Evaluating the limit using Taylor Series
We're asked to find the following limit by using Taylor expansions $$lim_{xto{}0}frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}$$
My Attempt:
Expressing $e^{3x}$, $sin(x)$, $cos(x)$, $ln(1-2x)$ and $cos(5x)$ in their respective taylor expansions yielded the following monstrous fraction, https://imgur.com/a/xGyfIyL (Picture size too big to be uploaded here for some reason, plus fraction too large to be expressed in the space given :/) But anyways, I can't seem to factorize this thing and evaluate the limit as $xto{}0$, any help would be appreciated.
calculus limits analysis taylor-expansion
|
show 1 more comment
We're asked to find the following limit by using Taylor expansions $$lim_{xto{}0}frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}$$
My Attempt:
Expressing $e^{3x}$, $sin(x)$, $cos(x)$, $ln(1-2x)$ and $cos(5x)$ in their respective taylor expansions yielded the following monstrous fraction, https://imgur.com/a/xGyfIyL (Picture size too big to be uploaded here for some reason, plus fraction too large to be expressed in the space given :/) But anyways, I can't seem to factorize this thing and evaluate the limit as $xto{}0$, any help would be appreciated.
calculus limits analysis taylor-expansion
A hint is that only the leading terms are going to matter. Can you see what happens to the constant, $x$, and $x^2$ terms in the numerator and denominator?
– user113102
Dec 7 at 21:23
As @gimusi notes, you do not need the explicit Taylor series for the fraction. You can answer the question with some algebra on the leading terms for numerator and denominator.
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 7 at 21:24
The main point is to guess the correct order for the expansion. In the doubt we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$. When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess looking at the denominator.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:46
I see now how I can go about evaluating the limit itself although I still find the concept a little bit vague, as in considering a specific order for the expansion and then applying it for all the functions while leaving the rest of the series behind, it'll probably start making more sense in a few more examples. Thanks for the help :)
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:52
@kareembokai Yes of course you need only to practice to get confident with the method. The main rule is that all the function must be expanded to the same order. Note also that we can get an uncorrect evaluation when the order is too low than the minimum requested but not when the order is higher (but it requires more effort and work). Then you need to practice a lot with that in order to becomemore and more confident.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:59
|
show 1 more comment
We're asked to find the following limit by using Taylor expansions $$lim_{xto{}0}frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}$$
My Attempt:
Expressing $e^{3x}$, $sin(x)$, $cos(x)$, $ln(1-2x)$ and $cos(5x)$ in their respective taylor expansions yielded the following monstrous fraction, https://imgur.com/a/xGyfIyL (Picture size too big to be uploaded here for some reason, plus fraction too large to be expressed in the space given :/) But anyways, I can't seem to factorize this thing and evaluate the limit as $xto{}0$, any help would be appreciated.
calculus limits analysis taylor-expansion
We're asked to find the following limit by using Taylor expansions $$lim_{xto{}0}frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}$$
My Attempt:
Expressing $e^{3x}$, $sin(x)$, $cos(x)$, $ln(1-2x)$ and $cos(5x)$ in their respective taylor expansions yielded the following monstrous fraction, https://imgur.com/a/xGyfIyL (Picture size too big to be uploaded here for some reason, plus fraction too large to be expressed in the space given :/) But anyways, I can't seem to factorize this thing and evaluate the limit as $xto{}0$, any help would be appreciated.
calculus limits analysis taylor-expansion
calculus limits analysis taylor-expansion
asked Dec 7 at 21:19
kareem bokai
344
344
A hint is that only the leading terms are going to matter. Can you see what happens to the constant, $x$, and $x^2$ terms in the numerator and denominator?
– user113102
Dec 7 at 21:23
As @gimusi notes, you do not need the explicit Taylor series for the fraction. You can answer the question with some algebra on the leading terms for numerator and denominator.
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 7 at 21:24
The main point is to guess the correct order for the expansion. In the doubt we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$. When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess looking at the denominator.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:46
I see now how I can go about evaluating the limit itself although I still find the concept a little bit vague, as in considering a specific order for the expansion and then applying it for all the functions while leaving the rest of the series behind, it'll probably start making more sense in a few more examples. Thanks for the help :)
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:52
@kareembokai Yes of course you need only to practice to get confident with the method. The main rule is that all the function must be expanded to the same order. Note also that we can get an uncorrect evaluation when the order is too low than the minimum requested but not when the order is higher (but it requires more effort and work). Then you need to practice a lot with that in order to becomemore and more confident.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:59
|
show 1 more comment
A hint is that only the leading terms are going to matter. Can you see what happens to the constant, $x$, and $x^2$ terms in the numerator and denominator?
– user113102
Dec 7 at 21:23
As @gimusi notes, you do not need the explicit Taylor series for the fraction. You can answer the question with some algebra on the leading terms for numerator and denominator.
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 7 at 21:24
The main point is to guess the correct order for the expansion. In the doubt we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$. When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess looking at the denominator.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:46
I see now how I can go about evaluating the limit itself although I still find the concept a little bit vague, as in considering a specific order for the expansion and then applying it for all the functions while leaving the rest of the series behind, it'll probably start making more sense in a few more examples. Thanks for the help :)
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:52
@kareembokai Yes of course you need only to practice to get confident with the method. The main rule is that all the function must be expanded to the same order. Note also that we can get an uncorrect evaluation when the order is too low than the minimum requested but not when the order is higher (but it requires more effort and work). Then you need to practice a lot with that in order to becomemore and more confident.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:59
A hint is that only the leading terms are going to matter. Can you see what happens to the constant, $x$, and $x^2$ terms in the numerator and denominator?
– user113102
Dec 7 at 21:23
A hint is that only the leading terms are going to matter. Can you see what happens to the constant, $x$, and $x^2$ terms in the numerator and denominator?
– user113102
Dec 7 at 21:23
As @gimusi notes, you do not need the explicit Taylor series for the fraction. You can answer the question with some algebra on the leading terms for numerator and denominator.
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 7 at 21:24
As @gimusi notes, you do not need the explicit Taylor series for the fraction. You can answer the question with some algebra on the leading terms for numerator and denominator.
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 7 at 21:24
The main point is to guess the correct order for the expansion. In the doubt we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$. When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess looking at the denominator.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:46
The main point is to guess the correct order for the expansion. In the doubt we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$. When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess looking at the denominator.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:46
I see now how I can go about evaluating the limit itself although I still find the concept a little bit vague, as in considering a specific order for the expansion and then applying it for all the functions while leaving the rest of the series behind, it'll probably start making more sense in a few more examples. Thanks for the help :)
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:52
I see now how I can go about evaluating the limit itself although I still find the concept a little bit vague, as in considering a specific order for the expansion and then applying it for all the functions while leaving the rest of the series behind, it'll probably start making more sense in a few more examples. Thanks for the help :)
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:52
@kareembokai Yes of course you need only to practice to get confident with the method. The main rule is that all the function must be expanded to the same order. Note also that we can get an uncorrect evaluation when the order is too low than the minimum requested but not when the order is higher (but it requires more effort and work). Then you need to practice a lot with that in order to becomemore and more confident.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:59
@kareembokai Yes of course you need only to practice to get confident with the method. The main rule is that all the function must be expanded to the same order. Note also that we can get an uncorrect evaluation when the order is too low than the minimum requested but not when the order is higher (but it requires more effort and work). Then you need to practice a lot with that in order to becomemore and more confident.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:59
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
HINT
By Taylor's expansion, term by term, we have that
- $e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$
- $sin x =x+o(x^2)$
- $cos x = 1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$
- $log(1-2x)=-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)$
- $cos (5x) = 1-frac{25}2 x^2+o(x^2)$
and then
$$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12x^2-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)}{-1+1-frac{25}2x^2+o(x^2)}$$
Can you conclude from here?
Edit for a remark
The main point with Taylor's expansion is to guess the correct order to use for the expansion and there is not general a rule to be sure about the order to use.
In the doubt, we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$.
When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess, in that case, looking at the denominator which is in the form $cx^2+o(x^2)$.
I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:31
@kareembokai I add something on that!
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:32
@kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:40
In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
– egreg
Dec 7 at 22:13
@egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 22:16
add a comment |
There is nothing monstrous in that computation. If you want a compact resolution, compute separately the coefficients in increasing order (numerator/denominator).
constant terms: $1-1=0 / -1+1=0$;
linear terms: $3-1-2=0 / 0$;
quadratic terms: $dfrac92+dfrac12-2=dfrac{6}{2} / -dfrac{25}2$.
As the first nonzero coefficients are of the same order, the limit is finite and is the ratio
$$-frac{6}{25}.$$
The trick is to obtain a fraction like
$$frac{ax^n+text{higher order terms}}{bx^m+text{higher order terms}}=x^{n-m}frac{a+text{higher order terms}}{b+text{higher order terms}}$$ which tends to $0,dfrac ab$ or $pminfty$ depending on the sign of $n-m$.
1
Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:43
add a comment |
From your picture, it seems an expansion at order $2$ will do. All functions should be expanded at the same
order, using, say Taylor-Young's formula. Thus
$mathrm e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$,
$sin x =x+o(x^2)$,
$cos x=1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$,
$ln(1-2x)=-2x-frac42 x^2+o(x^2)$
Thus the numerator is
$$N(x)=1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12 x^2-2x-2 x^2+o(x^2)=3 x^2+o(x^2).$$
Can you proceed?
add a comment |
We need only quote the numerator and denominator up to $x^2$ terms: $$lim_{xto 0}frac{1+3x+color{blue}{9x^2/2}-x-1+color{blue}{x^2/2}-2xcolor{blue}{-2x^2}+O(x^3)}{-1+1color{blue}{-25x^2/2}+O(x^3)}.$$You'll find only $x^2$ terms survive in each.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030377%2fevaluating-the-limit-using-taylor-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
HINT
By Taylor's expansion, term by term, we have that
- $e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$
- $sin x =x+o(x^2)$
- $cos x = 1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$
- $log(1-2x)=-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)$
- $cos (5x) = 1-frac{25}2 x^2+o(x^2)$
and then
$$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12x^2-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)}{-1+1-frac{25}2x^2+o(x^2)}$$
Can you conclude from here?
Edit for a remark
The main point with Taylor's expansion is to guess the correct order to use for the expansion and there is not general a rule to be sure about the order to use.
In the doubt, we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$.
When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess, in that case, looking at the denominator which is in the form $cx^2+o(x^2)$.
I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:31
@kareembokai I add something on that!
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:32
@kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:40
In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
– egreg
Dec 7 at 22:13
@egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 22:16
add a comment |
HINT
By Taylor's expansion, term by term, we have that
- $e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$
- $sin x =x+o(x^2)$
- $cos x = 1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$
- $log(1-2x)=-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)$
- $cos (5x) = 1-frac{25}2 x^2+o(x^2)$
and then
$$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12x^2-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)}{-1+1-frac{25}2x^2+o(x^2)}$$
Can you conclude from here?
Edit for a remark
The main point with Taylor's expansion is to guess the correct order to use for the expansion and there is not general a rule to be sure about the order to use.
In the doubt, we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$.
When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess, in that case, looking at the denominator which is in the form $cx^2+o(x^2)$.
I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:31
@kareembokai I add something on that!
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:32
@kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:40
In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
– egreg
Dec 7 at 22:13
@egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 22:16
add a comment |
HINT
By Taylor's expansion, term by term, we have that
- $e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$
- $sin x =x+o(x^2)$
- $cos x = 1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$
- $log(1-2x)=-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)$
- $cos (5x) = 1-frac{25}2 x^2+o(x^2)$
and then
$$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12x^2-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)}{-1+1-frac{25}2x^2+o(x^2)}$$
Can you conclude from here?
Edit for a remark
The main point with Taylor's expansion is to guess the correct order to use for the expansion and there is not general a rule to be sure about the order to use.
In the doubt, we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$.
When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess, in that case, looking at the denominator which is in the form $cx^2+o(x^2)$.
HINT
By Taylor's expansion, term by term, we have that
- $e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$
- $sin x =x+o(x^2)$
- $cos x = 1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$
- $log(1-2x)=-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)$
- $cos (5x) = 1-frac{25}2 x^2+o(x^2)$
and then
$$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12x^2-2x-2x^2+o(x^2)}{-1+1-frac{25}2x^2+o(x^2)}$$
Can you conclude from here?
Edit for a remark
The main point with Taylor's expansion is to guess the correct order to use for the expansion and there is not general a rule to be sure about the order to use.
In the doubt, we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$.
When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess, in that case, looking at the denominator which is in the form $cx^2+o(x^2)$.
edited Dec 7 at 21:54
answered Dec 7 at 21:22
gimusi
1
1
I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:31
@kareembokai I add something on that!
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:32
@kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:40
In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
– egreg
Dec 7 at 22:13
@egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 22:16
add a comment |
I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:31
@kareembokai I add something on that!
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:32
@kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:40
In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
– egreg
Dec 7 at 22:13
@egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 22:16
I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:31
I do see that you've ended up with the leading terms, however I still don't see how you managed to get rid of all the other terms so quickly
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:31
@kareembokai I add something on that!
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:32
@kareembokai I add something on that!
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:32
@kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:40
@kareembokai Let me know whether now it is clear or not. In case do not hesitate to ask for any clarification.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:40
In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
– egreg
Dec 7 at 22:13
In general it's better to start with the term that appears simpler, in this case the denominator, which is easily seen to have order $2$.
– egreg
Dec 7 at 22:13
@egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 22:16
@egreg Yes I agree in that case is quite simple, is some other cases for a student new in the topic it can be not so straightforward to see, but after a while and some tons of limits it becomes a simple task for usual limits.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 22:16
add a comment |
There is nothing monstrous in that computation. If you want a compact resolution, compute separately the coefficients in increasing order (numerator/denominator).
constant terms: $1-1=0 / -1+1=0$;
linear terms: $3-1-2=0 / 0$;
quadratic terms: $dfrac92+dfrac12-2=dfrac{6}{2} / -dfrac{25}2$.
As the first nonzero coefficients are of the same order, the limit is finite and is the ratio
$$-frac{6}{25}.$$
The trick is to obtain a fraction like
$$frac{ax^n+text{higher order terms}}{bx^m+text{higher order terms}}=x^{n-m}frac{a+text{higher order terms}}{b+text{higher order terms}}$$ which tends to $0,dfrac ab$ or $pminfty$ depending on the sign of $n-m$.
1
Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:43
add a comment |
There is nothing monstrous in that computation. If you want a compact resolution, compute separately the coefficients in increasing order (numerator/denominator).
constant terms: $1-1=0 / -1+1=0$;
linear terms: $3-1-2=0 / 0$;
quadratic terms: $dfrac92+dfrac12-2=dfrac{6}{2} / -dfrac{25}2$.
As the first nonzero coefficients are of the same order, the limit is finite and is the ratio
$$-frac{6}{25}.$$
The trick is to obtain a fraction like
$$frac{ax^n+text{higher order terms}}{bx^m+text{higher order terms}}=x^{n-m}frac{a+text{higher order terms}}{b+text{higher order terms}}$$ which tends to $0,dfrac ab$ or $pminfty$ depending on the sign of $n-m$.
1
Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:43
add a comment |
There is nothing monstrous in that computation. If you want a compact resolution, compute separately the coefficients in increasing order (numerator/denominator).
constant terms: $1-1=0 / -1+1=0$;
linear terms: $3-1-2=0 / 0$;
quadratic terms: $dfrac92+dfrac12-2=dfrac{6}{2} / -dfrac{25}2$.
As the first nonzero coefficients are of the same order, the limit is finite and is the ratio
$$-frac{6}{25}.$$
The trick is to obtain a fraction like
$$frac{ax^n+text{higher order terms}}{bx^m+text{higher order terms}}=x^{n-m}frac{a+text{higher order terms}}{b+text{higher order terms}}$$ which tends to $0,dfrac ab$ or $pminfty$ depending on the sign of $n-m$.
There is nothing monstrous in that computation. If you want a compact resolution, compute separately the coefficients in increasing order (numerator/denominator).
constant terms: $1-1=0 / -1+1=0$;
linear terms: $3-1-2=0 / 0$;
quadratic terms: $dfrac92+dfrac12-2=dfrac{6}{2} / -dfrac{25}2$.
As the first nonzero coefficients are of the same order, the limit is finite and is the ratio
$$-frac{6}{25}.$$
The trick is to obtain a fraction like
$$frac{ax^n+text{higher order terms}}{bx^m+text{higher order terms}}=x^{n-m}frac{a+text{higher order terms}}{b+text{higher order terms}}$$ which tends to $0,dfrac ab$ or $pminfty$ depending on the sign of $n-m$.
edited Dec 7 at 21:38
answered Dec 7 at 21:31
Yves Daoust
124k671221
124k671221
1
Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:43
add a comment |
1
Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:43
1
1
Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:43
Nice way to simplify even if it requires a few of experience to be handle in that way.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:43
add a comment |
From your picture, it seems an expansion at order $2$ will do. All functions should be expanded at the same
order, using, say Taylor-Young's formula. Thus
$mathrm e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$,
$sin x =x+o(x^2)$,
$cos x=1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$,
$ln(1-2x)=-2x-frac42 x^2+o(x^2)$
Thus the numerator is
$$N(x)=1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12 x^2-2x-2 x^2+o(x^2)=3 x^2+o(x^2).$$
Can you proceed?
add a comment |
From your picture, it seems an expansion at order $2$ will do. All functions should be expanded at the same
order, using, say Taylor-Young's formula. Thus
$mathrm e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$,
$sin x =x+o(x^2)$,
$cos x=1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$,
$ln(1-2x)=-2x-frac42 x^2+o(x^2)$
Thus the numerator is
$$N(x)=1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12 x^2-2x-2 x^2+o(x^2)=3 x^2+o(x^2).$$
Can you proceed?
add a comment |
From your picture, it seems an expansion at order $2$ will do. All functions should be expanded at the same
order, using, say Taylor-Young's formula. Thus
$mathrm e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$,
$sin x =x+o(x^2)$,
$cos x=1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$,
$ln(1-2x)=-2x-frac42 x^2+o(x^2)$
Thus the numerator is
$$N(x)=1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12 x^2-2x-2 x^2+o(x^2)=3 x^2+o(x^2).$$
Can you proceed?
From your picture, it seems an expansion at order $2$ will do. All functions should be expanded at the same
order, using, say Taylor-Young's formula. Thus
$mathrm e^{3x}=1+3x+frac92x^2+o(x^2)$,
$sin x =x+o(x^2)$,
$cos x=1-frac12 x^2+o(x^2)$,
$ln(1-2x)=-2x-frac42 x^2+o(x^2)$
Thus the numerator is
$$N(x)=1+3x+frac92x^2-x-1+frac12 x^2-2x-2 x^2+o(x^2)=3 x^2+o(x^2).$$
Can you proceed?
edited Dec 7 at 21:48
answered Dec 7 at 21:33
Bernard
118k639112
118k639112
add a comment |
add a comment |
We need only quote the numerator and denominator up to $x^2$ terms: $$lim_{xto 0}frac{1+3x+color{blue}{9x^2/2}-x-1+color{blue}{x^2/2}-2xcolor{blue}{-2x^2}+O(x^3)}{-1+1color{blue}{-25x^2/2}+O(x^3)}.$$You'll find only $x^2$ terms survive in each.
add a comment |
We need only quote the numerator and denominator up to $x^2$ terms: $$lim_{xto 0}frac{1+3x+color{blue}{9x^2/2}-x-1+color{blue}{x^2/2}-2xcolor{blue}{-2x^2}+O(x^3)}{-1+1color{blue}{-25x^2/2}+O(x^3)}.$$You'll find only $x^2$ terms survive in each.
add a comment |
We need only quote the numerator and denominator up to $x^2$ terms: $$lim_{xto 0}frac{1+3x+color{blue}{9x^2/2}-x-1+color{blue}{x^2/2}-2xcolor{blue}{-2x^2}+O(x^3)}{-1+1color{blue}{-25x^2/2}+O(x^3)}.$$You'll find only $x^2$ terms survive in each.
We need only quote the numerator and denominator up to $x^2$ terms: $$lim_{xto 0}frac{1+3x+color{blue}{9x^2/2}-x-1+color{blue}{x^2/2}-2xcolor{blue}{-2x^2}+O(x^3)}{-1+1color{blue}{-25x^2/2}+O(x^3)}.$$You'll find only $x^2$ terms survive in each.
edited Dec 7 at 22:17
answered Dec 7 at 21:26
J.G.
22.4k22035
22.4k22035
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3030377%2fevaluating-the-limit-using-taylor-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
A hint is that only the leading terms are going to matter. Can you see what happens to the constant, $x$, and $x^2$ terms in the numerator and denominator?
– user113102
Dec 7 at 21:23
As @gimusi notes, you do not need the explicit Taylor series for the fraction. You can answer the question with some algebra on the leading terms for numerator and denominator.
– Ethan Bolker
Dec 7 at 21:24
The main point is to guess the correct order for the expansion. In the doubt we could decide to start with the first order to obtain $$frac{e^{3x}-sin(x)-cos(x)+ln(1-2x)}{-1+cos(5x)}=frac{1+3x-x-1-2x+o(x)}{-1+1+o(x)}$$ which is an indeterminate form $frac 0 0$. When this happen it means that the order used is not sufficient. Then we can try with the order $2$ which indeed works fine. Of course also all the orders greater than $2$ work fine. But the second order suffices, how we can easily guess looking at the denominator.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:46
I see now how I can go about evaluating the limit itself although I still find the concept a little bit vague, as in considering a specific order for the expansion and then applying it for all the functions while leaving the rest of the series behind, it'll probably start making more sense in a few more examples. Thanks for the help :)
– kareem bokai
Dec 7 at 21:52
@kareembokai Yes of course you need only to practice to get confident with the method. The main rule is that all the function must be expanded to the same order. Note also that we can get an uncorrect evaluation when the order is too low than the minimum requested but not when the order is higher (but it requires more effort and work). Then you need to practice a lot with that in order to becomemore and more confident.
– gimusi
Dec 7 at 21:59