Automorphism group of the quaternion group
$begingroup$
Let $Q_8$ be the quaternion group.
How do we determine the automorphism group $Aut(Q_8)$ of $Q_8$ algebraically?
I searched for this problem on internet.
I found some geometric proofs that $Aut(Q_8)$ is isomorphic to the rotation group of a cube, hence it is isomorphic to the symmetric group $S_4$.
I would like to know an algebraic proof that $Aut(Q_8)$ is isomorphic to $S_4$.
group-theory finite-groups
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Q_8$ be the quaternion group.
How do we determine the automorphism group $Aut(Q_8)$ of $Q_8$ algebraically?
I searched for this problem on internet.
I found some geometric proofs that $Aut(Q_8)$ is isomorphic to the rotation group of a cube, hence it is isomorphic to the symmetric group $S_4$.
I would like to know an algebraic proof that $Aut(Q_8)$ is isomorphic to $S_4$.
group-theory finite-groups
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Have a look at this: crazyproject.wordpress.com/2010/07/25/…. It basically boils down to the fact that no automorphism of $Q_8$ can have order 6.
$endgroup$
– M Turgeon
Sep 14 '12 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@MTurgeon Thanks. "We already know that $|Aut(Q_8)| = 24$ by counting the possible images of, say. $i$ and $j$". How do we know that?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 14 '12 at 23:23
2
$begingroup$
$i$ can go to any of the $6$ elements of order $4$ in $Q_8$. After that, $j$ can go to any of four elements of order $4$; it can't end up in the same subgroup as $i$ (it won't be an automorphism), and since $i$ and $j$ generate $Q_8$, this is sufficient to determine the automorphism.
$endgroup$
– user641
Sep 14 '12 at 23:34
2
$begingroup$
Now simply note that any permutation of $i,j,k$ gives an autmorphism. Each of these is outer, since the subgroups $langle irangle$, $langle jrangle$, and $langle krangle$ are normal. Thus the automorphism group contains the semidirect product of the inner automorphisms (of size 4), and the permutations on $i,j,k$ (of size 6). Now you are done.
$endgroup$
– user641
Sep 14 '12 at 23:38
$begingroup$
@SteveD Why don't you make it the answer?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 2:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $Q_8$ be the quaternion group.
How do we determine the automorphism group $Aut(Q_8)$ of $Q_8$ algebraically?
I searched for this problem on internet.
I found some geometric proofs that $Aut(Q_8)$ is isomorphic to the rotation group of a cube, hence it is isomorphic to the symmetric group $S_4$.
I would like to know an algebraic proof that $Aut(Q_8)$ is isomorphic to $S_4$.
group-theory finite-groups
$endgroup$
Let $Q_8$ be the quaternion group.
How do we determine the automorphism group $Aut(Q_8)$ of $Q_8$ algebraically?
I searched for this problem on internet.
I found some geometric proofs that $Aut(Q_8)$ is isomorphic to the rotation group of a cube, hence it is isomorphic to the symmetric group $S_4$.
I would like to know an algebraic proof that $Aut(Q_8)$ is isomorphic to $S_4$.
group-theory finite-groups
group-theory finite-groups
edited Sep 14 '12 at 23:13
M Turgeon
7,87133066
7,87133066
asked Sep 14 '12 at 23:05
Makoto KatoMakoto Kato
23k560162
23k560162
$begingroup$
Have a look at this: crazyproject.wordpress.com/2010/07/25/…. It basically boils down to the fact that no automorphism of $Q_8$ can have order 6.
$endgroup$
– M Turgeon
Sep 14 '12 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@MTurgeon Thanks. "We already know that $|Aut(Q_8)| = 24$ by counting the possible images of, say. $i$ and $j$". How do we know that?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 14 '12 at 23:23
2
$begingroup$
$i$ can go to any of the $6$ elements of order $4$ in $Q_8$. After that, $j$ can go to any of four elements of order $4$; it can't end up in the same subgroup as $i$ (it won't be an automorphism), and since $i$ and $j$ generate $Q_8$, this is sufficient to determine the automorphism.
$endgroup$
– user641
Sep 14 '12 at 23:34
2
$begingroup$
Now simply note that any permutation of $i,j,k$ gives an autmorphism. Each of these is outer, since the subgroups $langle irangle$, $langle jrangle$, and $langle krangle$ are normal. Thus the automorphism group contains the semidirect product of the inner automorphisms (of size 4), and the permutations on $i,j,k$ (of size 6). Now you are done.
$endgroup$
– user641
Sep 14 '12 at 23:38
$begingroup$
@SteveD Why don't you make it the answer?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 2:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Have a look at this: crazyproject.wordpress.com/2010/07/25/…. It basically boils down to the fact that no automorphism of $Q_8$ can have order 6.
$endgroup$
– M Turgeon
Sep 14 '12 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@MTurgeon Thanks. "We already know that $|Aut(Q_8)| = 24$ by counting the possible images of, say. $i$ and $j$". How do we know that?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 14 '12 at 23:23
2
$begingroup$
$i$ can go to any of the $6$ elements of order $4$ in $Q_8$. After that, $j$ can go to any of four elements of order $4$; it can't end up in the same subgroup as $i$ (it won't be an automorphism), and since $i$ and $j$ generate $Q_8$, this is sufficient to determine the automorphism.
$endgroup$
– user641
Sep 14 '12 at 23:34
2
$begingroup$
Now simply note that any permutation of $i,j,k$ gives an autmorphism. Each of these is outer, since the subgroups $langle irangle$, $langle jrangle$, and $langle krangle$ are normal. Thus the automorphism group contains the semidirect product of the inner automorphisms (of size 4), and the permutations on $i,j,k$ (of size 6). Now you are done.
$endgroup$
– user641
Sep 14 '12 at 23:38
$begingroup$
@SteveD Why don't you make it the answer?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 2:22
$begingroup$
Have a look at this: crazyproject.wordpress.com/2010/07/25/…. It basically boils down to the fact that no automorphism of $Q_8$ can have order 6.
$endgroup$
– M Turgeon
Sep 14 '12 at 23:17
$begingroup$
Have a look at this: crazyproject.wordpress.com/2010/07/25/…. It basically boils down to the fact that no automorphism of $Q_8$ can have order 6.
$endgroup$
– M Turgeon
Sep 14 '12 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@MTurgeon Thanks. "We already know that $|Aut(Q_8)| = 24$ by counting the possible images of, say. $i$ and $j$". How do we know that?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 14 '12 at 23:23
$begingroup$
@MTurgeon Thanks. "We already know that $|Aut(Q_8)| = 24$ by counting the possible images of, say. $i$ and $j$". How do we know that?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 14 '12 at 23:23
2
2
$begingroup$
$i$ can go to any of the $6$ elements of order $4$ in $Q_8$. After that, $j$ can go to any of four elements of order $4$; it can't end up in the same subgroup as $i$ (it won't be an automorphism), and since $i$ and $j$ generate $Q_8$, this is sufficient to determine the automorphism.
$endgroup$
– user641
Sep 14 '12 at 23:34
$begingroup$
$i$ can go to any of the $6$ elements of order $4$ in $Q_8$. After that, $j$ can go to any of four elements of order $4$; it can't end up in the same subgroup as $i$ (it won't be an automorphism), and since $i$ and $j$ generate $Q_8$, this is sufficient to determine the automorphism.
$endgroup$
– user641
Sep 14 '12 at 23:34
2
2
$begingroup$
Now simply note that any permutation of $i,j,k$ gives an autmorphism. Each of these is outer, since the subgroups $langle irangle$, $langle jrangle$, and $langle krangle$ are normal. Thus the automorphism group contains the semidirect product of the inner automorphisms (of size 4), and the permutations on $i,j,k$ (of size 6). Now you are done.
$endgroup$
– user641
Sep 14 '12 at 23:38
$begingroup$
Now simply note that any permutation of $i,j,k$ gives an autmorphism. Each of these is outer, since the subgroups $langle irangle$, $langle jrangle$, and $langle krangle$ are normal. Thus the automorphism group contains the semidirect product of the inner automorphisms (of size 4), and the permutations on $i,j,k$ (of size 6). Now you are done.
$endgroup$
– user641
Sep 14 '12 at 23:38
$begingroup$
@SteveD Why don't you make it the answer?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 2:22
$begingroup$
@SteveD Why don't you make it the answer?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 2:22
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$Q_8$ has three cyclic subgroups of order 4: $langle irangle$, $langle jrangle$, $langle krangle$, and $Aut(Q_8)$ acts on these three subgroups; inducing a homomorphism $Phicolon Aut(Q_8)rightarrow S_3$. We can see that, the homomorphism is surjective, since the two automorphisms $fcolon imapsto j, jmapsto i$, and $gcolon jmapsto k, kmapsto j$ give two transpositions in $S_3$.
The kernel contains those $varphiin Aut(G)$ such that $varphi(langle irangle)=langle irangle$ and $varphi(langle jrangle)=langle jrangle$ (automatically, $varphi(langle krangle)=langle krangle$).
(1) $varphi(langle irangle)=langle irangle$ means $varphi(i)in {i,-i}$, and similarly, $varphi(j)in {j,-j}$. One can check that these four choices are automorphisms of order 2 (or 1) (since they are switching elements in a pair), and hence kernel is Klein-4 group $V_4$.
(2) Since, automorphisms in the kernel fix all the cyclic subgroups of $Q_8$ (not necessarily point-wise); consider the following automorphisms:
$S: imapsto j, jmapsto i$, (hence $kmapsto -k$) and
$Tcolon jmapsto k, kmapsto j$ (hence $imapsto -i$);
these are not inner (since they fix a subgroup), and they generate $S_3$ (they are like transpositions $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ ). Therefore, we have $langle S,T rangle=Kleq Aut(Q_8)$, such that $Kcong S_3$ and $Phi(K)=S_3$. Also,
$ker(Phi) cap K=phi $.
Therefore, $Aut(Q_8)=ker(Phi)rtimes K cong V_4rtimes S_3$.
Consider an element of $ker(Phi)$:
$f:imapsto -i$, $jmapsto j$,
and two elements of $Kcong Im$:
$gcolon imapsto j, jmapsto i $ (like a transposition), and $hcolon imapsto j, jmapsto k$ (like a 3-cycle).
One can check that $f$ doesn't commute with $g$ as well as $h$.
In fact, this shows that no element of $V_4setminus{1}$ commutes with any element of $Ksetminus { 1}$ (by inter-changing roles of $i,j,k$); this means, the action of $K$ on $V_4$ (by conjugation) is faithful; and up to equivalence, there is only one such action. Therefore, $Aut(Q_8)=V_4rtimes Kcong S_4$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you explain the step (2)? I don't understand why we have a subgroup $K$ isomorphic to $S_3$.
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 14:13
$begingroup$
@Kato: nice question; edited the answer.
$endgroup$
– Beginner
Sep 15 '12 at 15:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
OK, let's first put an upper bound on the number of automorphisms of $Q_8$.
There are $6$ elements of order $4$ in $Q_8$. It is well-known that $i$ and $j$ generate $Q_8$, so their images under some automorphism $phi$ are enough to determine that automorphism uniquely. So there are $6$ choices for $phi(i)$. Now we cannot have $phi(j)inlanglephi(i)rangle$, because then $phi$ would fail to be surjective. Thus there are $6-2=4$ possibilities for $phi(j)$. This crude reasoning gives the upper bound of $6cdot4=24$ automorphisms.
Let $alpha$ be any permutation on the elements $lbrace i,j,krbrace$ (as a set). We can "extend" $alpha$ to a map of $Q_8$ in the obvious way (let it commute with negatives). Since any two of $lbrace i,j,krbrace$ generates $Q_8$, this map will be surjective, and since $Q_8$ is finite, injective as well. It only remains to show it is a homomorphism. Since $i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$ is central and the only element of order $2$, we only need show
$$ alpha(i)alpha(j)=alpha(k);$$
This is not always true, but what is always true is that
$$ alpha(i)alpha(j)=pmalpha(k),$$
and so we see each permutation gives rise to an automorphism (after a suitable choice of sign).
Since the subgroups $langle irangle$,$langle jrangle$,$langle krangle$ are normal, none of these permutations is an inner automorphism. Thus they give a subgroup isomorphic to $S_3$ inside $Aut(Q_8)$, which trivially intersects $Inn(Q_8)cong Q_8/Z(Q_8)cong C_2times C_2$. Thus $Aut(Q_8)$ has size at least $|S_3|cdot |C_2times C_2|=24$ automorphisms.
Since $Inn(Q_8)lhd Aut(Q_8)$, we get a semidirect product $(C_2times C_2)rtimes S_3$ inside $Aut(Q_8)$, which is then the whole group $Aut(Q_8)$. This is easily seen to be isomorphic to $S_4$, and so we are done.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Since $i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$ is central and the only element of order $2$, we only need show $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=alpha(k);$ This is not always true, but what is always true is that $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=pmalpha(k),$ and so we see each permutation gives rise to an automorphism (after a suitable choice of sign)." I think the explanations are a bit too terse. Could you explain in more detail?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
$Inn(Q_8)cong V$ and it equals its own centralizer in $Aut(Q_8)$. Now use $N/C$ Lemma in which $G=Aut(Q_8)$ and $H=Inn(Q_8)$. Of course using the lemma we always have $Inn(G)vartriangleleft Aut(G)$ and $G/Z(G)cong Inn(G)$ in which $G$ is our group.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is $N/C$ Lemma?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:58
1
$begingroup$
If $Hleq G$, then $C_{G}(H)vartriangleleft N_{G}(H)$ and moreover $N_{G}(H)/C_{G}(H)hookrightarrow Aut(H)$. :)
$endgroup$
– mrs
Sep 15 '12 at 14:50
1
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/30379/583 has the proof for Inn being its own centralizer in this case.
$endgroup$
– Jack Schmidt
Sep 15 '12 at 18:45
$begingroup$
$quad +1quad ddotsmilequad$
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Mar 18 '13 at 0:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can find the proof here: automorphism of generalized quaternionic group
See Proposition 1.1 (pg. 156). Your case can be obtained taking $m=2$. But they prove for $mgeq 2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The simplest way to determine the automorphism group of $Q_{8}$ may be to realize that $$Q_{8} text{char} SL(2,3) unlhd GL(2,3)$$ So $Q_{8} unlhd GL(2,3)$. One can take $$begin{equation*} x =left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \ -1 & 0 end{array} right), y = left( begin{array}{cc} 1 & -1 \ -1 & -1 end{array} right) end{equation*}$$ as the two generators of $Q_{8}$.
Let $G=GL(2,3)$ and $Q=Q_{8}$. Then $C_{G}(Q) = Z(G)$ and therefore $PGL(2,3)=G/Z(G)$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $Aut(Q)$. Now $|G|=48$ and $|Z(G)|=2$. Thus $|G/Z(G)|=24$. As others have shown $|Aut(Q)| leq 24$. Hence we can conclude that $$PGL(2,3) simeq Aut(Q_{8})$$
Using that $SL(2,3)$ and therefore $GL(2,3)$ have $4$ Sylow-$3$ subgroups one get a homomorphism into $Sym(4)$. It is straight forward to show that the kernel of this homomorphism is $Z(GL(2,3))$ and therefore $PGL(2,3)$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $Sym(4)$. Since the two groups have the same number of elements we are done.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f195932%2fautomorphism-group-of-the-quaternion-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$Q_8$ has three cyclic subgroups of order 4: $langle irangle$, $langle jrangle$, $langle krangle$, and $Aut(Q_8)$ acts on these three subgroups; inducing a homomorphism $Phicolon Aut(Q_8)rightarrow S_3$. We can see that, the homomorphism is surjective, since the two automorphisms $fcolon imapsto j, jmapsto i$, and $gcolon jmapsto k, kmapsto j$ give two transpositions in $S_3$.
The kernel contains those $varphiin Aut(G)$ such that $varphi(langle irangle)=langle irangle$ and $varphi(langle jrangle)=langle jrangle$ (automatically, $varphi(langle krangle)=langle krangle$).
(1) $varphi(langle irangle)=langle irangle$ means $varphi(i)in {i,-i}$, and similarly, $varphi(j)in {j,-j}$. One can check that these four choices are automorphisms of order 2 (or 1) (since they are switching elements in a pair), and hence kernel is Klein-4 group $V_4$.
(2) Since, automorphisms in the kernel fix all the cyclic subgroups of $Q_8$ (not necessarily point-wise); consider the following automorphisms:
$S: imapsto j, jmapsto i$, (hence $kmapsto -k$) and
$Tcolon jmapsto k, kmapsto j$ (hence $imapsto -i$);
these are not inner (since they fix a subgroup), and they generate $S_3$ (they are like transpositions $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ ). Therefore, we have $langle S,T rangle=Kleq Aut(Q_8)$, such that $Kcong S_3$ and $Phi(K)=S_3$. Also,
$ker(Phi) cap K=phi $.
Therefore, $Aut(Q_8)=ker(Phi)rtimes K cong V_4rtimes S_3$.
Consider an element of $ker(Phi)$:
$f:imapsto -i$, $jmapsto j$,
and two elements of $Kcong Im$:
$gcolon imapsto j, jmapsto i $ (like a transposition), and $hcolon imapsto j, jmapsto k$ (like a 3-cycle).
One can check that $f$ doesn't commute with $g$ as well as $h$.
In fact, this shows that no element of $V_4setminus{1}$ commutes with any element of $Ksetminus { 1}$ (by inter-changing roles of $i,j,k$); this means, the action of $K$ on $V_4$ (by conjugation) is faithful; and up to equivalence, there is only one such action. Therefore, $Aut(Q_8)=V_4rtimes Kcong S_4$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you explain the step (2)? I don't understand why we have a subgroup $K$ isomorphic to $S_3$.
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 14:13
$begingroup$
@Kato: nice question; edited the answer.
$endgroup$
– Beginner
Sep 15 '12 at 15:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$Q_8$ has three cyclic subgroups of order 4: $langle irangle$, $langle jrangle$, $langle krangle$, and $Aut(Q_8)$ acts on these three subgroups; inducing a homomorphism $Phicolon Aut(Q_8)rightarrow S_3$. We can see that, the homomorphism is surjective, since the two automorphisms $fcolon imapsto j, jmapsto i$, and $gcolon jmapsto k, kmapsto j$ give two transpositions in $S_3$.
The kernel contains those $varphiin Aut(G)$ such that $varphi(langle irangle)=langle irangle$ and $varphi(langle jrangle)=langle jrangle$ (automatically, $varphi(langle krangle)=langle krangle$).
(1) $varphi(langle irangle)=langle irangle$ means $varphi(i)in {i,-i}$, and similarly, $varphi(j)in {j,-j}$. One can check that these four choices are automorphisms of order 2 (or 1) (since they are switching elements in a pair), and hence kernel is Klein-4 group $V_4$.
(2) Since, automorphisms in the kernel fix all the cyclic subgroups of $Q_8$ (not necessarily point-wise); consider the following automorphisms:
$S: imapsto j, jmapsto i$, (hence $kmapsto -k$) and
$Tcolon jmapsto k, kmapsto j$ (hence $imapsto -i$);
these are not inner (since they fix a subgroup), and they generate $S_3$ (they are like transpositions $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ ). Therefore, we have $langle S,T rangle=Kleq Aut(Q_8)$, such that $Kcong S_3$ and $Phi(K)=S_3$. Also,
$ker(Phi) cap K=phi $.
Therefore, $Aut(Q_8)=ker(Phi)rtimes K cong V_4rtimes S_3$.
Consider an element of $ker(Phi)$:
$f:imapsto -i$, $jmapsto j$,
and two elements of $Kcong Im$:
$gcolon imapsto j, jmapsto i $ (like a transposition), and $hcolon imapsto j, jmapsto k$ (like a 3-cycle).
One can check that $f$ doesn't commute with $g$ as well as $h$.
In fact, this shows that no element of $V_4setminus{1}$ commutes with any element of $Ksetminus { 1}$ (by inter-changing roles of $i,j,k$); this means, the action of $K$ on $V_4$ (by conjugation) is faithful; and up to equivalence, there is only one such action. Therefore, $Aut(Q_8)=V_4rtimes Kcong S_4$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you explain the step (2)? I don't understand why we have a subgroup $K$ isomorphic to $S_3$.
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 14:13
$begingroup$
@Kato: nice question; edited the answer.
$endgroup$
– Beginner
Sep 15 '12 at 15:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$Q_8$ has three cyclic subgroups of order 4: $langle irangle$, $langle jrangle$, $langle krangle$, and $Aut(Q_8)$ acts on these three subgroups; inducing a homomorphism $Phicolon Aut(Q_8)rightarrow S_3$. We can see that, the homomorphism is surjective, since the two automorphisms $fcolon imapsto j, jmapsto i$, and $gcolon jmapsto k, kmapsto j$ give two transpositions in $S_3$.
The kernel contains those $varphiin Aut(G)$ such that $varphi(langle irangle)=langle irangle$ and $varphi(langle jrangle)=langle jrangle$ (automatically, $varphi(langle krangle)=langle krangle$).
(1) $varphi(langle irangle)=langle irangle$ means $varphi(i)in {i,-i}$, and similarly, $varphi(j)in {j,-j}$. One can check that these four choices are automorphisms of order 2 (or 1) (since they are switching elements in a pair), and hence kernel is Klein-4 group $V_4$.
(2) Since, automorphisms in the kernel fix all the cyclic subgroups of $Q_8$ (not necessarily point-wise); consider the following automorphisms:
$S: imapsto j, jmapsto i$, (hence $kmapsto -k$) and
$Tcolon jmapsto k, kmapsto j$ (hence $imapsto -i$);
these are not inner (since they fix a subgroup), and they generate $S_3$ (they are like transpositions $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ ). Therefore, we have $langle S,T rangle=Kleq Aut(Q_8)$, such that $Kcong S_3$ and $Phi(K)=S_3$. Also,
$ker(Phi) cap K=phi $.
Therefore, $Aut(Q_8)=ker(Phi)rtimes K cong V_4rtimes S_3$.
Consider an element of $ker(Phi)$:
$f:imapsto -i$, $jmapsto j$,
and two elements of $Kcong Im$:
$gcolon imapsto j, jmapsto i $ (like a transposition), and $hcolon imapsto j, jmapsto k$ (like a 3-cycle).
One can check that $f$ doesn't commute with $g$ as well as $h$.
In fact, this shows that no element of $V_4setminus{1}$ commutes with any element of $Ksetminus { 1}$ (by inter-changing roles of $i,j,k$); this means, the action of $K$ on $V_4$ (by conjugation) is faithful; and up to equivalence, there is only one such action. Therefore, $Aut(Q_8)=V_4rtimes Kcong S_4$
$endgroup$
$Q_8$ has three cyclic subgroups of order 4: $langle irangle$, $langle jrangle$, $langle krangle$, and $Aut(Q_8)$ acts on these three subgroups; inducing a homomorphism $Phicolon Aut(Q_8)rightarrow S_3$. We can see that, the homomorphism is surjective, since the two automorphisms $fcolon imapsto j, jmapsto i$, and $gcolon jmapsto k, kmapsto j$ give two transpositions in $S_3$.
The kernel contains those $varphiin Aut(G)$ such that $varphi(langle irangle)=langle irangle$ and $varphi(langle jrangle)=langle jrangle$ (automatically, $varphi(langle krangle)=langle krangle$).
(1) $varphi(langle irangle)=langle irangle$ means $varphi(i)in {i,-i}$, and similarly, $varphi(j)in {j,-j}$. One can check that these four choices are automorphisms of order 2 (or 1) (since they are switching elements in a pair), and hence kernel is Klein-4 group $V_4$.
(2) Since, automorphisms in the kernel fix all the cyclic subgroups of $Q_8$ (not necessarily point-wise); consider the following automorphisms:
$S: imapsto j, jmapsto i$, (hence $kmapsto -k$) and
$Tcolon jmapsto k, kmapsto j$ (hence $imapsto -i$);
these are not inner (since they fix a subgroup), and they generate $S_3$ (they are like transpositions $(1,2)$ and $(2,3)$ ). Therefore, we have $langle S,T rangle=Kleq Aut(Q_8)$, such that $Kcong S_3$ and $Phi(K)=S_3$. Also,
$ker(Phi) cap K=phi $.
Therefore, $Aut(Q_8)=ker(Phi)rtimes K cong V_4rtimes S_3$.
Consider an element of $ker(Phi)$:
$f:imapsto -i$, $jmapsto j$,
and two elements of $Kcong Im$:
$gcolon imapsto j, jmapsto i $ (like a transposition), and $hcolon imapsto j, jmapsto k$ (like a 3-cycle).
One can check that $f$ doesn't commute with $g$ as well as $h$.
In fact, this shows that no element of $V_4setminus{1}$ commutes with any element of $Ksetminus { 1}$ (by inter-changing roles of $i,j,k$); this means, the action of $K$ on $V_4$ (by conjugation) is faithful; and up to equivalence, there is only one such action. Therefore, $Aut(Q_8)=V_4rtimes Kcong S_4$
edited Sep 15 '12 at 15:21
answered Sep 15 '12 at 5:37
BeginnerBeginner
3,97611226
3,97611226
$begingroup$
Could you explain the step (2)? I don't understand why we have a subgroup $K$ isomorphic to $S_3$.
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 14:13
$begingroup$
@Kato: nice question; edited the answer.
$endgroup$
– Beginner
Sep 15 '12 at 15:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could you explain the step (2)? I don't understand why we have a subgroup $K$ isomorphic to $S_3$.
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 14:13
$begingroup$
@Kato: nice question; edited the answer.
$endgroup$
– Beginner
Sep 15 '12 at 15:23
$begingroup$
Could you explain the step (2)? I don't understand why we have a subgroup $K$ isomorphic to $S_3$.
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 14:13
$begingroup$
Could you explain the step (2)? I don't understand why we have a subgroup $K$ isomorphic to $S_3$.
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 14:13
$begingroup$
@Kato: nice question; edited the answer.
$endgroup$
– Beginner
Sep 15 '12 at 15:23
$begingroup$
@Kato: nice question; edited the answer.
$endgroup$
– Beginner
Sep 15 '12 at 15:23
add a comment |
$begingroup$
OK, let's first put an upper bound on the number of automorphisms of $Q_8$.
There are $6$ elements of order $4$ in $Q_8$. It is well-known that $i$ and $j$ generate $Q_8$, so their images under some automorphism $phi$ are enough to determine that automorphism uniquely. So there are $6$ choices for $phi(i)$. Now we cannot have $phi(j)inlanglephi(i)rangle$, because then $phi$ would fail to be surjective. Thus there are $6-2=4$ possibilities for $phi(j)$. This crude reasoning gives the upper bound of $6cdot4=24$ automorphisms.
Let $alpha$ be any permutation on the elements $lbrace i,j,krbrace$ (as a set). We can "extend" $alpha$ to a map of $Q_8$ in the obvious way (let it commute with negatives). Since any two of $lbrace i,j,krbrace$ generates $Q_8$, this map will be surjective, and since $Q_8$ is finite, injective as well. It only remains to show it is a homomorphism. Since $i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$ is central and the only element of order $2$, we only need show
$$ alpha(i)alpha(j)=alpha(k);$$
This is not always true, but what is always true is that
$$ alpha(i)alpha(j)=pmalpha(k),$$
and so we see each permutation gives rise to an automorphism (after a suitable choice of sign).
Since the subgroups $langle irangle$,$langle jrangle$,$langle krangle$ are normal, none of these permutations is an inner automorphism. Thus they give a subgroup isomorphic to $S_3$ inside $Aut(Q_8)$, which trivially intersects $Inn(Q_8)cong Q_8/Z(Q_8)cong C_2times C_2$. Thus $Aut(Q_8)$ has size at least $|S_3|cdot |C_2times C_2|=24$ automorphisms.
Since $Inn(Q_8)lhd Aut(Q_8)$, we get a semidirect product $(C_2times C_2)rtimes S_3$ inside $Aut(Q_8)$, which is then the whole group $Aut(Q_8)$. This is easily seen to be isomorphic to $S_4$, and so we are done.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Since $i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$ is central and the only element of order $2$, we only need show $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=alpha(k);$ This is not always true, but what is always true is that $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=pmalpha(k),$ and so we see each permutation gives rise to an automorphism (after a suitable choice of sign)." I think the explanations are a bit too terse. Could you explain in more detail?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
OK, let's first put an upper bound on the number of automorphisms of $Q_8$.
There are $6$ elements of order $4$ in $Q_8$. It is well-known that $i$ and $j$ generate $Q_8$, so their images under some automorphism $phi$ are enough to determine that automorphism uniquely. So there are $6$ choices for $phi(i)$. Now we cannot have $phi(j)inlanglephi(i)rangle$, because then $phi$ would fail to be surjective. Thus there are $6-2=4$ possibilities for $phi(j)$. This crude reasoning gives the upper bound of $6cdot4=24$ automorphisms.
Let $alpha$ be any permutation on the elements $lbrace i,j,krbrace$ (as a set). We can "extend" $alpha$ to a map of $Q_8$ in the obvious way (let it commute with negatives). Since any two of $lbrace i,j,krbrace$ generates $Q_8$, this map will be surjective, and since $Q_8$ is finite, injective as well. It only remains to show it is a homomorphism. Since $i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$ is central and the only element of order $2$, we only need show
$$ alpha(i)alpha(j)=alpha(k);$$
This is not always true, but what is always true is that
$$ alpha(i)alpha(j)=pmalpha(k),$$
and so we see each permutation gives rise to an automorphism (after a suitable choice of sign).
Since the subgroups $langle irangle$,$langle jrangle$,$langle krangle$ are normal, none of these permutations is an inner automorphism. Thus they give a subgroup isomorphic to $S_3$ inside $Aut(Q_8)$, which trivially intersects $Inn(Q_8)cong Q_8/Z(Q_8)cong C_2times C_2$. Thus $Aut(Q_8)$ has size at least $|S_3|cdot |C_2times C_2|=24$ automorphisms.
Since $Inn(Q_8)lhd Aut(Q_8)$, we get a semidirect product $(C_2times C_2)rtimes S_3$ inside $Aut(Q_8)$, which is then the whole group $Aut(Q_8)$. This is easily seen to be isomorphic to $S_4$, and so we are done.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
"Since $i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$ is central and the only element of order $2$, we only need show $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=alpha(k);$ This is not always true, but what is always true is that $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=pmalpha(k),$ and so we see each permutation gives rise to an automorphism (after a suitable choice of sign)." I think the explanations are a bit too terse. Could you explain in more detail?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
OK, let's first put an upper bound on the number of automorphisms of $Q_8$.
There are $6$ elements of order $4$ in $Q_8$. It is well-known that $i$ and $j$ generate $Q_8$, so their images under some automorphism $phi$ are enough to determine that automorphism uniquely. So there are $6$ choices for $phi(i)$. Now we cannot have $phi(j)inlanglephi(i)rangle$, because then $phi$ would fail to be surjective. Thus there are $6-2=4$ possibilities for $phi(j)$. This crude reasoning gives the upper bound of $6cdot4=24$ automorphisms.
Let $alpha$ be any permutation on the elements $lbrace i,j,krbrace$ (as a set). We can "extend" $alpha$ to a map of $Q_8$ in the obvious way (let it commute with negatives). Since any two of $lbrace i,j,krbrace$ generates $Q_8$, this map will be surjective, and since $Q_8$ is finite, injective as well. It only remains to show it is a homomorphism. Since $i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$ is central and the only element of order $2$, we only need show
$$ alpha(i)alpha(j)=alpha(k);$$
This is not always true, but what is always true is that
$$ alpha(i)alpha(j)=pmalpha(k),$$
and so we see each permutation gives rise to an automorphism (after a suitable choice of sign).
Since the subgroups $langle irangle$,$langle jrangle$,$langle krangle$ are normal, none of these permutations is an inner automorphism. Thus they give a subgroup isomorphic to $S_3$ inside $Aut(Q_8)$, which trivially intersects $Inn(Q_8)cong Q_8/Z(Q_8)cong C_2times C_2$. Thus $Aut(Q_8)$ has size at least $|S_3|cdot |C_2times C_2|=24$ automorphisms.
Since $Inn(Q_8)lhd Aut(Q_8)$, we get a semidirect product $(C_2times C_2)rtimes S_3$ inside $Aut(Q_8)$, which is then the whole group $Aut(Q_8)$. This is easily seen to be isomorphic to $S_4$, and so we are done.
$endgroup$
OK, let's first put an upper bound on the number of automorphisms of $Q_8$.
There are $6$ elements of order $4$ in $Q_8$. It is well-known that $i$ and $j$ generate $Q_8$, so their images under some automorphism $phi$ are enough to determine that automorphism uniquely. So there are $6$ choices for $phi(i)$. Now we cannot have $phi(j)inlanglephi(i)rangle$, because then $phi$ would fail to be surjective. Thus there are $6-2=4$ possibilities for $phi(j)$. This crude reasoning gives the upper bound of $6cdot4=24$ automorphisms.
Let $alpha$ be any permutation on the elements $lbrace i,j,krbrace$ (as a set). We can "extend" $alpha$ to a map of $Q_8$ in the obvious way (let it commute with negatives). Since any two of $lbrace i,j,krbrace$ generates $Q_8$, this map will be surjective, and since $Q_8$ is finite, injective as well. It only remains to show it is a homomorphism. Since $i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$ is central and the only element of order $2$, we only need show
$$ alpha(i)alpha(j)=alpha(k);$$
This is not always true, but what is always true is that
$$ alpha(i)alpha(j)=pmalpha(k),$$
and so we see each permutation gives rise to an automorphism (after a suitable choice of sign).
Since the subgroups $langle irangle$,$langle jrangle$,$langle krangle$ are normal, none of these permutations is an inner automorphism. Thus they give a subgroup isomorphic to $S_3$ inside $Aut(Q_8)$, which trivially intersects $Inn(Q_8)cong Q_8/Z(Q_8)cong C_2times C_2$. Thus $Aut(Q_8)$ has size at least $|S_3|cdot |C_2times C_2|=24$ automorphisms.
Since $Inn(Q_8)lhd Aut(Q_8)$, we get a semidirect product $(C_2times C_2)rtimes S_3$ inside $Aut(Q_8)$, which is then the whole group $Aut(Q_8)$. This is easily seen to be isomorphic to $S_4$, and so we are done.
answered Sep 15 '12 at 2:39
user641
$begingroup$
"Since $i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$ is central and the only element of order $2$, we only need show $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=alpha(k);$ This is not always true, but what is always true is that $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=pmalpha(k),$ and so we see each permutation gives rise to an automorphism (after a suitable choice of sign)." I think the explanations are a bit too terse. Could you explain in more detail?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
"Since $i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$ is central and the only element of order $2$, we only need show $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=alpha(k);$ This is not always true, but what is always true is that $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=pmalpha(k),$ and so we see each permutation gives rise to an automorphism (after a suitable choice of sign)." I think the explanations are a bit too terse. Could you explain in more detail?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:55
$begingroup$
"Since $i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$ is central and the only element of order $2$, we only need show $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=alpha(k);$ This is not always true, but what is always true is that $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=pmalpha(k),$ and so we see each permutation gives rise to an automorphism (after a suitable choice of sign)." I think the explanations are a bit too terse. Could you explain in more detail?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:55
$begingroup$
"Since $i^2=j^2=k^2=-1$ is central and the only element of order $2$, we only need show $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=alpha(k);$ This is not always true, but what is always true is that $ alpha(i)alpha(j)=pmalpha(k),$ and so we see each permutation gives rise to an automorphism (after a suitable choice of sign)." I think the explanations are a bit too terse. Could you explain in more detail?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
$Inn(Q_8)cong V$ and it equals its own centralizer in $Aut(Q_8)$. Now use $N/C$ Lemma in which $G=Aut(Q_8)$ and $H=Inn(Q_8)$. Of course using the lemma we always have $Inn(G)vartriangleleft Aut(G)$ and $G/Z(G)cong Inn(G)$ in which $G$ is our group.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is $N/C$ Lemma?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:58
1
$begingroup$
If $Hleq G$, then $C_{G}(H)vartriangleleft N_{G}(H)$ and moreover $N_{G}(H)/C_{G}(H)hookrightarrow Aut(H)$. :)
$endgroup$
– mrs
Sep 15 '12 at 14:50
1
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/30379/583 has the proof for Inn being its own centralizer in this case.
$endgroup$
– Jack Schmidt
Sep 15 '12 at 18:45
$begingroup$
$quad +1quad ddotsmilequad$
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Mar 18 '13 at 0:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
$Inn(Q_8)cong V$ and it equals its own centralizer in $Aut(Q_8)$. Now use $N/C$ Lemma in which $G=Aut(Q_8)$ and $H=Inn(Q_8)$. Of course using the lemma we always have $Inn(G)vartriangleleft Aut(G)$ and $G/Z(G)cong Inn(G)$ in which $G$ is our group.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is $N/C$ Lemma?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:58
1
$begingroup$
If $Hleq G$, then $C_{G}(H)vartriangleleft N_{G}(H)$ and moreover $N_{G}(H)/C_{G}(H)hookrightarrow Aut(H)$. :)
$endgroup$
– mrs
Sep 15 '12 at 14:50
1
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/30379/583 has the proof for Inn being its own centralizer in this case.
$endgroup$
– Jack Schmidt
Sep 15 '12 at 18:45
$begingroup$
$quad +1quad ddotsmilequad$
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Mar 18 '13 at 0:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
$Inn(Q_8)cong V$ and it equals its own centralizer in $Aut(Q_8)$. Now use $N/C$ Lemma in which $G=Aut(Q_8)$ and $H=Inn(Q_8)$. Of course using the lemma we always have $Inn(G)vartriangleleft Aut(G)$ and $G/Z(G)cong Inn(G)$ in which $G$ is our group.
$endgroup$
Hint:
$Inn(Q_8)cong V$ and it equals its own centralizer in $Aut(Q_8)$. Now use $N/C$ Lemma in which $G=Aut(Q_8)$ and $H=Inn(Q_8)$. Of course using the lemma we always have $Inn(G)vartriangleleft Aut(G)$ and $G/Z(G)cong Inn(G)$ in which $G$ is our group.
answered Sep 15 '12 at 0:57
mrsmrs
1
1
$begingroup$
What is $N/C$ Lemma?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:58
1
$begingroup$
If $Hleq G$, then $C_{G}(H)vartriangleleft N_{G}(H)$ and moreover $N_{G}(H)/C_{G}(H)hookrightarrow Aut(H)$. :)
$endgroup$
– mrs
Sep 15 '12 at 14:50
1
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/30379/583 has the proof for Inn being its own centralizer in this case.
$endgroup$
– Jack Schmidt
Sep 15 '12 at 18:45
$begingroup$
$quad +1quad ddotsmilequad$
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Mar 18 '13 at 0:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is $N/C$ Lemma?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:58
1
$begingroup$
If $Hleq G$, then $C_{G}(H)vartriangleleft N_{G}(H)$ and moreover $N_{G}(H)/C_{G}(H)hookrightarrow Aut(H)$. :)
$endgroup$
– mrs
Sep 15 '12 at 14:50
1
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/30379/583 has the proof for Inn being its own centralizer in this case.
$endgroup$
– Jack Schmidt
Sep 15 '12 at 18:45
$begingroup$
$quad +1quad ddotsmilequad$
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Mar 18 '13 at 0:56
$begingroup$
What is $N/C$ Lemma?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:58
$begingroup$
What is $N/C$ Lemma?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 13:58
1
1
$begingroup$
If $Hleq G$, then $C_{G}(H)vartriangleleft N_{G}(H)$ and moreover $N_{G}(H)/C_{G}(H)hookrightarrow Aut(H)$. :)
$endgroup$
– mrs
Sep 15 '12 at 14:50
$begingroup$
If $Hleq G$, then $C_{G}(H)vartriangleleft N_{G}(H)$ and moreover $N_{G}(H)/C_{G}(H)hookrightarrow Aut(H)$. :)
$endgroup$
– mrs
Sep 15 '12 at 14:50
1
1
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/30379/583 has the proof for Inn being its own centralizer in this case.
$endgroup$
– Jack Schmidt
Sep 15 '12 at 18:45
$begingroup$
math.stackexchange.com/a/30379/583 has the proof for Inn being its own centralizer in this case.
$endgroup$
– Jack Schmidt
Sep 15 '12 at 18:45
$begingroup$
$quad +1quad ddotsmilequad$
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Mar 18 '13 at 0:56
$begingroup$
$quad +1quad ddotsmilequad$
$endgroup$
– Namaste
Mar 18 '13 at 0:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can find the proof here: automorphism of generalized quaternionic group
See Proposition 1.1 (pg. 156). Your case can be obtained taking $m=2$. But they prove for $mgeq 2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can find the proof here: automorphism of generalized quaternionic group
See Proposition 1.1 (pg. 156). Your case can be obtained taking $m=2$. But they prove for $mgeq 2$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can find the proof here: automorphism of generalized quaternionic group
See Proposition 1.1 (pg. 156). Your case can be obtained taking $m=2$. But they prove for $mgeq 2$.
$endgroup$
You can find the proof here: automorphism of generalized quaternionic group
See Proposition 1.1 (pg. 156). Your case can be obtained taking $m=2$. But they prove for $mgeq 2$.
edited Sep 15 '12 at 2:38
t.b.
62.8k7208287
62.8k7208287
answered Sep 15 '12 at 2:11
SigurSigur
4,50311736
4,50311736
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The simplest way to determine the automorphism group of $Q_{8}$ may be to realize that $$Q_{8} text{char} SL(2,3) unlhd GL(2,3)$$ So $Q_{8} unlhd GL(2,3)$. One can take $$begin{equation*} x =left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \ -1 & 0 end{array} right), y = left( begin{array}{cc} 1 & -1 \ -1 & -1 end{array} right) end{equation*}$$ as the two generators of $Q_{8}$.
Let $G=GL(2,3)$ and $Q=Q_{8}$. Then $C_{G}(Q) = Z(G)$ and therefore $PGL(2,3)=G/Z(G)$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $Aut(Q)$. Now $|G|=48$ and $|Z(G)|=2$. Thus $|G/Z(G)|=24$. As others have shown $|Aut(Q)| leq 24$. Hence we can conclude that $$PGL(2,3) simeq Aut(Q_{8})$$
Using that $SL(2,3)$ and therefore $GL(2,3)$ have $4$ Sylow-$3$ subgroups one get a homomorphism into $Sym(4)$. It is straight forward to show that the kernel of this homomorphism is $Z(GL(2,3))$ and therefore $PGL(2,3)$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $Sym(4)$. Since the two groups have the same number of elements we are done.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The simplest way to determine the automorphism group of $Q_{8}$ may be to realize that $$Q_{8} text{char} SL(2,3) unlhd GL(2,3)$$ So $Q_{8} unlhd GL(2,3)$. One can take $$begin{equation*} x =left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \ -1 & 0 end{array} right), y = left( begin{array}{cc} 1 & -1 \ -1 & -1 end{array} right) end{equation*}$$ as the two generators of $Q_{8}$.
Let $G=GL(2,3)$ and $Q=Q_{8}$. Then $C_{G}(Q) = Z(G)$ and therefore $PGL(2,3)=G/Z(G)$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $Aut(Q)$. Now $|G|=48$ and $|Z(G)|=2$. Thus $|G/Z(G)|=24$. As others have shown $|Aut(Q)| leq 24$. Hence we can conclude that $$PGL(2,3) simeq Aut(Q_{8})$$
Using that $SL(2,3)$ and therefore $GL(2,3)$ have $4$ Sylow-$3$ subgroups one get a homomorphism into $Sym(4)$. It is straight forward to show that the kernel of this homomorphism is $Z(GL(2,3))$ and therefore $PGL(2,3)$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $Sym(4)$. Since the two groups have the same number of elements we are done.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The simplest way to determine the automorphism group of $Q_{8}$ may be to realize that $$Q_{8} text{char} SL(2,3) unlhd GL(2,3)$$ So $Q_{8} unlhd GL(2,3)$. One can take $$begin{equation*} x =left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \ -1 & 0 end{array} right), y = left( begin{array}{cc} 1 & -1 \ -1 & -1 end{array} right) end{equation*}$$ as the two generators of $Q_{8}$.
Let $G=GL(2,3)$ and $Q=Q_{8}$. Then $C_{G}(Q) = Z(G)$ and therefore $PGL(2,3)=G/Z(G)$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $Aut(Q)$. Now $|G|=48$ and $|Z(G)|=2$. Thus $|G/Z(G)|=24$. As others have shown $|Aut(Q)| leq 24$. Hence we can conclude that $$PGL(2,3) simeq Aut(Q_{8})$$
Using that $SL(2,3)$ and therefore $GL(2,3)$ have $4$ Sylow-$3$ subgroups one get a homomorphism into $Sym(4)$. It is straight forward to show that the kernel of this homomorphism is $Z(GL(2,3))$ and therefore $PGL(2,3)$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $Sym(4)$. Since the two groups have the same number of elements we are done.
$endgroup$
The simplest way to determine the automorphism group of $Q_{8}$ may be to realize that $$Q_{8} text{char} SL(2,3) unlhd GL(2,3)$$ So $Q_{8} unlhd GL(2,3)$. One can take $$begin{equation*} x =left( begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \ -1 & 0 end{array} right), y = left( begin{array}{cc} 1 & -1 \ -1 & -1 end{array} right) end{equation*}$$ as the two generators of $Q_{8}$.
Let $G=GL(2,3)$ and $Q=Q_{8}$. Then $C_{G}(Q) = Z(G)$ and therefore $PGL(2,3)=G/Z(G)$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $Aut(Q)$. Now $|G|=48$ and $|Z(G)|=2$. Thus $|G/Z(G)|=24$. As others have shown $|Aut(Q)| leq 24$. Hence we can conclude that $$PGL(2,3) simeq Aut(Q_{8})$$
Using that $SL(2,3)$ and therefore $GL(2,3)$ have $4$ Sylow-$3$ subgroups one get a homomorphism into $Sym(4)$. It is straight forward to show that the kernel of this homomorphism is $Z(GL(2,3))$ and therefore $PGL(2,3)$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $Sym(4)$. Since the two groups have the same number of elements we are done.
answered Dec 17 '18 at 20:31
user515430user515430
17613
17613
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f195932%2fautomorphism-group-of-the-quaternion-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Have a look at this: crazyproject.wordpress.com/2010/07/25/…. It basically boils down to the fact that no automorphism of $Q_8$ can have order 6.
$endgroup$
– M Turgeon
Sep 14 '12 at 23:17
$begingroup$
@MTurgeon Thanks. "We already know that $|Aut(Q_8)| = 24$ by counting the possible images of, say. $i$ and $j$". How do we know that?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 14 '12 at 23:23
2
$begingroup$
$i$ can go to any of the $6$ elements of order $4$ in $Q_8$. After that, $j$ can go to any of four elements of order $4$; it can't end up in the same subgroup as $i$ (it won't be an automorphism), and since $i$ and $j$ generate $Q_8$, this is sufficient to determine the automorphism.
$endgroup$
– user641
Sep 14 '12 at 23:34
2
$begingroup$
Now simply note that any permutation of $i,j,k$ gives an autmorphism. Each of these is outer, since the subgroups $langle irangle$, $langle jrangle$, and $langle krangle$ are normal. Thus the automorphism group contains the semidirect product of the inner automorphisms (of size 4), and the permutations on $i,j,k$ (of size 6). Now you are done.
$endgroup$
– user641
Sep 14 '12 at 23:38
$begingroup$
@SteveD Why don't you make it the answer?
$endgroup$
– Makoto Kato
Sep 15 '12 at 2:22