Wave particle duality and gravity












5












$begingroup$


Is a particle's center of gravity at the center of its wave function or is it where we would measure the particle to be? When we measure a particle does its center of gravity shift to where the particle is measured?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$


    Is a particle's center of gravity at the center of its wave function or is it where we would measure the particle to be? When we measure a particle does its center of gravity shift to where the particle is measured?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5


      2



      $begingroup$


      Is a particle's center of gravity at the center of its wave function or is it where we would measure the particle to be? When we measure a particle does its center of gravity shift to where the particle is measured?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Is a particle's center of gravity at the center of its wave function or is it where we would measure the particle to be? When we measure a particle does its center of gravity shift to where the particle is measured?







      quantum-mechanics newtonian-gravity wavefunction wave-particle-duality wavefunction-collapse






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 25 '18 at 10:06









      Qmechanic

      103k121851175




      103k121851175










      asked Dec 25 '18 at 7:03









      Ben ArnaoBen Arnao

      261




      261






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          The wave function only predicts the probability distribution of finding a particle or a system of particles at an (x,y,z). The center of a wavefunction $Ψ$ is not a well defined concept, as it is different for different boundary conditions. It obeys the symmetries imposed by the interactions that define the $Ψ$ .



          In any case at present the standard model of particle physics has elementary particles defined as point particles,i.e. no dimensions, and the center of mass/gravity of course is at that point, and is the point whose measurement will verify the probability distribution, $Ψ*Ψ$, when enough events/measurements with the same boundary conditions are accumulated.



          Such elementary paticles are described by plane wave wavefunctions which are spread all over the place. A free electron has to be represented by a wavepacket wave function ,



          wavepacket



          but as the center of gravity/mass is where the electron is, the wave function squared will give the probability of finding it away from the maximum probability, which is the center for this wavepacket.



          Complex systems, as the proton and the neutron, will have an extension in space, and the instantaneous center of mass would be part of the model calculating the quantity of interest to measure. The models for hadrons are complicated .



          In general, in quantum mechanical problems, it is the symmetries of the interaction that are embedded in the wavefunction, the wave function itself may be all over a large space, depending on the problem under study, and its center has no usable meaning with respect to the center of mass of the particle-system modeled.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Surely though one could extend the concept of center of mass to a superposition of states instead of position vector. It would be probabilistic, but I don’t immediate see an issue with just replacing the position vectors with the states in Hilbert space and then projecting onto position space.
            $endgroup$
            – InertialObserver
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:06












          • $begingroup$
            @InertialObserver supeposition of states would be probability distribution also., see the wave packet above.
            $endgroup$
            – anna v
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:22










          • $begingroup$
            I see, for some reason I didn’t see the figure at the first pass for some reason.
            $endgroup$
            – InertialObserver
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:24






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @InertialObserver I put it in after your comment !!
            $endgroup$
            – anna v
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:50











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "151"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450263%2fwave-particle-duality-and-gravity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5












          $begingroup$

          The wave function only predicts the probability distribution of finding a particle or a system of particles at an (x,y,z). The center of a wavefunction $Ψ$ is not a well defined concept, as it is different for different boundary conditions. It obeys the symmetries imposed by the interactions that define the $Ψ$ .



          In any case at present the standard model of particle physics has elementary particles defined as point particles,i.e. no dimensions, and the center of mass/gravity of course is at that point, and is the point whose measurement will verify the probability distribution, $Ψ*Ψ$, when enough events/measurements with the same boundary conditions are accumulated.



          Such elementary paticles are described by plane wave wavefunctions which are spread all over the place. A free electron has to be represented by a wavepacket wave function ,



          wavepacket



          but as the center of gravity/mass is where the electron is, the wave function squared will give the probability of finding it away from the maximum probability, which is the center for this wavepacket.



          Complex systems, as the proton and the neutron, will have an extension in space, and the instantaneous center of mass would be part of the model calculating the quantity of interest to measure. The models for hadrons are complicated .



          In general, in quantum mechanical problems, it is the symmetries of the interaction that are embedded in the wavefunction, the wave function itself may be all over a large space, depending on the problem under study, and its center has no usable meaning with respect to the center of mass of the particle-system modeled.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Surely though one could extend the concept of center of mass to a superposition of states instead of position vector. It would be probabilistic, but I don’t immediate see an issue with just replacing the position vectors with the states in Hilbert space and then projecting onto position space.
            $endgroup$
            – InertialObserver
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:06












          • $begingroup$
            @InertialObserver supeposition of states would be probability distribution also., see the wave packet above.
            $endgroup$
            – anna v
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:22










          • $begingroup$
            I see, for some reason I didn’t see the figure at the first pass for some reason.
            $endgroup$
            – InertialObserver
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:24






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @InertialObserver I put it in after your comment !!
            $endgroup$
            – anna v
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:50
















          5












          $begingroup$

          The wave function only predicts the probability distribution of finding a particle or a system of particles at an (x,y,z). The center of a wavefunction $Ψ$ is not a well defined concept, as it is different for different boundary conditions. It obeys the symmetries imposed by the interactions that define the $Ψ$ .



          In any case at present the standard model of particle physics has elementary particles defined as point particles,i.e. no dimensions, and the center of mass/gravity of course is at that point, and is the point whose measurement will verify the probability distribution, $Ψ*Ψ$, when enough events/measurements with the same boundary conditions are accumulated.



          Such elementary paticles are described by plane wave wavefunctions which are spread all over the place. A free electron has to be represented by a wavepacket wave function ,



          wavepacket



          but as the center of gravity/mass is where the electron is, the wave function squared will give the probability of finding it away from the maximum probability, which is the center for this wavepacket.



          Complex systems, as the proton and the neutron, will have an extension in space, and the instantaneous center of mass would be part of the model calculating the quantity of interest to measure. The models for hadrons are complicated .



          In general, in quantum mechanical problems, it is the symmetries of the interaction that are embedded in the wavefunction, the wave function itself may be all over a large space, depending on the problem under study, and its center has no usable meaning with respect to the center of mass of the particle-system modeled.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Surely though one could extend the concept of center of mass to a superposition of states instead of position vector. It would be probabilistic, but I don’t immediate see an issue with just replacing the position vectors with the states in Hilbert space and then projecting onto position space.
            $endgroup$
            – InertialObserver
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:06












          • $begingroup$
            @InertialObserver supeposition of states would be probability distribution also., see the wave packet above.
            $endgroup$
            – anna v
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:22










          • $begingroup$
            I see, for some reason I didn’t see the figure at the first pass for some reason.
            $endgroup$
            – InertialObserver
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:24






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @InertialObserver I put it in after your comment !!
            $endgroup$
            – anna v
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:50














          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          The wave function only predicts the probability distribution of finding a particle or a system of particles at an (x,y,z). The center of a wavefunction $Ψ$ is not a well defined concept, as it is different for different boundary conditions. It obeys the symmetries imposed by the interactions that define the $Ψ$ .



          In any case at present the standard model of particle physics has elementary particles defined as point particles,i.e. no dimensions, and the center of mass/gravity of course is at that point, and is the point whose measurement will verify the probability distribution, $Ψ*Ψ$, when enough events/measurements with the same boundary conditions are accumulated.



          Such elementary paticles are described by plane wave wavefunctions which are spread all over the place. A free electron has to be represented by a wavepacket wave function ,



          wavepacket



          but as the center of gravity/mass is where the electron is, the wave function squared will give the probability of finding it away from the maximum probability, which is the center for this wavepacket.



          Complex systems, as the proton and the neutron, will have an extension in space, and the instantaneous center of mass would be part of the model calculating the quantity of interest to measure. The models for hadrons are complicated .



          In general, in quantum mechanical problems, it is the symmetries of the interaction that are embedded in the wavefunction, the wave function itself may be all over a large space, depending on the problem under study, and its center has no usable meaning with respect to the center of mass of the particle-system modeled.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The wave function only predicts the probability distribution of finding a particle or a system of particles at an (x,y,z). The center of a wavefunction $Ψ$ is not a well defined concept, as it is different for different boundary conditions. It obeys the symmetries imposed by the interactions that define the $Ψ$ .



          In any case at present the standard model of particle physics has elementary particles defined as point particles,i.e. no dimensions, and the center of mass/gravity of course is at that point, and is the point whose measurement will verify the probability distribution, $Ψ*Ψ$, when enough events/measurements with the same boundary conditions are accumulated.



          Such elementary paticles are described by plane wave wavefunctions which are spread all over the place. A free electron has to be represented by a wavepacket wave function ,



          wavepacket



          but as the center of gravity/mass is where the electron is, the wave function squared will give the probability of finding it away from the maximum probability, which is the center for this wavepacket.



          Complex systems, as the proton and the neutron, will have an extension in space, and the instantaneous center of mass would be part of the model calculating the quantity of interest to measure. The models for hadrons are complicated .



          In general, in quantum mechanical problems, it is the symmetries of the interaction that are embedded in the wavefunction, the wave function itself may be all over a large space, depending on the problem under study, and its center has no usable meaning with respect to the center of mass of the particle-system modeled.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 25 '18 at 9:18

























          answered Dec 25 '18 at 8:53









          anna vanna v

          157k8149446




          157k8149446












          • $begingroup$
            Surely though one could extend the concept of center of mass to a superposition of states instead of position vector. It would be probabilistic, but I don’t immediate see an issue with just replacing the position vectors with the states in Hilbert space and then projecting onto position space.
            $endgroup$
            – InertialObserver
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:06












          • $begingroup$
            @InertialObserver supeposition of states would be probability distribution also., see the wave packet above.
            $endgroup$
            – anna v
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:22










          • $begingroup$
            I see, for some reason I didn’t see the figure at the first pass for some reason.
            $endgroup$
            – InertialObserver
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:24






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @InertialObserver I put it in after your comment !!
            $endgroup$
            – anna v
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:50


















          • $begingroup$
            Surely though one could extend the concept of center of mass to a superposition of states instead of position vector. It would be probabilistic, but I don’t immediate see an issue with just replacing the position vectors with the states in Hilbert space and then projecting onto position space.
            $endgroup$
            – InertialObserver
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:06












          • $begingroup$
            @InertialObserver supeposition of states would be probability distribution also., see the wave packet above.
            $endgroup$
            – anna v
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:22










          • $begingroup$
            I see, for some reason I didn’t see the figure at the first pass for some reason.
            $endgroup$
            – InertialObserver
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:24






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @InertialObserver I put it in after your comment !!
            $endgroup$
            – anna v
            Dec 25 '18 at 9:50
















          $begingroup$
          Surely though one could extend the concept of center of mass to a superposition of states instead of position vector. It would be probabilistic, but I don’t immediate see an issue with just replacing the position vectors with the states in Hilbert space and then projecting onto position space.
          $endgroup$
          – InertialObserver
          Dec 25 '18 at 9:06






          $begingroup$
          Surely though one could extend the concept of center of mass to a superposition of states instead of position vector. It would be probabilistic, but I don’t immediate see an issue with just replacing the position vectors with the states in Hilbert space and then projecting onto position space.
          $endgroup$
          – InertialObserver
          Dec 25 '18 at 9:06














          $begingroup$
          @InertialObserver supeposition of states would be probability distribution also., see the wave packet above.
          $endgroup$
          – anna v
          Dec 25 '18 at 9:22




          $begingroup$
          @InertialObserver supeposition of states would be probability distribution also., see the wave packet above.
          $endgroup$
          – anna v
          Dec 25 '18 at 9:22












          $begingroup$
          I see, for some reason I didn’t see the figure at the first pass for some reason.
          $endgroup$
          – InertialObserver
          Dec 25 '18 at 9:24




          $begingroup$
          I see, for some reason I didn’t see the figure at the first pass for some reason.
          $endgroup$
          – InertialObserver
          Dec 25 '18 at 9:24




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @InertialObserver I put it in after your comment !!
          $endgroup$
          – anna v
          Dec 25 '18 at 9:50




          $begingroup$
          @InertialObserver I put it in after your comment !!
          $endgroup$
          – anna v
          Dec 25 '18 at 9:50


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f450263%2fwave-particle-duality-and-gravity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Puebla de Zaragoza

          Musa