Confusion about the uniqueness of the square root of a positive definite matrix












1












$begingroup$


There is a lot of material showing that a positive definite matrix $A$ has a unique positive definite square root, $B$ such that $B^2=A$. During a self study session, I needed to use this fact for a proof sketch, but I was confused about whether $B$ is the only square root of $A$ and it happens to be positive definite or is the uniqueness only valid for the positive definiteness; such that one can come up with a matrix $C$, not positive definite and $C^2=A$. I am confused about which is the correct one.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You also have to understand that uniqueness in this statement means that the positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite matrix is unique up to unitary similarity.
    $endgroup$
    – chhro
    Dec 18 '18 at 0:41










  • $begingroup$
    What does this mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Ufuk Can Bicici
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:23
















1












$begingroup$


There is a lot of material showing that a positive definite matrix $A$ has a unique positive definite square root, $B$ such that $B^2=A$. During a self study session, I needed to use this fact for a proof sketch, but I was confused about whether $B$ is the only square root of $A$ and it happens to be positive definite or is the uniqueness only valid for the positive definiteness; such that one can come up with a matrix $C$, not positive definite and $C^2=A$. I am confused about which is the correct one.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You also have to understand that uniqueness in this statement means that the positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite matrix is unique up to unitary similarity.
    $endgroup$
    – chhro
    Dec 18 '18 at 0:41










  • $begingroup$
    What does this mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Ufuk Can Bicici
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:23














1












1








1





$begingroup$


There is a lot of material showing that a positive definite matrix $A$ has a unique positive definite square root, $B$ such that $B^2=A$. During a self study session, I needed to use this fact for a proof sketch, but I was confused about whether $B$ is the only square root of $A$ and it happens to be positive definite or is the uniqueness only valid for the positive definiteness; such that one can come up with a matrix $C$, not positive definite and $C^2=A$. I am confused about which is the correct one.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




There is a lot of material showing that a positive definite matrix $A$ has a unique positive definite square root, $B$ such that $B^2=A$. During a self study session, I needed to use this fact for a proof sketch, but I was confused about whether $B$ is the only square root of $A$ and it happens to be positive definite or is the uniqueness only valid for the positive definiteness; such that one can come up with a matrix $C$, not positive definite and $C^2=A$. I am confused about which is the correct one.







linear-algebra matrices positive-definite






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 18 '18 at 0:09









Ufuk Can BiciciUfuk Can Bicici

1,24711127




1,24711127












  • $begingroup$
    You also have to understand that uniqueness in this statement means that the positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite matrix is unique up to unitary similarity.
    $endgroup$
    – chhro
    Dec 18 '18 at 0:41










  • $begingroup$
    What does this mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Ufuk Can Bicici
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:23


















  • $begingroup$
    You also have to understand that uniqueness in this statement means that the positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite matrix is unique up to unitary similarity.
    $endgroup$
    – chhro
    Dec 18 '18 at 0:41










  • $begingroup$
    What does this mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Ufuk Can Bicici
    Dec 18 '18 at 7:23
















$begingroup$
You also have to understand that uniqueness in this statement means that the positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite matrix is unique up to unitary similarity.
$endgroup$
– chhro
Dec 18 '18 at 0:41




$begingroup$
You also have to understand that uniqueness in this statement means that the positive semidefinite square root of a positive semidefinite matrix is unique up to unitary similarity.
$endgroup$
– chhro
Dec 18 '18 at 0:41












$begingroup$
What does this mean?
$endgroup$
– Ufuk Can Bicici
Dec 18 '18 at 7:23




$begingroup$
What does this mean?
$endgroup$
– Ufuk Can Bicici
Dec 18 '18 at 7:23










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

If I think in the case $A=Iin mathbb{R}^{ntimes n}$ the I have clearly at least two posibilities for $B$ and more if $n>1$ for example if $n=2$, there are this posivilities for $B$.



$ left[ {begin{array}{cc}
1 & 0 \
0 & 1 \
end{array} } right]$
$left[ {begin{array}{cc}
1 & 0 \
0 & -1 \
end{array} } right]$
$left[ {begin{array}{cc}
-1 & 0 \
0 & 1 \
end{array} } right]$
or $
left[ {begin{array}{cc}
-1 & 0 \
0 & -1 \
end{array} } right]
$



but only one of them is positive definite. It is used for the uniqueness.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    There are many square roots for matrices, but for a real symmetric (or complex Hermitian) positive definite matrix, there's only one real symmetric and positive definite square root.



    For example, $2times 2$ square roots of the identity include every reflection matrix of the form $begin{bmatrix}a&b\b&-aend{bmatrix}$ with $a^2+b^2=1$, but none of those are positive definite.

    It's not quite that bad for most matrices; a $ntimes n$ matrix with $n$ distinct positive eigenvalues only has $2^n$ square roots.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      "When a $n times n$ matrix has repeated eigenvalues, then it has infinitely many square roots; is this true?
      $endgroup$
      – Ufuk Can Bicici
      Dec 18 '18 at 7:52












    • $begingroup$
      The repeated eigenvalue needs at least two eigenvectors for that to happen; the infinite possibilities come from freely choosing a basis for the space of eigenvectors.
      $endgroup$
      – jmerry
      Dec 18 '18 at 21:05











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044622%2fconfusion-about-the-uniqueness-of-the-square-root-of-a-positive-definite-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    If I think in the case $A=Iin mathbb{R}^{ntimes n}$ the I have clearly at least two posibilities for $B$ and more if $n>1$ for example if $n=2$, there are this posivilities for $B$.



    $ left[ {begin{array}{cc}
    1 & 0 \
    0 & 1 \
    end{array} } right]$
    $left[ {begin{array}{cc}
    1 & 0 \
    0 & -1 \
    end{array} } right]$
    $left[ {begin{array}{cc}
    -1 & 0 \
    0 & 1 \
    end{array} } right]$
    or $
    left[ {begin{array}{cc}
    -1 & 0 \
    0 & -1 \
    end{array} } right]
    $



    but only one of them is positive definite. It is used for the uniqueness.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      If I think in the case $A=Iin mathbb{R}^{ntimes n}$ the I have clearly at least two posibilities for $B$ and more if $n>1$ for example if $n=2$, there are this posivilities for $B$.



      $ left[ {begin{array}{cc}
      1 & 0 \
      0 & 1 \
      end{array} } right]$
      $left[ {begin{array}{cc}
      1 & 0 \
      0 & -1 \
      end{array} } right]$
      $left[ {begin{array}{cc}
      -1 & 0 \
      0 & 1 \
      end{array} } right]$
      or $
      left[ {begin{array}{cc}
      -1 & 0 \
      0 & -1 \
      end{array} } right]
      $



      but only one of them is positive definite. It is used for the uniqueness.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        If I think in the case $A=Iin mathbb{R}^{ntimes n}$ the I have clearly at least two posibilities for $B$ and more if $n>1$ for example if $n=2$, there are this posivilities for $B$.



        $ left[ {begin{array}{cc}
        1 & 0 \
        0 & 1 \
        end{array} } right]$
        $left[ {begin{array}{cc}
        1 & 0 \
        0 & -1 \
        end{array} } right]$
        $left[ {begin{array}{cc}
        -1 & 0 \
        0 & 1 \
        end{array} } right]$
        or $
        left[ {begin{array}{cc}
        -1 & 0 \
        0 & -1 \
        end{array} } right]
        $



        but only one of them is positive definite. It is used for the uniqueness.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If I think in the case $A=Iin mathbb{R}^{ntimes n}$ the I have clearly at least two posibilities for $B$ and more if $n>1$ for example if $n=2$, there are this posivilities for $B$.



        $ left[ {begin{array}{cc}
        1 & 0 \
        0 & 1 \
        end{array} } right]$
        $left[ {begin{array}{cc}
        1 & 0 \
        0 & -1 \
        end{array} } right]$
        $left[ {begin{array}{cc}
        -1 & 0 \
        0 & 1 \
        end{array} } right]$
        or $
        left[ {begin{array}{cc}
        -1 & 0 \
        0 & -1 \
        end{array} } right]
        $



        but only one of them is positive definite. It is used for the uniqueness.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 18 '18 at 0:16









        Gabriel PalauGabriel Palau

        1126




        1126























            1












            $begingroup$

            There are many square roots for matrices, but for a real symmetric (or complex Hermitian) positive definite matrix, there's only one real symmetric and positive definite square root.



            For example, $2times 2$ square roots of the identity include every reflection matrix of the form $begin{bmatrix}a&b\b&-aend{bmatrix}$ with $a^2+b^2=1$, but none of those are positive definite.

            It's not quite that bad for most matrices; a $ntimes n$ matrix with $n$ distinct positive eigenvalues only has $2^n$ square roots.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              "When a $n times n$ matrix has repeated eigenvalues, then it has infinitely many square roots; is this true?
              $endgroup$
              – Ufuk Can Bicici
              Dec 18 '18 at 7:52












            • $begingroup$
              The repeated eigenvalue needs at least two eigenvectors for that to happen; the infinite possibilities come from freely choosing a basis for the space of eigenvectors.
              $endgroup$
              – jmerry
              Dec 18 '18 at 21:05
















            1












            $begingroup$

            There are many square roots for matrices, but for a real symmetric (or complex Hermitian) positive definite matrix, there's only one real symmetric and positive definite square root.



            For example, $2times 2$ square roots of the identity include every reflection matrix of the form $begin{bmatrix}a&b\b&-aend{bmatrix}$ with $a^2+b^2=1$, but none of those are positive definite.

            It's not quite that bad for most matrices; a $ntimes n$ matrix with $n$ distinct positive eigenvalues only has $2^n$ square roots.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              "When a $n times n$ matrix has repeated eigenvalues, then it has infinitely many square roots; is this true?
              $endgroup$
              – Ufuk Can Bicici
              Dec 18 '18 at 7:52












            • $begingroup$
              The repeated eigenvalue needs at least two eigenvectors for that to happen; the infinite possibilities come from freely choosing a basis for the space of eigenvectors.
              $endgroup$
              – jmerry
              Dec 18 '18 at 21:05














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            There are many square roots for matrices, but for a real symmetric (or complex Hermitian) positive definite matrix, there's only one real symmetric and positive definite square root.



            For example, $2times 2$ square roots of the identity include every reflection matrix of the form $begin{bmatrix}a&b\b&-aend{bmatrix}$ with $a^2+b^2=1$, but none of those are positive definite.

            It's not quite that bad for most matrices; a $ntimes n$ matrix with $n$ distinct positive eigenvalues only has $2^n$ square roots.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            There are many square roots for matrices, but for a real symmetric (or complex Hermitian) positive definite matrix, there's only one real symmetric and positive definite square root.



            For example, $2times 2$ square roots of the identity include every reflection matrix of the form $begin{bmatrix}a&b\b&-aend{bmatrix}$ with $a^2+b^2=1$, but none of those are positive definite.

            It's not quite that bad for most matrices; a $ntimes n$ matrix with $n$ distinct positive eigenvalues only has $2^n$ square roots.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 18 '18 at 0:36









            jmerryjmerry

            15.8k1632




            15.8k1632












            • $begingroup$
              "When a $n times n$ matrix has repeated eigenvalues, then it has infinitely many square roots; is this true?
              $endgroup$
              – Ufuk Can Bicici
              Dec 18 '18 at 7:52












            • $begingroup$
              The repeated eigenvalue needs at least two eigenvectors for that to happen; the infinite possibilities come from freely choosing a basis for the space of eigenvectors.
              $endgroup$
              – jmerry
              Dec 18 '18 at 21:05


















            • $begingroup$
              "When a $n times n$ matrix has repeated eigenvalues, then it has infinitely many square roots; is this true?
              $endgroup$
              – Ufuk Can Bicici
              Dec 18 '18 at 7:52












            • $begingroup$
              The repeated eigenvalue needs at least two eigenvectors for that to happen; the infinite possibilities come from freely choosing a basis for the space of eigenvectors.
              $endgroup$
              – jmerry
              Dec 18 '18 at 21:05
















            $begingroup$
            "When a $n times n$ matrix has repeated eigenvalues, then it has infinitely many square roots; is this true?
            $endgroup$
            – Ufuk Can Bicici
            Dec 18 '18 at 7:52






            $begingroup$
            "When a $n times n$ matrix has repeated eigenvalues, then it has infinitely many square roots; is this true?
            $endgroup$
            – Ufuk Can Bicici
            Dec 18 '18 at 7:52














            $begingroup$
            The repeated eigenvalue needs at least two eigenvectors for that to happen; the infinite possibilities come from freely choosing a basis for the space of eigenvectors.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Dec 18 '18 at 21:05




            $begingroup$
            The repeated eigenvalue needs at least two eigenvectors for that to happen; the infinite possibilities come from freely choosing a basis for the space of eigenvectors.
            $endgroup$
            – jmerry
            Dec 18 '18 at 21:05


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044622%2fconfusion-about-the-uniqueness-of-the-square-root-of-a-positive-definite-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...