Poisson Process Probability of a machine failing before other












2












$begingroup$



Machine $1$ is working now. Machine $2$ will be switched on at time
$t$. Suppose that machine $1$ fails at rate $λ_1$ and $2$ at rate
$λ_2$with an exponential waiting time. What is the probability that
machine $2$ fails first?




I thought:



It should be $P(X_2+t<X_1)$ or $P(X_2<X_1|X_2=t)$ but I don't know how to go about calculating it.



Can someone give me a hint?






probability poisson-distribution poisson-process







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Calculate the probability M1 fails before time $t$. Once both are working, probability M1<M2 is $frac {lambda_1}{lambda_1+lambda_2}$
    $endgroup$
    – A.S.
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:17










  • $begingroup$
    This is definitely $P(X_2+t<X_1)$ (I cannot even fathom what $P(X_2<X_1|X_2=t)$ stands for...) and one knows that, for every nonnegative $x$, $P(X_1>x)=e^{-lambda_1x}$ hence, by independence, $P(X_1>X_2+t)=E(e^{-lambda_1(X_2+t)})=e^{-lambda_1t}E(e^{-lambda_1X_2})$. Now, can you compute $E(e^{-sX_2})$ for every $s$?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:17












  • $begingroup$
    @A.S. would this be simply $P(X_1>t)P(X_1>X_2)$?
    $endgroup$
    – GRS
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:25










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. I was computing the complementary probability instead. Your answer is coincides with Did's term-for-term.
    $endgroup$
    – A.S.
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:27












  • $begingroup$
    @Did I had a think about it, but I don't understand why we are taking expectation? I know how to calculate $E(X_2)=1/lambda_2$
    $endgroup$
    – GRS
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:27
















2












$begingroup$



Machine $1$ is working now. Machine $2$ will be switched on at time
$t$. Suppose that machine $1$ fails at rate $λ_1$ and $2$ at rate
$λ_2$with an exponential waiting time. What is the probability that
machine $2$ fails first?




I thought:



It should be $P(X_2+t<X_1)$ or $P(X_2<X_1|X_2=t)$ but I don't know how to go about calculating it.



Can someone give me a hint?






probability poisson-distribution poisson-process







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Calculate the probability M1 fails before time $t$. Once both are working, probability M1<M2 is $frac {lambda_1}{lambda_1+lambda_2}$
    $endgroup$
    – A.S.
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:17










  • $begingroup$
    This is definitely $P(X_2+t<X_1)$ (I cannot even fathom what $P(X_2<X_1|X_2=t)$ stands for...) and one knows that, for every nonnegative $x$, $P(X_1>x)=e^{-lambda_1x}$ hence, by independence, $P(X_1>X_2+t)=E(e^{-lambda_1(X_2+t)})=e^{-lambda_1t}E(e^{-lambda_1X_2})$. Now, can you compute $E(e^{-sX_2})$ for every $s$?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:17












  • $begingroup$
    @A.S. would this be simply $P(X_1>t)P(X_1>X_2)$?
    $endgroup$
    – GRS
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:25










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. I was computing the complementary probability instead. Your answer is coincides with Did's term-for-term.
    $endgroup$
    – A.S.
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:27












  • $begingroup$
    @Did I had a think about it, but I don't understand why we are taking expectation? I know how to calculate $E(X_2)=1/lambda_2$
    $endgroup$
    – GRS
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:27














2












2








2





$begingroup$



Machine $1$ is working now. Machine $2$ will be switched on at time
$t$. Suppose that machine $1$ fails at rate $λ_1$ and $2$ at rate
$λ_2$with an exponential waiting time. What is the probability that
machine $2$ fails first?




I thought:



It should be $P(X_2+t<X_1)$ or $P(X_2<X_1|X_2=t)$ but I don't know how to go about calculating it.



Can someone give me a hint?






probability poisson-distribution poisson-process







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





Machine $1$ is working now. Machine $2$ will be switched on at time
$t$. Suppose that machine $1$ fails at rate $λ_1$ and $2$ at rate
$λ_2$with an exponential waiting time. What is the probability that
machine $2$ fails first?




I thought:



It should be $P(X_2+t<X_1)$ or $P(X_2<X_1|X_2=t)$ but I don't know how to go about calculating it.



Can someone give me a hint?






probability poisson-distribution poisson-process




probability poisson-distribution poisson-process






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 4 '16 at 10:12









GRSGRS

1,140927




1,140927








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Calculate the probability M1 fails before time $t$. Once both are working, probability M1<M2 is $frac {lambda_1}{lambda_1+lambda_2}$
    $endgroup$
    – A.S.
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:17










  • $begingroup$
    This is definitely $P(X_2+t<X_1)$ (I cannot even fathom what $P(X_2<X_1|X_2=t)$ stands for...) and one knows that, for every nonnegative $x$, $P(X_1>x)=e^{-lambda_1x}$ hence, by independence, $P(X_1>X_2+t)=E(e^{-lambda_1(X_2+t)})=e^{-lambda_1t}E(e^{-lambda_1X_2})$. Now, can you compute $E(e^{-sX_2})$ for every $s$?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:17












  • $begingroup$
    @A.S. would this be simply $P(X_1>t)P(X_1>X_2)$?
    $endgroup$
    – GRS
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:25










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. I was computing the complementary probability instead. Your answer is coincides with Did's term-for-term.
    $endgroup$
    – A.S.
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:27












  • $begingroup$
    @Did I had a think about it, but I don't understand why we are taking expectation? I know how to calculate $E(X_2)=1/lambda_2$
    $endgroup$
    – GRS
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:27














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Calculate the probability M1 fails before time $t$. Once both are working, probability M1<M2 is $frac {lambda_1}{lambda_1+lambda_2}$
    $endgroup$
    – A.S.
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:17










  • $begingroup$
    This is definitely $P(X_2+t<X_1)$ (I cannot even fathom what $P(X_2<X_1|X_2=t)$ stands for...) and one knows that, for every nonnegative $x$, $P(X_1>x)=e^{-lambda_1x}$ hence, by independence, $P(X_1>X_2+t)=E(e^{-lambda_1(X_2+t)})=e^{-lambda_1t}E(e^{-lambda_1X_2})$. Now, can you compute $E(e^{-sX_2})$ for every $s$?
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:17












  • $begingroup$
    @A.S. would this be simply $P(X_1>t)P(X_1>X_2)$?
    $endgroup$
    – GRS
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:25










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. I was computing the complementary probability instead. Your answer is coincides with Did's term-for-term.
    $endgroup$
    – A.S.
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:27












  • $begingroup$
    @Did I had a think about it, but I don't understand why we are taking expectation? I know how to calculate $E(X_2)=1/lambda_2$
    $endgroup$
    – GRS
    Mar 4 '16 at 10:27








1




1




$begingroup$
Calculate the probability M1 fails before time $t$. Once both are working, probability M1<M2 is $frac {lambda_1}{lambda_1+lambda_2}$
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 4 '16 at 10:17




$begingroup$
Calculate the probability M1 fails before time $t$. Once both are working, probability M1<M2 is $frac {lambda_1}{lambda_1+lambda_2}$
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 4 '16 at 10:17












$begingroup$
This is definitely $P(X_2+t<X_1)$ (I cannot even fathom what $P(X_2<X_1|X_2=t)$ stands for...) and one knows that, for every nonnegative $x$, $P(X_1>x)=e^{-lambda_1x}$ hence, by independence, $P(X_1>X_2+t)=E(e^{-lambda_1(X_2+t)})=e^{-lambda_1t}E(e^{-lambda_1X_2})$. Now, can you compute $E(e^{-sX_2})$ for every $s$?
$endgroup$
– Did
Mar 4 '16 at 10:17






$begingroup$
This is definitely $P(X_2+t<X_1)$ (I cannot even fathom what $P(X_2<X_1|X_2=t)$ stands for...) and one knows that, for every nonnegative $x$, $P(X_1>x)=e^{-lambda_1x}$ hence, by independence, $P(X_1>X_2+t)=E(e^{-lambda_1(X_2+t)})=e^{-lambda_1t}E(e^{-lambda_1X_2})$. Now, can you compute $E(e^{-sX_2})$ for every $s$?
$endgroup$
– Did
Mar 4 '16 at 10:17














$begingroup$
@A.S. would this be simply $P(X_1>t)P(X_1>X_2)$?
$endgroup$
– GRS
Mar 4 '16 at 10:25




$begingroup$
@A.S. would this be simply $P(X_1>t)P(X_1>X_2)$?
$endgroup$
– GRS
Mar 4 '16 at 10:25












$begingroup$
Yes. I was computing the complementary probability instead. Your answer is coincides with Did's term-for-term.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 4 '16 at 10:27






$begingroup$
Yes. I was computing the complementary probability instead. Your answer is coincides with Did's term-for-term.
$endgroup$
– A.S.
Mar 4 '16 at 10:27














$begingroup$
@Did I had a think about it, but I don't understand why we are taking expectation? I know how to calculate $E(X_2)=1/lambda_2$
$endgroup$
– GRS
Mar 4 '16 at 10:27




$begingroup$
@Did I had a think about it, but I don't understand why we are taking expectation? I know how to calculate $E(X_2)=1/lambda_2$
$endgroup$
– GRS
Mar 4 '16 at 10:27










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Let $X_i$ be the failure time of machine $i$. By lack of memory we have
begin{align}
mathbb P(X_2+t<X_1) &= mathbb P(X_1>X_2+tmid X_1>t)mathbb P(X_1>t)\
&= mathbb P(X_1>X_2)mathbb P(X_1>t)\
&= left(frac{lambda_2}{lambda_1+lambda_2}right) e^{-lambda_1 t}.
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1682753%2fpoisson-process-probability-of-a-machine-failing-before-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Let $X_i$ be the failure time of machine $i$. By lack of memory we have
    begin{align}
    mathbb P(X_2+t<X_1) &= mathbb P(X_1>X_2+tmid X_1>t)mathbb P(X_1>t)\
    &= mathbb P(X_1>X_2)mathbb P(X_1>t)\
    &= left(frac{lambda_2}{lambda_1+lambda_2}right) e^{-lambda_1 t}.
    end{align}






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Let $X_i$ be the failure time of machine $i$. By lack of memory we have
      begin{align}
      mathbb P(X_2+t<X_1) &= mathbb P(X_1>X_2+tmid X_1>t)mathbb P(X_1>t)\
      &= mathbb P(X_1>X_2)mathbb P(X_1>t)\
      &= left(frac{lambda_2}{lambda_1+lambda_2}right) e^{-lambda_1 t}.
      end{align}






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Let $X_i$ be the failure time of machine $i$. By lack of memory we have
        begin{align}
        mathbb P(X_2+t<X_1) &= mathbb P(X_1>X_2+tmid X_1>t)mathbb P(X_1>t)\
        &= mathbb P(X_1>X_2)mathbb P(X_1>t)\
        &= left(frac{lambda_2}{lambda_1+lambda_2}right) e^{-lambda_1 t}.
        end{align}






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Let $X_i$ be the failure time of machine $i$. By lack of memory we have
        begin{align}
        mathbb P(X_2+t<X_1) &= mathbb P(X_1>X_2+tmid X_1>t)mathbb P(X_1>t)\
        &= mathbb P(X_1>X_2)mathbb P(X_1>t)\
        &= left(frac{lambda_2}{lambda_1+lambda_2}right) e^{-lambda_1 t}.
        end{align}







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Apr 24 '16 at 22:57

























        answered Apr 1 '16 at 11:35









        Math1000Math1000

        19.2k31745




        19.2k31745






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1682753%2fpoisson-process-probability-of-a-machine-failing-before-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Image
            Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
            Read more

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Image
            Para otros usos de este término, véase Puebla (desambiguación). Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localidad De arriba a abajo de izquierda a derecha: Estrella de Puebla, Volcán Popocatépetl, Catedral de Puebla, Monumento a Ignacio Zaragoza, Estadio Cuauhtémoc, Angelópolis y Vista panorámica de la ciudad. Escudo Otros nombres: El relicario de América/ La ciudad de los Ángeles/ La Angelópolis Lema: Muy noble y muy leal ciudad de Puebla de los Ángeles Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localización de Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza en México Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza Localización de Heroica Puebla de Zaragoza en Puebla Mapa interactivo Coordenadas 19°03′05″N 98°13′04″O  /  19.051388888889, -98.217777777778 Coordenadas: 19°03′05″N 98°13′04″O  /  19.051388888889, -98.217777777778 Idioma oficial Español Entidad Localidad  • País   México  • Estado Puebla  • Municipio Puebla Presidente municipal Claudia Rivera Vivanc
            Read more

            Musa

            Image
            Para el género de plantas, véase Musa (planta). Apolo y la Nueve Musas En la mitología griega, las musas (en griego antiguo μοῦσαι « mousai» ) son, según los escritores más antiguos, las divinidades inspiradoras de las Artes: cada una de ellas está relacionada con ramas artísticas y del conocimiento. Son hijas de Zeus y de Mnemósine, compañeras del séquito de Apolo, dios olímpico de la música y patrón de las bellas artes, quien tuvo romances con cada una de ellas, dejando descendientes. Bajaban a la tierra a susurrar ideas e inspirar a aquellos mortales que las invocaran. En la época más arcaica eran las ninfas inspiradoras de las fuentes, en las cuales eran adoradas. Finalmente, alrededor de los siglos VIII-VII a. C. [ 1 ] ​ prevaleció en todo el territorio de la Hélade la adoración de las nueve Musas, que son Calíope, Clío, Erato, Euterpe, Melpómene, Polimnia, Talía, Terpsícore y Urania. El culto a las musas era originalmente de Tracia y Beocia, y fueron de vital impo
            Read more