Limit of integral expression approaches maximum of function [duplicate]












1












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Finding $limlimits_{n rightarrow infty}left(int_0^1(f(x))^n,mathrm dxright)^frac{1}{n}$ for continuous $f:[0,1]to[0,infty)$ [duplicate]

    2 answers




So I've been trying to find a solution for this all afternoon, but haven't found a good place to start:




Prove that if $f:[a,b]tomathbf{R}^+$ is a continuous function with maximum value $M$, then
$$
lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b f(x)^n,dxright)^{1/n} = M
$$




Here are some of the paths I've considered, though none have been very successful:



(1) Considering the sequence of functions for all increasing integer $n$ and trying to show that the sequence converges. We've had plenty of work on converging sequences, but with the integral expression, I am not sure how to simplify.



(2) Showing that that sequence is increasing (again, how?) and then showing there to be a supremum at $M$. I'm not sure how the maximum of the function arrives in this problem.



(3) Mean value theorems for integrals



If anyone could give me a solid place to start or perhaps point me to a place where this question has been asked before (I can't seem to find it), I would be very grateful.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by RRL real-analysis
Users with the  real-analysis badge can single-handedly close real-analysis questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 30 '18 at 15:20


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.















  • $begingroup$
    Completely believable, but I've never seen this fact in my 30 years in calculus. Interesting.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Nov 30 '18 at 3:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: Try squeezing it: For example, $f(x) leq M$, so $int_a^bf(x)^n , dx leq (b-a)M^n$.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Nov 30 '18 at 3:53








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the expression $left(int_a^bf(x)^nright)^frac{1}{n}$ is the definition of the $L^p$ norm of the function $f$ (since it is positive). For $nrightarrowinfty$ this converges to the max-norm.
    $endgroup$
    – obscurans
    Nov 30 '18 at 3:55










  • $begingroup$
    @AnuragA I see how this gives you an upper bound for the limit, but how do you go about squeezing it from below? or show the sequence is increasing?
    $endgroup$
    – user474084
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:12










  • $begingroup$
    @obscurans can you point me to a proof of this fact?
    $endgroup$
    – user474084
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:19
















1












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Finding $limlimits_{n rightarrow infty}left(int_0^1(f(x))^n,mathrm dxright)^frac{1}{n}$ for continuous $f:[0,1]to[0,infty)$ [duplicate]

    2 answers




So I've been trying to find a solution for this all afternoon, but haven't found a good place to start:




Prove that if $f:[a,b]tomathbf{R}^+$ is a continuous function with maximum value $M$, then
$$
lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b f(x)^n,dxright)^{1/n} = M
$$




Here are some of the paths I've considered, though none have been very successful:



(1) Considering the sequence of functions for all increasing integer $n$ and trying to show that the sequence converges. We've had plenty of work on converging sequences, but with the integral expression, I am not sure how to simplify.



(2) Showing that that sequence is increasing (again, how?) and then showing there to be a supremum at $M$. I'm not sure how the maximum of the function arrives in this problem.



(3) Mean value theorems for integrals



If anyone could give me a solid place to start or perhaps point me to a place where this question has been asked before (I can't seem to find it), I would be very grateful.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by RRL real-analysis
Users with the  real-analysis badge can single-handedly close real-analysis questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 30 '18 at 15:20


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.















  • $begingroup$
    Completely believable, but I've never seen this fact in my 30 years in calculus. Interesting.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Nov 30 '18 at 3:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: Try squeezing it: For example, $f(x) leq M$, so $int_a^bf(x)^n , dx leq (b-a)M^n$.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Nov 30 '18 at 3:53








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the expression $left(int_a^bf(x)^nright)^frac{1}{n}$ is the definition of the $L^p$ norm of the function $f$ (since it is positive). For $nrightarrowinfty$ this converges to the max-norm.
    $endgroup$
    – obscurans
    Nov 30 '18 at 3:55










  • $begingroup$
    @AnuragA I see how this gives you an upper bound for the limit, but how do you go about squeezing it from below? or show the sequence is increasing?
    $endgroup$
    – user474084
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:12










  • $begingroup$
    @obscurans can you point me to a proof of this fact?
    $endgroup$
    – user474084
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:19














1












1








1





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Finding $limlimits_{n rightarrow infty}left(int_0^1(f(x))^n,mathrm dxright)^frac{1}{n}$ for continuous $f:[0,1]to[0,infty)$ [duplicate]

    2 answers




So I've been trying to find a solution for this all afternoon, but haven't found a good place to start:




Prove that if $f:[a,b]tomathbf{R}^+$ is a continuous function with maximum value $M$, then
$$
lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b f(x)^n,dxright)^{1/n} = M
$$




Here are some of the paths I've considered, though none have been very successful:



(1) Considering the sequence of functions for all increasing integer $n$ and trying to show that the sequence converges. We've had plenty of work on converging sequences, but with the integral expression, I am not sure how to simplify.



(2) Showing that that sequence is increasing (again, how?) and then showing there to be a supremum at $M$. I'm not sure how the maximum of the function arrives in this problem.



(3) Mean value theorems for integrals



If anyone could give me a solid place to start or perhaps point me to a place where this question has been asked before (I can't seem to find it), I would be very grateful.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Finding $limlimits_{n rightarrow infty}left(int_0^1(f(x))^n,mathrm dxright)^frac{1}{n}$ for continuous $f:[0,1]to[0,infty)$ [duplicate]

    2 answers




So I've been trying to find a solution for this all afternoon, but haven't found a good place to start:




Prove that if $f:[a,b]tomathbf{R}^+$ is a continuous function with maximum value $M$, then
$$
lim_{ntoinfty}left(int_a^b f(x)^n,dxright)^{1/n} = M
$$




Here are some of the paths I've considered, though none have been very successful:



(1) Considering the sequence of functions for all increasing integer $n$ and trying to show that the sequence converges. We've had plenty of work on converging sequences, but with the integral expression, I am not sure how to simplify.



(2) Showing that that sequence is increasing (again, how?) and then showing there to be a supremum at $M$. I'm not sure how the maximum of the function arrives in this problem.



(3) Mean value theorems for integrals



If anyone could give me a solid place to start or perhaps point me to a place where this question has been asked before (I can't seem to find it), I would be very grateful.





This question already has an answer here:




  • Finding $limlimits_{n rightarrow infty}left(int_0^1(f(x))^n,mathrm dxright)^frac{1}{n}$ for continuous $f:[0,1]to[0,infty)$ [duplicate]

    2 answers








real-analysis integration limits proof-writing






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 30 '18 at 3:48









user474084user474084

344




344




marked as duplicate by RRL real-analysis
Users with the  real-analysis badge can single-handedly close real-analysis questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 30 '18 at 15:20


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by RRL real-analysis
Users with the  real-analysis badge can single-handedly close real-analysis questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Nov 30 '18 at 15:20


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • $begingroup$
    Completely believable, but I've never seen this fact in my 30 years in calculus. Interesting.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Nov 30 '18 at 3:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: Try squeezing it: For example, $f(x) leq M$, so $int_a^bf(x)^n , dx leq (b-a)M^n$.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Nov 30 '18 at 3:53








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the expression $left(int_a^bf(x)^nright)^frac{1}{n}$ is the definition of the $L^p$ norm of the function $f$ (since it is positive). For $nrightarrowinfty$ this converges to the max-norm.
    $endgroup$
    – obscurans
    Nov 30 '18 at 3:55










  • $begingroup$
    @AnuragA I see how this gives you an upper bound for the limit, but how do you go about squeezing it from below? or show the sequence is increasing?
    $endgroup$
    – user474084
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:12










  • $begingroup$
    @obscurans can you point me to a proof of this fact?
    $endgroup$
    – user474084
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:19


















  • $begingroup$
    Completely believable, but I've never seen this fact in my 30 years in calculus. Interesting.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Nov 30 '18 at 3:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hint: Try squeezing it: For example, $f(x) leq M$, so $int_a^bf(x)^n , dx leq (b-a)M^n$.
    $endgroup$
    – Anurag A
    Nov 30 '18 at 3:53








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that the expression $left(int_a^bf(x)^nright)^frac{1}{n}$ is the definition of the $L^p$ norm of the function $f$ (since it is positive). For $nrightarrowinfty$ this converges to the max-norm.
    $endgroup$
    – obscurans
    Nov 30 '18 at 3:55










  • $begingroup$
    @AnuragA I see how this gives you an upper bound for the limit, but how do you go about squeezing it from below? or show the sequence is increasing?
    $endgroup$
    – user474084
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:12










  • $begingroup$
    @obscurans can you point me to a proof of this fact?
    $endgroup$
    – user474084
    Nov 30 '18 at 4:19
















$begingroup$
Completely believable, but I've never seen this fact in my 30 years in calculus. Interesting.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Nov 30 '18 at 3:52




$begingroup$
Completely believable, but I've never seen this fact in my 30 years in calculus. Interesting.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Nov 30 '18 at 3:52




1




1




$begingroup$
Hint: Try squeezing it: For example, $f(x) leq M$, so $int_a^bf(x)^n , dx leq (b-a)M^n$.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Nov 30 '18 at 3:53






$begingroup$
Hint: Try squeezing it: For example, $f(x) leq M$, so $int_a^bf(x)^n , dx leq (b-a)M^n$.
$endgroup$
– Anurag A
Nov 30 '18 at 3:53






1




1




$begingroup$
Note that the expression $left(int_a^bf(x)^nright)^frac{1}{n}$ is the definition of the $L^p$ norm of the function $f$ (since it is positive). For $nrightarrowinfty$ this converges to the max-norm.
$endgroup$
– obscurans
Nov 30 '18 at 3:55




$begingroup$
Note that the expression $left(int_a^bf(x)^nright)^frac{1}{n}$ is the definition of the $L^p$ norm of the function $f$ (since it is positive). For $nrightarrowinfty$ this converges to the max-norm.
$endgroup$
– obscurans
Nov 30 '18 at 3:55












$begingroup$
@AnuragA I see how this gives you an upper bound for the limit, but how do you go about squeezing it from below? or show the sequence is increasing?
$endgroup$
– user474084
Nov 30 '18 at 4:12




$begingroup$
@AnuragA I see how this gives you an upper bound for the limit, but how do you go about squeezing it from below? or show the sequence is increasing?
$endgroup$
– user474084
Nov 30 '18 at 4:12












$begingroup$
@obscurans can you point me to a proof of this fact?
$endgroup$
– user474084
Nov 30 '18 at 4:19




$begingroup$
@obscurans can you point me to a proof of this fact?
$endgroup$
– user474084
Nov 30 '18 at 4:19










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

If you have done the following question, then you probably know how to do the one in the post:




Given $m$ positive real numbers $a_1, dots, a_n$, prove that
$$
lim_{nto +infty} (a_1^n + dots + a_m^n)^{1/n} = max_{j} a_j.
$$




Proof




The trick is to use the squeeze theorem, and note that $$ max_j a_j leqslant (a_1^n + dots + a_m^n)^{1/n} leqslant m^{1/n} a_j. $$ Now let $n to +infty$, and note that $lim_n m^{1/n} = 1$.




Using the similar trick, we could do the original one. The problem is $f$ is "continuous". Even $f$ could reach $M$ at some point $x_0$, we cannot directly use it. So we only requires that for each $varepsilon >0$, find those $x$ s.t. $M-varepsilon leqslant f(x) leqslant M$. So we have the following proof.



Proof




Let $x_0 in [a, b]$ be the point where $f(c) =M$ [this is possible, since $fin mathcal C[a,b]$]. For each $epsilon > 0$, by the definition of continuity, there exists an interval $[c,d]$ that contains $x_0$ s.t. $$ xin [c,d] implies M-varepsilon leqslant f(x) leqslant M. $$ Thus $$ (d-c)^{1/n} (M-varepsilon) leqslant left(int_c^d f^nright)^{1/n}leqslant left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant M, $$ and then $$M-varepsilon leqslant varliminf_n left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant varlimsup_n left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant M. $$ Now let $varepsilon to 0^+$, then the upper limit and the lower limit are equal to $M$, hence the limit equation.




Remark



Technically, this is actually not an application of the squeezing theorem [the end of the inequality chains are not the same], but the idea is similar. If no tools of upper/lower limits are allowed, then the whole proof could be completed in $varepsilon$-$N$ format.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    If you have done the following question, then you probably know how to do the one in the post:




    Given $m$ positive real numbers $a_1, dots, a_n$, prove that
    $$
    lim_{nto +infty} (a_1^n + dots + a_m^n)^{1/n} = max_{j} a_j.
    $$




    Proof




    The trick is to use the squeeze theorem, and note that $$ max_j a_j leqslant (a_1^n + dots + a_m^n)^{1/n} leqslant m^{1/n} a_j. $$ Now let $n to +infty$, and note that $lim_n m^{1/n} = 1$.




    Using the similar trick, we could do the original one. The problem is $f$ is "continuous". Even $f$ could reach $M$ at some point $x_0$, we cannot directly use it. So we only requires that for each $varepsilon >0$, find those $x$ s.t. $M-varepsilon leqslant f(x) leqslant M$. So we have the following proof.



    Proof




    Let $x_0 in [a, b]$ be the point where $f(c) =M$ [this is possible, since $fin mathcal C[a,b]$]. For each $epsilon > 0$, by the definition of continuity, there exists an interval $[c,d]$ that contains $x_0$ s.t. $$ xin [c,d] implies M-varepsilon leqslant f(x) leqslant M. $$ Thus $$ (d-c)^{1/n} (M-varepsilon) leqslant left(int_c^d f^nright)^{1/n}leqslant left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant M, $$ and then $$M-varepsilon leqslant varliminf_n left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant varlimsup_n left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant M. $$ Now let $varepsilon to 0^+$, then the upper limit and the lower limit are equal to $M$, hence the limit equation.




    Remark



    Technically, this is actually not an application of the squeezing theorem [the end of the inequality chains are not the same], but the idea is similar. If no tools of upper/lower limits are allowed, then the whole proof could be completed in $varepsilon$-$N$ format.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      If you have done the following question, then you probably know how to do the one in the post:




      Given $m$ positive real numbers $a_1, dots, a_n$, prove that
      $$
      lim_{nto +infty} (a_1^n + dots + a_m^n)^{1/n} = max_{j} a_j.
      $$




      Proof




      The trick is to use the squeeze theorem, and note that $$ max_j a_j leqslant (a_1^n + dots + a_m^n)^{1/n} leqslant m^{1/n} a_j. $$ Now let $n to +infty$, and note that $lim_n m^{1/n} = 1$.




      Using the similar trick, we could do the original one. The problem is $f$ is "continuous". Even $f$ could reach $M$ at some point $x_0$, we cannot directly use it. So we only requires that for each $varepsilon >0$, find those $x$ s.t. $M-varepsilon leqslant f(x) leqslant M$. So we have the following proof.



      Proof




      Let $x_0 in [a, b]$ be the point where $f(c) =M$ [this is possible, since $fin mathcal C[a,b]$]. For each $epsilon > 0$, by the definition of continuity, there exists an interval $[c,d]$ that contains $x_0$ s.t. $$ xin [c,d] implies M-varepsilon leqslant f(x) leqslant M. $$ Thus $$ (d-c)^{1/n} (M-varepsilon) leqslant left(int_c^d f^nright)^{1/n}leqslant left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant M, $$ and then $$M-varepsilon leqslant varliminf_n left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant varlimsup_n left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant M. $$ Now let $varepsilon to 0^+$, then the upper limit and the lower limit are equal to $M$, hence the limit equation.




      Remark



      Technically, this is actually not an application of the squeezing theorem [the end of the inequality chains are not the same], but the idea is similar. If no tools of upper/lower limits are allowed, then the whole proof could be completed in $varepsilon$-$N$ format.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        If you have done the following question, then you probably know how to do the one in the post:




        Given $m$ positive real numbers $a_1, dots, a_n$, prove that
        $$
        lim_{nto +infty} (a_1^n + dots + a_m^n)^{1/n} = max_{j} a_j.
        $$




        Proof




        The trick is to use the squeeze theorem, and note that $$ max_j a_j leqslant (a_1^n + dots + a_m^n)^{1/n} leqslant m^{1/n} a_j. $$ Now let $n to +infty$, and note that $lim_n m^{1/n} = 1$.




        Using the similar trick, we could do the original one. The problem is $f$ is "continuous". Even $f$ could reach $M$ at some point $x_0$, we cannot directly use it. So we only requires that for each $varepsilon >0$, find those $x$ s.t. $M-varepsilon leqslant f(x) leqslant M$. So we have the following proof.



        Proof




        Let $x_0 in [a, b]$ be the point where $f(c) =M$ [this is possible, since $fin mathcal C[a,b]$]. For each $epsilon > 0$, by the definition of continuity, there exists an interval $[c,d]$ that contains $x_0$ s.t. $$ xin [c,d] implies M-varepsilon leqslant f(x) leqslant M. $$ Thus $$ (d-c)^{1/n} (M-varepsilon) leqslant left(int_c^d f^nright)^{1/n}leqslant left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant M, $$ and then $$M-varepsilon leqslant varliminf_n left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant varlimsup_n left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant M. $$ Now let $varepsilon to 0^+$, then the upper limit and the lower limit are equal to $M$, hence the limit equation.




        Remark



        Technically, this is actually not an application of the squeezing theorem [the end of the inequality chains are not the same], but the idea is similar. If no tools of upper/lower limits are allowed, then the whole proof could be completed in $varepsilon$-$N$ format.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        If you have done the following question, then you probably know how to do the one in the post:




        Given $m$ positive real numbers $a_1, dots, a_n$, prove that
        $$
        lim_{nto +infty} (a_1^n + dots + a_m^n)^{1/n} = max_{j} a_j.
        $$




        Proof




        The trick is to use the squeeze theorem, and note that $$ max_j a_j leqslant (a_1^n + dots + a_m^n)^{1/n} leqslant m^{1/n} a_j. $$ Now let $n to +infty$, and note that $lim_n m^{1/n} = 1$.




        Using the similar trick, we could do the original one. The problem is $f$ is "continuous". Even $f$ could reach $M$ at some point $x_0$, we cannot directly use it. So we only requires that for each $varepsilon >0$, find those $x$ s.t. $M-varepsilon leqslant f(x) leqslant M$. So we have the following proof.



        Proof




        Let $x_0 in [a, b]$ be the point where $f(c) =M$ [this is possible, since $fin mathcal C[a,b]$]. For each $epsilon > 0$, by the definition of continuity, there exists an interval $[c,d]$ that contains $x_0$ s.t. $$ xin [c,d] implies M-varepsilon leqslant f(x) leqslant M. $$ Thus $$ (d-c)^{1/n} (M-varepsilon) leqslant left(int_c^d f^nright)^{1/n}leqslant left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant M, $$ and then $$M-varepsilon leqslant varliminf_n left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant varlimsup_n left(int_a^b f^nright)^{1/n} leqslant M. $$ Now let $varepsilon to 0^+$, then the upper limit and the lower limit are equal to $M$, hence the limit equation.




        Remark



        Technically, this is actually not an application of the squeezing theorem [the end of the inequality chains are not the same], but the idea is similar. If no tools of upper/lower limits are allowed, then the whole proof could be completed in $varepsilon$-$N$ format.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 30 '18 at 9:05

























        answered Nov 30 '18 at 8:50









        xbhxbh

        6,0581522




        6,0581522















            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            How to extract passwords from Mobaxterm Free Version

            IC on Digikey is 5x more expensive than board containing same IC on Alibaba: How? [on hold]