When would I use Cauchy's Integral Formula over Residue












0












$begingroup$


Just a quick question I've been wondering about. When would I use Cauchy's Integral Formula over the Residue Theorem to solve complex integration problems with poles? To me it seems that Residue theorem is much faster and easier to apply then creating partial fractions for rationals then solving the individual integrals. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It's a theoretical tool that is useful for proving many things, even though most of the time it might not be the best formula to compute an integral. In some sense it is kind of similar to Cramer's rule for solving linear system: no one uses it for practical purposes.
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 21 '18 at 4:49


















0












$begingroup$


Just a quick question I've been wondering about. When would I use Cauchy's Integral Formula over the Residue Theorem to solve complex integration problems with poles? To me it seems that Residue theorem is much faster and easier to apply then creating partial fractions for rationals then solving the individual integrals. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It's a theoretical tool that is useful for proving many things, even though most of the time it might not be the best formula to compute an integral. In some sense it is kind of similar to Cramer's rule for solving linear system: no one uses it for practical purposes.
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 21 '18 at 4:49
















0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


Just a quick question I've been wondering about. When would I use Cauchy's Integral Formula over the Residue Theorem to solve complex integration problems with poles? To me it seems that Residue theorem is much faster and easier to apply then creating partial fractions for rationals then solving the individual integrals. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Just a quick question I've been wondering about. When would I use Cauchy's Integral Formula over the Residue Theorem to solve complex integration problems with poles? To me it seems that Residue theorem is much faster and easier to apply then creating partial fractions for rationals then solving the individual integrals. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated?







complex-analysis residue-calculus complex-integration cauchy-integral-formula






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 20 '18 at 17:11









SafderSafder

318112




318112












  • $begingroup$
    It's a theoretical tool that is useful for proving many things, even though most of the time it might not be the best formula to compute an integral. In some sense it is kind of similar to Cramer's rule for solving linear system: no one uses it for practical purposes.
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 21 '18 at 4:49




















  • $begingroup$
    It's a theoretical tool that is useful for proving many things, even though most of the time it might not be the best formula to compute an integral. In some sense it is kind of similar to Cramer's rule for solving linear system: no one uses it for practical purposes.
    $endgroup$
    – BigbearZzz
    Dec 21 '18 at 4:49


















$begingroup$
It's a theoretical tool that is useful for proving many things, even though most of the time it might not be the best formula to compute an integral. In some sense it is kind of similar to Cramer's rule for solving linear system: no one uses it for practical purposes.
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 21 '18 at 4:49






$begingroup$
It's a theoretical tool that is useful for proving many things, even though most of the time it might not be the best formula to compute an integral. In some sense it is kind of similar to Cramer's rule for solving linear system: no one uses it for practical purposes.
$endgroup$
– BigbearZzz
Dec 21 '18 at 4:49












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

It just so happens that the Residue Theorem encompasses the Cauchy's Integral Formula. If you have a analytic function $f$ in the domain D such that $Gamma in D$ and you are asked to evaluate a loop integral of the form $$oint_Gamma frac{f(z)}{(z-z_0)^n}$$ then just use Cauchy's Integral Formula. It turns out its the exact same as the Residue Formula. Note that they both are essentially both looking at the $1/z$ term of the Laurent expansion of a series, and the Residue theorem encompasses everything without doing much preprocessing work.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Okay that makes sense. It just seemed easier to apply residue on most things.
    $endgroup$
    – Safder
    Dec 22 '18 at 0:01












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047765%2fwhen-would-i-use-cauchys-integral-formula-over-residue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

It just so happens that the Residue Theorem encompasses the Cauchy's Integral Formula. If you have a analytic function $f$ in the domain D such that $Gamma in D$ and you are asked to evaluate a loop integral of the form $$oint_Gamma frac{f(z)}{(z-z_0)^n}$$ then just use Cauchy's Integral Formula. It turns out its the exact same as the Residue Formula. Note that they both are essentially both looking at the $1/z$ term of the Laurent expansion of a series, and the Residue theorem encompasses everything without doing much preprocessing work.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Okay that makes sense. It just seemed easier to apply residue on most things.
    $endgroup$
    – Safder
    Dec 22 '18 at 0:01
















2












$begingroup$

It just so happens that the Residue Theorem encompasses the Cauchy's Integral Formula. If you have a analytic function $f$ in the domain D such that $Gamma in D$ and you are asked to evaluate a loop integral of the form $$oint_Gamma frac{f(z)}{(z-z_0)^n}$$ then just use Cauchy's Integral Formula. It turns out its the exact same as the Residue Formula. Note that they both are essentially both looking at the $1/z$ term of the Laurent expansion of a series, and the Residue theorem encompasses everything without doing much preprocessing work.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Okay that makes sense. It just seemed easier to apply residue on most things.
    $endgroup$
    – Safder
    Dec 22 '18 at 0:01














2












2








2





$begingroup$

It just so happens that the Residue Theorem encompasses the Cauchy's Integral Formula. If you have a analytic function $f$ in the domain D such that $Gamma in D$ and you are asked to evaluate a loop integral of the form $$oint_Gamma frac{f(z)}{(z-z_0)^n}$$ then just use Cauchy's Integral Formula. It turns out its the exact same as the Residue Formula. Note that they both are essentially both looking at the $1/z$ term of the Laurent expansion of a series, and the Residue theorem encompasses everything without doing much preprocessing work.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



It just so happens that the Residue Theorem encompasses the Cauchy's Integral Formula. If you have a analytic function $f$ in the domain D such that $Gamma in D$ and you are asked to evaluate a loop integral of the form $$oint_Gamma frac{f(z)}{(z-z_0)^n}$$ then just use Cauchy's Integral Formula. It turns out its the exact same as the Residue Formula. Note that they both are essentially both looking at the $1/z$ term of the Laurent expansion of a series, and the Residue theorem encompasses everything without doing much preprocessing work.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 21 '18 at 4:12









Neeyanth KopparapuNeeyanth Kopparapu

3016




3016












  • $begingroup$
    Okay that makes sense. It just seemed easier to apply residue on most things.
    $endgroup$
    – Safder
    Dec 22 '18 at 0:01


















  • $begingroup$
    Okay that makes sense. It just seemed easier to apply residue on most things.
    $endgroup$
    – Safder
    Dec 22 '18 at 0:01
















$begingroup$
Okay that makes sense. It just seemed easier to apply residue on most things.
$endgroup$
– Safder
Dec 22 '18 at 0:01




$begingroup$
Okay that makes sense. It just seemed easier to apply residue on most things.
$endgroup$
– Safder
Dec 22 '18 at 0:01


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047765%2fwhen-would-i-use-cauchys-integral-formula-over-residue%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...