Proving N-derivative test











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.



My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.



This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
    – Jimmy R.
    Nov 19 at 4:16










  • $f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:17















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.



My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.



This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
    – Jimmy R.
    Nov 19 at 4:16










  • $f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:17













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.



My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.



This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.










share|cite|improve this question













Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.



My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.



This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.







real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 19 at 3:55









HD5450

63




63












  • How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
    – Jimmy R.
    Nov 19 at 4:16










  • $f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:17


















  • How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
    – Jimmy R.
    Nov 19 at 4:16










  • $f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:17
















How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 at 4:16




How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 at 4:16












$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:17




$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :



$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:21










  • yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
    – Red shoes
    Nov 19 at 4:25










  • Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:30











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004503%2fproving-n-derivative-test%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :



$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:21










  • yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
    – Red shoes
    Nov 19 at 4:25










  • Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:30















up vote
1
down vote













Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :



$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:21










  • yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
    – Red shoes
    Nov 19 at 4:25










  • Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:30













up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :



$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .






share|cite|improve this answer












Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :



$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 19 at 4:12









Red shoes

4,676621




4,676621












  • so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:21










  • yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
    – Red shoes
    Nov 19 at 4:25










  • Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:30


















  • so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:21










  • yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
    – Red shoes
    Nov 19 at 4:25










  • Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 at 4:30
















so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:21




so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:21












yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 at 4:25




yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 at 4:25












Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:30




Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 at 4:30


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004503%2fproving-n-derivative-test%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

Puebla de Zaragoza

Musa