Why does my bumper scrape when driving fast over a bump but not slow?











up vote
27
down vote

favorite
3












When driving my car over a bump or a quick change in gradient (from flat to uphill or downhill to flat), if I don't drive slowly and the bump/change in gradient is large enough, I'll end up with my front bumper dragging on the road/bump. But if I go slowly, there's no such issue.



I would expect that the wheels are still taking the same path regardless of the speed, so the car's body should also act the same regardless. Why does it make a difference when speed is changed? Why doesn't the car behave the same way regardless?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




scohe001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • youtube.com/watch?v=UB9gA9Af5Tw
    – Jasper
    2 days ago















up vote
27
down vote

favorite
3












When driving my car over a bump or a quick change in gradient (from flat to uphill or downhill to flat), if I don't drive slowly and the bump/change in gradient is large enough, I'll end up with my front bumper dragging on the road/bump. But if I go slowly, there's no such issue.



I would expect that the wheels are still taking the same path regardless of the speed, so the car's body should also act the same regardless. Why does it make a difference when speed is changed? Why doesn't the car behave the same way regardless?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




scohe001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • youtube.com/watch?v=UB9gA9Af5Tw
    – Jasper
    2 days ago













up vote
27
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
27
down vote

favorite
3






3





When driving my car over a bump or a quick change in gradient (from flat to uphill or downhill to flat), if I don't drive slowly and the bump/change in gradient is large enough, I'll end up with my front bumper dragging on the road/bump. But if I go slowly, there's no such issue.



I would expect that the wheels are still taking the same path regardless of the speed, so the car's body should also act the same regardless. Why does it make a difference when speed is changed? Why doesn't the car behave the same way regardless?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




scohe001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











When driving my car over a bump or a quick change in gradient (from flat to uphill or downhill to flat), if I don't drive slowly and the bump/change in gradient is large enough, I'll end up with my front bumper dragging on the road/bump. But if I go slowly, there's no such issue.



I would expect that the wheels are still taking the same path regardless of the speed, so the car's body should also act the same regardless. Why does it make a difference when speed is changed? Why doesn't the car behave the same way regardless?







newtonian-mechanics everyday-life collision spring






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




scohe001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




scohe001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Qmechanic

99.3k121781107




99.3k121781107






New contributor




scohe001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









scohe001

247211




247211




New contributor




scohe001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





scohe001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






scohe001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • youtube.com/watch?v=UB9gA9Af5Tw
    – Jasper
    2 days ago


















  • youtube.com/watch?v=UB9gA9Af5Tw
    – Jasper
    2 days ago
















youtube.com/watch?v=UB9gA9Af5Tw
– Jasper
2 days ago




youtube.com/watch?v=UB9gA9Af5Tw
– Jasper
2 days ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
27
down vote



accepted










I think that physics.SE deserves an answer in physics terminology.



Change of direction = acceleration. Acceleration is caused by force. Force is applied through suspension and compresses it.



Larger speeds lead to larger acceleration and larger force which in turn compresses the spring more.



To be a bit more precise, we could model the upwards curve as consisting of arc segments. It would mean that at the segment with curvature radius $r$ the acceleration is $v^2/r$ and the force is $mv^2/r$. If we suppose the spring is linear, the compression will equal force over the spring constant - $frac{mv^2}{rk}$.



Disclaimer: the spring is probably not linear, it should become increasingly high-degree-polynomial near the extremes of it's range (i.e. it should try to stop itself from compressing too much). The $m$ is not the mass of the car but something like the portion that rests on the axis in question. Which depends on multiple factors including the road curvature and the absolute acceleration of car. And the $r$ is not the curvature radius of the road but that of the car's body. Suspension is intended exactly to make it less than the curvature of the road - smoothen the bump.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 3




    Car suspension is designed to be pretty close to linear across the entire motion ratio, so it's a valid assumption to make - also +1 for being the only answer to mention the velocity squared part, as that's the key issue I see - the question's assumption about the car's wheels and body taking the same path is false
    – user2813274
    2 days ago










  • Awesome explanation. The v^2 relationship specifically explains why there's such a big difference in just a few mph.
    – scohe001
    yesterday






  • 2




    @jpaugh: unless you are driving a purpose-built racing car at ludicrous speed, the aerodynamic downforce is not significant. Gravity is sufficient in analyzing this situation.
    – whatsisname
    21 hours ago






  • 1




    This is not a good answer. It is factually correct in its statements but it does not present a complete chain of reasoning between a large speed and scraping the front into the speed bump.
    – MichaelK
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    @jpaugh: I can't understand the level of confusion you're describing here. The system can be understood even if you think of a car as having just one wheel. The mass of the car resists changes in velocity. If the ground underneath moves fast enough, i.e. a big enough bump relative to the cars speed, the springs won't deliver enough force to move the car's mass and the vehicle will bottom out. Throw a few thousand pounds of bricks in a car and you can bottom it out hitting bumps at walking speeds.
    – whatsisname
    9 hours ago




















up vote
67
down vote













Because your car has a suspension.



A car's wheels are not rigidly attached to the frame. Rather, they are attached with springs and shock absorbers that allow the wheels to move somewhat relative to the rest of the car. This is generally speaking a good thing, as it means that when the wheels go over a small bump or pothole in the road, the frame does not necessarily need to move up and down; and so you, the passenger, get a smoother ride. But if the bumps are large and the speeds are too high, this same "smoothing" effect means that the frame of the car can come into contact with the road surface.



As to why this smoothing effect occurs: imagine that you have, on a table, a large block (standing in for the car), attached by a spring (the suspension) to a smaller block (the wheel.) Suppose that the table is very smooth, so that we can ignore friction between the table and the smaller blocks. If you pull the small block quickly & suddenly away from the larger block, the spring stretches a lot and the large block won't move very much at all: it has a lot of inertia, and so it can't accelerate very quickly. This is the equivalent of going over a bump or pothole at high speed: the wheel suddenly moves up or down relative to the frame, but the frame doesn't move up or down much at all.



But if you pull the small block away from the large block slowly, then the large block will follow the small block, while the spring doesn't stretch terribly much. In this case, the low acceleration of the large mass takes place over a longer time, and so it can move more while the force is being exerted on it. This is the equivalent of going over a bump/pothole at low speed; since the wheels move up or down relatively slowly, the frame of the car will follow them. If you go over a bump at low speed, this means that the frame will follow the wheels (which follow the road surface), rather than moving in something resembling a straight line and possibly hitting the road surface.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 2




    Also worth pointing out that suspensions can behave differently depending on the stiffness of the springs. Cars that are low to the ground need to have a relatively stiff suspension to prevent bottoming out, since there's little room for the spring to travel. Vehicles that ride higher can have a softer suspension that absorbs more bumps without dragging the chassis on the ground. It's a smoother ride, but can also make the car less responsive as steering input is dampened by the shocks.
    – Nuclear Wang
    yesterday










  • I really wish I could accept 2 answers. Your thought experiment is perfect, but I was hoping for a more physics answer, so I'm going with Džuris'. Thanks for the great answer!!
    – scohe001
    yesterday










  • No, it's because the car has downforce. The suspension allows movement, but doesn't cause it.
    – jpaugh
    22 hours ago








  • 2




    @jpaugh: downforce doesn't matter here. Cars are held on the road by all that heavy steel and aluminum they are made out of.
    – whatsisname
    21 hours ago










  • Bear in mind that the springs absorb the shocks and the "shock absorbers" are dampers.
    – Andrew Morton
    15 hours ago


















up vote
8
down vote













In order to avoid the issue, your car needs to be lifted over the bump. In the case of fast motion, this has to occur in a shorter time span, hence with a higher acceleration, hence with greater force - and this force has to be transferred from the ground via your wheels to the car body. However, the positional relation between your tires and the car body is governed by springs and shock absorbers, which are compressed under strong forces. Additionally, your tire bottom may be compressed for the same reason. It follows that the car body moves closer to the bump than it would in slow motion.



You could avoid this phenomenon by getting rid of all springs and dampers (and also the air-filled tires) and replacing them with rigid connections. In that case, the car body would be accelerated quite suddenly with great force at the bump - probably resulting in structural failure! There's a reason why these elastic elements are built into your car after all ...






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Shocks have time factor. They will absorb more if the change is rapid. This is by design as your body and car do not want a rapid impact.



    I believe springs also have a time factor.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Hitting the bump at a higher rate of speed causes more force on the wheel and thus more force on the springs/shocks which causes the them to compress more as the wheel travels up the front side of the bump. If the bumper is far enough ahead of the wheel, it might clear the top of the bump but when the wheel goes over the top and starts going back down the backside, the springs can't push the body and bumper back up fast enough to provide the same height difference as there was before the bump was hit. Thus, when the wheel gets to the bottom of the bump on the backside, the springs/shocks are still compressed somewhat and that causes either the bumper to scrape the ground past the bump or the underside of the car behind the wheel to scrape the top of the bump.






      share|cite








      New contributor




      Ed Would is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.


















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "151"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        scohe001 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










         

        draft saved


        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f440510%2fwhy-does-my-bumper-scrape-when-driving-fast-over-a-bump-but-not-slow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest
































        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        27
        down vote



        accepted










        I think that physics.SE deserves an answer in physics terminology.



        Change of direction = acceleration. Acceleration is caused by force. Force is applied through suspension and compresses it.



        Larger speeds lead to larger acceleration and larger force which in turn compresses the spring more.



        To be a bit more precise, we could model the upwards curve as consisting of arc segments. It would mean that at the segment with curvature radius $r$ the acceleration is $v^2/r$ and the force is $mv^2/r$. If we suppose the spring is linear, the compression will equal force over the spring constant - $frac{mv^2}{rk}$.



        Disclaimer: the spring is probably not linear, it should become increasingly high-degree-polynomial near the extremes of it's range (i.e. it should try to stop itself from compressing too much). The $m$ is not the mass of the car but something like the portion that rests on the axis in question. Which depends on multiple factors including the road curvature and the absolute acceleration of car. And the $r$ is not the curvature radius of the road but that of the car's body. Suspension is intended exactly to make it less than the curvature of the road - smoothen the bump.






        share|cite|improve this answer

















        • 3




          Car suspension is designed to be pretty close to linear across the entire motion ratio, so it's a valid assumption to make - also +1 for being the only answer to mention the velocity squared part, as that's the key issue I see - the question's assumption about the car's wheels and body taking the same path is false
          – user2813274
          2 days ago










        • Awesome explanation. The v^2 relationship specifically explains why there's such a big difference in just a few mph.
          – scohe001
          yesterday






        • 2




          @jpaugh: unless you are driving a purpose-built racing car at ludicrous speed, the aerodynamic downforce is not significant. Gravity is sufficient in analyzing this situation.
          – whatsisname
          21 hours ago






        • 1




          This is not a good answer. It is factually correct in its statements but it does not present a complete chain of reasoning between a large speed and scraping the front into the speed bump.
          – MichaelK
          11 hours ago






        • 1




          @jpaugh: I can't understand the level of confusion you're describing here. The system can be understood even if you think of a car as having just one wheel. The mass of the car resists changes in velocity. If the ground underneath moves fast enough, i.e. a big enough bump relative to the cars speed, the springs won't deliver enough force to move the car's mass and the vehicle will bottom out. Throw a few thousand pounds of bricks in a car and you can bottom it out hitting bumps at walking speeds.
          – whatsisname
          9 hours ago

















        up vote
        27
        down vote



        accepted










        I think that physics.SE deserves an answer in physics terminology.



        Change of direction = acceleration. Acceleration is caused by force. Force is applied through suspension and compresses it.



        Larger speeds lead to larger acceleration and larger force which in turn compresses the spring more.



        To be a bit more precise, we could model the upwards curve as consisting of arc segments. It would mean that at the segment with curvature radius $r$ the acceleration is $v^2/r$ and the force is $mv^2/r$. If we suppose the spring is linear, the compression will equal force over the spring constant - $frac{mv^2}{rk}$.



        Disclaimer: the spring is probably not linear, it should become increasingly high-degree-polynomial near the extremes of it's range (i.e. it should try to stop itself from compressing too much). The $m$ is not the mass of the car but something like the portion that rests on the axis in question. Which depends on multiple factors including the road curvature and the absolute acceleration of car. And the $r$ is not the curvature radius of the road but that of the car's body. Suspension is intended exactly to make it less than the curvature of the road - smoothen the bump.






        share|cite|improve this answer

















        • 3




          Car suspension is designed to be pretty close to linear across the entire motion ratio, so it's a valid assumption to make - also +1 for being the only answer to mention the velocity squared part, as that's the key issue I see - the question's assumption about the car's wheels and body taking the same path is false
          – user2813274
          2 days ago










        • Awesome explanation. The v^2 relationship specifically explains why there's such a big difference in just a few mph.
          – scohe001
          yesterday






        • 2




          @jpaugh: unless you are driving a purpose-built racing car at ludicrous speed, the aerodynamic downforce is not significant. Gravity is sufficient in analyzing this situation.
          – whatsisname
          21 hours ago






        • 1




          This is not a good answer. It is factually correct in its statements but it does not present a complete chain of reasoning between a large speed and scraping the front into the speed bump.
          – MichaelK
          11 hours ago






        • 1




          @jpaugh: I can't understand the level of confusion you're describing here. The system can be understood even if you think of a car as having just one wheel. The mass of the car resists changes in velocity. If the ground underneath moves fast enough, i.e. a big enough bump relative to the cars speed, the springs won't deliver enough force to move the car's mass and the vehicle will bottom out. Throw a few thousand pounds of bricks in a car and you can bottom it out hitting bumps at walking speeds.
          – whatsisname
          9 hours ago















        up vote
        27
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        27
        down vote



        accepted






        I think that physics.SE deserves an answer in physics terminology.



        Change of direction = acceleration. Acceleration is caused by force. Force is applied through suspension and compresses it.



        Larger speeds lead to larger acceleration and larger force which in turn compresses the spring more.



        To be a bit more precise, we could model the upwards curve as consisting of arc segments. It would mean that at the segment with curvature radius $r$ the acceleration is $v^2/r$ and the force is $mv^2/r$. If we suppose the spring is linear, the compression will equal force over the spring constant - $frac{mv^2}{rk}$.



        Disclaimer: the spring is probably not linear, it should become increasingly high-degree-polynomial near the extremes of it's range (i.e. it should try to stop itself from compressing too much). The $m$ is not the mass of the car but something like the portion that rests on the axis in question. Which depends on multiple factors including the road curvature and the absolute acceleration of car. And the $r$ is not the curvature radius of the road but that of the car's body. Suspension is intended exactly to make it less than the curvature of the road - smoothen the bump.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        I think that physics.SE deserves an answer in physics terminology.



        Change of direction = acceleration. Acceleration is caused by force. Force is applied through suspension and compresses it.



        Larger speeds lead to larger acceleration and larger force which in turn compresses the spring more.



        To be a bit more precise, we could model the upwards curve as consisting of arc segments. It would mean that at the segment with curvature radius $r$ the acceleration is $v^2/r$ and the force is $mv^2/r$. If we suppose the spring is linear, the compression will equal force over the spring constant - $frac{mv^2}{rk}$.



        Disclaimer: the spring is probably not linear, it should become increasingly high-degree-polynomial near the extremes of it's range (i.e. it should try to stop itself from compressing too much). The $m$ is not the mass of the car but something like the portion that rests on the axis in question. Which depends on multiple factors including the road curvature and the absolute acceleration of car. And the $r$ is not the curvature radius of the road but that of the car's body. Suspension is intended exactly to make it less than the curvature of the road - smoothen the bump.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Džuris

        1,93711329




        1,93711329








        • 3




          Car suspension is designed to be pretty close to linear across the entire motion ratio, so it's a valid assumption to make - also +1 for being the only answer to mention the velocity squared part, as that's the key issue I see - the question's assumption about the car's wheels and body taking the same path is false
          – user2813274
          2 days ago










        • Awesome explanation. The v^2 relationship specifically explains why there's such a big difference in just a few mph.
          – scohe001
          yesterday






        • 2




          @jpaugh: unless you are driving a purpose-built racing car at ludicrous speed, the aerodynamic downforce is not significant. Gravity is sufficient in analyzing this situation.
          – whatsisname
          21 hours ago






        • 1




          This is not a good answer. It is factually correct in its statements but it does not present a complete chain of reasoning between a large speed and scraping the front into the speed bump.
          – MichaelK
          11 hours ago






        • 1




          @jpaugh: I can't understand the level of confusion you're describing here. The system can be understood even if you think of a car as having just one wheel. The mass of the car resists changes in velocity. If the ground underneath moves fast enough, i.e. a big enough bump relative to the cars speed, the springs won't deliver enough force to move the car's mass and the vehicle will bottom out. Throw a few thousand pounds of bricks in a car and you can bottom it out hitting bumps at walking speeds.
          – whatsisname
          9 hours ago
















        • 3




          Car suspension is designed to be pretty close to linear across the entire motion ratio, so it's a valid assumption to make - also +1 for being the only answer to mention the velocity squared part, as that's the key issue I see - the question's assumption about the car's wheels and body taking the same path is false
          – user2813274
          2 days ago










        • Awesome explanation. The v^2 relationship specifically explains why there's such a big difference in just a few mph.
          – scohe001
          yesterday






        • 2




          @jpaugh: unless you are driving a purpose-built racing car at ludicrous speed, the aerodynamic downforce is not significant. Gravity is sufficient in analyzing this situation.
          – whatsisname
          21 hours ago






        • 1




          This is not a good answer. It is factually correct in its statements but it does not present a complete chain of reasoning between a large speed and scraping the front into the speed bump.
          – MichaelK
          11 hours ago






        • 1




          @jpaugh: I can't understand the level of confusion you're describing here. The system can be understood even if you think of a car as having just one wheel. The mass of the car resists changes in velocity. If the ground underneath moves fast enough, i.e. a big enough bump relative to the cars speed, the springs won't deliver enough force to move the car's mass and the vehicle will bottom out. Throw a few thousand pounds of bricks in a car and you can bottom it out hitting bumps at walking speeds.
          – whatsisname
          9 hours ago










        3




        3




        Car suspension is designed to be pretty close to linear across the entire motion ratio, so it's a valid assumption to make - also +1 for being the only answer to mention the velocity squared part, as that's the key issue I see - the question's assumption about the car's wheels and body taking the same path is false
        – user2813274
        2 days ago




        Car suspension is designed to be pretty close to linear across the entire motion ratio, so it's a valid assumption to make - also +1 for being the only answer to mention the velocity squared part, as that's the key issue I see - the question's assumption about the car's wheels and body taking the same path is false
        – user2813274
        2 days ago












        Awesome explanation. The v^2 relationship specifically explains why there's such a big difference in just a few mph.
        – scohe001
        yesterday




        Awesome explanation. The v^2 relationship specifically explains why there's such a big difference in just a few mph.
        – scohe001
        yesterday




        2




        2




        @jpaugh: unless you are driving a purpose-built racing car at ludicrous speed, the aerodynamic downforce is not significant. Gravity is sufficient in analyzing this situation.
        – whatsisname
        21 hours ago




        @jpaugh: unless you are driving a purpose-built racing car at ludicrous speed, the aerodynamic downforce is not significant. Gravity is sufficient in analyzing this situation.
        – whatsisname
        21 hours ago




        1




        1




        This is not a good answer. It is factually correct in its statements but it does not present a complete chain of reasoning between a large speed and scraping the front into the speed bump.
        – MichaelK
        11 hours ago




        This is not a good answer. It is factually correct in its statements but it does not present a complete chain of reasoning between a large speed and scraping the front into the speed bump.
        – MichaelK
        11 hours ago




        1




        1




        @jpaugh: I can't understand the level of confusion you're describing here. The system can be understood even if you think of a car as having just one wheel. The mass of the car resists changes in velocity. If the ground underneath moves fast enough, i.e. a big enough bump relative to the cars speed, the springs won't deliver enough force to move the car's mass and the vehicle will bottom out. Throw a few thousand pounds of bricks in a car and you can bottom it out hitting bumps at walking speeds.
        – whatsisname
        9 hours ago






        @jpaugh: I can't understand the level of confusion you're describing here. The system can be understood even if you think of a car as having just one wheel. The mass of the car resists changes in velocity. If the ground underneath moves fast enough, i.e. a big enough bump relative to the cars speed, the springs won't deliver enough force to move the car's mass and the vehicle will bottom out. Throw a few thousand pounds of bricks in a car and you can bottom it out hitting bumps at walking speeds.
        – whatsisname
        9 hours ago












        up vote
        67
        down vote













        Because your car has a suspension.



        A car's wheels are not rigidly attached to the frame. Rather, they are attached with springs and shock absorbers that allow the wheels to move somewhat relative to the rest of the car. This is generally speaking a good thing, as it means that when the wheels go over a small bump or pothole in the road, the frame does not necessarily need to move up and down; and so you, the passenger, get a smoother ride. But if the bumps are large and the speeds are too high, this same "smoothing" effect means that the frame of the car can come into contact with the road surface.



        As to why this smoothing effect occurs: imagine that you have, on a table, a large block (standing in for the car), attached by a spring (the suspension) to a smaller block (the wheel.) Suppose that the table is very smooth, so that we can ignore friction between the table and the smaller blocks. If you pull the small block quickly & suddenly away from the larger block, the spring stretches a lot and the large block won't move very much at all: it has a lot of inertia, and so it can't accelerate very quickly. This is the equivalent of going over a bump or pothole at high speed: the wheel suddenly moves up or down relative to the frame, but the frame doesn't move up or down much at all.



        But if you pull the small block away from the large block slowly, then the large block will follow the small block, while the spring doesn't stretch terribly much. In this case, the low acceleration of the large mass takes place over a longer time, and so it can move more while the force is being exerted on it. This is the equivalent of going over a bump/pothole at low speed; since the wheels move up or down relatively slowly, the frame of the car will follow them. If you go over a bump at low speed, this means that the frame will follow the wheels (which follow the road surface), rather than moving in something resembling a straight line and possibly hitting the road surface.






        share|cite|improve this answer



















        • 2




          Also worth pointing out that suspensions can behave differently depending on the stiffness of the springs. Cars that are low to the ground need to have a relatively stiff suspension to prevent bottoming out, since there's little room for the spring to travel. Vehicles that ride higher can have a softer suspension that absorbs more bumps without dragging the chassis on the ground. It's a smoother ride, but can also make the car less responsive as steering input is dampened by the shocks.
          – Nuclear Wang
          yesterday










        • I really wish I could accept 2 answers. Your thought experiment is perfect, but I was hoping for a more physics answer, so I'm going with Džuris'. Thanks for the great answer!!
          – scohe001
          yesterday










        • No, it's because the car has downforce. The suspension allows movement, but doesn't cause it.
          – jpaugh
          22 hours ago








        • 2




          @jpaugh: downforce doesn't matter here. Cars are held on the road by all that heavy steel and aluminum they are made out of.
          – whatsisname
          21 hours ago










        • Bear in mind that the springs absorb the shocks and the "shock absorbers" are dampers.
          – Andrew Morton
          15 hours ago















        up vote
        67
        down vote













        Because your car has a suspension.



        A car's wheels are not rigidly attached to the frame. Rather, they are attached with springs and shock absorbers that allow the wheels to move somewhat relative to the rest of the car. This is generally speaking a good thing, as it means that when the wheels go over a small bump or pothole in the road, the frame does not necessarily need to move up and down; and so you, the passenger, get a smoother ride. But if the bumps are large and the speeds are too high, this same "smoothing" effect means that the frame of the car can come into contact with the road surface.



        As to why this smoothing effect occurs: imagine that you have, on a table, a large block (standing in for the car), attached by a spring (the suspension) to a smaller block (the wheel.) Suppose that the table is very smooth, so that we can ignore friction between the table and the smaller blocks. If you pull the small block quickly & suddenly away from the larger block, the spring stretches a lot and the large block won't move very much at all: it has a lot of inertia, and so it can't accelerate very quickly. This is the equivalent of going over a bump or pothole at high speed: the wheel suddenly moves up or down relative to the frame, but the frame doesn't move up or down much at all.



        But if you pull the small block away from the large block slowly, then the large block will follow the small block, while the spring doesn't stretch terribly much. In this case, the low acceleration of the large mass takes place over a longer time, and so it can move more while the force is being exerted on it. This is the equivalent of going over a bump/pothole at low speed; since the wheels move up or down relatively slowly, the frame of the car will follow them. If you go over a bump at low speed, this means that the frame will follow the wheels (which follow the road surface), rather than moving in something resembling a straight line and possibly hitting the road surface.






        share|cite|improve this answer



















        • 2




          Also worth pointing out that suspensions can behave differently depending on the stiffness of the springs. Cars that are low to the ground need to have a relatively stiff suspension to prevent bottoming out, since there's little room for the spring to travel. Vehicles that ride higher can have a softer suspension that absorbs more bumps without dragging the chassis on the ground. It's a smoother ride, but can also make the car less responsive as steering input is dampened by the shocks.
          – Nuclear Wang
          yesterday










        • I really wish I could accept 2 answers. Your thought experiment is perfect, but I was hoping for a more physics answer, so I'm going with Džuris'. Thanks for the great answer!!
          – scohe001
          yesterday










        • No, it's because the car has downforce. The suspension allows movement, but doesn't cause it.
          – jpaugh
          22 hours ago








        • 2




          @jpaugh: downforce doesn't matter here. Cars are held on the road by all that heavy steel and aluminum they are made out of.
          – whatsisname
          21 hours ago










        • Bear in mind that the springs absorb the shocks and the "shock absorbers" are dampers.
          – Andrew Morton
          15 hours ago













        up vote
        67
        down vote










        up vote
        67
        down vote









        Because your car has a suspension.



        A car's wheels are not rigidly attached to the frame. Rather, they are attached with springs and shock absorbers that allow the wheels to move somewhat relative to the rest of the car. This is generally speaking a good thing, as it means that when the wheels go over a small bump or pothole in the road, the frame does not necessarily need to move up and down; and so you, the passenger, get a smoother ride. But if the bumps are large and the speeds are too high, this same "smoothing" effect means that the frame of the car can come into contact with the road surface.



        As to why this smoothing effect occurs: imagine that you have, on a table, a large block (standing in for the car), attached by a spring (the suspension) to a smaller block (the wheel.) Suppose that the table is very smooth, so that we can ignore friction between the table and the smaller blocks. If you pull the small block quickly & suddenly away from the larger block, the spring stretches a lot and the large block won't move very much at all: it has a lot of inertia, and so it can't accelerate very quickly. This is the equivalent of going over a bump or pothole at high speed: the wheel suddenly moves up or down relative to the frame, but the frame doesn't move up or down much at all.



        But if you pull the small block away from the large block slowly, then the large block will follow the small block, while the spring doesn't stretch terribly much. In this case, the low acceleration of the large mass takes place over a longer time, and so it can move more while the force is being exerted on it. This is the equivalent of going over a bump/pothole at low speed; since the wheels move up or down relatively slowly, the frame of the car will follow them. If you go over a bump at low speed, this means that the frame will follow the wheels (which follow the road surface), rather than moving in something resembling a straight line and possibly hitting the road surface.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Because your car has a suspension.



        A car's wheels are not rigidly attached to the frame. Rather, they are attached with springs and shock absorbers that allow the wheels to move somewhat relative to the rest of the car. This is generally speaking a good thing, as it means that when the wheels go over a small bump or pothole in the road, the frame does not necessarily need to move up and down; and so you, the passenger, get a smoother ride. But if the bumps are large and the speeds are too high, this same "smoothing" effect means that the frame of the car can come into contact with the road surface.



        As to why this smoothing effect occurs: imagine that you have, on a table, a large block (standing in for the car), attached by a spring (the suspension) to a smaller block (the wheel.) Suppose that the table is very smooth, so that we can ignore friction between the table and the smaller blocks. If you pull the small block quickly & suddenly away from the larger block, the spring stretches a lot and the large block won't move very much at all: it has a lot of inertia, and so it can't accelerate very quickly. This is the equivalent of going over a bump or pothole at high speed: the wheel suddenly moves up or down relative to the frame, but the frame doesn't move up or down much at all.



        But if you pull the small block away from the large block slowly, then the large block will follow the small block, while the spring doesn't stretch terribly much. In this case, the low acceleration of the large mass takes place over a longer time, and so it can move more while the force is being exerted on it. This is the equivalent of going over a bump/pothole at low speed; since the wheels move up or down relatively slowly, the frame of the car will follow them. If you go over a bump at low speed, this means that the frame will follow the wheels (which follow the road surface), rather than moving in something resembling a straight line and possibly hitting the road surface.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday









        Roger Lipscombe

        1033




        1033










        answered 2 days ago









        Michael Seifert

        14.5k22752




        14.5k22752








        • 2




          Also worth pointing out that suspensions can behave differently depending on the stiffness of the springs. Cars that are low to the ground need to have a relatively stiff suspension to prevent bottoming out, since there's little room for the spring to travel. Vehicles that ride higher can have a softer suspension that absorbs more bumps without dragging the chassis on the ground. It's a smoother ride, but can also make the car less responsive as steering input is dampened by the shocks.
          – Nuclear Wang
          yesterday










        • I really wish I could accept 2 answers. Your thought experiment is perfect, but I was hoping for a more physics answer, so I'm going with Džuris'. Thanks for the great answer!!
          – scohe001
          yesterday










        • No, it's because the car has downforce. The suspension allows movement, but doesn't cause it.
          – jpaugh
          22 hours ago








        • 2




          @jpaugh: downforce doesn't matter here. Cars are held on the road by all that heavy steel and aluminum they are made out of.
          – whatsisname
          21 hours ago










        • Bear in mind that the springs absorb the shocks and the "shock absorbers" are dampers.
          – Andrew Morton
          15 hours ago














        • 2




          Also worth pointing out that suspensions can behave differently depending on the stiffness of the springs. Cars that are low to the ground need to have a relatively stiff suspension to prevent bottoming out, since there's little room for the spring to travel. Vehicles that ride higher can have a softer suspension that absorbs more bumps without dragging the chassis on the ground. It's a smoother ride, but can also make the car less responsive as steering input is dampened by the shocks.
          – Nuclear Wang
          yesterday










        • I really wish I could accept 2 answers. Your thought experiment is perfect, but I was hoping for a more physics answer, so I'm going with Džuris'. Thanks for the great answer!!
          – scohe001
          yesterday










        • No, it's because the car has downforce. The suspension allows movement, but doesn't cause it.
          – jpaugh
          22 hours ago








        • 2




          @jpaugh: downforce doesn't matter here. Cars are held on the road by all that heavy steel and aluminum they are made out of.
          – whatsisname
          21 hours ago










        • Bear in mind that the springs absorb the shocks and the "shock absorbers" are dampers.
          – Andrew Morton
          15 hours ago








        2




        2




        Also worth pointing out that suspensions can behave differently depending on the stiffness of the springs. Cars that are low to the ground need to have a relatively stiff suspension to prevent bottoming out, since there's little room for the spring to travel. Vehicles that ride higher can have a softer suspension that absorbs more bumps without dragging the chassis on the ground. It's a smoother ride, but can also make the car less responsive as steering input is dampened by the shocks.
        – Nuclear Wang
        yesterday




        Also worth pointing out that suspensions can behave differently depending on the stiffness of the springs. Cars that are low to the ground need to have a relatively stiff suspension to prevent bottoming out, since there's little room for the spring to travel. Vehicles that ride higher can have a softer suspension that absorbs more bumps without dragging the chassis on the ground. It's a smoother ride, but can also make the car less responsive as steering input is dampened by the shocks.
        – Nuclear Wang
        yesterday












        I really wish I could accept 2 answers. Your thought experiment is perfect, but I was hoping for a more physics answer, so I'm going with Džuris'. Thanks for the great answer!!
        – scohe001
        yesterday




        I really wish I could accept 2 answers. Your thought experiment is perfect, but I was hoping for a more physics answer, so I'm going with Džuris'. Thanks for the great answer!!
        – scohe001
        yesterday












        No, it's because the car has downforce. The suspension allows movement, but doesn't cause it.
        – jpaugh
        22 hours ago






        No, it's because the car has downforce. The suspension allows movement, but doesn't cause it.
        – jpaugh
        22 hours ago






        2




        2




        @jpaugh: downforce doesn't matter here. Cars are held on the road by all that heavy steel and aluminum they are made out of.
        – whatsisname
        21 hours ago




        @jpaugh: downforce doesn't matter here. Cars are held on the road by all that heavy steel and aluminum they are made out of.
        – whatsisname
        21 hours ago












        Bear in mind that the springs absorb the shocks and the "shock absorbers" are dampers.
        – Andrew Morton
        15 hours ago




        Bear in mind that the springs absorb the shocks and the "shock absorbers" are dampers.
        – Andrew Morton
        15 hours ago










        up vote
        8
        down vote













        In order to avoid the issue, your car needs to be lifted over the bump. In the case of fast motion, this has to occur in a shorter time span, hence with a higher acceleration, hence with greater force - and this force has to be transferred from the ground via your wheels to the car body. However, the positional relation between your tires and the car body is governed by springs and shock absorbers, which are compressed under strong forces. Additionally, your tire bottom may be compressed for the same reason. It follows that the car body moves closer to the bump than it would in slow motion.



        You could avoid this phenomenon by getting rid of all springs and dampers (and also the air-filled tires) and replacing them with rigid connections. In that case, the car body would be accelerated quite suddenly with great force at the bump - probably resulting in structural failure! There's a reason why these elastic elements are built into your car after all ...






        share|cite|improve this answer



























          up vote
          8
          down vote













          In order to avoid the issue, your car needs to be lifted over the bump. In the case of fast motion, this has to occur in a shorter time span, hence with a higher acceleration, hence with greater force - and this force has to be transferred from the ground via your wheels to the car body. However, the positional relation between your tires and the car body is governed by springs and shock absorbers, which are compressed under strong forces. Additionally, your tire bottom may be compressed for the same reason. It follows that the car body moves closer to the bump than it would in slow motion.



          You could avoid this phenomenon by getting rid of all springs and dampers (and also the air-filled tires) and replacing them with rigid connections. In that case, the car body would be accelerated quite suddenly with great force at the bump - probably resulting in structural failure! There's a reason why these elastic elements are built into your car after all ...






          share|cite|improve this answer

























            up vote
            8
            down vote










            up vote
            8
            down vote









            In order to avoid the issue, your car needs to be lifted over the bump. In the case of fast motion, this has to occur in a shorter time span, hence with a higher acceleration, hence with greater force - and this force has to be transferred from the ground via your wheels to the car body. However, the positional relation between your tires and the car body is governed by springs and shock absorbers, which are compressed under strong forces. Additionally, your tire bottom may be compressed for the same reason. It follows that the car body moves closer to the bump than it would in slow motion.



            You could avoid this phenomenon by getting rid of all springs and dampers (and also the air-filled tires) and replacing them with rigid connections. In that case, the car body would be accelerated quite suddenly with great force at the bump - probably resulting in structural failure! There's a reason why these elastic elements are built into your car after all ...






            share|cite|improve this answer














            In order to avoid the issue, your car needs to be lifted over the bump. In the case of fast motion, this has to occur in a shorter time span, hence with a higher acceleration, hence with greater force - and this force has to be transferred from the ground via your wheels to the car body. However, the positional relation between your tires and the car body is governed by springs and shock absorbers, which are compressed under strong forces. Additionally, your tire bottom may be compressed for the same reason. It follows that the car body moves closer to the bump than it would in slow motion.



            You could avoid this phenomenon by getting rid of all springs and dampers (and also the air-filled tires) and replacing them with rigid connections. In that case, the car body would be accelerated quite suddenly with great force at the bump - probably resulting in structural failure! There's a reason why these elastic elements are built into your car after all ...







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited yesterday









            SiHa

            1032




            1032










            answered 2 days ago









            Hagen von Eitzen

            24115




            24115






















                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Shocks have time factor. They will absorb more if the change is rapid. This is by design as your body and car do not want a rapid impact.



                I believe springs also have a time factor.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote













                  Shocks have time factor. They will absorb more if the change is rapid. This is by design as your body and car do not want a rapid impact.



                  I believe springs also have a time factor.






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    Shocks have time factor. They will absorb more if the change is rapid. This is by design as your body and car do not want a rapid impact.



                    I believe springs also have a time factor.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    Shocks have time factor. They will absorb more if the change is rapid. This is by design as your body and car do not want a rapid impact.



                    I believe springs also have a time factor.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 2 days ago









                    paparazzo

                    1,165511




                    1,165511






















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Hitting the bump at a higher rate of speed causes more force on the wheel and thus more force on the springs/shocks which causes the them to compress more as the wheel travels up the front side of the bump. If the bumper is far enough ahead of the wheel, it might clear the top of the bump but when the wheel goes over the top and starts going back down the backside, the springs can't push the body and bumper back up fast enough to provide the same height difference as there was before the bump was hit. Thus, when the wheel gets to the bottom of the bump on the backside, the springs/shocks are still compressed somewhat and that causes either the bumper to scrape the ground past the bump or the underside of the car behind the wheel to scrape the top of the bump.






                        share|cite








                        New contributor




                        Ed Would is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          Hitting the bump at a higher rate of speed causes more force on the wheel and thus more force on the springs/shocks which causes the them to compress more as the wheel travels up the front side of the bump. If the bumper is far enough ahead of the wheel, it might clear the top of the bump but when the wheel goes over the top and starts going back down the backside, the springs can't push the body and bumper back up fast enough to provide the same height difference as there was before the bump was hit. Thus, when the wheel gets to the bottom of the bump on the backside, the springs/shocks are still compressed somewhat and that causes either the bumper to scrape the ground past the bump or the underside of the car behind the wheel to scrape the top of the bump.






                          share|cite








                          New contributor




                          Ed Would is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            Hitting the bump at a higher rate of speed causes more force on the wheel and thus more force on the springs/shocks which causes the them to compress more as the wheel travels up the front side of the bump. If the bumper is far enough ahead of the wheel, it might clear the top of the bump but when the wheel goes over the top and starts going back down the backside, the springs can't push the body and bumper back up fast enough to provide the same height difference as there was before the bump was hit. Thus, when the wheel gets to the bottom of the bump on the backside, the springs/shocks are still compressed somewhat and that causes either the bumper to scrape the ground past the bump or the underside of the car behind the wheel to scrape the top of the bump.






                            share|cite








                            New contributor




                            Ed Would is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            Hitting the bump at a higher rate of speed causes more force on the wheel and thus more force on the springs/shocks which causes the them to compress more as the wheel travels up the front side of the bump. If the bumper is far enough ahead of the wheel, it might clear the top of the bump but when the wheel goes over the top and starts going back down the backside, the springs can't push the body and bumper back up fast enough to provide the same height difference as there was before the bump was hit. Thus, when the wheel gets to the bottom of the bump on the backside, the springs/shocks are still compressed somewhat and that causes either the bumper to scrape the ground past the bump or the underside of the car behind the wheel to scrape the top of the bump.







                            share|cite








                            New contributor




                            Ed Would is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            share|cite



                            share|cite






                            New contributor




                            Ed Would is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            answered 4 mins ago









                            Ed Would

                            1




                            1




                            New contributor




                            Ed Would is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                            New contributor





                            Ed Would is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            Ed Would is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                scohe001 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                 

                                draft saved


                                draft discarded


















                                scohe001 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                scohe001 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                scohe001 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















                                 


                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f440510%2fwhy-does-my-bumper-scrape-when-driving-fast-over-a-bump-but-not-slow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest




















































































                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Plaza Victoria

                                Puebla de Zaragoza

                                Musa