Entropy and reversibility











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I'm very confused right now, I need to make sure of the following if they're correct or not:



A reversible path is a path in which if if you return back to your initial state, there would be no change in the system and the surroundings



Let's say I now increase the temperature of something by adding heat and then remove heat again to bring it back to its initial temperature, along the adding heat path, I should have increased the entropy of the system, if I go back to the initial state, I should have decreased the entropy again to its initial state and so the total change of the entropy of the system is zero.



Now from the above, atleast from my understanding which I'm not 100 % convinced about, I just concluded that the change in entropy of the system is zero for a reversible process, even though the process was not adiabatic, but the equation for entropy states that $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ for a reversible path, so its not always equal to zero, it needs to be adiabatic, what is wrong in my statements? I hope you clear everything up for me please, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • How would you add heat? From some body at a higher temperature? Then how would you get it back to that object?
    – Pieter
    Nov 24 at 15:42










  • I want to add heat from a higher temperature object then lose the heat back to a lower temperature object, I want to focus on only the state of the system
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 15:56










  • Then you changed the entropy of the surroundings.
    – Pieter
    Nov 24 at 16:12










  • But reversibility implies no change in entropy, so the only way in which the entropy of the surroundings are changed is that the process itself I mentioned is not reversible, correct?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:14






  • 1




    @khaled014z, reversibility does not imply no change in entropy, it implies no entropy generation. You can have a reversible entropy change, and it's given by $Delta S = int_i^f({frac{dQ}{T}})_{rev}$. Note the $rev$ subscript, as this is integrated along a reversible path. Entropy is a state function, so this same $Delta S$ will also apply for an irreversible interaction between 2 states. For an irreversible interaction, you have $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}} + S_{gen}$, where we no longer integrate the entropy change term $int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ along a reversible path.
    – Drew
    Nov 24 at 18:52

















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I'm very confused right now, I need to make sure of the following if they're correct or not:



A reversible path is a path in which if if you return back to your initial state, there would be no change in the system and the surroundings



Let's say I now increase the temperature of something by adding heat and then remove heat again to bring it back to its initial temperature, along the adding heat path, I should have increased the entropy of the system, if I go back to the initial state, I should have decreased the entropy again to its initial state and so the total change of the entropy of the system is zero.



Now from the above, atleast from my understanding which I'm not 100 % convinced about, I just concluded that the change in entropy of the system is zero for a reversible process, even though the process was not adiabatic, but the equation for entropy states that $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ for a reversible path, so its not always equal to zero, it needs to be adiabatic, what is wrong in my statements? I hope you clear everything up for me please, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • How would you add heat? From some body at a higher temperature? Then how would you get it back to that object?
    – Pieter
    Nov 24 at 15:42










  • I want to add heat from a higher temperature object then lose the heat back to a lower temperature object, I want to focus on only the state of the system
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 15:56










  • Then you changed the entropy of the surroundings.
    – Pieter
    Nov 24 at 16:12










  • But reversibility implies no change in entropy, so the only way in which the entropy of the surroundings are changed is that the process itself I mentioned is not reversible, correct?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:14






  • 1




    @khaled014z, reversibility does not imply no change in entropy, it implies no entropy generation. You can have a reversible entropy change, and it's given by $Delta S = int_i^f({frac{dQ}{T}})_{rev}$. Note the $rev$ subscript, as this is integrated along a reversible path. Entropy is a state function, so this same $Delta S$ will also apply for an irreversible interaction between 2 states. For an irreversible interaction, you have $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}} + S_{gen}$, where we no longer integrate the entropy change term $int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ along a reversible path.
    – Drew
    Nov 24 at 18:52















up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











I'm very confused right now, I need to make sure of the following if they're correct or not:



A reversible path is a path in which if if you return back to your initial state, there would be no change in the system and the surroundings



Let's say I now increase the temperature of something by adding heat and then remove heat again to bring it back to its initial temperature, along the adding heat path, I should have increased the entropy of the system, if I go back to the initial state, I should have decreased the entropy again to its initial state and so the total change of the entropy of the system is zero.



Now from the above, atleast from my understanding which I'm not 100 % convinced about, I just concluded that the change in entropy of the system is zero for a reversible process, even though the process was not adiabatic, but the equation for entropy states that $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ for a reversible path, so its not always equal to zero, it needs to be adiabatic, what is wrong in my statements? I hope you clear everything up for me please, thank you.










share|cite|improve this question













I'm very confused right now, I need to make sure of the following if they're correct or not:



A reversible path is a path in which if if you return back to your initial state, there would be no change in the system and the surroundings



Let's say I now increase the temperature of something by adding heat and then remove heat again to bring it back to its initial temperature, along the adding heat path, I should have increased the entropy of the system, if I go back to the initial state, I should have decreased the entropy again to its initial state and so the total change of the entropy of the system is zero.



Now from the above, atleast from my understanding which I'm not 100 % convinced about, I just concluded that the change in entropy of the system is zero for a reversible process, even though the process was not adiabatic, but the equation for entropy states that $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ for a reversible path, so its not always equal to zero, it needs to be adiabatic, what is wrong in my statements? I hope you clear everything up for me please, thank you.







thermodynamics entropy reversibility






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 24 at 14:47









khaled014z

876




876












  • How would you add heat? From some body at a higher temperature? Then how would you get it back to that object?
    – Pieter
    Nov 24 at 15:42










  • I want to add heat from a higher temperature object then lose the heat back to a lower temperature object, I want to focus on only the state of the system
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 15:56










  • Then you changed the entropy of the surroundings.
    – Pieter
    Nov 24 at 16:12










  • But reversibility implies no change in entropy, so the only way in which the entropy of the surroundings are changed is that the process itself I mentioned is not reversible, correct?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:14






  • 1




    @khaled014z, reversibility does not imply no change in entropy, it implies no entropy generation. You can have a reversible entropy change, and it's given by $Delta S = int_i^f({frac{dQ}{T}})_{rev}$. Note the $rev$ subscript, as this is integrated along a reversible path. Entropy is a state function, so this same $Delta S$ will also apply for an irreversible interaction between 2 states. For an irreversible interaction, you have $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}} + S_{gen}$, where we no longer integrate the entropy change term $int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ along a reversible path.
    – Drew
    Nov 24 at 18:52




















  • How would you add heat? From some body at a higher temperature? Then how would you get it back to that object?
    – Pieter
    Nov 24 at 15:42










  • I want to add heat from a higher temperature object then lose the heat back to a lower temperature object, I want to focus on only the state of the system
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 15:56










  • Then you changed the entropy of the surroundings.
    – Pieter
    Nov 24 at 16:12










  • But reversibility implies no change in entropy, so the only way in which the entropy of the surroundings are changed is that the process itself I mentioned is not reversible, correct?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:14






  • 1




    @khaled014z, reversibility does not imply no change in entropy, it implies no entropy generation. You can have a reversible entropy change, and it's given by $Delta S = int_i^f({frac{dQ}{T}})_{rev}$. Note the $rev$ subscript, as this is integrated along a reversible path. Entropy is a state function, so this same $Delta S$ will also apply for an irreversible interaction between 2 states. For an irreversible interaction, you have $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}} + S_{gen}$, where we no longer integrate the entropy change term $int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ along a reversible path.
    – Drew
    Nov 24 at 18:52


















How would you add heat? From some body at a higher temperature? Then how would you get it back to that object?
– Pieter
Nov 24 at 15:42




How would you add heat? From some body at a higher temperature? Then how would you get it back to that object?
– Pieter
Nov 24 at 15:42












I want to add heat from a higher temperature object then lose the heat back to a lower temperature object, I want to focus on only the state of the system
– khaled014z
Nov 24 at 15:56




I want to add heat from a higher temperature object then lose the heat back to a lower temperature object, I want to focus on only the state of the system
– khaled014z
Nov 24 at 15:56












Then you changed the entropy of the surroundings.
– Pieter
Nov 24 at 16:12




Then you changed the entropy of the surroundings.
– Pieter
Nov 24 at 16:12












But reversibility implies no change in entropy, so the only way in which the entropy of the surroundings are changed is that the process itself I mentioned is not reversible, correct?
– khaled014z
Nov 24 at 16:14




But reversibility implies no change in entropy, so the only way in which the entropy of the surroundings are changed is that the process itself I mentioned is not reversible, correct?
– khaled014z
Nov 24 at 16:14




1




1




@khaled014z, reversibility does not imply no change in entropy, it implies no entropy generation. You can have a reversible entropy change, and it's given by $Delta S = int_i^f({frac{dQ}{T}})_{rev}$. Note the $rev$ subscript, as this is integrated along a reversible path. Entropy is a state function, so this same $Delta S$ will also apply for an irreversible interaction between 2 states. For an irreversible interaction, you have $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}} + S_{gen}$, where we no longer integrate the entropy change term $int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ along a reversible path.
– Drew
Nov 24 at 18:52






@khaled014z, reversibility does not imply no change in entropy, it implies no entropy generation. You can have a reversible entropy change, and it's given by $Delta S = int_i^f({frac{dQ}{T}})_{rev}$. Note the $rev$ subscript, as this is integrated along a reversible path. Entropy is a state function, so this same $Delta S$ will also apply for an irreversible interaction between 2 states. For an irreversible interaction, you have $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}} + S_{gen}$, where we no longer integrate the entropy change term $int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ along a reversible path.
– Drew
Nov 24 at 18:52












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










An example of a reversible path that is not adiabatic is a reversible isothermal process. During a reversible isothermal expansion of a gas, for example, heat is added. Since an isothermal process is constant temperature, the temperature comes out of the integral and the change in entropy is $frac {+Q}{T}$ for the system and $frac {-Q}{T}$ for the surroundings where Q is the heat transferred from the surroundings to the system undergoing expansion. The key for reversibility is the temperature difference between the system and the surroundings must be infinitesimally small and the expansion carried out very slowly (Quasi-statically).



Now reverse the process and compress the gas to its original state. The entropy change of the system is $frac{-Q}{T}$ and the surroundings is $frac{+Q}{T}$. The key again is an infinitesimally small difference between the system and surroundings and a slow (Quasi-static) process.



The total entropy change for the combination of the expansion and compression is zero for both the system and surroundings.



Hope this helps.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • It helped indeed, just one thing I need to be confirmed, if you have a reversible process then when you expand the gas then compress it back to the original state, the change of entropy of the system is zero and the change of entropy of the surroundings is also zero, but, if I don't reverse the path, say I only expand the gas so the change in entropy of the universe is zero, correct?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:59










  • @khaled014z Yes, as long as it is reversible. Keep in mind that all real processes are irreversible and that the reversible process is an idealization. For the total entropy change to actually be zero, the temperature between the system and surroundings would have to be the same. But if there is no difference in temperature, you can not have heat transfer.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 17:07










  • @khaled014z You can prove it to yourself by letting the temperature of the surroundings be greater than the system. Then the temperature in the denominator for the surroundings will be greater than the temperature in the denominator of the system. When you add the two entropies (system + surroundings for the expansion) you will get a number greater that zero.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 17:12






  • 1




    @khaled014z The increase in entropy of the surroundings will be greater than the decrease in entropy of the coffee for a total entropy change greater than zero. The process is irreversible. Let Q be the heat transfer from the coffee to the surroundings and let the transfer be isothermal (no change in temp of the coffee and the surroundings). Let the temperature of the coffee be $T_H$ and the temperature of the surroundings be $T_L$. Then the total entropy change will be $frac{-Q}{T_H} + frac{+Q}{T_L}$. You can see that for all $T_{H}$ > $T_L$ the total entropy change will be >0.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 18:05








  • 1




    @khaled014z Another way to think about irreversibility and entropy increase. The transfer of heat from the coffee to the surroundings occurs spontaneously. Can you envision the transfer of the same heat from the surroundings to the coffee happening spontaneously?
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 18:40


















up vote
2
down vote













Reversible just like you said doesn't mean that there is no exchange, it just mean that if you go back there would be no change. In the formula you are using everything depends on your final state. If the final state is the same as the initial state (f = i) then you would find that $Delta S = 0$. But if you do not go back then it is expected that the entropy has changed.



If you separate the path in two part the first part will have $delta Q > 0$ for instance and when you go back you will have $delta Q < 0$ so the integral will be null.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • So far so good, what if I now have an irreversible path from i to f, now I will not go back to i, how would I know that this process is irreversible without going back? Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path? Am I making sense?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 15:54












  • Reversibility is just a property. You define that a path is reversible because $textbf{if}$ you chose to go back then there would not have any change. It is just the (kind of) the definition. It is an abstract situation that you don't encounter in everyday life. I'm not sure that i'm getting the "Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path?"
    – Q.Reindeerson
    Nov 24 at 16:07












  • I mean that, entropy is a state function, which depends only on initial and final points, then why is entropy defined as $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ if the process is reversible, why can't we calculate the change in entropy on an irreversible path too?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:09






  • 2




    @khaled014z you can calculate the change in entropy for an irreversible process, you just need to add the entropy generation term to your equation.
    – Drew
    Nov 24 at 17:26












  • @Drew did not know that, thanks.
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 17:41











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442969%2fentropy-and-reversibility%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










An example of a reversible path that is not adiabatic is a reversible isothermal process. During a reversible isothermal expansion of a gas, for example, heat is added. Since an isothermal process is constant temperature, the temperature comes out of the integral and the change in entropy is $frac {+Q}{T}$ for the system and $frac {-Q}{T}$ for the surroundings where Q is the heat transferred from the surroundings to the system undergoing expansion. The key for reversibility is the temperature difference between the system and the surroundings must be infinitesimally small and the expansion carried out very slowly (Quasi-statically).



Now reverse the process and compress the gas to its original state. The entropy change of the system is $frac{-Q}{T}$ and the surroundings is $frac{+Q}{T}$. The key again is an infinitesimally small difference between the system and surroundings and a slow (Quasi-static) process.



The total entropy change for the combination of the expansion and compression is zero for both the system and surroundings.



Hope this helps.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • It helped indeed, just one thing I need to be confirmed, if you have a reversible process then when you expand the gas then compress it back to the original state, the change of entropy of the system is zero and the change of entropy of the surroundings is also zero, but, if I don't reverse the path, say I only expand the gas so the change in entropy of the universe is zero, correct?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:59










  • @khaled014z Yes, as long as it is reversible. Keep in mind that all real processes are irreversible and that the reversible process is an idealization. For the total entropy change to actually be zero, the temperature between the system and surroundings would have to be the same. But if there is no difference in temperature, you can not have heat transfer.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 17:07










  • @khaled014z You can prove it to yourself by letting the temperature of the surroundings be greater than the system. Then the temperature in the denominator for the surroundings will be greater than the temperature in the denominator of the system. When you add the two entropies (system + surroundings for the expansion) you will get a number greater that zero.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 17:12






  • 1




    @khaled014z The increase in entropy of the surroundings will be greater than the decrease in entropy of the coffee for a total entropy change greater than zero. The process is irreversible. Let Q be the heat transfer from the coffee to the surroundings and let the transfer be isothermal (no change in temp of the coffee and the surroundings). Let the temperature of the coffee be $T_H$ and the temperature of the surroundings be $T_L$. Then the total entropy change will be $frac{-Q}{T_H} + frac{+Q}{T_L}$. You can see that for all $T_{H}$ > $T_L$ the total entropy change will be >0.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 18:05








  • 1




    @khaled014z Another way to think about irreversibility and entropy increase. The transfer of heat from the coffee to the surroundings occurs spontaneously. Can you envision the transfer of the same heat from the surroundings to the coffee happening spontaneously?
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 18:40















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










An example of a reversible path that is not adiabatic is a reversible isothermal process. During a reversible isothermal expansion of a gas, for example, heat is added. Since an isothermal process is constant temperature, the temperature comes out of the integral and the change in entropy is $frac {+Q}{T}$ for the system and $frac {-Q}{T}$ for the surroundings where Q is the heat transferred from the surroundings to the system undergoing expansion. The key for reversibility is the temperature difference between the system and the surroundings must be infinitesimally small and the expansion carried out very slowly (Quasi-statically).



Now reverse the process and compress the gas to its original state. The entropy change of the system is $frac{-Q}{T}$ and the surroundings is $frac{+Q}{T}$. The key again is an infinitesimally small difference between the system and surroundings and a slow (Quasi-static) process.



The total entropy change for the combination of the expansion and compression is zero for both the system and surroundings.



Hope this helps.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • It helped indeed, just one thing I need to be confirmed, if you have a reversible process then when you expand the gas then compress it back to the original state, the change of entropy of the system is zero and the change of entropy of the surroundings is also zero, but, if I don't reverse the path, say I only expand the gas so the change in entropy of the universe is zero, correct?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:59










  • @khaled014z Yes, as long as it is reversible. Keep in mind that all real processes are irreversible and that the reversible process is an idealization. For the total entropy change to actually be zero, the temperature between the system and surroundings would have to be the same. But if there is no difference in temperature, you can not have heat transfer.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 17:07










  • @khaled014z You can prove it to yourself by letting the temperature of the surroundings be greater than the system. Then the temperature in the denominator for the surroundings will be greater than the temperature in the denominator of the system. When you add the two entropies (system + surroundings for the expansion) you will get a number greater that zero.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 17:12






  • 1




    @khaled014z The increase in entropy of the surroundings will be greater than the decrease in entropy of the coffee for a total entropy change greater than zero. The process is irreversible. Let Q be the heat transfer from the coffee to the surroundings and let the transfer be isothermal (no change in temp of the coffee and the surroundings). Let the temperature of the coffee be $T_H$ and the temperature of the surroundings be $T_L$. Then the total entropy change will be $frac{-Q}{T_H} + frac{+Q}{T_L}$. You can see that for all $T_{H}$ > $T_L$ the total entropy change will be >0.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 18:05








  • 1




    @khaled014z Another way to think about irreversibility and entropy increase. The transfer of heat from the coffee to the surroundings occurs spontaneously. Can you envision the transfer of the same heat from the surroundings to the coffee happening spontaneously?
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 18:40













up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






An example of a reversible path that is not adiabatic is a reversible isothermal process. During a reversible isothermal expansion of a gas, for example, heat is added. Since an isothermal process is constant temperature, the temperature comes out of the integral and the change in entropy is $frac {+Q}{T}$ for the system and $frac {-Q}{T}$ for the surroundings where Q is the heat transferred from the surroundings to the system undergoing expansion. The key for reversibility is the temperature difference between the system and the surroundings must be infinitesimally small and the expansion carried out very slowly (Quasi-statically).



Now reverse the process and compress the gas to its original state. The entropy change of the system is $frac{-Q}{T}$ and the surroundings is $frac{+Q}{T}$. The key again is an infinitesimally small difference between the system and surroundings and a slow (Quasi-static) process.



The total entropy change for the combination of the expansion and compression is zero for both the system and surroundings.



Hope this helps.






share|cite|improve this answer












An example of a reversible path that is not adiabatic is a reversible isothermal process. During a reversible isothermal expansion of a gas, for example, heat is added. Since an isothermal process is constant temperature, the temperature comes out of the integral and the change in entropy is $frac {+Q}{T}$ for the system and $frac {-Q}{T}$ for the surroundings where Q is the heat transferred from the surroundings to the system undergoing expansion. The key for reversibility is the temperature difference between the system and the surroundings must be infinitesimally small and the expansion carried out very slowly (Quasi-statically).



Now reverse the process and compress the gas to its original state. The entropy change of the system is $frac{-Q}{T}$ and the surroundings is $frac{+Q}{T}$. The key again is an infinitesimally small difference between the system and surroundings and a slow (Quasi-static) process.



The total entropy change for the combination of the expansion and compression is zero for both the system and surroundings.



Hope this helps.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 24 at 16:52









Bob D

1,872211




1,872211












  • It helped indeed, just one thing I need to be confirmed, if you have a reversible process then when you expand the gas then compress it back to the original state, the change of entropy of the system is zero and the change of entropy of the surroundings is also zero, but, if I don't reverse the path, say I only expand the gas so the change in entropy of the universe is zero, correct?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:59










  • @khaled014z Yes, as long as it is reversible. Keep in mind that all real processes are irreversible and that the reversible process is an idealization. For the total entropy change to actually be zero, the temperature between the system and surroundings would have to be the same. But if there is no difference in temperature, you can not have heat transfer.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 17:07










  • @khaled014z You can prove it to yourself by letting the temperature of the surroundings be greater than the system. Then the temperature in the denominator for the surroundings will be greater than the temperature in the denominator of the system. When you add the two entropies (system + surroundings for the expansion) you will get a number greater that zero.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 17:12






  • 1




    @khaled014z The increase in entropy of the surroundings will be greater than the decrease in entropy of the coffee for a total entropy change greater than zero. The process is irreversible. Let Q be the heat transfer from the coffee to the surroundings and let the transfer be isothermal (no change in temp of the coffee and the surroundings). Let the temperature of the coffee be $T_H$ and the temperature of the surroundings be $T_L$. Then the total entropy change will be $frac{-Q}{T_H} + frac{+Q}{T_L}$. You can see that for all $T_{H}$ > $T_L$ the total entropy change will be >0.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 18:05








  • 1




    @khaled014z Another way to think about irreversibility and entropy increase. The transfer of heat from the coffee to the surroundings occurs spontaneously. Can you envision the transfer of the same heat from the surroundings to the coffee happening spontaneously?
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 18:40


















  • It helped indeed, just one thing I need to be confirmed, if you have a reversible process then when you expand the gas then compress it back to the original state, the change of entropy of the system is zero and the change of entropy of the surroundings is also zero, but, if I don't reverse the path, say I only expand the gas so the change in entropy of the universe is zero, correct?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:59










  • @khaled014z Yes, as long as it is reversible. Keep in mind that all real processes are irreversible and that the reversible process is an idealization. For the total entropy change to actually be zero, the temperature between the system and surroundings would have to be the same. But if there is no difference in temperature, you can not have heat transfer.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 17:07










  • @khaled014z You can prove it to yourself by letting the temperature of the surroundings be greater than the system. Then the temperature in the denominator for the surroundings will be greater than the temperature in the denominator of the system. When you add the two entropies (system + surroundings for the expansion) you will get a number greater that zero.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 17:12






  • 1




    @khaled014z The increase in entropy of the surroundings will be greater than the decrease in entropy of the coffee for a total entropy change greater than zero. The process is irreversible. Let Q be the heat transfer from the coffee to the surroundings and let the transfer be isothermal (no change in temp of the coffee and the surroundings). Let the temperature of the coffee be $T_H$ and the temperature of the surroundings be $T_L$. Then the total entropy change will be $frac{-Q}{T_H} + frac{+Q}{T_L}$. You can see that for all $T_{H}$ > $T_L$ the total entropy change will be >0.
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 18:05








  • 1




    @khaled014z Another way to think about irreversibility and entropy increase. The transfer of heat from the coffee to the surroundings occurs spontaneously. Can you envision the transfer of the same heat from the surroundings to the coffee happening spontaneously?
    – Bob D
    Nov 24 at 18:40
















It helped indeed, just one thing I need to be confirmed, if you have a reversible process then when you expand the gas then compress it back to the original state, the change of entropy of the system is zero and the change of entropy of the surroundings is also zero, but, if I don't reverse the path, say I only expand the gas so the change in entropy of the universe is zero, correct?
– khaled014z
Nov 24 at 16:59




It helped indeed, just one thing I need to be confirmed, if you have a reversible process then when you expand the gas then compress it back to the original state, the change of entropy of the system is zero and the change of entropy of the surroundings is also zero, but, if I don't reverse the path, say I only expand the gas so the change in entropy of the universe is zero, correct?
– khaled014z
Nov 24 at 16:59












@khaled014z Yes, as long as it is reversible. Keep in mind that all real processes are irreversible and that the reversible process is an idealization. For the total entropy change to actually be zero, the temperature between the system and surroundings would have to be the same. But if there is no difference in temperature, you can not have heat transfer.
– Bob D
Nov 24 at 17:07




@khaled014z Yes, as long as it is reversible. Keep in mind that all real processes are irreversible and that the reversible process is an idealization. For the total entropy change to actually be zero, the temperature between the system and surroundings would have to be the same. But if there is no difference in temperature, you can not have heat transfer.
– Bob D
Nov 24 at 17:07












@khaled014z You can prove it to yourself by letting the temperature of the surroundings be greater than the system. Then the temperature in the denominator for the surroundings will be greater than the temperature in the denominator of the system. When you add the two entropies (system + surroundings for the expansion) you will get a number greater that zero.
– Bob D
Nov 24 at 17:12




@khaled014z You can prove it to yourself by letting the temperature of the surroundings be greater than the system. Then the temperature in the denominator for the surroundings will be greater than the temperature in the denominator of the system. When you add the two entropies (system + surroundings for the expansion) you will get a number greater that zero.
– Bob D
Nov 24 at 17:12




1




1




@khaled014z The increase in entropy of the surroundings will be greater than the decrease in entropy of the coffee for a total entropy change greater than zero. The process is irreversible. Let Q be the heat transfer from the coffee to the surroundings and let the transfer be isothermal (no change in temp of the coffee and the surroundings). Let the temperature of the coffee be $T_H$ and the temperature of the surroundings be $T_L$. Then the total entropy change will be $frac{-Q}{T_H} + frac{+Q}{T_L}$. You can see that for all $T_{H}$ > $T_L$ the total entropy change will be >0.
– Bob D
Nov 24 at 18:05






@khaled014z The increase in entropy of the surroundings will be greater than the decrease in entropy of the coffee for a total entropy change greater than zero. The process is irreversible. Let Q be the heat transfer from the coffee to the surroundings and let the transfer be isothermal (no change in temp of the coffee and the surroundings). Let the temperature of the coffee be $T_H$ and the temperature of the surroundings be $T_L$. Then the total entropy change will be $frac{-Q}{T_H} + frac{+Q}{T_L}$. You can see that for all $T_{H}$ > $T_L$ the total entropy change will be >0.
– Bob D
Nov 24 at 18:05






1




1




@khaled014z Another way to think about irreversibility and entropy increase. The transfer of heat from the coffee to the surroundings occurs spontaneously. Can you envision the transfer of the same heat from the surroundings to the coffee happening spontaneously?
– Bob D
Nov 24 at 18:40




@khaled014z Another way to think about irreversibility and entropy increase. The transfer of heat from the coffee to the surroundings occurs spontaneously. Can you envision the transfer of the same heat from the surroundings to the coffee happening spontaneously?
– Bob D
Nov 24 at 18:40










up vote
2
down vote













Reversible just like you said doesn't mean that there is no exchange, it just mean that if you go back there would be no change. In the formula you are using everything depends on your final state. If the final state is the same as the initial state (f = i) then you would find that $Delta S = 0$. But if you do not go back then it is expected that the entropy has changed.



If you separate the path in two part the first part will have $delta Q > 0$ for instance and when you go back you will have $delta Q < 0$ so the integral will be null.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • So far so good, what if I now have an irreversible path from i to f, now I will not go back to i, how would I know that this process is irreversible without going back? Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path? Am I making sense?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 15:54












  • Reversibility is just a property. You define that a path is reversible because $textbf{if}$ you chose to go back then there would not have any change. It is just the (kind of) the definition. It is an abstract situation that you don't encounter in everyday life. I'm not sure that i'm getting the "Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path?"
    – Q.Reindeerson
    Nov 24 at 16:07












  • I mean that, entropy is a state function, which depends only on initial and final points, then why is entropy defined as $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ if the process is reversible, why can't we calculate the change in entropy on an irreversible path too?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:09






  • 2




    @khaled014z you can calculate the change in entropy for an irreversible process, you just need to add the entropy generation term to your equation.
    – Drew
    Nov 24 at 17:26












  • @Drew did not know that, thanks.
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 17:41















up vote
2
down vote













Reversible just like you said doesn't mean that there is no exchange, it just mean that if you go back there would be no change. In the formula you are using everything depends on your final state. If the final state is the same as the initial state (f = i) then you would find that $Delta S = 0$. But if you do not go back then it is expected that the entropy has changed.



If you separate the path in two part the first part will have $delta Q > 0$ for instance and when you go back you will have $delta Q < 0$ so the integral will be null.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • So far so good, what if I now have an irreversible path from i to f, now I will not go back to i, how would I know that this process is irreversible without going back? Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path? Am I making sense?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 15:54












  • Reversibility is just a property. You define that a path is reversible because $textbf{if}$ you chose to go back then there would not have any change. It is just the (kind of) the definition. It is an abstract situation that you don't encounter in everyday life. I'm not sure that i'm getting the "Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path?"
    – Q.Reindeerson
    Nov 24 at 16:07












  • I mean that, entropy is a state function, which depends only on initial and final points, then why is entropy defined as $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ if the process is reversible, why can't we calculate the change in entropy on an irreversible path too?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:09






  • 2




    @khaled014z you can calculate the change in entropy for an irreversible process, you just need to add the entropy generation term to your equation.
    – Drew
    Nov 24 at 17:26












  • @Drew did not know that, thanks.
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 17:41













up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









Reversible just like you said doesn't mean that there is no exchange, it just mean that if you go back there would be no change. In the formula you are using everything depends on your final state. If the final state is the same as the initial state (f = i) then you would find that $Delta S = 0$. But if you do not go back then it is expected that the entropy has changed.



If you separate the path in two part the first part will have $delta Q > 0$ for instance and when you go back you will have $delta Q < 0$ so the integral will be null.






share|cite|improve this answer














Reversible just like you said doesn't mean that there is no exchange, it just mean that if you go back there would be no change. In the formula you are using everything depends on your final state. If the final state is the same as the initial state (f = i) then you would find that $Delta S = 0$. But if you do not go back then it is expected that the entropy has changed.



If you separate the path in two part the first part will have $delta Q > 0$ for instance and when you go back you will have $delta Q < 0$ so the integral will be null.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 24 at 15:42

























answered Nov 24 at 15:33









Q.Reindeerson

3396




3396












  • So far so good, what if I now have an irreversible path from i to f, now I will not go back to i, how would I know that this process is irreversible without going back? Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path? Am I making sense?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 15:54












  • Reversibility is just a property. You define that a path is reversible because $textbf{if}$ you chose to go back then there would not have any change. It is just the (kind of) the definition. It is an abstract situation that you don't encounter in everyday life. I'm not sure that i'm getting the "Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path?"
    – Q.Reindeerson
    Nov 24 at 16:07












  • I mean that, entropy is a state function, which depends only on initial and final points, then why is entropy defined as $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ if the process is reversible, why can't we calculate the change in entropy on an irreversible path too?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:09






  • 2




    @khaled014z you can calculate the change in entropy for an irreversible process, you just need to add the entropy generation term to your equation.
    – Drew
    Nov 24 at 17:26












  • @Drew did not know that, thanks.
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 17:41


















  • So far so good, what if I now have an irreversible path from i to f, now I will not go back to i, how would I know that this process is irreversible without going back? Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path? Am I making sense?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 15:54












  • Reversibility is just a property. You define that a path is reversible because $textbf{if}$ you chose to go back then there would not have any change. It is just the (kind of) the definition. It is an abstract situation that you don't encounter in everyday life. I'm not sure that i'm getting the "Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path?"
    – Q.Reindeerson
    Nov 24 at 16:07












  • I mean that, entropy is a state function, which depends only on initial and final points, then why is entropy defined as $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ if the process is reversible, why can't we calculate the change in entropy on an irreversible path too?
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 16:09






  • 2




    @khaled014z you can calculate the change in entropy for an irreversible process, you just need to add the entropy generation term to your equation.
    – Drew
    Nov 24 at 17:26












  • @Drew did not know that, thanks.
    – khaled014z
    Nov 24 at 17:41
















So far so good, what if I now have an irreversible path from i to f, now I will not go back to i, how would I know that this process is irreversible without going back? Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path? Am I making sense?
– khaled014z
Nov 24 at 15:54






So far so good, what if I now have an irreversible path from i to f, now I will not go back to i, how would I know that this process is irreversible without going back? Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path? Am I making sense?
– khaled014z
Nov 24 at 15:54














Reversibility is just a property. You define that a path is reversible because $textbf{if}$ you chose to go back then there would not have any change. It is just the (kind of) the definition. It is an abstract situation that you don't encounter in everyday life. I'm not sure that i'm getting the "Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path?"
– Q.Reindeerson
Nov 24 at 16:07






Reversibility is just a property. You define that a path is reversible because $textbf{if}$ you chose to go back then there would not have any change. It is just the (kind of) the definition. It is an abstract situation that you don't encounter in everyday life. I'm not sure that i'm getting the "Why is change in entropy restricted only on which it has to be calculated along a reversible path?"
– Q.Reindeerson
Nov 24 at 16:07














I mean that, entropy is a state function, which depends only on initial and final points, then why is entropy defined as $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ if the process is reversible, why can't we calculate the change in entropy on an irreversible path too?
– khaled014z
Nov 24 at 16:09




I mean that, entropy is a state function, which depends only on initial and final points, then why is entropy defined as $Delta S = int_i^f{frac{dQ}{T}}$ if the process is reversible, why can't we calculate the change in entropy on an irreversible path too?
– khaled014z
Nov 24 at 16:09




2




2




@khaled014z you can calculate the change in entropy for an irreversible process, you just need to add the entropy generation term to your equation.
– Drew
Nov 24 at 17:26






@khaled014z you can calculate the change in entropy for an irreversible process, you just need to add the entropy generation term to your equation.
– Drew
Nov 24 at 17:26














@Drew did not know that, thanks.
– khaled014z
Nov 24 at 17:41




@Drew did not know that, thanks.
– khaled014z
Nov 24 at 17:41


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442969%2fentropy-and-reversibility%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...