Homebrew not accepting valid options
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I've built a script to install a bunch of packages with homebrew. The script's available here.
When installing packages that has options, such as --with-default-names I get a warning like this:
warning: gnu-indent: this formula has no --with-default-names option so it will be ignored!
If I check the site, --with-default-names is a valid option.
If I run brew info gnu-indent I get the following output (nothing about --with-default-names).
gnu-indent: stable 2.2.12 (bottled)
C code prettifier
https://www.gnu.org/software/indent/
/usr/local/Cellar/gnu-indent/2.2.12 (47 files, 598.3KB) *
Poured from bottle on 2019-02-02 at 10:18:03
From: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formula/gnu-indent.rb
==> Dependencies
Required: gettext ✔
==> Caveats
GNU "indent" has been installed as "gindent".
If you need to use it as "indent", you can add a "gnubin" directory
to your PATH from your bashrc like:
PATH="/usr/local/opt/gnu-indent/libexec/gnubin:$PATH"
==> Analytics
install: 1,421 (30 days), 3,893 (90 days), 14,931 (365 days)
install_on_request: 1,325 (30 days), 3,584 (90 days), 13,848 (365 days)
build_error: 0 (30 days)
I've tried brew doctor (no warnings), uninstall Homebrew, and different syntaxes, without prevail. I've also used each command directly on the command line (outside the script), with the same results.
Note that I get error for all packages for which I use options.
macos homebrew
asked Feb 2 at 9:33
MaxMax
479
add a comment |
I've built a script to install a bunch of packages with homebrew. The script's available here.
When installing packages that has options, such as --with-default-names I get a warning like this:
warning: gnu-indent: this formula has no --with-default-names option so it will be ignored!
If I check the site, --with-default-names is a valid option.
If I run brew info gnu-indent I get the following output (nothing about --with-default-names).
gnu-indent: stable 2.2.12 (bottled)
C code prettifier
https://www.gnu.org/software/indent/
/usr/local/Cellar/gnu-indent/2.2.12 (47 files, 598.3KB) *
Poured from bottle on 2019-02-02 at 10:18:03
From: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formula/gnu-indent.rb
==> Dependencies
Required: gettext ✔
==> Caveats
GNU "indent" has been installed as "gindent".
If you need to use it as "indent", you can add a "gnubin" directory
to your PATH from your bashrc like:
PATH="/usr/local/opt/gnu-indent/libexec/gnubin:$PATH"
==> Analytics
install: 1,421 (30 days), 3,893 (90 days), 14,931 (365 days)
install_on_request: 1,325 (30 days), 3,584 (90 days), 13,848 (365 days)
build_error: 0 (30 days)
I've tried brew doctor (no warnings), uninstall Homebrew, and different syntaxes, without prevail. I've also used each command directly on the command line (outside the script), with the same results.
Note that I get error for all packages for which I use options.
macos homebrew
asked Feb 2 at 9:33
MaxMax
479
If the formula does not list this option, what makes you think it's a valid option to pass?
– slhck
Feb 2 at 11:00
Check the link above. There the option is listed. It's also used in several guides on how to install GNU command line tools on macOS, such as this.
– Max
Feb 2 at 11:51
The option obviously does not exist anymore.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 19:52
add a comment |
I've built a script to install a bunch of packages with homebrew. The script's available here.
When installing packages that has options, such as --with-default-names I get a warning like this:
warning: gnu-indent: this formula has no --with-default-names option so it will be ignored!
If I check the site, --with-default-names is a valid option.
If I run brew info gnu-indent I get the following output (nothing about --with-default-names).
gnu-indent: stable 2.2.12 (bottled)
C code prettifier
https://www.gnu.org/software/indent/
/usr/local/Cellar/gnu-indent/2.2.12 (47 files, 598.3KB) *
Poured from bottle on 2019-02-02 at 10:18:03
From: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formula/gnu-indent.rb
==> Dependencies
Required: gettext ✔
==> Caveats
GNU "indent" has been installed as "gindent".
If you need to use it as "indent", you can add a "gnubin" directory
to your PATH from your bashrc like:
PATH="/usr/local/opt/gnu-indent/libexec/gnubin:$PATH"
==> Analytics
install: 1,421 (30 days), 3,893 (90 days), 14,931 (365 days)
install_on_request: 1,325 (30 days), 3,584 (90 days), 13,848 (365 days)
build_error: 0 (30 days)
I've tried brew doctor (no warnings), uninstall Homebrew, and different syntaxes, without prevail. I've also used each command directly on the command line (outside the script), with the same results.
Note that I get error for all packages for which I use options.
macos homebrew
asked Feb 2 at 9:33
MaxMax
479
I've built a script to install a bunch of packages with homebrew. The script's available here.
When installing packages that has options, such as --with-default-names I get a warning like this:
warning: gnu-indent: this formula has no --with-default-names option so it will be ignored!
If I check the site, --with-default-names is a valid option.
If I run brew info gnu-indent I get the following output (nothing about --with-default-names).
gnu-indent: stable 2.2.12 (bottled)
C code prettifier
https://www.gnu.org/software/indent/
/usr/local/Cellar/gnu-indent/2.2.12 (47 files, 598.3KB) *
Poured from bottle on 2019-02-02 at 10:18:03
From: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formula/gnu-indent.rb
==> Dependencies
Required: gettext ✔
==> Caveats
GNU "indent" has been installed as "gindent".
If you need to use it as "indent", you can add a "gnubin" directory
to your PATH from your bashrc like:
PATH="/usr/local/opt/gnu-indent/libexec/gnubin:$PATH"
==> Analytics
install: 1,421 (30 days), 3,893 (90 days), 14,931 (365 days)
install_on_request: 1,325 (30 days), 3,584 (90 days), 13,848 (365 days)
build_error: 0 (30 days)
I've tried brew doctor (no warnings), uninstall Homebrew, and different syntaxes, without prevail. I've also used each command directly on the command line (outside the script), with the same results.
Note that I get error for all packages for which I use options.
macos homebrew
macos homebrew
asked Feb 2 at 9:33
MaxMax
479
asked Feb 2 at 9:33
MaxMax
479
edited Feb 2 at 14:15
Max
asked Feb 2 at 9:33
MaxMax
479
asked Feb 2 at 9:33
MaxMax
479
asked Feb 2 at 9:33
MaxMax
479
479
If the formula does not list this option, what makes you think it's a valid option to pass?
– slhck
Feb 2 at 11:00
Check the link above. There the option is listed. It's also used in several guides on how to install GNU command line tools on macOS, such as this.
– Max
Feb 2 at 11:51
The option obviously does not exist anymore.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 19:52
add a comment |
If the formula does not list this option, what makes you think it's a valid option to pass?
– slhck
Feb 2 at 11:00
Check the link above. There the option is listed. It's also used in several guides on how to install GNU command line tools on macOS, such as this.
– Max
Feb 2 at 11:51
The option obviously does not exist anymore.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 19:52
If the formula does not list this option, what makes you think it's a valid option to pass?
– slhck
Feb 2 at 11:00
If the formula does not list this option, what makes you think it's a valid option to pass?
– slhck
Feb 2 at 11:00
Check the link above. There the option is listed. It's also used in several guides on how to install GNU command line tools on macOS, such as this.
– Max
Feb 2 at 11:51
Check the link above. There the option is listed. It's also used in several guides on how to install GNU command line tools on macOS, such as this.
– Max
Feb 2 at 11:51
The option obviously does not exist anymore.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 19:52
The option obviously does not exist anymore.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 19:52
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Options are going away for core formulae.
You could use brew edit to edit the formula to your liking. You might have to remove the bottle.
answered Feb 2 at 20:01
Daniel BDaniel B
34.6k76587
Yes, that's seems to be the case. Confusing for me as I'm not very into how HomeBrew works, as the options are still among the most downloaded on the formulae.brew.sh site. The options must have been removed recently.
– Max
Feb 2 at 21:44
The option was removed on Jan 5, that’s why installs are still showing up in the 30-days statistic.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 23:37
Ok, I've searched now and can see that the option--with-default-nameshas been removed by the same time. Now I've learnt some about HomeBrew at least.
– Max
Feb 3 at 8:12
A link to the affected commits in the beginning of January 2019, if anyone's interested.
– Max
Feb 3 at 8:18
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1401274%2fhomebrew-not-accepting-valid-options%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Options are going away for core formulae.
You could use brew edit to edit the formula to your liking. You might have to remove the bottle.
answered Feb 2 at 20:01
Daniel BDaniel B
34.6k76587
Yes, that's seems to be the case. Confusing for me as I'm not very into how HomeBrew works, as the options are still among the most downloaded on the formulae.brew.sh site. The options must have been removed recently.
– Max
Feb 2 at 21:44
The option was removed on Jan 5, that’s why installs are still showing up in the 30-days statistic.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 23:37
Ok, I've searched now and can see that the option--with-default-nameshas been removed by the same time. Now I've learnt some about HomeBrew at least.
– Max
Feb 3 at 8:12
A link to the affected commits in the beginning of January 2019, if anyone's interested.
– Max
Feb 3 at 8:18
add a comment |
Options are going away for core formulae.
You could use brew edit to edit the formula to your liking. You might have to remove the bottle.
answered Feb 2 at 20:01
Daniel BDaniel B
34.6k76587
Yes, that's seems to be the case. Confusing for me as I'm not very into how HomeBrew works, as the options are still among the most downloaded on the formulae.brew.sh site. The options must have been removed recently.
– Max
Feb 2 at 21:44
The option was removed on Jan 5, that’s why installs are still showing up in the 30-days statistic.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 23:37
Ok, I've searched now and can see that the option--with-default-nameshas been removed by the same time. Now I've learnt some about HomeBrew at least.
– Max
Feb 3 at 8:12
A link to the affected commits in the beginning of January 2019, if anyone's interested.
– Max
Feb 3 at 8:18
add a comment |
Options are going away for core formulae.
You could use brew edit to edit the formula to your liking. You might have to remove the bottle.
answered Feb 2 at 20:01
Daniel BDaniel B
34.6k76587
Options are going away for core formulae.
You could use brew edit to edit the formula to your liking. You might have to remove the bottle.
answered Feb 2 at 20:01
Daniel BDaniel B
34.6k76587
answered Feb 2 at 20:01
Daniel BDaniel B
34.6k76587
answered Feb 2 at 20:01
Daniel BDaniel B
34.6k76587
answered Feb 2 at 20:01
Daniel BDaniel B
34.6k76587
34.6k76587
Yes, that's seems to be the case. Confusing for me as I'm not very into how HomeBrew works, as the options are still among the most downloaded on the formulae.brew.sh site. The options must have been removed recently.
– Max
Feb 2 at 21:44
The option was removed on Jan 5, that’s why installs are still showing up in the 30-days statistic.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 23:37
Ok, I've searched now and can see that the option--with-default-nameshas been removed by the same time. Now I've learnt some about HomeBrew at least.
– Max
Feb 3 at 8:12
A link to the affected commits in the beginning of January 2019, if anyone's interested.
– Max
Feb 3 at 8:18
add a comment |
Yes, that's seems to be the case. Confusing for me as I'm not very into how HomeBrew works, as the options are still among the most downloaded on the formulae.brew.sh site. The options must have been removed recently.
– Max
Feb 2 at 21:44
The option was removed on Jan 5, that’s why installs are still showing up in the 30-days statistic.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 23:37
Ok, I've searched now and can see that the option--with-default-nameshas been removed by the same time. Now I've learnt some about HomeBrew at least.
– Max
Feb 3 at 8:12
A link to the affected commits in the beginning of January 2019, if anyone's interested.
– Max
Feb 3 at 8:18
Yes, that's seems to be the case. Confusing for me as I'm not very into how HomeBrew works, as the options are still among the most downloaded on the formulae.brew.sh site. The options must have been removed recently.
– Max
Feb 2 at 21:44
Yes, that's seems to be the case. Confusing for me as I'm not very into how HomeBrew works, as the options are still among the most downloaded on the formulae.brew.sh site. The options must have been removed recently.
– Max
Feb 2 at 21:44
The option was removed on Jan 5, that’s why installs are still showing up in the 30-days statistic.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 23:37
The option was removed on Jan 5, that’s why installs are still showing up in the 30-days statistic.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 23:37
Ok, I've searched now and can see that the option
--with-default-names has been removed by the same time. Now I've learnt some about HomeBrew at least.– Max
Feb 3 at 8:12
Ok, I've searched now and can see that the option
--with-default-names has been removed by the same time. Now I've learnt some about HomeBrew at least.– Max
Feb 3 at 8:12
A link to the affected commits in the beginning of January 2019, if anyone's interested.
– Max
Feb 3 at 8:18
A link to the affected commits in the beginning of January 2019, if anyone's interested.
– Max
Feb 3 at 8:18
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1401274%2fhomebrew-not-accepting-valid-options%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
If the formula does not list this option, what makes you think it's a valid option to pass?
– slhck
Feb 2 at 11:00
Check the link above. There the option is listed. It's also used in several guides on how to install GNU command line tools on macOS, such as this.
– Max
Feb 2 at 11:51
The option obviously does not exist anymore.
– Daniel B
Feb 2 at 19:52