Question on proposition 4 in do carmo's differential geometry page 66
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This is the proposition and proof saying that if we know that S is a regular surface and x is a candidate of parametrization which satisfies 1)differentiable 2)surjective differential map 3)continuous bijective then, x has a continuous inverse thus resulting that x is a real parametrization
However, in the proof, I cannot see that where I used the condition that S is a regular surface
Please let me know where the condition S is a regular surface used and is there any counter-example that x does not have a continuous inverse when S is not a regular surface?
differential-geometry parametrization
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This is the proposition and proof saying that if we know that S is a regular surface and x is a candidate of parametrization which satisfies 1)differentiable 2)surjective differential map 3)continuous bijective then, x has a continuous inverse thus resulting that x is a real parametrization
However, in the proof, I cannot see that where I used the condition that S is a regular surface
Please let me know where the condition S is a regular surface used and is there any counter-example that x does not have a continuous inverse when S is not a regular surface?
differential-geometry parametrization
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This is the proposition and proof saying that if we know that S is a regular surface and x is a candidate of parametrization which satisfies 1)differentiable 2)surjective differential map 3)continuous bijective then, x has a continuous inverse thus resulting that x is a real parametrization
However, in the proof, I cannot see that where I used the condition that S is a regular surface
Please let me know where the condition S is a regular surface used and is there any counter-example that x does not have a continuous inverse when S is not a regular surface?
differential-geometry parametrization
This is the proposition and proof saying that if we know that S is a regular surface and x is a candidate of parametrization which satisfies 1)differentiable 2)surjective differential map 3)continuous bijective then, x has a continuous inverse thus resulting that x is a real parametrization
However, in the proof, I cannot see that where I used the condition that S is a regular surface
Please let me know where the condition S is a regular surface used and is there any counter-example that x does not have a continuous inverse when S is not a regular surface?
differential-geometry parametrization
differential-geometry parametrization
asked 15 hours ago
Jaeyoon Yoo
876
876
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2997899%2fquestion-on-proposition-4-in-do-carmos-differential-geometry-page-66%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password