Why does a simple loop result in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits?












15















The following T-SQL takes about 25 seconds on my machine with SSMS v17.9:



DECLARE @outer_loop INT = 0,
@big_string_for_u VARCHAR(8000);

SET NOCOUNT ON;

WHILE @outer_loop < 50000000
BEGIN
SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
END;


It accumulates 532 ms of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits according to both sys.dm_exec_session_wait_stats and sys.dm_os_wait_stats. The total wait time increases as the number of loop iterations increases. Using the wait_completed extended event I can see that the wait happens roughly every 43 ms with a few exceptions:



wait table



In addition, I can get the call stacks that occur right before the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait:



sqldk.dll!SOS_DispatcherBase::GetTrack+0x7f6c
sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::PromotePendingTask+0x204
sqldk.dll!SOS_Task::PostWait+0x5f
sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::Suspend+0xb15
sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf6af
sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf44c
sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0xd63
sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x2097
sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x1f99
sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x18fe
sqllang.dll!CAutoExecuteAsContext::Restore+0x52d
sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x151b
sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0xe13
sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x474
sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x165d
sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0xa92
sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0x883
sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x15d
sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x638
sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x2ad
sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xdf8
sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xf00
sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0x667
sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xbb9


Finally, I noticed that SSMS uses a surprising amount of CPU during the loop (about half a core on average). I'm unable to figure out what SSMS is doing during that time.



Why does a simple loop cause ASYNC_NETWORK_IOwaits when executed through SSMS? The only output that I appear to get from the client from this query execution is the "Commands completed successfully." message.










share|improve this question



























    15















    The following T-SQL takes about 25 seconds on my machine with SSMS v17.9:



    DECLARE @outer_loop INT = 0,
    @big_string_for_u VARCHAR(8000);

    SET NOCOUNT ON;

    WHILE @outer_loop < 50000000
    BEGIN
    SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
    SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
    END;


    It accumulates 532 ms of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits according to both sys.dm_exec_session_wait_stats and sys.dm_os_wait_stats. The total wait time increases as the number of loop iterations increases. Using the wait_completed extended event I can see that the wait happens roughly every 43 ms with a few exceptions:



    wait table



    In addition, I can get the call stacks that occur right before the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait:



    sqldk.dll!SOS_DispatcherBase::GetTrack+0x7f6c
    sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::PromotePendingTask+0x204
    sqldk.dll!SOS_Task::PostWait+0x5f
    sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::Suspend+0xb15
    sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf6af
    sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf44c
    sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0xd63
    sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x2097
    sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x1f99
    sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x18fe
    sqllang.dll!CAutoExecuteAsContext::Restore+0x52d
    sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x151b
    sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0xe13
    sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x474
    sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x165d
    sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0xa92
    sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0x883
    sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x15d
    sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x638
    sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x2ad
    sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xdf8
    sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xf00
    sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0x667
    sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xbb9


    Finally, I noticed that SSMS uses a surprising amount of CPU during the loop (about half a core on average). I'm unable to figure out what SSMS is doing during that time.



    Why does a simple loop cause ASYNC_NETWORK_IOwaits when executed through SSMS? The only output that I appear to get from the client from this query execution is the "Commands completed successfully." message.










    share|improve this question

























      15












      15








      15


      2






      The following T-SQL takes about 25 seconds on my machine with SSMS v17.9:



      DECLARE @outer_loop INT = 0,
      @big_string_for_u VARCHAR(8000);

      SET NOCOUNT ON;

      WHILE @outer_loop < 50000000
      BEGIN
      SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
      SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
      END;


      It accumulates 532 ms of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits according to both sys.dm_exec_session_wait_stats and sys.dm_os_wait_stats. The total wait time increases as the number of loop iterations increases. Using the wait_completed extended event I can see that the wait happens roughly every 43 ms with a few exceptions:



      wait table



      In addition, I can get the call stacks that occur right before the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait:



      sqldk.dll!SOS_DispatcherBase::GetTrack+0x7f6c
      sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::PromotePendingTask+0x204
      sqldk.dll!SOS_Task::PostWait+0x5f
      sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::Suspend+0xb15
      sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf6af
      sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf44c
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0xd63
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x2097
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x1f99
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x18fe
      sqllang.dll!CAutoExecuteAsContext::Restore+0x52d
      sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x151b
      sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0xe13
      sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x474
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x165d
      sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0xa92
      sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0x883
      sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x15d
      sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x638
      sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x2ad
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xdf8
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xf00
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0x667
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xbb9


      Finally, I noticed that SSMS uses a surprising amount of CPU during the loop (about half a core on average). I'm unable to figure out what SSMS is doing during that time.



      Why does a simple loop cause ASYNC_NETWORK_IOwaits when executed through SSMS? The only output that I appear to get from the client from this query execution is the "Commands completed successfully." message.










      share|improve this question














      The following T-SQL takes about 25 seconds on my machine with SSMS v17.9:



      DECLARE @outer_loop INT = 0,
      @big_string_for_u VARCHAR(8000);

      SET NOCOUNT ON;

      WHILE @outer_loop < 50000000
      BEGIN
      SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
      SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
      END;


      It accumulates 532 ms of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits according to both sys.dm_exec_session_wait_stats and sys.dm_os_wait_stats. The total wait time increases as the number of loop iterations increases. Using the wait_completed extended event I can see that the wait happens roughly every 43 ms with a few exceptions:



      wait table



      In addition, I can get the call stacks that occur right before the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait:



      sqldk.dll!SOS_DispatcherBase::GetTrack+0x7f6c
      sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::PromotePendingTask+0x204
      sqldk.dll!SOS_Task::PostWait+0x5f
      sqldk.dll!SOS_Scheduler::Suspend+0xb15
      sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf6af
      sqllang.dll!CSECCNGProvider::GetBCryptHandleFromAlgID+0xf44c
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0xd63
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x2097
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x1f99
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x18fe
      sqllang.dll!CAutoExecuteAsContext::Restore+0x52d
      sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x151b
      sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0xe13
      sqllang.dll!CSQLSource::Execute+0x474
      sqllang.dll!SNIPacketRelease+0x165d
      sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0xa92
      sqllang.dll!CValOdsRow::CValOdsRow+0x883
      sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x15d
      sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x638
      sqldk.dll!ClockHand::Statistic::RecordClockHandStats+0x2ad
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xdf8
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xf00
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0x667
      sqldk.dll!SystemThread::MakeMiniSOSThread+0xbb9


      Finally, I noticed that SSMS uses a surprising amount of CPU during the loop (about half a core on average). I'm unable to figure out what SSMS is doing during that time.



      Why does a simple loop cause ASYNC_NETWORK_IOwaits when executed through SSMS? The only output that I appear to get from the client from this query execution is the "Commands completed successfully." message.







      sql-server ssms






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 22 at 4:21









      Joe ObbishJoe Obbish

      21.5k43189




      21.5k43189






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          25














          The documentation for SET NOCOUNT says:




          SET NOCOUNT ON prevents the sending of DONE_IN_PROC messages to the client for each statement in a stored procedure. For stored procedures that contain several statements that do not return much actual data, or for procedures that contain Transact-SQL loops, setting SET NOCOUNT to ON can provide a significant performance boost, because network traffic is greatly reduced.




          You are not running the statements in a stored procedure, so SQL Server sends DONE tokens (code 0xFD) to indicate the completion status of each SQL statement. These messages are deferred, and sent asynchronously when the network packet is full. When the client does not consume network packets quickly enough, eventually the buffers fill up, and the operation becomes blocking for SQL Server, generating the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits.



          Note the DONE tokens are different from DONEINPROC (code 0xFF) as the documentation notes:





          • A DONE token is returned for each SQL statement in the SQL batch except variable declarations.


          • For execution of SQL statements within stored procedures, DONEPROC and DONEINPROC tokens are used in place of DONE tokens.





          You will see a dramatic reduction in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits using:



          CREATE PROCEDURE #P AS
          SET NOCOUNT ON;

          DECLARE
          @outer_loop integer = 0,
          @big_string_for_u varchar(8000);


          WHILE @outer_loop < 5000000
          BEGIN
          SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
          SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
          END;
          GO
          EXECUTE dbo.#P;


          You could also use sys.sp_executesql to achieve the same result.



          Example stack trace captured just as an ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait begins:



          sending a packet



          An example TDS packet as seen in the inline function sqllang!srv_completioncode_ex<1> had the following 13 bytes:



          fd 01 00 c1 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00          


          Which decodes to:




          • TokenType = 0xfd DONE_TOKEN

          • Status = 0x0001 DONE_MORE

          • CurCmd = 0x00c1 (193)

          • DoneRowCount = 0x00000001 (1)


          Ultimately, the number of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits depends on the client and driver, and what it does, if anything, with all the DONE messages. Testing with a loop 1/10th of the size given in the question (5,000,000 loop iterations) I found SSMS ran for about 4 seconds with 200-300 ms of waits. sqlcmd ran for 2-3 seconds with single digit ms waits; osql around the same run time with around 10 ms of waits.



          The worst client by far for this test was Azure Data Studio. It ran for almost 6 hours:



          ADS






          share|improve this answer

























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "182"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232816%2fwhy-does-a-simple-loop-result-in-async-network-io-waits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            25














            The documentation for SET NOCOUNT says:




            SET NOCOUNT ON prevents the sending of DONE_IN_PROC messages to the client for each statement in a stored procedure. For stored procedures that contain several statements that do not return much actual data, or for procedures that contain Transact-SQL loops, setting SET NOCOUNT to ON can provide a significant performance boost, because network traffic is greatly reduced.




            You are not running the statements in a stored procedure, so SQL Server sends DONE tokens (code 0xFD) to indicate the completion status of each SQL statement. These messages are deferred, and sent asynchronously when the network packet is full. When the client does not consume network packets quickly enough, eventually the buffers fill up, and the operation becomes blocking for SQL Server, generating the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits.



            Note the DONE tokens are different from DONEINPROC (code 0xFF) as the documentation notes:





            • A DONE token is returned for each SQL statement in the SQL batch except variable declarations.


            • For execution of SQL statements within stored procedures, DONEPROC and DONEINPROC tokens are used in place of DONE tokens.





            You will see a dramatic reduction in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits using:



            CREATE PROCEDURE #P AS
            SET NOCOUNT ON;

            DECLARE
            @outer_loop integer = 0,
            @big_string_for_u varchar(8000);


            WHILE @outer_loop < 5000000
            BEGIN
            SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
            SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
            END;
            GO
            EXECUTE dbo.#P;


            You could also use sys.sp_executesql to achieve the same result.



            Example stack trace captured just as an ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait begins:



            sending a packet



            An example TDS packet as seen in the inline function sqllang!srv_completioncode_ex<1> had the following 13 bytes:



            fd 01 00 c1 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00          


            Which decodes to:




            • TokenType = 0xfd DONE_TOKEN

            • Status = 0x0001 DONE_MORE

            • CurCmd = 0x00c1 (193)

            • DoneRowCount = 0x00000001 (1)


            Ultimately, the number of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits depends on the client and driver, and what it does, if anything, with all the DONE messages. Testing with a loop 1/10th of the size given in the question (5,000,000 loop iterations) I found SSMS ran for about 4 seconds with 200-300 ms of waits. sqlcmd ran for 2-3 seconds with single digit ms waits; osql around the same run time with around 10 ms of waits.



            The worst client by far for this test was Azure Data Studio. It ran for almost 6 hours:



            ADS






            share|improve this answer






























              25














              The documentation for SET NOCOUNT says:




              SET NOCOUNT ON prevents the sending of DONE_IN_PROC messages to the client for each statement in a stored procedure. For stored procedures that contain several statements that do not return much actual data, or for procedures that contain Transact-SQL loops, setting SET NOCOUNT to ON can provide a significant performance boost, because network traffic is greatly reduced.




              You are not running the statements in a stored procedure, so SQL Server sends DONE tokens (code 0xFD) to indicate the completion status of each SQL statement. These messages are deferred, and sent asynchronously when the network packet is full. When the client does not consume network packets quickly enough, eventually the buffers fill up, and the operation becomes blocking for SQL Server, generating the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits.



              Note the DONE tokens are different from DONEINPROC (code 0xFF) as the documentation notes:





              • A DONE token is returned for each SQL statement in the SQL batch except variable declarations.


              • For execution of SQL statements within stored procedures, DONEPROC and DONEINPROC tokens are used in place of DONE tokens.





              You will see a dramatic reduction in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits using:



              CREATE PROCEDURE #P AS
              SET NOCOUNT ON;

              DECLARE
              @outer_loop integer = 0,
              @big_string_for_u varchar(8000);


              WHILE @outer_loop < 5000000
              BEGIN
              SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
              SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
              END;
              GO
              EXECUTE dbo.#P;


              You could also use sys.sp_executesql to achieve the same result.



              Example stack trace captured just as an ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait begins:



              sending a packet



              An example TDS packet as seen in the inline function sqllang!srv_completioncode_ex<1> had the following 13 bytes:



              fd 01 00 c1 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00          


              Which decodes to:




              • TokenType = 0xfd DONE_TOKEN

              • Status = 0x0001 DONE_MORE

              • CurCmd = 0x00c1 (193)

              • DoneRowCount = 0x00000001 (1)


              Ultimately, the number of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits depends on the client and driver, and what it does, if anything, with all the DONE messages. Testing with a loop 1/10th of the size given in the question (5,000,000 loop iterations) I found SSMS ran for about 4 seconds with 200-300 ms of waits. sqlcmd ran for 2-3 seconds with single digit ms waits; osql around the same run time with around 10 ms of waits.



              The worst client by far for this test was Azure Data Studio. It ran for almost 6 hours:



              ADS






              share|improve this answer




























                25












                25








                25







                The documentation for SET NOCOUNT says:




                SET NOCOUNT ON prevents the sending of DONE_IN_PROC messages to the client for each statement in a stored procedure. For stored procedures that contain several statements that do not return much actual data, or for procedures that contain Transact-SQL loops, setting SET NOCOUNT to ON can provide a significant performance boost, because network traffic is greatly reduced.




                You are not running the statements in a stored procedure, so SQL Server sends DONE tokens (code 0xFD) to indicate the completion status of each SQL statement. These messages are deferred, and sent asynchronously when the network packet is full. When the client does not consume network packets quickly enough, eventually the buffers fill up, and the operation becomes blocking for SQL Server, generating the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits.



                Note the DONE tokens are different from DONEINPROC (code 0xFF) as the documentation notes:





                • A DONE token is returned for each SQL statement in the SQL batch except variable declarations.


                • For execution of SQL statements within stored procedures, DONEPROC and DONEINPROC tokens are used in place of DONE tokens.





                You will see a dramatic reduction in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits using:



                CREATE PROCEDURE #P AS
                SET NOCOUNT ON;

                DECLARE
                @outer_loop integer = 0,
                @big_string_for_u varchar(8000);


                WHILE @outer_loop < 5000000
                BEGIN
                SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
                SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
                END;
                GO
                EXECUTE dbo.#P;


                You could also use sys.sp_executesql to achieve the same result.



                Example stack trace captured just as an ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait begins:



                sending a packet



                An example TDS packet as seen in the inline function sqllang!srv_completioncode_ex<1> had the following 13 bytes:



                fd 01 00 c1 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00          


                Which decodes to:




                • TokenType = 0xfd DONE_TOKEN

                • Status = 0x0001 DONE_MORE

                • CurCmd = 0x00c1 (193)

                • DoneRowCount = 0x00000001 (1)


                Ultimately, the number of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits depends on the client and driver, and what it does, if anything, with all the DONE messages. Testing with a loop 1/10th of the size given in the question (5,000,000 loop iterations) I found SSMS ran for about 4 seconds with 200-300 ms of waits. sqlcmd ran for 2-3 seconds with single digit ms waits; osql around the same run time with around 10 ms of waits.



                The worst client by far for this test was Azure Data Studio. It ran for almost 6 hours:



                ADS






                share|improve this answer















                The documentation for SET NOCOUNT says:




                SET NOCOUNT ON prevents the sending of DONE_IN_PROC messages to the client for each statement in a stored procedure. For stored procedures that contain several statements that do not return much actual data, or for procedures that contain Transact-SQL loops, setting SET NOCOUNT to ON can provide a significant performance boost, because network traffic is greatly reduced.




                You are not running the statements in a stored procedure, so SQL Server sends DONE tokens (code 0xFD) to indicate the completion status of each SQL statement. These messages are deferred, and sent asynchronously when the network packet is full. When the client does not consume network packets quickly enough, eventually the buffers fill up, and the operation becomes blocking for SQL Server, generating the ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits.



                Note the DONE tokens are different from DONEINPROC (code 0xFF) as the documentation notes:





                • A DONE token is returned for each SQL statement in the SQL batch except variable declarations.


                • For execution of SQL statements within stored procedures, DONEPROC and DONEINPROC tokens are used in place of DONE tokens.





                You will see a dramatic reduction in ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits using:



                CREATE PROCEDURE #P AS
                SET NOCOUNT ON;

                DECLARE
                @outer_loop integer = 0,
                @big_string_for_u varchar(8000);


                WHILE @outer_loop < 5000000
                BEGIN
                SET @big_string_for_u = 'ZZZZZZZZZZ';
                SET @outer_loop = @outer_loop + 1;
                END;
                GO
                EXECUTE dbo.#P;


                You could also use sys.sp_executesql to achieve the same result.



                Example stack trace captured just as an ASYNC_NETWORK_IO wait begins:



                sending a packet



                An example TDS packet as seen in the inline function sqllang!srv_completioncode_ex<1> had the following 13 bytes:



                fd 01 00 c1 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00          


                Which decodes to:




                • TokenType = 0xfd DONE_TOKEN

                • Status = 0x0001 DONE_MORE

                • CurCmd = 0x00c1 (193)

                • DoneRowCount = 0x00000001 (1)


                Ultimately, the number of ASYNC_NETWORK_IO waits depends on the client and driver, and what it does, if anything, with all the DONE messages. Testing with a loop 1/10th of the size given in the question (5,000,000 loop iterations) I found SSMS ran for about 4 seconds with 200-300 ms of waits. sqlcmd ran for 2-3 seconds with single digit ms waits; osql around the same run time with around 10 ms of waits.



                The worst client by far for this test was Azure Data Studio. It ran for almost 6 hours:



                ADS







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Mar 22 at 22:31

























                answered Mar 22 at 6:42









                Paul WhitePaul White

                53.6k14286458




                53.6k14286458






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232816%2fwhy-does-a-simple-loop-result-in-async-network-io-waits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...