Why does Java 12 try to convert the result of a switch to a number?












32















I agree that this code:



var y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
case 3 -> true;
default -> 4;
};
System.out.println(y);
System.out.println(((Object) y).getClass().getName());


returns this:



0
java.lang.Character


But if you remove boolean:



var y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
default -> 4;
};
System.out.println(y);
System.out.println(((Object) y).getClass().getName());


returns this:



48.0
java.lang.Float


I suppose this result is unexpected.










share|improve this question























  • Probably some kind of optimization. In the second example you can map all results to Float, in the first example they are just only Objects.

    – Ralf Renz
    Mar 22 at 7:03






  • 11





    I would imagine it is for the same reason as true ? '0' : false would return a Character because it necessarily requires boxing, whereas true ? '0' : 0.0f would return a float because binary numeric promotion would occur.

    – Andy Turner
    Mar 22 at 7:16






  • 3





    Can anybody point me to the bit of the language spec where they are defined. I can't find "switch expression" mentioned.

    – Andy Turner
    Mar 22 at 7:28
















32















I agree that this code:



var y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
case 3 -> true;
default -> 4;
};
System.out.println(y);
System.out.println(((Object) y).getClass().getName());


returns this:



0
java.lang.Character


But if you remove boolean:



var y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
default -> 4;
};
System.out.println(y);
System.out.println(((Object) y).getClass().getName());


returns this:



48.0
java.lang.Float


I suppose this result is unexpected.










share|improve this question























  • Probably some kind of optimization. In the second example you can map all results to Float, in the first example they are just only Objects.

    – Ralf Renz
    Mar 22 at 7:03






  • 11





    I would imagine it is for the same reason as true ? '0' : false would return a Character because it necessarily requires boxing, whereas true ? '0' : 0.0f would return a float because binary numeric promotion would occur.

    – Andy Turner
    Mar 22 at 7:16






  • 3





    Can anybody point me to the bit of the language spec where they are defined. I can't find "switch expression" mentioned.

    – Andy Turner
    Mar 22 at 7:28














32












32








32


4






I agree that this code:



var y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
case 3 -> true;
default -> 4;
};
System.out.println(y);
System.out.println(((Object) y).getClass().getName());


returns this:



0
java.lang.Character


But if you remove boolean:



var y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
default -> 4;
};
System.out.println(y);
System.out.println(((Object) y).getClass().getName());


returns this:



48.0
java.lang.Float


I suppose this result is unexpected.










share|improve this question














I agree that this code:



var y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
case 3 -> true;
default -> 4;
};
System.out.println(y);
System.out.println(((Object) y).getClass().getName());


returns this:



0
java.lang.Character


But if you remove boolean:



var y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
default -> 4;
};
System.out.println(y);
System.out.println(((Object) y).getClass().getName());


returns this:



48.0
java.lang.Float


I suppose this result is unexpected.







java switch-statement java-12






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 22 at 6:44









IlyaIlya

385312




385312













  • Probably some kind of optimization. In the second example you can map all results to Float, in the first example they are just only Objects.

    – Ralf Renz
    Mar 22 at 7:03






  • 11





    I would imagine it is for the same reason as true ? '0' : false would return a Character because it necessarily requires boxing, whereas true ? '0' : 0.0f would return a float because binary numeric promotion would occur.

    – Andy Turner
    Mar 22 at 7:16






  • 3





    Can anybody point me to the bit of the language spec where they are defined. I can't find "switch expression" mentioned.

    – Andy Turner
    Mar 22 at 7:28



















  • Probably some kind of optimization. In the second example you can map all results to Float, in the first example they are just only Objects.

    – Ralf Renz
    Mar 22 at 7:03






  • 11





    I would imagine it is for the same reason as true ? '0' : false would return a Character because it necessarily requires boxing, whereas true ? '0' : 0.0f would return a float because binary numeric promotion would occur.

    – Andy Turner
    Mar 22 at 7:16






  • 3





    Can anybody point me to the bit of the language spec where they are defined. I can't find "switch expression" mentioned.

    – Andy Turner
    Mar 22 at 7:28

















Probably some kind of optimization. In the second example you can map all results to Float, in the first example they are just only Objects.

– Ralf Renz
Mar 22 at 7:03





Probably some kind of optimization. In the second example you can map all results to Float, in the first example they are just only Objects.

– Ralf Renz
Mar 22 at 7:03




11




11





I would imagine it is for the same reason as true ? '0' : false would return a Character because it necessarily requires boxing, whereas true ? '0' : 0.0f would return a float because binary numeric promotion would occur.

– Andy Turner
Mar 22 at 7:16





I would imagine it is for the same reason as true ? '0' : false would return a Character because it necessarily requires boxing, whereas true ? '0' : 0.0f would return a float because binary numeric promotion would occur.

– Andy Turner
Mar 22 at 7:16




3




3





Can anybody point me to the bit of the language spec where they are defined. I can't find "switch expression" mentioned.

– Andy Turner
Mar 22 at 7:28





Can anybody point me to the bit of the language spec where they are defined. I can't find "switch expression" mentioned.

– Andy Turner
Mar 22 at 7:28












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















32














According to the switch expression's JEP, a switch expression is a poly expression:




A switch expression is a poly expression; if the target type is known, this type is pushed down into each arm. The type of a switch expression is its target type, if known; if not, a standalone type is computed by combining the types of each case arm.




Because you don't have a target type, the expression is not checked to match any given type, which is expected.



You can verify this by replacing var with a type:



int y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
case 3 -> true;
default -> 4;
};


In my shell, this fails with:



|  Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| possible lossy conversion from float to int
| case 1 -> 0.0F;
| ^--^
| Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| possible lossy conversion from long to int
| case 2 -> 2L;
| ^^
| Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| boolean cannot be converted to int
| case 3 -> true;
| ^--^



But if you remove boolean:...




It should be enough to see how the standalone type is determined (rules here):




The type of a standalone switch expression is determined as follows:




  • If the result expressions all have the same type (which may be the null type), then that is the type of the switch expression.

  • Otherwise, if the type of each result expression is boolean or Boolean, an unboxing conversion (5.1.8) is applied to each result expression of type Boolean, and the switch expression has type boolean.

  • Otherwise, if the type of each result expression is convertible to a numeric type (5.1.8), the type of the switch expression is the result of numeric promotion (5.6) applied to the result expressions.


  • Otherwise, boxing conversion (5.1.7) is applied to each result expression that has a primitive type, after which the type of the switch expression is the result of applying capture conversion (5.1.10) to the least upper bound (4.10.4) of the types of the result expressions.





As far as I can see, when you remove the boolean expression, you're left with numeric expressions (char '0' (int 48) is promoted to float 48.0). See third bullet point above.



And as for why float is the result's type, see the Numeric Contexts section.






share|improve this answer





















  • 6





    good answer. 1+, this indeed follows whatever the binary numeric promotion existed in the JLS until switch expressions were added.

    – Eugene
    Mar 22 at 8:35











  • why the first output gives you java.lang.Character class? because boolean is after a float class. why float is not casting?

    – Akash Shah
    Mar 22 at 8:41








  • 4





    @AkashShah I believe it's because no type conversion occurs. I haven't verified this, but I think the least upper bound for all these expression's types is java.lang.Object. So it boils down to something like Object y = ... and the actual type of the result ends up being printed (java.lang.Character being the boxed type of the matched case expression, which returns '0')

    – ernest_k
    Mar 22 at 8:46






  • 6





    @Ilya no, when you use var, there is no target type. In that case, the right-hand side has to be treated as stand-alone expression (not poly expression), to determine the expression type, then, the variable will get the resulting type. As said by Andy Turner, the behavior is consistent with previous Java versions. The takeaway is, when the type is not obvious, don’t use var to declare a variable.

    – Holger
    Mar 22 at 10:38








  • 5





    @Ilya no, in the first example, the variable’s type is an intersection type of Object,Serializable, and Comparable<?>. If you want Object (which would be relevant if you want to assign another value at a later point), you have to declare it explicitly. Your question’s example is equivalent to var y = x == 0? '0': x == 1? 0.0F: x == 2? 2L: x == 3? true: 4;. As said, use var when the right-hand side is obvious only. No-one forces you to use it at other places.

    – Holger
    Mar 22 at 11:51













Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55294208%2fwhy-does-java-12-try-to-convert-the-result-of-a-switch-to-a-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









32














According to the switch expression's JEP, a switch expression is a poly expression:




A switch expression is a poly expression; if the target type is known, this type is pushed down into each arm. The type of a switch expression is its target type, if known; if not, a standalone type is computed by combining the types of each case arm.




Because you don't have a target type, the expression is not checked to match any given type, which is expected.



You can verify this by replacing var with a type:



int y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
case 3 -> true;
default -> 4;
};


In my shell, this fails with:



|  Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| possible lossy conversion from float to int
| case 1 -> 0.0F;
| ^--^
| Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| possible lossy conversion from long to int
| case 2 -> 2L;
| ^^
| Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| boolean cannot be converted to int
| case 3 -> true;
| ^--^



But if you remove boolean:...




It should be enough to see how the standalone type is determined (rules here):




The type of a standalone switch expression is determined as follows:




  • If the result expressions all have the same type (which may be the null type), then that is the type of the switch expression.

  • Otherwise, if the type of each result expression is boolean or Boolean, an unboxing conversion (5.1.8) is applied to each result expression of type Boolean, and the switch expression has type boolean.

  • Otherwise, if the type of each result expression is convertible to a numeric type (5.1.8), the type of the switch expression is the result of numeric promotion (5.6) applied to the result expressions.


  • Otherwise, boxing conversion (5.1.7) is applied to each result expression that has a primitive type, after which the type of the switch expression is the result of applying capture conversion (5.1.10) to the least upper bound (4.10.4) of the types of the result expressions.





As far as I can see, when you remove the boolean expression, you're left with numeric expressions (char '0' (int 48) is promoted to float 48.0). See third bullet point above.



And as for why float is the result's type, see the Numeric Contexts section.






share|improve this answer





















  • 6





    good answer. 1+, this indeed follows whatever the binary numeric promotion existed in the JLS until switch expressions were added.

    – Eugene
    Mar 22 at 8:35











  • why the first output gives you java.lang.Character class? because boolean is after a float class. why float is not casting?

    – Akash Shah
    Mar 22 at 8:41








  • 4





    @AkashShah I believe it's because no type conversion occurs. I haven't verified this, but I think the least upper bound for all these expression's types is java.lang.Object. So it boils down to something like Object y = ... and the actual type of the result ends up being printed (java.lang.Character being the boxed type of the matched case expression, which returns '0')

    – ernest_k
    Mar 22 at 8:46






  • 6





    @Ilya no, when you use var, there is no target type. In that case, the right-hand side has to be treated as stand-alone expression (not poly expression), to determine the expression type, then, the variable will get the resulting type. As said by Andy Turner, the behavior is consistent with previous Java versions. The takeaway is, when the type is not obvious, don’t use var to declare a variable.

    – Holger
    Mar 22 at 10:38








  • 5





    @Ilya no, in the first example, the variable’s type is an intersection type of Object,Serializable, and Comparable<?>. If you want Object (which would be relevant if you want to assign another value at a later point), you have to declare it explicitly. Your question’s example is equivalent to var y = x == 0? '0': x == 1? 0.0F: x == 2? 2L: x == 3? true: 4;. As said, use var when the right-hand side is obvious only. No-one forces you to use it at other places.

    – Holger
    Mar 22 at 11:51


















32














According to the switch expression's JEP, a switch expression is a poly expression:




A switch expression is a poly expression; if the target type is known, this type is pushed down into each arm. The type of a switch expression is its target type, if known; if not, a standalone type is computed by combining the types of each case arm.




Because you don't have a target type, the expression is not checked to match any given type, which is expected.



You can verify this by replacing var with a type:



int y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
case 3 -> true;
default -> 4;
};


In my shell, this fails with:



|  Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| possible lossy conversion from float to int
| case 1 -> 0.0F;
| ^--^
| Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| possible lossy conversion from long to int
| case 2 -> 2L;
| ^^
| Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| boolean cannot be converted to int
| case 3 -> true;
| ^--^



But if you remove boolean:...




It should be enough to see how the standalone type is determined (rules here):




The type of a standalone switch expression is determined as follows:




  • If the result expressions all have the same type (which may be the null type), then that is the type of the switch expression.

  • Otherwise, if the type of each result expression is boolean or Boolean, an unboxing conversion (5.1.8) is applied to each result expression of type Boolean, and the switch expression has type boolean.

  • Otherwise, if the type of each result expression is convertible to a numeric type (5.1.8), the type of the switch expression is the result of numeric promotion (5.6) applied to the result expressions.


  • Otherwise, boxing conversion (5.1.7) is applied to each result expression that has a primitive type, after which the type of the switch expression is the result of applying capture conversion (5.1.10) to the least upper bound (4.10.4) of the types of the result expressions.





As far as I can see, when you remove the boolean expression, you're left with numeric expressions (char '0' (int 48) is promoted to float 48.0). See third bullet point above.



And as for why float is the result's type, see the Numeric Contexts section.






share|improve this answer





















  • 6





    good answer. 1+, this indeed follows whatever the binary numeric promotion existed in the JLS until switch expressions were added.

    – Eugene
    Mar 22 at 8:35











  • why the first output gives you java.lang.Character class? because boolean is after a float class. why float is not casting?

    – Akash Shah
    Mar 22 at 8:41








  • 4





    @AkashShah I believe it's because no type conversion occurs. I haven't verified this, but I think the least upper bound for all these expression's types is java.lang.Object. So it boils down to something like Object y = ... and the actual type of the result ends up being printed (java.lang.Character being the boxed type of the matched case expression, which returns '0')

    – ernest_k
    Mar 22 at 8:46






  • 6





    @Ilya no, when you use var, there is no target type. In that case, the right-hand side has to be treated as stand-alone expression (not poly expression), to determine the expression type, then, the variable will get the resulting type. As said by Andy Turner, the behavior is consistent with previous Java versions. The takeaway is, when the type is not obvious, don’t use var to declare a variable.

    – Holger
    Mar 22 at 10:38








  • 5





    @Ilya no, in the first example, the variable’s type is an intersection type of Object,Serializable, and Comparable<?>. If you want Object (which would be relevant if you want to assign another value at a later point), you have to declare it explicitly. Your question’s example is equivalent to var y = x == 0? '0': x == 1? 0.0F: x == 2? 2L: x == 3? true: 4;. As said, use var when the right-hand side is obvious only. No-one forces you to use it at other places.

    – Holger
    Mar 22 at 11:51
















32












32








32







According to the switch expression's JEP, a switch expression is a poly expression:




A switch expression is a poly expression; if the target type is known, this type is pushed down into each arm. The type of a switch expression is its target type, if known; if not, a standalone type is computed by combining the types of each case arm.




Because you don't have a target type, the expression is not checked to match any given type, which is expected.



You can verify this by replacing var with a type:



int y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
case 3 -> true;
default -> 4;
};


In my shell, this fails with:



|  Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| possible lossy conversion from float to int
| case 1 -> 0.0F;
| ^--^
| Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| possible lossy conversion from long to int
| case 2 -> 2L;
| ^^
| Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| boolean cannot be converted to int
| case 3 -> true;
| ^--^



But if you remove boolean:...




It should be enough to see how the standalone type is determined (rules here):




The type of a standalone switch expression is determined as follows:




  • If the result expressions all have the same type (which may be the null type), then that is the type of the switch expression.

  • Otherwise, if the type of each result expression is boolean or Boolean, an unboxing conversion (5.1.8) is applied to each result expression of type Boolean, and the switch expression has type boolean.

  • Otherwise, if the type of each result expression is convertible to a numeric type (5.1.8), the type of the switch expression is the result of numeric promotion (5.6) applied to the result expressions.


  • Otherwise, boxing conversion (5.1.7) is applied to each result expression that has a primitive type, after which the type of the switch expression is the result of applying capture conversion (5.1.10) to the least upper bound (4.10.4) of the types of the result expressions.





As far as I can see, when you remove the boolean expression, you're left with numeric expressions (char '0' (int 48) is promoted to float 48.0). See third bullet point above.



And as for why float is the result's type, see the Numeric Contexts section.






share|improve this answer















According to the switch expression's JEP, a switch expression is a poly expression:




A switch expression is a poly expression; if the target type is known, this type is pushed down into each arm. The type of a switch expression is its target type, if known; if not, a standalone type is computed by combining the types of each case arm.




Because you don't have a target type, the expression is not checked to match any given type, which is expected.



You can verify this by replacing var with a type:



int y = switch (0) {
case 0 -> '0';
case 1 -> 0.0F;
case 2 -> 2L;
case 3 -> true;
default -> 4;
};


In my shell, this fails with:



|  Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| possible lossy conversion from float to int
| case 1 -> 0.0F;
| ^--^
| Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| possible lossy conversion from long to int
| case 2 -> 2L;
| ^^
| Error:
| incompatible types: bad type in switch expression
| boolean cannot be converted to int
| case 3 -> true;
| ^--^



But if you remove boolean:...




It should be enough to see how the standalone type is determined (rules here):




The type of a standalone switch expression is determined as follows:




  • If the result expressions all have the same type (which may be the null type), then that is the type of the switch expression.

  • Otherwise, if the type of each result expression is boolean or Boolean, an unboxing conversion (5.1.8) is applied to each result expression of type Boolean, and the switch expression has type boolean.

  • Otherwise, if the type of each result expression is convertible to a numeric type (5.1.8), the type of the switch expression is the result of numeric promotion (5.6) applied to the result expressions.


  • Otherwise, boxing conversion (5.1.7) is applied to each result expression that has a primitive type, after which the type of the switch expression is the result of applying capture conversion (5.1.10) to the least upper bound (4.10.4) of the types of the result expressions.





As far as I can see, when you remove the boolean expression, you're left with numeric expressions (char '0' (int 48) is promoted to float 48.0). See third bullet point above.



And as for why float is the result's type, see the Numeric Contexts section.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 22 at 8:19

























answered Mar 22 at 8:07









ernest_kernest_k

24.1k43050




24.1k43050








  • 6





    good answer. 1+, this indeed follows whatever the binary numeric promotion existed in the JLS until switch expressions were added.

    – Eugene
    Mar 22 at 8:35











  • why the first output gives you java.lang.Character class? because boolean is after a float class. why float is not casting?

    – Akash Shah
    Mar 22 at 8:41








  • 4





    @AkashShah I believe it's because no type conversion occurs. I haven't verified this, but I think the least upper bound for all these expression's types is java.lang.Object. So it boils down to something like Object y = ... and the actual type of the result ends up being printed (java.lang.Character being the boxed type of the matched case expression, which returns '0')

    – ernest_k
    Mar 22 at 8:46






  • 6





    @Ilya no, when you use var, there is no target type. In that case, the right-hand side has to be treated as stand-alone expression (not poly expression), to determine the expression type, then, the variable will get the resulting type. As said by Andy Turner, the behavior is consistent with previous Java versions. The takeaway is, when the type is not obvious, don’t use var to declare a variable.

    – Holger
    Mar 22 at 10:38








  • 5





    @Ilya no, in the first example, the variable’s type is an intersection type of Object,Serializable, and Comparable<?>. If you want Object (which would be relevant if you want to assign another value at a later point), you have to declare it explicitly. Your question’s example is equivalent to var y = x == 0? '0': x == 1? 0.0F: x == 2? 2L: x == 3? true: 4;. As said, use var when the right-hand side is obvious only. No-one forces you to use it at other places.

    – Holger
    Mar 22 at 11:51
















  • 6





    good answer. 1+, this indeed follows whatever the binary numeric promotion existed in the JLS until switch expressions were added.

    – Eugene
    Mar 22 at 8:35











  • why the first output gives you java.lang.Character class? because boolean is after a float class. why float is not casting?

    – Akash Shah
    Mar 22 at 8:41








  • 4





    @AkashShah I believe it's because no type conversion occurs. I haven't verified this, but I think the least upper bound for all these expression's types is java.lang.Object. So it boils down to something like Object y = ... and the actual type of the result ends up being printed (java.lang.Character being the boxed type of the matched case expression, which returns '0')

    – ernest_k
    Mar 22 at 8:46






  • 6





    @Ilya no, when you use var, there is no target type. In that case, the right-hand side has to be treated as stand-alone expression (not poly expression), to determine the expression type, then, the variable will get the resulting type. As said by Andy Turner, the behavior is consistent with previous Java versions. The takeaway is, when the type is not obvious, don’t use var to declare a variable.

    – Holger
    Mar 22 at 10:38








  • 5





    @Ilya no, in the first example, the variable’s type is an intersection type of Object,Serializable, and Comparable<?>. If you want Object (which would be relevant if you want to assign another value at a later point), you have to declare it explicitly. Your question’s example is equivalent to var y = x == 0? '0': x == 1? 0.0F: x == 2? 2L: x == 3? true: 4;. As said, use var when the right-hand side is obvious only. No-one forces you to use it at other places.

    – Holger
    Mar 22 at 11:51










6




6





good answer. 1+, this indeed follows whatever the binary numeric promotion existed in the JLS until switch expressions were added.

– Eugene
Mar 22 at 8:35





good answer. 1+, this indeed follows whatever the binary numeric promotion existed in the JLS until switch expressions were added.

– Eugene
Mar 22 at 8:35













why the first output gives you java.lang.Character class? because boolean is after a float class. why float is not casting?

– Akash Shah
Mar 22 at 8:41







why the first output gives you java.lang.Character class? because boolean is after a float class. why float is not casting?

– Akash Shah
Mar 22 at 8:41






4




4





@AkashShah I believe it's because no type conversion occurs. I haven't verified this, but I think the least upper bound for all these expression's types is java.lang.Object. So it boils down to something like Object y = ... and the actual type of the result ends up being printed (java.lang.Character being the boxed type of the matched case expression, which returns '0')

– ernest_k
Mar 22 at 8:46





@AkashShah I believe it's because no type conversion occurs. I haven't verified this, but I think the least upper bound for all these expression's types is java.lang.Object. So it boils down to something like Object y = ... and the actual type of the result ends up being printed (java.lang.Character being the boxed type of the matched case expression, which returns '0')

– ernest_k
Mar 22 at 8:46




6




6





@Ilya no, when you use var, there is no target type. In that case, the right-hand side has to be treated as stand-alone expression (not poly expression), to determine the expression type, then, the variable will get the resulting type. As said by Andy Turner, the behavior is consistent with previous Java versions. The takeaway is, when the type is not obvious, don’t use var to declare a variable.

– Holger
Mar 22 at 10:38







@Ilya no, when you use var, there is no target type. In that case, the right-hand side has to be treated as stand-alone expression (not poly expression), to determine the expression type, then, the variable will get the resulting type. As said by Andy Turner, the behavior is consistent with previous Java versions. The takeaway is, when the type is not obvious, don’t use var to declare a variable.

– Holger
Mar 22 at 10:38






5




5





@Ilya no, in the first example, the variable’s type is an intersection type of Object,Serializable, and Comparable<?>. If you want Object (which would be relevant if you want to assign another value at a later point), you have to declare it explicitly. Your question’s example is equivalent to var y = x == 0? '0': x == 1? 0.0F: x == 2? 2L: x == 3? true: 4;. As said, use var when the right-hand side is obvious only. No-one forces you to use it at other places.

– Holger
Mar 22 at 11:51







@Ilya no, in the first example, the variable’s type is an intersection type of Object,Serializable, and Comparable<?>. If you want Object (which would be relevant if you want to assign another value at a later point), you have to declare it explicitly. Your question’s example is equivalent to var y = x == 0? '0': x == 1? 0.0F: x == 2? 2L: x == 3? true: 4;. As said, use var when the right-hand side is obvious only. No-one forces you to use it at other places.

– Holger
Mar 22 at 11:51






















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55294208%2fwhy-does-java-12-try-to-convert-the-result-of-a-switch-to-a-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa