Why should the roll program position the shuttle's nose to the east?
$begingroup$
The roll program occurred during a shuttle launch for the following reasons:
(...)
Orienting the shuttle more parallel toward the ground with the nose to the east.
But why east?
launch launch-sequence
edited Dec 4 '18 at 17:45
jpaugh
1055
asked Dec 4 '18 at 12:29
Marian PaździochMarian Paździoch
1512
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The roll program occurred during a shuttle launch for the following reasons:
(...)
Orienting the shuttle more parallel toward the ground with the nose to the east.
But why east?
launch launch-sequence
edited Dec 4 '18 at 17:45
jpaugh
1055
asked Dec 4 '18 at 12:29
Marian PaździochMarian Paździoch
1512
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How does the roll maneuver allow more mass to be lifted into orbit?
$endgroup$
– SF.
Dec 4 '18 at 13:07
$begingroup$
(long story short: utilizing the speed of rotation of Earth as a part of orbital velocity. This choice of direction sheds some 200-300m/s off the delta-V required to orbit.)
$endgroup$
– SF.
Dec 4 '18 at 13:09
3
$begingroup$
I disgree with the duplicate topic votes. That topic has some relevant information, but doesn't explain why launches were aimed to the East.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Dec 4 '18 at 13:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The roll program occurred during a shuttle launch for the following reasons:
(...)
Orienting the shuttle more parallel toward the ground with the nose to the east.
But why east?
launch launch-sequence
edited Dec 4 '18 at 17:45
jpaugh
1055
asked Dec 4 '18 at 12:29
Marian PaździochMarian Paździoch
1512
$endgroup$
The roll program occurred during a shuttle launch for the following reasons:
(...)
Orienting the shuttle more parallel toward the ground with the nose to the east.
But why east?
launch launch-sequence
launch launch-sequence
edited Dec 4 '18 at 17:45
jpaugh
1055
asked Dec 4 '18 at 12:29
Marian PaździochMarian Paździoch
1512
edited Dec 4 '18 at 17:45
jpaugh
1055
asked Dec 4 '18 at 12:29
Marian PaździochMarian Paździoch
1512
edited Dec 4 '18 at 17:45
jpaugh
1055
edited Dec 4 '18 at 17:45
jpaugh
1055
edited Dec 4 '18 at 17:45
jpaugh
1055
1055
asked Dec 4 '18 at 12:29
Marian PaździochMarian Paździoch
1512
asked Dec 4 '18 at 12:29
Marian PaździochMarian Paździoch
1512
asked Dec 4 '18 at 12:29
Marian PaździochMarian Paździoch
1512
1512
2
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How does the roll maneuver allow more mass to be lifted into orbit?
$endgroup$
– SF.
Dec 4 '18 at 13:07
$begingroup$
(long story short: utilizing the speed of rotation of Earth as a part of orbital velocity. This choice of direction sheds some 200-300m/s off the delta-V required to orbit.)
$endgroup$
– SF.
Dec 4 '18 at 13:09
3
$begingroup$
I disgree with the duplicate topic votes. That topic has some relevant information, but doesn't explain why launches were aimed to the East.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Dec 4 '18 at 13:53
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How does the roll maneuver allow more mass to be lifted into orbit?
$endgroup$
– SF.
Dec 4 '18 at 13:07
$begingroup$
(long story short: utilizing the speed of rotation of Earth as a part of orbital velocity. This choice of direction sheds some 200-300m/s off the delta-V required to orbit.)
$endgroup$
– SF.
Dec 4 '18 at 13:09
3
$begingroup$
I disgree with the duplicate topic votes. That topic has some relevant information, but doesn't explain why launches were aimed to the East.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Dec 4 '18 at 13:53
2
2
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How does the roll maneuver allow more mass to be lifted into orbit?
$endgroup$
– SF.
Dec 4 '18 at 13:07
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How does the roll maneuver allow more mass to be lifted into orbit?
$endgroup$
– SF.
Dec 4 '18 at 13:07
$begingroup$
(long story short: utilizing the speed of rotation of Earth as a part of orbital velocity. This choice of direction sheds some 200-300m/s off the delta-V required to orbit.)
$endgroup$
– SF.
Dec 4 '18 at 13:09
$begingroup$
(long story short: utilizing the speed of rotation of Earth as a part of orbital velocity. This choice of direction sheds some 200-300m/s off the delta-V required to orbit.)
$endgroup$
– SF.
Dec 4 '18 at 13:09
3
3
$begingroup$
I disgree with the duplicate topic votes. That topic has some relevant information, but doesn't explain why launches were aimed to the East.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Dec 4 '18 at 13:53
$begingroup$
I disgree with the duplicate topic votes. That topic has some relevant information, but doesn't explain why launches were aimed to the East.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Dec 4 '18 at 13:53
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The phrase 'with the nose to the east' is a shorthand. The direction depended on the orbital inclination chosen for the mission.
- Missions to the ISS have to match the 51.6° inclination of the ISS
- the possible inclinations are limited by the launch location: from Cape Canaveral, you have to launch over water, so in a direction roughly between North-East and South.
You usually want to launch to the East (as opposed to launching to the West) because of the Earth's rotation to the East. If you launch to the East, you get part of your orbital speed (about 300 m/s on the equator) 'for free'.
The Shuttle needed to perform a roll program to get to the launch inclination: the launch pad is at a fixed angle that usually doesn't match the launch inclination, so you need to change course (preferably just after launch when your speed is low and the energy cost of the maneuver is lowest).
answered Dec 4 '18 at 14:05
HobbesHobbes
89.8k2254404
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So, this is a bit more complicated. If this was all there was to the story, you could must have a yaw program and yaw to the east. In reality, the roll program orients the stack aerodynamically with the comm antennas (on the top of the orbiter) facing down -- a "heads down" ascent. Later in the program, there were plans to do a "heads up" ascent out of Vandenberg, but it never happened.
$endgroup$
– Erik
Dec 11 '18 at 3:06
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32558%2fwhy-should-the-roll-program-position-the-shuttles-nose-to-the-east%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The phrase 'with the nose to the east' is a shorthand. The direction depended on the orbital inclination chosen for the mission.
- Missions to the ISS have to match the 51.6° inclination of the ISS
- the possible inclinations are limited by the launch location: from Cape Canaveral, you have to launch over water, so in a direction roughly between North-East and South.
You usually want to launch to the East (as opposed to launching to the West) because of the Earth's rotation to the East. If you launch to the East, you get part of your orbital speed (about 300 m/s on the equator) 'for free'.
The Shuttle needed to perform a roll program to get to the launch inclination: the launch pad is at a fixed angle that usually doesn't match the launch inclination, so you need to change course (preferably just after launch when your speed is low and the energy cost of the maneuver is lowest).
answered Dec 4 '18 at 14:05
HobbesHobbes
89.8k2254404
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So, this is a bit more complicated. If this was all there was to the story, you could must have a yaw program and yaw to the east. In reality, the roll program orients the stack aerodynamically with the comm antennas (on the top of the orbiter) facing down -- a "heads down" ascent. Later in the program, there were plans to do a "heads up" ascent out of Vandenberg, but it never happened.
$endgroup$
– Erik
Dec 11 '18 at 3:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The phrase 'with the nose to the east' is a shorthand. The direction depended on the orbital inclination chosen for the mission.
- Missions to the ISS have to match the 51.6° inclination of the ISS
- the possible inclinations are limited by the launch location: from Cape Canaveral, you have to launch over water, so in a direction roughly between North-East and South.
You usually want to launch to the East (as opposed to launching to the West) because of the Earth's rotation to the East. If you launch to the East, you get part of your orbital speed (about 300 m/s on the equator) 'for free'.
The Shuttle needed to perform a roll program to get to the launch inclination: the launch pad is at a fixed angle that usually doesn't match the launch inclination, so you need to change course (preferably just after launch when your speed is low and the energy cost of the maneuver is lowest).
answered Dec 4 '18 at 14:05
HobbesHobbes
89.8k2254404
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So, this is a bit more complicated. If this was all there was to the story, you could must have a yaw program and yaw to the east. In reality, the roll program orients the stack aerodynamically with the comm antennas (on the top of the orbiter) facing down -- a "heads down" ascent. Later in the program, there were plans to do a "heads up" ascent out of Vandenberg, but it never happened.
$endgroup$
– Erik
Dec 11 '18 at 3:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The phrase 'with the nose to the east' is a shorthand. The direction depended on the orbital inclination chosen for the mission.
- Missions to the ISS have to match the 51.6° inclination of the ISS
- the possible inclinations are limited by the launch location: from Cape Canaveral, you have to launch over water, so in a direction roughly between North-East and South.
You usually want to launch to the East (as opposed to launching to the West) because of the Earth's rotation to the East. If you launch to the East, you get part of your orbital speed (about 300 m/s on the equator) 'for free'.
The Shuttle needed to perform a roll program to get to the launch inclination: the launch pad is at a fixed angle that usually doesn't match the launch inclination, so you need to change course (preferably just after launch when your speed is low and the energy cost of the maneuver is lowest).
answered Dec 4 '18 at 14:05
HobbesHobbes
89.8k2254404
$endgroup$
The phrase 'with the nose to the east' is a shorthand. The direction depended on the orbital inclination chosen for the mission.
- Missions to the ISS have to match the 51.6° inclination of the ISS
- the possible inclinations are limited by the launch location: from Cape Canaveral, you have to launch over water, so in a direction roughly between North-East and South.
You usually want to launch to the East (as opposed to launching to the West) because of the Earth's rotation to the East. If you launch to the East, you get part of your orbital speed (about 300 m/s on the equator) 'for free'.
The Shuttle needed to perform a roll program to get to the launch inclination: the launch pad is at a fixed angle that usually doesn't match the launch inclination, so you need to change course (preferably just after launch when your speed is low and the energy cost of the maneuver is lowest).
answered Dec 4 '18 at 14:05
HobbesHobbes
89.8k2254404
answered Dec 4 '18 at 14:05
HobbesHobbes
89.8k2254404
answered Dec 4 '18 at 14:05
HobbesHobbes
89.8k2254404
answered Dec 4 '18 at 14:05
HobbesHobbes
89.8k2254404
89.8k2254404
$begingroup$
So, this is a bit more complicated. If this was all there was to the story, you could must have a yaw program and yaw to the east. In reality, the roll program orients the stack aerodynamically with the comm antennas (on the top of the orbiter) facing down -- a "heads down" ascent. Later in the program, there were plans to do a "heads up" ascent out of Vandenberg, but it never happened.
$endgroup$
– Erik
Dec 11 '18 at 3:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So, this is a bit more complicated. If this was all there was to the story, you could must have a yaw program and yaw to the east. In reality, the roll program orients the stack aerodynamically with the comm antennas (on the top of the orbiter) facing down -- a "heads down" ascent. Later in the program, there were plans to do a "heads up" ascent out of Vandenberg, but it never happened.
$endgroup$
– Erik
Dec 11 '18 at 3:06
$begingroup$
So, this is a bit more complicated. If this was all there was to the story, you could must have a yaw program and yaw to the east. In reality, the roll program orients the stack aerodynamically with the comm antennas (on the top of the orbiter) facing down -- a "heads down" ascent. Later in the program, there were plans to do a "heads up" ascent out of Vandenberg, but it never happened.
$endgroup$
– Erik
Dec 11 '18 at 3:06
$begingroup$
So, this is a bit more complicated. If this was all there was to the story, you could must have a yaw program and yaw to the east. In reality, the roll program orients the stack aerodynamically with the comm antennas (on the top of the orbiter) facing down -- a "heads down" ascent. Later in the program, there were plans to do a "heads up" ascent out of Vandenberg, but it never happened.
$endgroup$
– Erik
Dec 11 '18 at 3:06
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32558%2fwhy-should-the-roll-program-position-the-shuttles-nose-to-the-east%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of How does the roll maneuver allow more mass to be lifted into orbit?
$endgroup$
– SF.
Dec 4 '18 at 13:07
$begingroup$
(long story short: utilizing the speed of rotation of Earth as a part of orbital velocity. This choice of direction sheds some 200-300m/s off the delta-V required to orbit.)
$endgroup$
– SF.
Dec 4 '18 at 13:09
3
$begingroup$
I disgree with the duplicate topic votes. That topic has some relevant information, but doesn't explain why launches were aimed to the East.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Dec 4 '18 at 13:53