ubuntu 18.04 (no Internet connection), it is just used as a local NAS.



    The reason I did this was due to a warning when doing updates:





    WARN: uid is 0 but '/usr' is owned by 1000
    WARN: /usr is group writable!


    I asked and someone in a forum suggested the above commands with "it is perfectly safe". Lesson learned: Don't trust people on the Internet, even if they sound totally convinced.



    The reason, apparently, why /usr was group writable and not owned by root is because of my specific DIY-Nas Ubuntu (Odroid):





    drwxrwxr-x  10 odroid odroid     4096 Apr 12  2018 usr


    Perhaps I should have not used the -R recursive option. It doesn't matter now.



    The last few hours, I looked through various posts to find out what I did. It looks like running any chown on /usr breaks setuid and setgid bits, so I would need to manually compare to an existing system to restore all of those once I have fix the ownership again. For fixing sudo command, I already did this:





    chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo && chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo


    Besides this, I don't see any more problems. When I log in to Ubuntu interface, I get a permission warning from some Bluetooth Software, but it is not immidiatly relevant.
    I understand that there is some software in /usr that has a group other than root (see list here, for example), for reasons of security - but will there be any really negative effects on my nas-system, especially related to file handling/archive things, e.g. corrupted or inaccessible files?



    Note that I created a new stackexchange account because I am too embarrassed.. anyway, many thanks for suggestions!










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite











      I did something stupid:





      chown -R root:root /usr
      chmod -R g-w /usr


      Apparently, the best thing I can do is reinstall the system. However, my system works fine so far - is there anything immediately dangerous not fixing this asap? I have Ubuntu 18.04 (no Internet connection), it is just used as a local NAS.



      The reason I did this was due to a warning when doing updates:





      WARN: uid is 0 but '/usr' is owned by 1000
      WARN: /usr is group writable!


      I asked and someone in a forum suggested the above commands with "it is perfectly safe". Lesson learned: Don't trust people on the Internet, even if they sound totally convinced.



      The reason, apparently, why /usr was group writable and not owned by root is because of my specific DIY-Nas Ubuntu (Odroid):





      drwxrwxr-x  10 odroid odroid     4096 Apr 12  2018 usr


      Perhaps I should have not used the -R recursive option. It doesn't matter now.



      The last few hours, I looked through various posts to find out what I did. It looks like running any chown on /usr breaks setuid and setgid bits, so I would need to manually compare to an existing system to restore all of those once I have fix the ownership again. For fixing sudo command, I already did this:





      chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo && chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo


      Besides this, I don't see any more problems. When I log in to Ubuntu interface, I get a permission warning from some Bluetooth Software, but it is not immidiatly relevant.
      I understand that there is some software in /usr that has a group other than root (see list here, for example), for reasons of security - but will there be any really negative effects on my nas-system, especially related to file handling/archive things, e.g. corrupted or inaccessible files?



      Note that I created a new stackexchange account because I am too embarrassed.. anyway, many thanks for suggestions!










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I did something stupid:





      chown -R root:root /usr
      chmod -R g-w /usr


      Apparently, the best thing I can do is reinstall the system. However, my system works fine so far - is there anything immediately dangerous not fixing this asap? I have Ubuntu 18.04 (no Internet connection), it is just used as a local NAS.



      The reason I did this was due to a warning when doing updates:





      WARN: uid is 0 but '/usr' is owned by 1000
      WARN: /usr is group writable!


      I asked and someone in a forum suggested the above commands with "it is perfectly safe". Lesson learned: Don't trust people on the Internet, even if they sound totally convinced.



      The reason, apparently, why /usr was group writable and not owned by root is because of my specific DIY-Nas Ubuntu (Odroid):





      drwxrwxr-x  10 odroid odroid     4096 Apr 12  2018 usr


      Perhaps I should have not used the -R recursive option. It doesn't matter now.



      The last few hours, I looked through various posts to find out what I did. It looks like running any chown on /usr breaks setuid and setgid bits, so I would need to manually compare to an existing system to restore all of those once I have fix the ownership again. For fixing sudo command, I already did this:





      chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo && chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo


      Besides this, I don't see any more problems. When I log in to Ubuntu interface, I get a permission warning from some Bluetooth Software, but it is not immidiatly relevant.
      I understand that there is some software in /usr that has a group other than root (see list here, for example), for reasons of security - but will there be any really negative effects on my nas-system, especially related to file handling/archive things, e.g. corrupted or inaccessible files?



      Note that I created a new stackexchange account because I am too embarrassed.. anyway, many thanks for suggestions!







      permissions root chmod chown






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago





















      New contributor




      Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      Helmut

      434




      434




      New contributor




      Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          I think you were lucky because you just removed the "writable" bit for groups.
          This won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits. If they were set before, they are
          still set. The command chmod -R 777 /usr on the other hand resets all bits
          to rwx while removing any other bits at the same time, including the s bits.
          This is why people who issued chmod -R 777 /usr are usually forced to do
          a re-install.



          Maybe the observations I made on my system can help you. I have run some find commands to see which
          files and directories would have been affected by the commands you issued. Here are the results:



          # Find all files and directories NOT owned by user root:
          find usr -not -user root -ls
          3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at

          # Find all files and directories NOT owned by group root:
          find usr -not -group root -ls
          3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
          3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
          3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
          3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
          3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          3416934 372 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root dip 378600 Jun 12 19:20 usr/sbin/pppd
          3410196 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 39000 Apr 3 2018 usr/sbin/ssmtp
          3408208 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root utmp 10232 Mär 11 2016 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
          3419827 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 10232 Aug 4 2017 usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
          3428536 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 14336 Jul 31 16:14 usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
          3416858 44 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root messagebus 42992 Nov 15 2017 usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
          1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
          3410118 44 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mlocate 43088 Mär 1 2018 usr/bin/mlocate
          3408029 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 14328 Jan 17 2018 usr/bin/bsd-write
          3414379 356 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root ssh 362640 Nov 5 12:51 usr/bin/ssh-agent
          3410676 32 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 30800 Jul 26 18:20 usr/bin/wall
          3409008 72 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 71816 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/chage
          3416771 24 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 22808 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/expiry
          3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
          3409356 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root crontab 39352 Nov 16 2017 usr/bin/crontab

          # find objects that have the group-writable bit set and are owned by user=root but group!=root:
          find usr -perm -0020 -user root -not -group root -ls
          3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
          3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
          3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
          3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
          3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom


          Of course, your mileage may vary have varied but I'm confident that
          you only "broke" a handful of files. The vast majority of objects below
          /usr are owned by root:root and usually have either rwxrwxr-x
          or rwxr-xr-x. Removing the g-w bit doesn't really do harm because it
          removes the writeable bit for the group root but (at least on my standard
          system) the only member of that group is the user root anyway and he has
          write access via the user permissions (which you didn't change) and doesn't
          really need write access via group membership.



          Btw, my /usr itself has the following attributes:



          drwxr-xr-x  10 root root  4096 Jan  5  2018 usr/


          Update



          The OP mentions he faced the error



          sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set


          after issuing chmod g-w and chown root:root and had to fix it with
          chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo. As it turns out, the chown g-w indeed
          does NOT change the setuid bit but the chown root:root did.
          It apparently clears those SETUID (and presumably also the SETGID and
          STICKY) bits. To me, this is unexpected behaviour but I'm pretty sure
          there's an explanation and/or reason. However. I ran another find
          command to see which of my files below /usr have one or more of
          SETUID, SETGID, and STICKY bits set:



          find usr -perm /7000 -printf '%Mt%u:%gt%pn'
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/fonts
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          -rwsr-xr-- root:dip usr/sbin/pppd
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/sbin/ssmtp
          -rwxr-sr-x root:utmp usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
          -rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/xorg/Xorg.wrap
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
          -rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
          -rwsr-xr-- root:messagebus usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/openssh/ssh-keysign
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/policykit-1/polkit-agent-helper-1
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/eject/dmcrypt-get-device
          drwxrwsr-t root:lpadmin usr/share/ppd/custom
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mlocate usr/bin/mlocate
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/bsd-write
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/traceroute6.iputils
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/gpasswd
          -rwxr-sr-x root:ssh usr/bin/ssh-agent
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/passwd
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/pkexec
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/sudo
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/wall
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chfn
          -rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/chage
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/arping
          -rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/expiry
          -rwsr-sr-x daemon:daemon usr/bin/at
          -rwxr-sr-x root:crontab usr/bin/crontab
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chsh
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/newgrp


          This list is not very long but it still contains some files I'd
          consider crucial. Especially those in the last third, like passwd,
          crontab, etc., and of course sudo.






          share|improve this answer























          • Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that is sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here
            – Helmut
            2 days ago












          • @Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and did sudo -i to get a root shell. Then I did chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo and indeed, the setuid bit has gone and sudo is broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by the chmod g-w but by the chown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago










          • @Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago






          • 1




            I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
            – Helmut
            2 days ago












          • @Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is the sudo command. If that works, everything else can be recovered.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago


















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          I think the above answer from @PerlDuck explains most crucial things. After working through each file manually, I think I removed the largest mess. If this computer would have been exposed to the internet, I would have reinstalled right away - now I have some more time.



          Anyway, I want to add a link to a complete list of Linux default permissions here:
          https://www.vidarholen.net/contents/junk/ubuntu_permissions.html This also helped me restore a number of additional file permissions.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.














          • 1




            Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for the sudo command: chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, the chown undoes the chmod 4xxx (removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e. chown first and then chmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first do grep -E 'chown.*/usr' and then grep -E 'chmod.*/usr' (or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago








          • 1




            Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doing chmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgid and chmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuid both more legible and less dangerous for typos.
            – Helmut
            yesterday













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "89"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Helmut is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1099381%2ffix-setuid-and-setgid-bits-in-usr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          I think you were lucky because you just removed the "writable" bit for groups.
          This won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits. If they were set before, they are
          still set. The command chmod -R 777 /usr on the other hand resets all bits
          to rwx while removing any other bits at the same time, including the s bits.
          This is why people who issued chmod -R 777 /usr are usually forced to do
          a re-install.



          Maybe the observations I made on my system can help you. I have run some find commands to see which
          files and directories would have been affected by the commands you issued. Here are the results:



          # Find all files and directories NOT owned by user root:
          find usr -not -user root -ls
          3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at

          # Find all files and directories NOT owned by group root:
          find usr -not -group root -ls
          3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
          3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
          3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
          3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
          3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          3416934 372 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root dip 378600 Jun 12 19:20 usr/sbin/pppd
          3410196 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 39000 Apr 3 2018 usr/sbin/ssmtp
          3408208 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root utmp 10232 Mär 11 2016 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
          3419827 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 10232 Aug 4 2017 usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
          3428536 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 14336 Jul 31 16:14 usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
          3416858 44 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root messagebus 42992 Nov 15 2017 usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
          1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
          3410118 44 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mlocate 43088 Mär 1 2018 usr/bin/mlocate
          3408029 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 14328 Jan 17 2018 usr/bin/bsd-write
          3414379 356 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root ssh 362640 Nov 5 12:51 usr/bin/ssh-agent
          3410676 32 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 30800 Jul 26 18:20 usr/bin/wall
          3409008 72 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 71816 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/chage
          3416771 24 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 22808 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/expiry
          3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
          3409356 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root crontab 39352 Nov 16 2017 usr/bin/crontab

          # find objects that have the group-writable bit set and are owned by user=root but group!=root:
          find usr -perm -0020 -user root -not -group root -ls
          3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
          3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
          3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
          3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
          3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom


          Of course, your mileage may vary have varied but I'm confident that
          you only "broke" a handful of files. The vast majority of objects below
          /usr are owned by root:root and usually have either rwxrwxr-x
          or rwxr-xr-x. Removing the g-w bit doesn't really do harm because it
          removes the writeable bit for the group root but (at least on my standard
          system) the only member of that group is the user root anyway and he has
          write access via the user permissions (which you didn't change) and doesn't
          really need write access via group membership.



          Btw, my /usr itself has the following attributes:



          drwxr-xr-x  10 root root  4096 Jan  5  2018 usr/


          Update



          The OP mentions he faced the error



          sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set


          after issuing chmod g-w and chown root:root and had to fix it with
          chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo. As it turns out, the chown g-w indeed
          does NOT change the setuid bit but the chown root:root did.
          It apparently clears those SETUID (and presumably also the SETGID and
          STICKY) bits. To me, this is unexpected behaviour but I'm pretty sure
          there's an explanation and/or reason. However. I ran another find
          command to see which of my files below /usr have one or more of
          SETUID, SETGID, and STICKY bits set:



          find usr -perm /7000 -printf '%Mt%u:%gt%pn'
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/fonts
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          -rwsr-xr-- root:dip usr/sbin/pppd
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/sbin/ssmtp
          -rwxr-sr-x root:utmp usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
          -rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/xorg/Xorg.wrap
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
          -rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
          -rwsr-xr-- root:messagebus usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/openssh/ssh-keysign
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/policykit-1/polkit-agent-helper-1
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/eject/dmcrypt-get-device
          drwxrwsr-t root:lpadmin usr/share/ppd/custom
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mlocate usr/bin/mlocate
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/bsd-write
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/traceroute6.iputils
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/gpasswd
          -rwxr-sr-x root:ssh usr/bin/ssh-agent
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/passwd
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/pkexec
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/sudo
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/wall
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chfn
          -rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/chage
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/arping
          -rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/expiry
          -rwsr-sr-x daemon:daemon usr/bin/at
          -rwxr-sr-x root:crontab usr/bin/crontab
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chsh
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/newgrp


          This list is not very long but it still contains some files I'd
          consider crucial. Especially those in the last third, like passwd,
          crontab, etc., and of course sudo.






          share|improve this answer























          • Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that is sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here
            – Helmut
            2 days ago












          • @Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and did sudo -i to get a root shell. Then I did chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo and indeed, the setuid bit has gone and sudo is broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by the chmod g-w but by the chown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago










          • @Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago






          • 1




            I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
            – Helmut
            2 days ago












          • @Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is the sudo command. If that works, everything else can be recovered.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          I think you were lucky because you just removed the "writable" bit for groups.
          This won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits. If they were set before, they are
          still set. The command chmod -R 777 /usr on the other hand resets all bits
          to rwx while removing any other bits at the same time, including the s bits.
          This is why people who issued chmod -R 777 /usr are usually forced to do
          a re-install.



          Maybe the observations I made on my system can help you. I have run some find commands to see which
          files and directories would have been affected by the commands you issued. Here are the results:



          # Find all files and directories NOT owned by user root:
          find usr -not -user root -ls
          3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at

          # Find all files and directories NOT owned by group root:
          find usr -not -group root -ls
          3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
          3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
          3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
          3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
          3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          3416934 372 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root dip 378600 Jun 12 19:20 usr/sbin/pppd
          3410196 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 39000 Apr 3 2018 usr/sbin/ssmtp
          3408208 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root utmp 10232 Mär 11 2016 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
          3419827 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 10232 Aug 4 2017 usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
          3428536 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 14336 Jul 31 16:14 usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
          3416858 44 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root messagebus 42992 Nov 15 2017 usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
          1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
          3410118 44 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mlocate 43088 Mär 1 2018 usr/bin/mlocate
          3408029 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 14328 Jan 17 2018 usr/bin/bsd-write
          3414379 356 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root ssh 362640 Nov 5 12:51 usr/bin/ssh-agent
          3410676 32 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 30800 Jul 26 18:20 usr/bin/wall
          3409008 72 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 71816 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/chage
          3416771 24 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 22808 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/expiry
          3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
          3409356 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root crontab 39352 Nov 16 2017 usr/bin/crontab

          # find objects that have the group-writable bit set and are owned by user=root but group!=root:
          find usr -perm -0020 -user root -not -group root -ls
          3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
          3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
          3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
          3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
          3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom


          Of course, your mileage may vary have varied but I'm confident that
          you only "broke" a handful of files. The vast majority of objects below
          /usr are owned by root:root and usually have either rwxrwxr-x
          or rwxr-xr-x. Removing the g-w bit doesn't really do harm because it
          removes the writeable bit for the group root but (at least on my standard
          system) the only member of that group is the user root anyway and he has
          write access via the user permissions (which you didn't change) and doesn't
          really need write access via group membership.



          Btw, my /usr itself has the following attributes:



          drwxr-xr-x  10 root root  4096 Jan  5  2018 usr/


          Update



          The OP mentions he faced the error



          sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set


          after issuing chmod g-w and chown root:root and had to fix it with
          chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo. As it turns out, the chown g-w indeed
          does NOT change the setuid bit but the chown root:root did.
          It apparently clears those SETUID (and presumably also the SETGID and
          STICKY) bits. To me, this is unexpected behaviour but I'm pretty sure
          there's an explanation and/or reason. However. I ran another find
          command to see which of my files below /usr have one or more of
          SETUID, SETGID, and STICKY bits set:



          find usr -perm /7000 -printf '%Mt%u:%gt%pn'
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/fonts
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          -rwsr-xr-- root:dip usr/sbin/pppd
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/sbin/ssmtp
          -rwxr-sr-x root:utmp usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
          -rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/xorg/Xorg.wrap
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
          -rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
          -rwsr-xr-- root:messagebus usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/openssh/ssh-keysign
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/policykit-1/polkit-agent-helper-1
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/eject/dmcrypt-get-device
          drwxrwsr-t root:lpadmin usr/share/ppd/custom
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mlocate usr/bin/mlocate
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/bsd-write
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/traceroute6.iputils
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/gpasswd
          -rwxr-sr-x root:ssh usr/bin/ssh-agent
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/passwd
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/pkexec
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/sudo
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/wall
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chfn
          -rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/chage
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/arping
          -rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/expiry
          -rwsr-sr-x daemon:daemon usr/bin/at
          -rwxr-sr-x root:crontab usr/bin/crontab
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chsh
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/newgrp


          This list is not very long but it still contains some files I'd
          consider crucial. Especially those in the last third, like passwd,
          crontab, etc., and of course sudo.






          share|improve this answer























          • Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that is sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here
            – Helmut
            2 days ago












          • @Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and did sudo -i to get a root shell. Then I did chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo and indeed, the setuid bit has gone and sudo is broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by the chmod g-w but by the chown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago










          • @Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago






          • 1




            I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
            – Helmut
            2 days ago












          • @Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is the sudo command. If that works, everything else can be recovered.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago













          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted






          I think you were lucky because you just removed the "writable" bit for groups.
          This won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits. If they were set before, they are
          still set. The command chmod -R 777 /usr on the other hand resets all bits
          to rwx while removing any other bits at the same time, including the s bits.
          This is why people who issued chmod -R 777 /usr are usually forced to do
          a re-install.



          Maybe the observations I made on my system can help you. I have run some find commands to see which
          files and directories would have been affected by the commands you issued. Here are the results:



          # Find all files and directories NOT owned by user root:
          find usr -not -user root -ls
          3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at

          # Find all files and directories NOT owned by group root:
          find usr -not -group root -ls
          3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
          3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
          3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
          3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
          3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          3416934 372 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root dip 378600 Jun 12 19:20 usr/sbin/pppd
          3410196 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 39000 Apr 3 2018 usr/sbin/ssmtp
          3408208 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root utmp 10232 Mär 11 2016 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
          3419827 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 10232 Aug 4 2017 usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
          3428536 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 14336 Jul 31 16:14 usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
          3416858 44 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root messagebus 42992 Nov 15 2017 usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
          1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
          3410118 44 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mlocate 43088 Mär 1 2018 usr/bin/mlocate
          3408029 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 14328 Jan 17 2018 usr/bin/bsd-write
          3414379 356 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root ssh 362640 Nov 5 12:51 usr/bin/ssh-agent
          3410676 32 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 30800 Jul 26 18:20 usr/bin/wall
          3409008 72 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 71816 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/chage
          3416771 24 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 22808 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/expiry
          3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
          3409356 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root crontab 39352 Nov 16 2017 usr/bin/crontab

          # find objects that have the group-writable bit set and are owned by user=root but group!=root:
          find usr -perm -0020 -user root -not -group root -ls
          3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
          3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
          3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
          3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
          3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom


          Of course, your mileage may vary have varied but I'm confident that
          you only "broke" a handful of files. The vast majority of objects below
          /usr are owned by root:root and usually have either rwxrwxr-x
          or rwxr-xr-x. Removing the g-w bit doesn't really do harm because it
          removes the writeable bit for the group root but (at least on my standard
          system) the only member of that group is the user root anyway and he has
          write access via the user permissions (which you didn't change) and doesn't
          really need write access via group membership.



          Btw, my /usr itself has the following attributes:



          drwxr-xr-x  10 root root  4096 Jan  5  2018 usr/


          Update



          The OP mentions he faced the error



          sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set


          after issuing chmod g-w and chown root:root and had to fix it with
          chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo. As it turns out, the chown g-w indeed
          does NOT change the setuid bit but the chown root:root did.
          It apparently clears those SETUID (and presumably also the SETGID and
          STICKY) bits. To me, this is unexpected behaviour but I'm pretty sure
          there's an explanation and/or reason. However. I ran another find
          command to see which of my files below /usr have one or more of
          SETUID, SETGID, and STICKY bits set:



          find usr -perm /7000 -printf '%Mt%u:%gt%pn'
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/fonts
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          -rwsr-xr-- root:dip usr/sbin/pppd
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/sbin/ssmtp
          -rwxr-sr-x root:utmp usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
          -rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/xorg/Xorg.wrap
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
          -rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
          -rwsr-xr-- root:messagebus usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/openssh/ssh-keysign
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/policykit-1/polkit-agent-helper-1
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/eject/dmcrypt-get-device
          drwxrwsr-t root:lpadmin usr/share/ppd/custom
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mlocate usr/bin/mlocate
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/bsd-write
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/traceroute6.iputils
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/gpasswd
          -rwxr-sr-x root:ssh usr/bin/ssh-agent
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/passwd
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/pkexec
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/sudo
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/wall
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chfn
          -rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/chage
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/arping
          -rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/expiry
          -rwsr-sr-x daemon:daemon usr/bin/at
          -rwxr-sr-x root:crontab usr/bin/crontab
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chsh
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/newgrp


          This list is not very long but it still contains some files I'd
          consider crucial. Especially those in the last third, like passwd,
          crontab, etc., and of course sudo.






          share|improve this answer














          I think you were lucky because you just removed the "writable" bit for groups.
          This won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits. If they were set before, they are
          still set. The command chmod -R 777 /usr on the other hand resets all bits
          to rwx while removing any other bits at the same time, including the s bits.
          This is why people who issued chmod -R 777 /usr are usually forced to do
          a re-install.



          Maybe the observations I made on my system can help you. I have run some find commands to see which
          files and directories would have been affected by the commands you issued. Here are the results:



          # Find all files and directories NOT owned by user root:
          find usr -not -user root -ls
          3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at

          # Find all files and directories NOT owned by group root:
          find usr -not -group root -ls
          3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
          3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
          3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
          3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
          3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          3416934 372 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root dip 378600 Jun 12 19:20 usr/sbin/pppd
          3410196 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 39000 Apr 3 2018 usr/sbin/ssmtp
          3408208 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root utmp 10232 Mär 11 2016 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
          3419827 12 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 10232 Aug 4 2017 usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
          3428536 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 14336 Jul 31 16:14 usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
          3416858 44 -rwsr-xr-- 1 root messagebus 42992 Nov 15 2017 usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
          1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom
          3410118 44 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mlocate 43088 Mär 1 2018 usr/bin/mlocate
          3408029 16 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 14328 Jan 17 2018 usr/bin/bsd-write
          3414379 356 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root ssh 362640 Nov 5 12:51 usr/bin/ssh-agent
          3410676 32 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 30800 Jul 26 18:20 usr/bin/wall
          3409008 72 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 71816 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/chage
          3416771 24 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root shadow 22808 Jan 25 2018 usr/bin/expiry
          3407926 52 -rwsr-sr-x 1 daemon daemon 51464 Feb 20 2018 usr/bin/at
          3409356 40 -rwxr-sr-x 1 root crontab 39352 Nov 16 2017 usr/bin/crontab

          # find objects that have the group-writable bit set and are owned by user=root but group!=root:
          find usr -perm -0020 -user root -not -group root -ls
          3418319 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6
          3418322 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          3419229 4 drwxrwsr-x 4 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7
          3419230 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 26 2018 usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          1049153 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Nov 13 20:03 usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          3544477 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/fonts
          3418324 4 drwxrwsr-x 3 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs
          3544479 4 drwxrwsr-x 2 root staff 4096 Jan 5 2018 usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          1183416 4 drwxrwsr-t 2 root lpadmin 4096 Nov 8 2017 usr/share/ppd/custom


          Of course, your mileage may vary have varied but I'm confident that
          you only "broke" a handful of files. The vast majority of objects below
          /usr are owned by root:root and usually have either rwxrwxr-x
          or rwxr-xr-x. Removing the g-w bit doesn't really do harm because it
          removes the writeable bit for the group root but (at least on my standard
          system) the only member of that group is the user root anyway and he has
          write access via the user permissions (which you didn't change) and doesn't
          really need write access via group membership.



          Btw, my /usr itself has the following attributes:



          drwxr-xr-x  10 root root  4096 Jan  5  2018 usr/


          Update



          The OP mentions he faced the error



          sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set


          after issuing chmod g-w and chown root:root and had to fix it with
          chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo. As it turns out, the chown g-w indeed
          does NOT change the setuid bit but the chown root:root did.
          It apparently clears those SETUID (and presumably also the SETGID and
          STICKY) bits. To me, this is unexpected behaviour but I'm pretty sure
          there's an explanation and/or reason. However. I ran another find
          command to see which of my files below /usr have one or more of
          SETUID, SETGID, and STICKY bits set:



          find usr -perm /7000 -printf '%Mt%u:%gt%pn'
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/fonts
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs
          drwxrwsr-x root:staff usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp
          -rwsr-xr-- root:dip usr/sbin/pppd
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/sbin/ssmtp
          -rwxr-sr-x root:utmp usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/utempter/utempter
          -rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/xorg/Xorg.wrap
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/lib/mc/cons.saver
          -rwsr-sr-x root:root usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mail usr/lib/evolution/camel-lock-helper-1.2
          -rwsr-xr-- root:messagebus usr/lib/dbus-1.0/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/openssh/ssh-keysign
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/policykit-1/polkit-agent-helper-1
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/lib/eject/dmcrypt-get-device
          drwxrwsr-t root:lpadmin usr/share/ppd/custom
          -rwxr-sr-x root:mlocate usr/bin/mlocate
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/bsd-write
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/traceroute6.iputils
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/gpasswd
          -rwxr-sr-x root:ssh usr/bin/ssh-agent
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/passwd
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/pkexec
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/sudo
          -rwxr-sr-x root:tty usr/bin/wall
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chfn
          -rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/chage
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/arping
          -rwxr-sr-x root:shadow usr/bin/expiry
          -rwsr-sr-x daemon:daemon usr/bin/at
          -rwxr-sr-x root:crontab usr/bin/crontab
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/chsh
          -rwsr-xr-x root:root usr/bin/newgrp


          This list is not very long but it still contains some files I'd
          consider crucial. Especially those in the last third, like passwd,
          crontab, etc., and of course sudo.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago

























          answered 2 days ago









          PerlDuck

          5,06911230




          5,06911230












          • Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that is sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here
            – Helmut
            2 days ago












          • @Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and did sudo -i to get a root shell. Then I did chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo and indeed, the setuid bit has gone and sudo is broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by the chmod g-w but by the chown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago










          • @Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago






          • 1




            I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
            – Helmut
            2 days ago












          • @Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is the sudo command. If that works, everything else can be recovered.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago


















          • Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that is sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here
            – Helmut
            2 days ago












          • @Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and did sudo -i to get a root shell. Then I did chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo and indeed, the setuid bit has gone and sudo is broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by the chmod g-w but by the chown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago










          • @Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago






          • 1




            I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
            – Helmut
            2 days ago












          • @Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is the sudo command. If that works, everything else can be recovered.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago
















          Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that is sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here
          – Helmut
          2 days ago






          Many thanks for the effort to list those files! I will investigate a bit more, change those groups-settings and oberserve if anything still appears strange. Thank you also for your explanation, which is even more helpful. However, what I don't understand: if the removing the writable bits for groups doesn't affect won't affect the SETGID or SETUID bits, why did I have problems with my sudo command, that is sudo: /usr/bin/sudo must be owned by uid 0 and have the setuid bit set? See here
          – Helmut
          2 days ago














          @Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and did sudo -i to get a root shell. Then I did chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo and indeed, the setuid bit has gone and sudo is broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by the chmod g-w but by the chown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.
          – PerlDuck
          2 days ago




          @Helmut Oh. I just tried, you are right. I stand corrected. I opened a terminal and did sudo -i to get a root shell. Then I did chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo and indeed, the setuid bit has gone and sudo is broken :-( The setuid bit isn't removed by the chmod g-w but by the chown. I'm afraid my whole answer has proved wrong now.
          – PerlDuck
          2 days ago












          @Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
          – PerlDuck
          2 days ago




          @Helmut I updated my post and added "my" SETUID/SETGID files. I'm not satisfied with my answer, though. Maybe I'll remove it because it is not a real answer but rather a list of files that would have been affected on my personal installation and yours is likely to be different.
          – PerlDuck
          2 days ago




          1




          1




          I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
          – Helmut
          2 days ago






          I think it really helps, please leave it. Changing those owners back won't solve all my problems, but I might survive until I can reinstall the system in a couple of weeks! - I removed the "correct answer" selection, nonetheless this is perhaps the only answer that can be given under my circumstances.
          – Helmut
          2 days ago














          @Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is the sudo command. If that works, everything else can be recovered.
          – PerlDuck
          2 days ago




          @Helmut Ok. :-) Good to hear it helped you at least a bit. I think the most important thing is the sudo command. If that works, everything else can be recovered.
          – PerlDuck
          2 days ago












          up vote
          2
          down vote













          I think the above answer from @PerlDuck explains most crucial things. After working through each file manually, I think I removed the largest mess. If this computer would have been exposed to the internet, I would have reinstalled right away - now I have some more time.



          Anyway, I want to add a link to a complete list of Linux default permissions here:
          https://www.vidarholen.net/contents/junk/ubuntu_permissions.html This also helped me restore a number of additional file permissions.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.














          • 1




            Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for the sudo command: chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, the chown undoes the chmod 4xxx (removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e. chown first and then chmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first do grep -E 'chown.*/usr' and then grep -E 'chmod.*/usr' (or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago








          • 1




            Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doing chmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgid and chmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuid both more legible and less dangerous for typos.
            – Helmut
            yesterday

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          I think the above answer from @PerlDuck explains most crucial things. After working through each file manually, I think I removed the largest mess. If this computer would have been exposed to the internet, I would have reinstalled right away - now I have some more time.



          Anyway, I want to add a link to a complete list of Linux default permissions here:
          https://www.vidarholen.net/contents/junk/ubuntu_permissions.html This also helped me restore a number of additional file permissions.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.














          • 1




            Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for the sudo command: chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, the chown undoes the chmod 4xxx (removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e. chown first and then chmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first do grep -E 'chown.*/usr' and then grep -E 'chmod.*/usr' (or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago








          • 1




            Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doing chmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgid and chmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuid both more legible and less dangerous for typos.
            – Helmut
            yesterday















          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          I think the above answer from @PerlDuck explains most crucial things. After working through each file manually, I think I removed the largest mess. If this computer would have been exposed to the internet, I would have reinstalled right away - now I have some more time.



          Anyway, I want to add a link to a complete list of Linux default permissions here:
          https://www.vidarholen.net/contents/junk/ubuntu_permissions.html This also helped me restore a number of additional file permissions.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          I think the above answer from @PerlDuck explains most crucial things. After working through each file manually, I think I removed the largest mess. If this computer would have been exposed to the internet, I would have reinstalled right away - now I have some more time.



          Anyway, I want to add a link to a complete list of Linux default permissions here:
          https://www.vidarholen.net/contents/junk/ubuntu_permissions.html This also helped me restore a number of additional file permissions.







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 2 days ago









          Helmut

          434




          434




          New contributor




          Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Helmut is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          • 1




            Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for the sudo command: chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, the chown undoes the chmod 4xxx (removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e. chown first and then chmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first do grep -E 'chown.*/usr' and then grep -E 'chmod.*/usr' (or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago








          • 1




            Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doing chmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgid and chmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuid both more legible and less dangerous for typos.
            – Helmut
            yesterday
















          • 1




            Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for the sudo command: chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, the chown undoes the chmod 4xxx (removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e. chown first and then chmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first do grep -E 'chown.*/usr' and then grep -E 'chmod.*/usr' (or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.
            – PerlDuck
            2 days ago








          • 1




            Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doing chmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgid and chmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuid both more legible and less dangerous for typos.
            – Helmut
            yesterday










          1




          1




          Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for the sudo command: chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, the chown undoes the chmod 4xxx (removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e. chown first and then chmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first do grep -E 'chown.*/usr' and then grep -E 'chmod.*/usr' (or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.
          – PerlDuck
          2 days ago






          Great finding. But the link you show tells e.g. for the sudo command: chmod 4755 /usr/bin/sudo; chown root:root /usr/bin/sudo. As we both just learned, the chown undoes the chmod 4xxx (removes the special bits). It's better to swap the two commands, i.e. chown first and then chmod. Nonetheless, that list is good. I'd first do grep -E 'chown.*/usr' and then grep -E 'chmod.*/usr' (or similar, untested) in your case and run the results in that order.
          – PerlDuck
          2 days ago






          1




          1




          Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doing chmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgid and chmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuid both more legible and less dangerous for typos.
          – Helmut
          yesterday






          Yes, totally true! I didn't actually follow this order, just looked up information for some links. Thanks for mentioning this. Also: I find doing chmod g+s /file/thatneeds/setgid and chmod u+s /file/thatneeds/setuid both more legible and less dangerous for typos.
          – Helmut
          yesterday












          Helmut is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Helmut is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Helmut is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Helmut is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1099381%2ffix-setuid-and-setgid-bits-in-usr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Brian Clough

          Cáceres