Help with solving an in-equation with a variable as exponent












0














I need to decide on an integer value for $n$ in the following in-equation:



$left(1-dfrac{1}{2^{64}}right)^n leq dfrac{1}{2}$



What I have tried:



The expression above reminds me of the known limit:



$limlimits_{n to infty}left(1 - dfrac{1}{n}right)^n = dfrac{1}{e} $



So, my intuition is to just determine $n = 2^{64}$ and to evaluate the entire left-hand-side expression as approaching to $dfrac{1}{e}$ and since that is less than $dfrac{1}{2}$ then it "feels" true



However, I feel this is really not a the way of solving this equation and there can probably be a better way to do it and obviously get a better value for $n$.



Thanks in advance






limits inequality







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    May be take $log_2$ on both sides.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 22 at 21:54
















0














I need to decide on an integer value for $n$ in the following in-equation:



$left(1-dfrac{1}{2^{64}}right)^n leq dfrac{1}{2}$



What I have tried:



The expression above reminds me of the known limit:



$limlimits_{n to infty}left(1 - dfrac{1}{n}right)^n = dfrac{1}{e} $



So, my intuition is to just determine $n = 2^{64}$ and to evaluate the entire left-hand-side expression as approaching to $dfrac{1}{e}$ and since that is less than $dfrac{1}{2}$ then it "feels" true



However, I feel this is really not a the way of solving this equation and there can probably be a better way to do it and obviously get a better value for $n$.



Thanks in advance






limits inequality







share|cite|improve this question




















  • 3




    May be take $log_2$ on both sides.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 22 at 21:54














0












0








0


1





I need to decide on an integer value for $n$ in the following in-equation:



$left(1-dfrac{1}{2^{64}}right)^n leq dfrac{1}{2}$



What I have tried:



The expression above reminds me of the known limit:



$limlimits_{n to infty}left(1 - dfrac{1}{n}right)^n = dfrac{1}{e} $



So, my intuition is to just determine $n = 2^{64}$ and to evaluate the entire left-hand-side expression as approaching to $dfrac{1}{e}$ and since that is less than $dfrac{1}{2}$ then it "feels" true



However, I feel this is really not a the way of solving this equation and there can probably be a better way to do it and obviously get a better value for $n$.



Thanks in advance






limits inequality







share|cite|improve this question















I need to decide on an integer value for $n$ in the following in-equation:



$left(1-dfrac{1}{2^{64}}right)^n leq dfrac{1}{2}$



What I have tried:



The expression above reminds me of the known limit:



$limlimits_{n to infty}left(1 - dfrac{1}{n}right)^n = dfrac{1}{e} $



So, my intuition is to just determine $n = 2^{64}$ and to evaluate the entire left-hand-side expression as approaching to $dfrac{1}{e}$ and since that is less than $dfrac{1}{2}$ then it "feels" true



However, I feel this is really not a the way of solving this equation and there can probably be a better way to do it and obviously get a better value for $n$.



Thanks in advance






limits inequality




limits inequality






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 at 22:00









Yadati Kiran

1,694519




1,694519










asked Nov 22 at 21:51









shaqed

28537




28537








  • 3




    May be take $log_2$ on both sides.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 22 at 21:54














  • 3




    May be take $log_2$ on both sides.
    – Yadati Kiran
    Nov 22 at 21:54








3




3




May be take $log_2$ on both sides.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 22 at 21:54




May be take $log_2$ on both sides.
– Yadati Kiran
Nov 22 at 21:54










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














Since $log$ function is increasing, we have that



$$left(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)^n leq frac{1}{2} iff nlogleft(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right) leq log frac{1}{2} iff ngefrac{log frac{1}{2}}{logleft(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)}approx1.28cdot 10^{19}$$






share|cite|improve this answer































    2














    If OP wants some $n$ to satisfy the inequality they can proceed as follows. From the inequality
    $$
    e^xgeq 1+x
    $$
    for all $x$ we have that
    $$
    left(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)^nleq e^{-n/2^{64}}
    $$
    and
    $$
    e^{-n/2^{64}}leq frac{1}{2}
    $$
    if
    $$
    ngeq 2^{64}times log 2geq 2^{32}
    $$
    Hence $n=2^{32}$ works for example.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • I couldn't quite understand the first step, could you please elaborate? where is $2^{64}$ being substituted exactly? why is $n$ in the exponent of $e$ ?
      – shaqed
      Nov 23 at 13:10











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009707%2fhelp-with-solving-an-in-equation-with-a-variable-as-exponent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    Since $log$ function is increasing, we have that



    $$left(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)^n leq frac{1}{2} iff nlogleft(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right) leq log frac{1}{2} iff ngefrac{log frac{1}{2}}{logleft(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)}approx1.28cdot 10^{19}$$






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      2














      Since $log$ function is increasing, we have that



      $$left(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)^n leq frac{1}{2} iff nlogleft(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right) leq log frac{1}{2} iff ngefrac{log frac{1}{2}}{logleft(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)}approx1.28cdot 10^{19}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2






        Since $log$ function is increasing, we have that



        $$left(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)^n leq frac{1}{2} iff nlogleft(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right) leq log frac{1}{2} iff ngefrac{log frac{1}{2}}{logleft(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)}approx1.28cdot 10^{19}$$






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Since $log$ function is increasing, we have that



        $$left(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)^n leq frac{1}{2} iff nlogleft(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right) leq log frac{1}{2} iff ngefrac{log frac{1}{2}}{logleft(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)}approx1.28cdot 10^{19}$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 22 at 21:59

























        answered Nov 22 at 21:54









        gimusi

        1




        1























            2














            If OP wants some $n$ to satisfy the inequality they can proceed as follows. From the inequality
            $$
            e^xgeq 1+x
            $$
            for all $x$ we have that
            $$
            left(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)^nleq e^{-n/2^{64}}
            $$
            and
            $$
            e^{-n/2^{64}}leq frac{1}{2}
            $$
            if
            $$
            ngeq 2^{64}times log 2geq 2^{32}
            $$
            Hence $n=2^{32}$ works for example.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • I couldn't quite understand the first step, could you please elaborate? where is $2^{64}$ being substituted exactly? why is $n$ in the exponent of $e$ ?
              – shaqed
              Nov 23 at 13:10
















            2














            If OP wants some $n$ to satisfy the inequality they can proceed as follows. From the inequality
            $$
            e^xgeq 1+x
            $$
            for all $x$ we have that
            $$
            left(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)^nleq e^{-n/2^{64}}
            $$
            and
            $$
            e^{-n/2^{64}}leq frac{1}{2}
            $$
            if
            $$
            ngeq 2^{64}times log 2geq 2^{32}
            $$
            Hence $n=2^{32}$ works for example.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • I couldn't quite understand the first step, could you please elaborate? where is $2^{64}$ being substituted exactly? why is $n$ in the exponent of $e$ ?
              – shaqed
              Nov 23 at 13:10














            2












            2








            2






            If OP wants some $n$ to satisfy the inequality they can proceed as follows. From the inequality
            $$
            e^xgeq 1+x
            $$
            for all $x$ we have that
            $$
            left(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)^nleq e^{-n/2^{64}}
            $$
            and
            $$
            e^{-n/2^{64}}leq frac{1}{2}
            $$
            if
            $$
            ngeq 2^{64}times log 2geq 2^{32}
            $$
            Hence $n=2^{32}$ works for example.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            If OP wants some $n$ to satisfy the inequality they can proceed as follows. From the inequality
            $$
            e^xgeq 1+x
            $$
            for all $x$ we have that
            $$
            left(1-frac{1}{2^{64}}right)^nleq e^{-n/2^{64}}
            $$
            and
            $$
            e^{-n/2^{64}}leq frac{1}{2}
            $$
            if
            $$
            ngeq 2^{64}times log 2geq 2^{32}
            $$
            Hence $n=2^{32}$ works for example.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 22 at 22:02

























            answered Nov 22 at 21:57









            Foobaz John

            20.8k41250




            20.8k41250












            • I couldn't quite understand the first step, could you please elaborate? where is $2^{64}$ being substituted exactly? why is $n$ in the exponent of $e$ ?
              – shaqed
              Nov 23 at 13:10


















            • I couldn't quite understand the first step, could you please elaborate? where is $2^{64}$ being substituted exactly? why is $n$ in the exponent of $e$ ?
              – shaqed
              Nov 23 at 13:10
















            I couldn't quite understand the first step, could you please elaborate? where is $2^{64}$ being substituted exactly? why is $n$ in the exponent of $e$ ?
            – shaqed
            Nov 23 at 13:10




            I couldn't quite understand the first step, could you please elaborate? where is $2^{64}$ being substituted exactly? why is $n$ in the exponent of $e$ ?
            – shaqed
            Nov 23 at 13:10


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3009707%2fhelp-with-solving-an-in-equation-with-a-variable-as-exponent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Image
            Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l...
            Read more

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Image
            Para otros usos de este término, véase Puebla (desambiguación). Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localidad De arriba a abajo de izquierda a derecha: Estrella de Puebla, Volcán Popocatépetl, Catedral de Puebla, Monumento a Ignacio Zaragoza, Estadio Cuauhtémoc, Angelópolis y Vista panorámica de la ciudad. Escudo Otros nombres: El relicario de América/ La ciudad de los Ángeles/ La Angelópolis Lema: Muy noble y muy leal ciudad de Puebla de los Ángeles Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localización de Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza en México Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localización de Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza en Puebla Mapa interactivo Coordenadas 19°03′05″N 98°13′04″O  /  19.051388888889, -98.217777777778 Coordenadas: 19°03′05″N 98°13′04″O  /  19.051388888889, -98.217777777778 Idioma oficial Español Entidad Localidad  • País   México  • Estado Puebla  • Municipio Puebla Presidente municipal Claudia Rivera Vivanc...
            Read more

            Musa

            Image
            Para el género de plantas, véase Musa (planta). Apolo y la Nueve Musas En la mitología griega, las musas (en griego antiguo μοῦσαι « mousai» ) son, según los escritores más antiguos, las divinidades inspiradoras de las Artes: cada una de ellas está relacionada con ramas artísticas y del conocimiento. Son hijas de Zeus y de Mnemósine, compañeras del séquito de Apolo, dios olímpico de la música y patrón de las bellas artes, quien tuvo romances con cada una de ellas, dejando descendientes. Bajaban a la tierra a susurrar ideas e inspirar a aquellos mortales que las invocaran. En la época más arcaica eran las ninfas inspiradoras de las fuentes, en las cuales eran adoradas. Finalmente, alrededor de los siglos VIII-VII a. C. [ 1 ] ​ prevaleció en todo el territorio de la Hélade la adoración de las nueve Musas, que son Calíope, Clío, Erato, Euterpe, Melpómene, Polimnia, Talía, Terpsícore y Urania. El culto a las musas era originalmente de Tracia y Beocia, y fueron de vital impo...
            Read more