Proving an universal function for which there is computable total composition is principal












0












$begingroup$


Let $U(n, x)$ be an universal function for the class of computable functions. Let $c(p, q)$ be a total computable function such that $forall p, q, x : U(c(p, q), x) = U(p, U(q, x))$ — that is, given $U$-indices of any two functions, $c$ produces an $U$-index of their composition. It's easy to show that if $U$ is principal, then $c$ exists. But how can we prove the other direction: if $c$ exists, then $U$ defines a principal numbering of computable functions? That is, we need to prove that for every other computable $V(n, x)$ (not necessarily universal) there exists a total computable $s$ such that $forall n, x: V(n, x) = U(s(n), x)$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let $U(n, x)$ be an universal function for the class of computable functions. Let $c(p, q)$ be a total computable function such that $forall p, q, x : U(c(p, q), x) = U(p, U(q, x))$ — that is, given $U$-indices of any two functions, $c$ produces an $U$-index of their composition. It's easy to show that if $U$ is principal, then $c$ exists. But how can we prove the other direction: if $c$ exists, then $U$ defines a principal numbering of computable functions? That is, we need to prove that for every other computable $V(n, x)$ (not necessarily universal) there exists a total computable $s$ such that $forall n, x: V(n, x) = U(s(n), x)$.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let $U(n, x)$ be an universal function for the class of computable functions. Let $c(p, q)$ be a total computable function such that $forall p, q, x : U(c(p, q), x) = U(p, U(q, x))$ — that is, given $U$-indices of any two functions, $c$ produces an $U$-index of their composition. It's easy to show that if $U$ is principal, then $c$ exists. But how can we prove the other direction: if $c$ exists, then $U$ defines a principal numbering of computable functions? That is, we need to prove that for every other computable $V(n, x)$ (not necessarily universal) there exists a total computable $s$ such that $forall n, x: V(n, x) = U(s(n), x)$.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $U(n, x)$ be an universal function for the class of computable functions. Let $c(p, q)$ be a total computable function such that $forall p, q, x : U(c(p, q), x) = U(p, U(q, x))$ — that is, given $U$-indices of any two functions, $c$ produces an $U$-index of their composition. It's easy to show that if $U$ is principal, then $c$ exists. But how can we prove the other direction: if $c$ exists, then $U$ defines a principal numbering of computable functions? That is, we need to prove that for every other computable $V(n, x)$ (not necessarily universal) there exists a total computable $s$ such that $forall n, x: V(n, x) = U(s(n), x)$.







      logic computability






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 1 '18 at 17:50







      0xd34df00d

















      asked Dec 1 '18 at 17:26









      0xd34df00d0xd34df00d

      412212




      412212






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021595%2fproving-an-universal-function-for-which-there-is-computable-total-composition-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021595%2fproving-an-universal-function-for-which-there-is-computable-total-composition-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

          How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...