Smart way to solve octics like $x^8+5992704x-304129728=0$












6












$begingroup$


Question: How to quickly find explicit formula for roots of polynomials (solvable by radicals) like $f(x)=x^8+5992704x-304129728$?





My current approach is just a brute force - not very fast and convenient:




  • observe that Galois group of above $f(x)$ is $C_2 wr S_4$, so one needs to find quartic polynomial $g(x)=x^4+cx^2+dx+e$ such that $f(x)$ splits into quadratic (and sextic) polynomial over it

  • iterate over small integer triples $c,d,e$ until correct $g(x)$ is found

  • to speed up the process I limited $g(x)$ to such that $Delta(g(x))$ divides $Delta(f(x))$ - here $Delta$ means discriminant


More explicitly, using GAP system:



x:=Indeterminate(Rationals, "x");
f:=x^8+5992704*x-304129728;
discrF:=Discriminant(f);

# define some arbitrary range of the c,d,e coefficients
for c in [-40..40] do
for d in [1..6000] do
for e in [-30000..30000] do
# small perf trick, calculate discriminant
# without actual construction of g(x)
discrG:=256*e^3-128*c^2*e^2+144*c*d^2*e-27*d^4+16*c^4*e-4*c^3*d^2;
if (discrG <> 0 and discrF mod discrG = 0) then
g:=x^4+c*x^2+d*x+e;
if IsIrreducible(g) then
e:=AlgebraicExtension(Rationals,g);
factors:=FactorsPolynomialAlgExt(e, f);
if Size(factors) > 1 then
Print("Success: g(x)=", g," : factors=", factors,"n");
fi;
fi;
fi;
od;
od;
od;


Couple hours later...:




  • $g(x)=x^4-34x^2+1632x-7871$

  • $f(x)={ x^2+(-a^3/56-a^2/56+89a/56-1207/56)x+(3a^3/28+6a^2/7+153a/28+459/7) }times{x^6+(a^3/56+a^2/56-89a/56+1207/56)x^5+(3a^3/28+33a^2/14+153a/28+561/14)x^4+(-27a^3/14-153a^2/14+2907a/14-4743/14)x^3+(-153a^2-3060a+4437)x^2+(-153a^3/7+8415a^2/7+13617a/7-2078199/7)x+(-2754a^3-5508a^2+109242a-2465748) }$


where $g(a) = 0$



Now one can find (very long and fancy) explicit expression for roots of $f(x)$, using only $+$, $-$, $times$, $div$, and $sqrt{}$ operations.





Loosely related question: On solvable octic trinomials like $x^8-5x-5=0$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you're going to resort to a computer algebra system, there's probably one that solves solvable octics quickly. Maybe Maple, maybe Mathematica.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    @N.S. As far as I understand degree of extension is determined by Galois group of roots of $f(x)$. Quadratic $g(x)$ is not possible for $C_2 wr S_4$. On the contrary, quadratic $g(x)$ is required e.g. for another group $S_4 wr C_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – klajok
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:56










  • $begingroup$
    @GerryMyerson I tried RadiRoot package in GAP system, but $C_2 wr S_4$ group is too big for it and calculations finish with out of memory error. Maybe one day I will get Maple or Mathematica...
    $endgroup$
    – klajok
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:01
















6












$begingroup$


Question: How to quickly find explicit formula for roots of polynomials (solvable by radicals) like $f(x)=x^8+5992704x-304129728$?





My current approach is just a brute force - not very fast and convenient:




  • observe that Galois group of above $f(x)$ is $C_2 wr S_4$, so one needs to find quartic polynomial $g(x)=x^4+cx^2+dx+e$ such that $f(x)$ splits into quadratic (and sextic) polynomial over it

  • iterate over small integer triples $c,d,e$ until correct $g(x)$ is found

  • to speed up the process I limited $g(x)$ to such that $Delta(g(x))$ divides $Delta(f(x))$ - here $Delta$ means discriminant


More explicitly, using GAP system:



x:=Indeterminate(Rationals, "x");
f:=x^8+5992704*x-304129728;
discrF:=Discriminant(f);

# define some arbitrary range of the c,d,e coefficients
for c in [-40..40] do
for d in [1..6000] do
for e in [-30000..30000] do
# small perf trick, calculate discriminant
# without actual construction of g(x)
discrG:=256*e^3-128*c^2*e^2+144*c*d^2*e-27*d^4+16*c^4*e-4*c^3*d^2;
if (discrG <> 0 and discrF mod discrG = 0) then
g:=x^4+c*x^2+d*x+e;
if IsIrreducible(g) then
e:=AlgebraicExtension(Rationals,g);
factors:=FactorsPolynomialAlgExt(e, f);
if Size(factors) > 1 then
Print("Success: g(x)=", g," : factors=", factors,"n");
fi;
fi;
fi;
od;
od;
od;


Couple hours later...:




  • $g(x)=x^4-34x^2+1632x-7871$

  • $f(x)={ x^2+(-a^3/56-a^2/56+89a/56-1207/56)x+(3a^3/28+6a^2/7+153a/28+459/7) }times{x^6+(a^3/56+a^2/56-89a/56+1207/56)x^5+(3a^3/28+33a^2/14+153a/28+561/14)x^4+(-27a^3/14-153a^2/14+2907a/14-4743/14)x^3+(-153a^2-3060a+4437)x^2+(-153a^3/7+8415a^2/7+13617a/7-2078199/7)x+(-2754a^3-5508a^2+109242a-2465748) }$


where $g(a) = 0$



Now one can find (very long and fancy) explicit expression for roots of $f(x)$, using only $+$, $-$, $times$, $div$, and $sqrt{}$ operations.





Loosely related question: On solvable octic trinomials like $x^8-5x-5=0$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you're going to resort to a computer algebra system, there's probably one that solves solvable octics quickly. Maybe Maple, maybe Mathematica.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    @N.S. As far as I understand degree of extension is determined by Galois group of roots of $f(x)$. Quadratic $g(x)$ is not possible for $C_2 wr S_4$. On the contrary, quadratic $g(x)$ is required e.g. for another group $S_4 wr C_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – klajok
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:56










  • $begingroup$
    @GerryMyerson I tried RadiRoot package in GAP system, but $C_2 wr S_4$ group is too big for it and calculations finish with out of memory error. Maybe one day I will get Maple or Mathematica...
    $endgroup$
    – klajok
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:01














6












6








6


1



$begingroup$


Question: How to quickly find explicit formula for roots of polynomials (solvable by radicals) like $f(x)=x^8+5992704x-304129728$?





My current approach is just a brute force - not very fast and convenient:




  • observe that Galois group of above $f(x)$ is $C_2 wr S_4$, so one needs to find quartic polynomial $g(x)=x^4+cx^2+dx+e$ such that $f(x)$ splits into quadratic (and sextic) polynomial over it

  • iterate over small integer triples $c,d,e$ until correct $g(x)$ is found

  • to speed up the process I limited $g(x)$ to such that $Delta(g(x))$ divides $Delta(f(x))$ - here $Delta$ means discriminant


More explicitly, using GAP system:



x:=Indeterminate(Rationals, "x");
f:=x^8+5992704*x-304129728;
discrF:=Discriminant(f);

# define some arbitrary range of the c,d,e coefficients
for c in [-40..40] do
for d in [1..6000] do
for e in [-30000..30000] do
# small perf trick, calculate discriminant
# without actual construction of g(x)
discrG:=256*e^3-128*c^2*e^2+144*c*d^2*e-27*d^4+16*c^4*e-4*c^3*d^2;
if (discrG <> 0 and discrF mod discrG = 0) then
g:=x^4+c*x^2+d*x+e;
if IsIrreducible(g) then
e:=AlgebraicExtension(Rationals,g);
factors:=FactorsPolynomialAlgExt(e, f);
if Size(factors) > 1 then
Print("Success: g(x)=", g," : factors=", factors,"n");
fi;
fi;
fi;
od;
od;
od;


Couple hours later...:




  • $g(x)=x^4-34x^2+1632x-7871$

  • $f(x)={ x^2+(-a^3/56-a^2/56+89a/56-1207/56)x+(3a^3/28+6a^2/7+153a/28+459/7) }times{x^6+(a^3/56+a^2/56-89a/56+1207/56)x^5+(3a^3/28+33a^2/14+153a/28+561/14)x^4+(-27a^3/14-153a^2/14+2907a/14-4743/14)x^3+(-153a^2-3060a+4437)x^2+(-153a^3/7+8415a^2/7+13617a/7-2078199/7)x+(-2754a^3-5508a^2+109242a-2465748) }$


where $g(a) = 0$



Now one can find (very long and fancy) explicit expression for roots of $f(x)$, using only $+$, $-$, $times$, $div$, and $sqrt{}$ operations.





Loosely related question: On solvable octic trinomials like $x^8-5x-5=0$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Question: How to quickly find explicit formula for roots of polynomials (solvable by radicals) like $f(x)=x^8+5992704x-304129728$?





My current approach is just a brute force - not very fast and convenient:




  • observe that Galois group of above $f(x)$ is $C_2 wr S_4$, so one needs to find quartic polynomial $g(x)=x^4+cx^2+dx+e$ such that $f(x)$ splits into quadratic (and sextic) polynomial over it

  • iterate over small integer triples $c,d,e$ until correct $g(x)$ is found

  • to speed up the process I limited $g(x)$ to such that $Delta(g(x))$ divides $Delta(f(x))$ - here $Delta$ means discriminant


More explicitly, using GAP system:



x:=Indeterminate(Rationals, "x");
f:=x^8+5992704*x-304129728;
discrF:=Discriminant(f);

# define some arbitrary range of the c,d,e coefficients
for c in [-40..40] do
for d in [1..6000] do
for e in [-30000..30000] do
# small perf trick, calculate discriminant
# without actual construction of g(x)
discrG:=256*e^3-128*c^2*e^2+144*c*d^2*e-27*d^4+16*c^4*e-4*c^3*d^2;
if (discrG <> 0 and discrF mod discrG = 0) then
g:=x^4+c*x^2+d*x+e;
if IsIrreducible(g) then
e:=AlgebraicExtension(Rationals,g);
factors:=FactorsPolynomialAlgExt(e, f);
if Size(factors) > 1 then
Print("Success: g(x)=", g," : factors=", factors,"n");
fi;
fi;
fi;
od;
od;
od;


Couple hours later...:




  • $g(x)=x^4-34x^2+1632x-7871$

  • $f(x)={ x^2+(-a^3/56-a^2/56+89a/56-1207/56)x+(3a^3/28+6a^2/7+153a/28+459/7) }times{x^6+(a^3/56+a^2/56-89a/56+1207/56)x^5+(3a^3/28+33a^2/14+153a/28+561/14)x^4+(-27a^3/14-153a^2/14+2907a/14-4743/14)x^3+(-153a^2-3060a+4437)x^2+(-153a^3/7+8415a^2/7+13617a/7-2078199/7)x+(-2754a^3-5508a^2+109242a-2465748) }$


where $g(a) = 0$



Now one can find (very long and fancy) explicit expression for roots of $f(x)$, using only $+$, $-$, $times$, $div$, and $sqrt{}$ operations.





Loosely related question: On solvable octic trinomials like $x^8-5x-5=0$







galois-theory radicals gap






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 21 '18 at 18:27









klajokklajok

37519




37519












  • $begingroup$
    If you're going to resort to a computer algebra system, there's probably one that solves solvable octics quickly. Maybe Maple, maybe Mathematica.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    @N.S. As far as I understand degree of extension is determined by Galois group of roots of $f(x)$. Quadratic $g(x)$ is not possible for $C_2 wr S_4$. On the contrary, quadratic $g(x)$ is required e.g. for another group $S_4 wr C_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – klajok
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:56










  • $begingroup$
    @GerryMyerson I tried RadiRoot package in GAP system, but $C_2 wr S_4$ group is too big for it and calculations finish with out of memory error. Maybe one day I will get Maple or Mathematica...
    $endgroup$
    – klajok
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:01


















  • $begingroup$
    If you're going to resort to a computer algebra system, there's probably one that solves solvable octics quickly. Maybe Maple, maybe Mathematica.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerry Myerson
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    @N.S. As far as I understand degree of extension is determined by Galois group of roots of $f(x)$. Quadratic $g(x)$ is not possible for $C_2 wr S_4$. On the contrary, quadratic $g(x)$ is required e.g. for another group $S_4 wr C_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – klajok
    Dec 21 '18 at 19:56










  • $begingroup$
    @GerryMyerson I tried RadiRoot package in GAP system, but $C_2 wr S_4$ group is too big for it and calculations finish with out of memory error. Maybe one day I will get Maple or Mathematica...
    $endgroup$
    – klajok
    Dec 21 '18 at 20:01
















$begingroup$
If you're going to resort to a computer algebra system, there's probably one that solves solvable octics quickly. Maybe Maple, maybe Mathematica.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Dec 21 '18 at 19:41




$begingroup$
If you're going to resort to a computer algebra system, there's probably one that solves solvable octics quickly. Maybe Maple, maybe Mathematica.
$endgroup$
– Gerry Myerson
Dec 21 '18 at 19:41












$begingroup$
@N.S. As far as I understand degree of extension is determined by Galois group of roots of $f(x)$. Quadratic $g(x)$ is not possible for $C_2 wr S_4$. On the contrary, quadratic $g(x)$ is required e.g. for another group $S_4 wr C_2$.
$endgroup$
– klajok
Dec 21 '18 at 19:56




$begingroup$
@N.S. As far as I understand degree of extension is determined by Galois group of roots of $f(x)$. Quadratic $g(x)$ is not possible for $C_2 wr S_4$. On the contrary, quadratic $g(x)$ is required e.g. for another group $S_4 wr C_2$.
$endgroup$
– klajok
Dec 21 '18 at 19:56












$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson I tried RadiRoot package in GAP system, but $C_2 wr S_4$ group is too big for it and calculations finish with out of memory error. Maybe one day I will get Maple or Mathematica...
$endgroup$
– klajok
Dec 21 '18 at 20:01




$begingroup$
@GerryMyerson I tried RadiRoot package in GAP system, but $C_2 wr S_4$ group is too big for it and calculations finish with out of memory error. Maybe one day I will get Maple or Mathematica...
$endgroup$
– klajok
Dec 21 '18 at 20:01










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

If I understand your question correctly, the abstract translation of your observation is that the Galois group is imprimitive, that is that the field of degree 8 defined by $f$ has a subfield of degree $2$ (over which it has degree $2$), that is over this subfield $f$ will have a quadratic factor.



Such subfields correspond to polynomial decompositions, that is pairs of polynomials $g,h$ such that $f(x)$ divides $g(h(x))$. The polynomial $g$ defines the subfield you are seeking, the polynomial $h$ expresses a root of $g$ in terms of a root of $f$.



In GAP, you can find such decompositions using the function DecomPoly. It takes a polynomial $f$ and returns a list of all possible decompositions (up to equality of the intermediate fields.



In your example, we indeed get the degree 2 factor you were seeking (and this is much faster than the hours you quote):



gap> DecomPoly(f);
[ [ x^4+273770356608*x^3+4408835773957146427392*x^2- 7845555523405311768791676626141184*x-986470018747508750165370725578689408242024448,
3663*x^7-22492*x^6-364752*x^5-5179288*x^4-28801128*x^3+150835968*x^2+121269024*x-49235223744 ] ]
gap> g:=last[1][1];
x^4+273770356608*x^3+4408835773957146427392*x^2- 7845555523405311768791676626141184*x-986470018747508750165370725578689408242024448
gap> e:=AlgebraicExtension(Rationals,g);
<algebraic extension over the Rationals of degree 4>
gap> fe:=Value(f,X(e)); # write f over e
x_1^8+!5992704*x_1+(!-304129728)
gap> Factors(fe);
[ x_1^2+(-1/514753642938357559490856611217408*a^3-1/1141573548613903985664*a^2+1/233510010048*a+18)*x_1+1/1342011552*a,
x_1^6+(1/514753642938357559490856611217408*a^3+1/1141573548613903985664*a^2-1/233510010048*a-18)*x_1^5+(-1/12256039117579941892639443124224*a^3-1/104457710330684024832*a^2+47/19459167504*a+408)*x_1^4+(5/14298712303843265541412683644928*a^3-1/26114427582671006208*a^2-9/926627024*a+1224)*x_1^3+(1/420550361877743104159196577792*a^3+1/932658127952535936*a^2-15/95388076*a-30600)*x_1^2+(-1/14501736616473900143420571648*a^3-1/112562187856340544*a^2+9/6578488*a+105264)*x_1+(-1/2416956102745650023903428608*a^3-1/8828406890693376*a^2-3/1644622*a+3246048) ]


The algorithm used by GAP is described (disclaimer: self-promotion) in



Hulpke, Alexander
Block systems of a Galois group, Experiment. Math. 4 (1995), no. 1, 1–9.



but there are by now better algorithms with



van Hoeij, Mark; Klüners, Jürgen; Novocin, Andrew
Generating subfields,
J. Symbolic Comput. 52 (2013), 17–34.



as far as I know the state of the art.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048773%2fsmart-way-to-solve-octics-like-x85992704x-304129728-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    If I understand your question correctly, the abstract translation of your observation is that the Galois group is imprimitive, that is that the field of degree 8 defined by $f$ has a subfield of degree $2$ (over which it has degree $2$), that is over this subfield $f$ will have a quadratic factor.



    Such subfields correspond to polynomial decompositions, that is pairs of polynomials $g,h$ such that $f(x)$ divides $g(h(x))$. The polynomial $g$ defines the subfield you are seeking, the polynomial $h$ expresses a root of $g$ in terms of a root of $f$.



    In GAP, you can find such decompositions using the function DecomPoly. It takes a polynomial $f$ and returns a list of all possible decompositions (up to equality of the intermediate fields.



    In your example, we indeed get the degree 2 factor you were seeking (and this is much faster than the hours you quote):



    gap> DecomPoly(f);
    [ [ x^4+273770356608*x^3+4408835773957146427392*x^2- 7845555523405311768791676626141184*x-986470018747508750165370725578689408242024448,
    3663*x^7-22492*x^6-364752*x^5-5179288*x^4-28801128*x^3+150835968*x^2+121269024*x-49235223744 ] ]
    gap> g:=last[1][1];
    x^4+273770356608*x^3+4408835773957146427392*x^2- 7845555523405311768791676626141184*x-986470018747508750165370725578689408242024448
    gap> e:=AlgebraicExtension(Rationals,g);
    <algebraic extension over the Rationals of degree 4>
    gap> fe:=Value(f,X(e)); # write f over e
    x_1^8+!5992704*x_1+(!-304129728)
    gap> Factors(fe);
    [ x_1^2+(-1/514753642938357559490856611217408*a^3-1/1141573548613903985664*a^2+1/233510010048*a+18)*x_1+1/1342011552*a,
    x_1^6+(1/514753642938357559490856611217408*a^3+1/1141573548613903985664*a^2-1/233510010048*a-18)*x_1^5+(-1/12256039117579941892639443124224*a^3-1/104457710330684024832*a^2+47/19459167504*a+408)*x_1^4+(5/14298712303843265541412683644928*a^3-1/26114427582671006208*a^2-9/926627024*a+1224)*x_1^3+(1/420550361877743104159196577792*a^3+1/932658127952535936*a^2-15/95388076*a-30600)*x_1^2+(-1/14501736616473900143420571648*a^3-1/112562187856340544*a^2+9/6578488*a+105264)*x_1+(-1/2416956102745650023903428608*a^3-1/8828406890693376*a^2-3/1644622*a+3246048) ]


    The algorithm used by GAP is described (disclaimer: self-promotion) in



    Hulpke, Alexander
    Block systems of a Galois group, Experiment. Math. 4 (1995), no. 1, 1–9.



    but there are by now better algorithms with



    van Hoeij, Mark; Klüners, Jürgen; Novocin, Andrew
    Generating subfields,
    J. Symbolic Comput. 52 (2013), 17–34.



    as far as I know the state of the art.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      If I understand your question correctly, the abstract translation of your observation is that the Galois group is imprimitive, that is that the field of degree 8 defined by $f$ has a subfield of degree $2$ (over which it has degree $2$), that is over this subfield $f$ will have a quadratic factor.



      Such subfields correspond to polynomial decompositions, that is pairs of polynomials $g,h$ such that $f(x)$ divides $g(h(x))$. The polynomial $g$ defines the subfield you are seeking, the polynomial $h$ expresses a root of $g$ in terms of a root of $f$.



      In GAP, you can find such decompositions using the function DecomPoly. It takes a polynomial $f$ and returns a list of all possible decompositions (up to equality of the intermediate fields.



      In your example, we indeed get the degree 2 factor you were seeking (and this is much faster than the hours you quote):



      gap> DecomPoly(f);
      [ [ x^4+273770356608*x^3+4408835773957146427392*x^2- 7845555523405311768791676626141184*x-986470018747508750165370725578689408242024448,
      3663*x^7-22492*x^6-364752*x^5-5179288*x^4-28801128*x^3+150835968*x^2+121269024*x-49235223744 ] ]
      gap> g:=last[1][1];
      x^4+273770356608*x^3+4408835773957146427392*x^2- 7845555523405311768791676626141184*x-986470018747508750165370725578689408242024448
      gap> e:=AlgebraicExtension(Rationals,g);
      <algebraic extension over the Rationals of degree 4>
      gap> fe:=Value(f,X(e)); # write f over e
      x_1^8+!5992704*x_1+(!-304129728)
      gap> Factors(fe);
      [ x_1^2+(-1/514753642938357559490856611217408*a^3-1/1141573548613903985664*a^2+1/233510010048*a+18)*x_1+1/1342011552*a,
      x_1^6+(1/514753642938357559490856611217408*a^3+1/1141573548613903985664*a^2-1/233510010048*a-18)*x_1^5+(-1/12256039117579941892639443124224*a^3-1/104457710330684024832*a^2+47/19459167504*a+408)*x_1^4+(5/14298712303843265541412683644928*a^3-1/26114427582671006208*a^2-9/926627024*a+1224)*x_1^3+(1/420550361877743104159196577792*a^3+1/932658127952535936*a^2-15/95388076*a-30600)*x_1^2+(-1/14501736616473900143420571648*a^3-1/112562187856340544*a^2+9/6578488*a+105264)*x_1+(-1/2416956102745650023903428608*a^3-1/8828406890693376*a^2-3/1644622*a+3246048) ]


      The algorithm used by GAP is described (disclaimer: self-promotion) in



      Hulpke, Alexander
      Block systems of a Galois group, Experiment. Math. 4 (1995), no. 1, 1–9.



      but there are by now better algorithms with



      van Hoeij, Mark; Klüners, Jürgen; Novocin, Andrew
      Generating subfields,
      J. Symbolic Comput. 52 (2013), 17–34.



      as far as I know the state of the art.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        If I understand your question correctly, the abstract translation of your observation is that the Galois group is imprimitive, that is that the field of degree 8 defined by $f$ has a subfield of degree $2$ (over which it has degree $2$), that is over this subfield $f$ will have a quadratic factor.



        Such subfields correspond to polynomial decompositions, that is pairs of polynomials $g,h$ such that $f(x)$ divides $g(h(x))$. The polynomial $g$ defines the subfield you are seeking, the polynomial $h$ expresses a root of $g$ in terms of a root of $f$.



        In GAP, you can find such decompositions using the function DecomPoly. It takes a polynomial $f$ and returns a list of all possible decompositions (up to equality of the intermediate fields.



        In your example, we indeed get the degree 2 factor you were seeking (and this is much faster than the hours you quote):



        gap> DecomPoly(f);
        [ [ x^4+273770356608*x^3+4408835773957146427392*x^2- 7845555523405311768791676626141184*x-986470018747508750165370725578689408242024448,
        3663*x^7-22492*x^6-364752*x^5-5179288*x^4-28801128*x^3+150835968*x^2+121269024*x-49235223744 ] ]
        gap> g:=last[1][1];
        x^4+273770356608*x^3+4408835773957146427392*x^2- 7845555523405311768791676626141184*x-986470018747508750165370725578689408242024448
        gap> e:=AlgebraicExtension(Rationals,g);
        <algebraic extension over the Rationals of degree 4>
        gap> fe:=Value(f,X(e)); # write f over e
        x_1^8+!5992704*x_1+(!-304129728)
        gap> Factors(fe);
        [ x_1^2+(-1/514753642938357559490856611217408*a^3-1/1141573548613903985664*a^2+1/233510010048*a+18)*x_1+1/1342011552*a,
        x_1^6+(1/514753642938357559490856611217408*a^3+1/1141573548613903985664*a^2-1/233510010048*a-18)*x_1^5+(-1/12256039117579941892639443124224*a^3-1/104457710330684024832*a^2+47/19459167504*a+408)*x_1^4+(5/14298712303843265541412683644928*a^3-1/26114427582671006208*a^2-9/926627024*a+1224)*x_1^3+(1/420550361877743104159196577792*a^3+1/932658127952535936*a^2-15/95388076*a-30600)*x_1^2+(-1/14501736616473900143420571648*a^3-1/112562187856340544*a^2+9/6578488*a+105264)*x_1+(-1/2416956102745650023903428608*a^3-1/8828406890693376*a^2-3/1644622*a+3246048) ]


        The algorithm used by GAP is described (disclaimer: self-promotion) in



        Hulpke, Alexander
        Block systems of a Galois group, Experiment. Math. 4 (1995), no. 1, 1–9.



        but there are by now better algorithms with



        van Hoeij, Mark; Klüners, Jürgen; Novocin, Andrew
        Generating subfields,
        J. Symbolic Comput. 52 (2013), 17–34.



        as far as I know the state of the art.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If I understand your question correctly, the abstract translation of your observation is that the Galois group is imprimitive, that is that the field of degree 8 defined by $f$ has a subfield of degree $2$ (over which it has degree $2$), that is over this subfield $f$ will have a quadratic factor.



        Such subfields correspond to polynomial decompositions, that is pairs of polynomials $g,h$ such that $f(x)$ divides $g(h(x))$. The polynomial $g$ defines the subfield you are seeking, the polynomial $h$ expresses a root of $g$ in terms of a root of $f$.



        In GAP, you can find such decompositions using the function DecomPoly. It takes a polynomial $f$ and returns a list of all possible decompositions (up to equality of the intermediate fields.



        In your example, we indeed get the degree 2 factor you were seeking (and this is much faster than the hours you quote):



        gap> DecomPoly(f);
        [ [ x^4+273770356608*x^3+4408835773957146427392*x^2- 7845555523405311768791676626141184*x-986470018747508750165370725578689408242024448,
        3663*x^7-22492*x^6-364752*x^5-5179288*x^4-28801128*x^3+150835968*x^2+121269024*x-49235223744 ] ]
        gap> g:=last[1][1];
        x^4+273770356608*x^3+4408835773957146427392*x^2- 7845555523405311768791676626141184*x-986470018747508750165370725578689408242024448
        gap> e:=AlgebraicExtension(Rationals,g);
        <algebraic extension over the Rationals of degree 4>
        gap> fe:=Value(f,X(e)); # write f over e
        x_1^8+!5992704*x_1+(!-304129728)
        gap> Factors(fe);
        [ x_1^2+(-1/514753642938357559490856611217408*a^3-1/1141573548613903985664*a^2+1/233510010048*a+18)*x_1+1/1342011552*a,
        x_1^6+(1/514753642938357559490856611217408*a^3+1/1141573548613903985664*a^2-1/233510010048*a-18)*x_1^5+(-1/12256039117579941892639443124224*a^3-1/104457710330684024832*a^2+47/19459167504*a+408)*x_1^4+(5/14298712303843265541412683644928*a^3-1/26114427582671006208*a^2-9/926627024*a+1224)*x_1^3+(1/420550361877743104159196577792*a^3+1/932658127952535936*a^2-15/95388076*a-30600)*x_1^2+(-1/14501736616473900143420571648*a^3-1/112562187856340544*a^2+9/6578488*a+105264)*x_1+(-1/2416956102745650023903428608*a^3-1/8828406890693376*a^2-3/1644622*a+3246048) ]


        The algorithm used by GAP is described (disclaimer: self-promotion) in



        Hulpke, Alexander
        Block systems of a Galois group, Experiment. Math. 4 (1995), no. 1, 1–9.



        but there are by now better algorithms with



        van Hoeij, Mark; Klüners, Jürgen; Novocin, Andrew
        Generating subfields,
        J. Symbolic Comput. 52 (2013), 17–34.



        as far as I know the state of the art.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 23 '18 at 15:48









        ahulpkeahulpke

        7,2421026




        7,2421026






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048773%2fsmart-way-to-solve-octics-like-x85992704x-304129728-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...