Must compact bijections be continuous?
$begingroup$
We say a map $f:X to Y$ is compact if compact sets are mapped to compact sets.
If $f:X to Y$ is a compact bijection, must it be continuous?
The bijection condition is necessary. Otherwise consider an appropriately constructed piecewise constant function $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ as a counterexample.
You might notice I never specified what exactly $X,Y$ are. Let us first consider simply the case where $X=mathbb{R}^n$, $Y=mathbb{R}^m$. If that holds, then work our way up to $X,Y$ being generic metric spaces. If that holds, then work our way up to $X,Y$ being topological spaces [EDIT: it's not true for general topological spaces, see the comments].
real-analysis general-topology continuity metric-spaces compactness
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We say a map $f:X to Y$ is compact if compact sets are mapped to compact sets.
If $f:X to Y$ is a compact bijection, must it be continuous?
The bijection condition is necessary. Otherwise consider an appropriately constructed piecewise constant function $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ as a counterexample.
You might notice I never specified what exactly $X,Y$ are. Let us first consider simply the case where $X=mathbb{R}^n$, $Y=mathbb{R}^m$. If that holds, then work our way up to $X,Y$ being generic metric spaces. If that holds, then work our way up to $X,Y$ being topological spaces [EDIT: it's not true for general topological spaces, see the comments].
real-analysis general-topology continuity metric-spaces compactness
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Generally no. Finite spaces are necessarily compact so all these notions become vacuous. And it’s not true that all bijections between finite spaces are continuous.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 18 '18 at 0:41
$begingroup$
Related questions: question 1 and question 2
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 18 '18 at 0:44
2
$begingroup$
@Randall Thank you. This rules out the case for general topological spaces, although I believe for metric spaces, the only finite metric spaces are those with a discrete metric, and we certainly have continuity then.
$endgroup$
– MathematicsStudent1122
Dec 18 '18 at 0:46
$begingroup$
Incidentally, I had a vague feeling that I had answered this question before, but I believe I was instead thinking of this tangentially related question which is another neat result along these lines.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 18 '18 at 4:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We say a map $f:X to Y$ is compact if compact sets are mapped to compact sets.
If $f:X to Y$ is a compact bijection, must it be continuous?
The bijection condition is necessary. Otherwise consider an appropriately constructed piecewise constant function $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ as a counterexample.
You might notice I never specified what exactly $X,Y$ are. Let us first consider simply the case where $X=mathbb{R}^n$, $Y=mathbb{R}^m$. If that holds, then work our way up to $X,Y$ being generic metric spaces. If that holds, then work our way up to $X,Y$ being topological spaces [EDIT: it's not true for general topological spaces, see the comments].
real-analysis general-topology continuity metric-spaces compactness
$endgroup$
We say a map $f:X to Y$ is compact if compact sets are mapped to compact sets.
If $f:X to Y$ is a compact bijection, must it be continuous?
The bijection condition is necessary. Otherwise consider an appropriately constructed piecewise constant function $mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ as a counterexample.
You might notice I never specified what exactly $X,Y$ are. Let us first consider simply the case where $X=mathbb{R}^n$, $Y=mathbb{R}^m$. If that holds, then work our way up to $X,Y$ being generic metric spaces. If that holds, then work our way up to $X,Y$ being topological spaces [EDIT: it's not true for general topological spaces, see the comments].
real-analysis general-topology continuity metric-spaces compactness
real-analysis general-topology continuity metric-spaces compactness
edited Dec 18 '18 at 4:08
Eric Wofsey
190k14216348
190k14216348
asked Dec 18 '18 at 0:34
MathematicsStudent1122MathematicsStudent1122
8,98322668
8,98322668
3
$begingroup$
Generally no. Finite spaces are necessarily compact so all these notions become vacuous. And it’s not true that all bijections between finite spaces are continuous.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 18 '18 at 0:41
$begingroup$
Related questions: question 1 and question 2
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 18 '18 at 0:44
2
$begingroup$
@Randall Thank you. This rules out the case for general topological spaces, although I believe for metric spaces, the only finite metric spaces are those with a discrete metric, and we certainly have continuity then.
$endgroup$
– MathematicsStudent1122
Dec 18 '18 at 0:46
$begingroup$
Incidentally, I had a vague feeling that I had answered this question before, but I believe I was instead thinking of this tangentially related question which is another neat result along these lines.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 18 '18 at 4:02
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Generally no. Finite spaces are necessarily compact so all these notions become vacuous. And it’s not true that all bijections between finite spaces are continuous.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 18 '18 at 0:41
$begingroup$
Related questions: question 1 and question 2
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 18 '18 at 0:44
2
$begingroup$
@Randall Thank you. This rules out the case for general topological spaces, although I believe for metric spaces, the only finite metric spaces are those with a discrete metric, and we certainly have continuity then.
$endgroup$
– MathematicsStudent1122
Dec 18 '18 at 0:46
$begingroup$
Incidentally, I had a vague feeling that I had answered this question before, but I believe I was instead thinking of this tangentially related question which is another neat result along these lines.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 18 '18 at 4:02
3
3
$begingroup$
Generally no. Finite spaces are necessarily compact so all these notions become vacuous. And it’s not true that all bijections between finite spaces are continuous.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 18 '18 at 0:41
$begingroup$
Generally no. Finite spaces are necessarily compact so all these notions become vacuous. And it’s not true that all bijections between finite spaces are continuous.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 18 '18 at 0:41
$begingroup$
Related questions: question 1 and question 2
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 18 '18 at 0:44
$begingroup$
Related questions: question 1 and question 2
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 18 '18 at 0:44
2
2
$begingroup$
@Randall Thank you. This rules out the case for general topological spaces, although I believe for metric spaces, the only finite metric spaces are those with a discrete metric, and we certainly have continuity then.
$endgroup$
– MathematicsStudent1122
Dec 18 '18 at 0:46
$begingroup$
@Randall Thank you. This rules out the case for general topological spaces, although I believe for metric spaces, the only finite metric spaces are those with a discrete metric, and we certainly have continuity then.
$endgroup$
– MathematicsStudent1122
Dec 18 '18 at 0:46
$begingroup$
Incidentally, I had a vague feeling that I had answered this question before, but I believe I was instead thinking of this tangentially related question which is another neat result along these lines.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 18 '18 at 4:02
$begingroup$
Incidentally, I had a vague feeling that I had answered this question before, but I believe I was instead thinking of this tangentially related question which is another neat result along these lines.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 18 '18 at 4:02
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, this is true for any metric spaces or more generally for any compactly generated Hausdorff spaces. A space $X$ is compactly generated if a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff $Acap K$ is closed in $K$ for all compact subspaces $Ksubseteq X$. Equivalently, $X$ is compactly generated iff every map from $X$ to another space which is continuous when restricted to every compact subset of $X$ is continuous. Note that any metric space is compactly generated, since closedness of sets is detected by convergent sequences and the closure of any convergent sequence is compact.
Here is the precise statement in what seems to be the maximal generality.
Let $X$ be a compactly generated Hausdorff space and let $Y$ be a Hausdorff space. Let $f:Xto Y$ be a compact injection. Then $f$ is continuous.
To show that $f$ is continuous, it suffices to show its restriction to any compact subset of $X$ is continuous. So, let $Ksubseteq X$ be compact. Then the restriction of $f$ to $K$ is a closed map, since $Y$ is Hausdorff. This means that the inverse of the restriction $g:f(K)to K$ is a continuous bijection. Since $f(K)$ is compact and $K$ is Hausdorff, this implies $g$ is a homeomorphism. Thus $f|_K=g^{-1}$ is continuous, as desired.
Here are some quick examples to show each of the hypotheses above are needed.
$X$ needs to be compactly generated: If $X$ is the 1-point Lindelöfification of an uncountable discrete space and $Y$ is the same set with the discrete topology, then $X$ and $Y$ are Hausdorff and the identity map $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$X$ needs to be Hausdorff: If $X$ is a 2-point indiscrete space and $Y$ is a 2-point discrete space, then $X$ is compactly generated, $Y$ is Hausdorff, and a bijection $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$Y$ needs to be Hausdorff: If $X=[0,1]$ with the usual topology and $Y=[0,1]$ with the topology that the only nontrivial open set is ${0}$, then $X$ is compactly generated and Hausdorff and the identity map $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044647%2fmust-compact-bijections-be-continuous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, this is true for any metric spaces or more generally for any compactly generated Hausdorff spaces. A space $X$ is compactly generated if a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff $Acap K$ is closed in $K$ for all compact subspaces $Ksubseteq X$. Equivalently, $X$ is compactly generated iff every map from $X$ to another space which is continuous when restricted to every compact subset of $X$ is continuous. Note that any metric space is compactly generated, since closedness of sets is detected by convergent sequences and the closure of any convergent sequence is compact.
Here is the precise statement in what seems to be the maximal generality.
Let $X$ be a compactly generated Hausdorff space and let $Y$ be a Hausdorff space. Let $f:Xto Y$ be a compact injection. Then $f$ is continuous.
To show that $f$ is continuous, it suffices to show its restriction to any compact subset of $X$ is continuous. So, let $Ksubseteq X$ be compact. Then the restriction of $f$ to $K$ is a closed map, since $Y$ is Hausdorff. This means that the inverse of the restriction $g:f(K)to K$ is a continuous bijection. Since $f(K)$ is compact and $K$ is Hausdorff, this implies $g$ is a homeomorphism. Thus $f|_K=g^{-1}$ is continuous, as desired.
Here are some quick examples to show each of the hypotheses above are needed.
$X$ needs to be compactly generated: If $X$ is the 1-point Lindelöfification of an uncountable discrete space and $Y$ is the same set with the discrete topology, then $X$ and $Y$ are Hausdorff and the identity map $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$X$ needs to be Hausdorff: If $X$ is a 2-point indiscrete space and $Y$ is a 2-point discrete space, then $X$ is compactly generated, $Y$ is Hausdorff, and a bijection $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$Y$ needs to be Hausdorff: If $X=[0,1]$ with the usual topology and $Y=[0,1]$ with the topology that the only nontrivial open set is ${0}$, then $X$ is compactly generated and Hausdorff and the identity map $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, this is true for any metric spaces or more generally for any compactly generated Hausdorff spaces. A space $X$ is compactly generated if a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff $Acap K$ is closed in $K$ for all compact subspaces $Ksubseteq X$. Equivalently, $X$ is compactly generated iff every map from $X$ to another space which is continuous when restricted to every compact subset of $X$ is continuous. Note that any metric space is compactly generated, since closedness of sets is detected by convergent sequences and the closure of any convergent sequence is compact.
Here is the precise statement in what seems to be the maximal generality.
Let $X$ be a compactly generated Hausdorff space and let $Y$ be a Hausdorff space. Let $f:Xto Y$ be a compact injection. Then $f$ is continuous.
To show that $f$ is continuous, it suffices to show its restriction to any compact subset of $X$ is continuous. So, let $Ksubseteq X$ be compact. Then the restriction of $f$ to $K$ is a closed map, since $Y$ is Hausdorff. This means that the inverse of the restriction $g:f(K)to K$ is a continuous bijection. Since $f(K)$ is compact and $K$ is Hausdorff, this implies $g$ is a homeomorphism. Thus $f|_K=g^{-1}$ is continuous, as desired.
Here are some quick examples to show each of the hypotheses above are needed.
$X$ needs to be compactly generated: If $X$ is the 1-point Lindelöfification of an uncountable discrete space and $Y$ is the same set with the discrete topology, then $X$ and $Y$ are Hausdorff and the identity map $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$X$ needs to be Hausdorff: If $X$ is a 2-point indiscrete space and $Y$ is a 2-point discrete space, then $X$ is compactly generated, $Y$ is Hausdorff, and a bijection $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$Y$ needs to be Hausdorff: If $X=[0,1]$ with the usual topology and $Y=[0,1]$ with the topology that the only nontrivial open set is ${0}$, then $X$ is compactly generated and Hausdorff and the identity map $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, this is true for any metric spaces or more generally for any compactly generated Hausdorff spaces. A space $X$ is compactly generated if a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff $Acap K$ is closed in $K$ for all compact subspaces $Ksubseteq X$. Equivalently, $X$ is compactly generated iff every map from $X$ to another space which is continuous when restricted to every compact subset of $X$ is continuous. Note that any metric space is compactly generated, since closedness of sets is detected by convergent sequences and the closure of any convergent sequence is compact.
Here is the precise statement in what seems to be the maximal generality.
Let $X$ be a compactly generated Hausdorff space and let $Y$ be a Hausdorff space. Let $f:Xto Y$ be a compact injection. Then $f$ is continuous.
To show that $f$ is continuous, it suffices to show its restriction to any compact subset of $X$ is continuous. So, let $Ksubseteq X$ be compact. Then the restriction of $f$ to $K$ is a closed map, since $Y$ is Hausdorff. This means that the inverse of the restriction $g:f(K)to K$ is a continuous bijection. Since $f(K)$ is compact and $K$ is Hausdorff, this implies $g$ is a homeomorphism. Thus $f|_K=g^{-1}$ is continuous, as desired.
Here are some quick examples to show each of the hypotheses above are needed.
$X$ needs to be compactly generated: If $X$ is the 1-point Lindelöfification of an uncountable discrete space and $Y$ is the same set with the discrete topology, then $X$ and $Y$ are Hausdorff and the identity map $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$X$ needs to be Hausdorff: If $X$ is a 2-point indiscrete space and $Y$ is a 2-point discrete space, then $X$ is compactly generated, $Y$ is Hausdorff, and a bijection $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$Y$ needs to be Hausdorff: If $X=[0,1]$ with the usual topology and $Y=[0,1]$ with the topology that the only nontrivial open set is ${0}$, then $X$ is compactly generated and Hausdorff and the identity map $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$endgroup$
Yes, this is true for any metric spaces or more generally for any compactly generated Hausdorff spaces. A space $X$ is compactly generated if a subset $Asubseteq X$ is closed iff $Acap K$ is closed in $K$ for all compact subspaces $Ksubseteq X$. Equivalently, $X$ is compactly generated iff every map from $X$ to another space which is continuous when restricted to every compact subset of $X$ is continuous. Note that any metric space is compactly generated, since closedness of sets is detected by convergent sequences and the closure of any convergent sequence is compact.
Here is the precise statement in what seems to be the maximal generality.
Let $X$ be a compactly generated Hausdorff space and let $Y$ be a Hausdorff space. Let $f:Xto Y$ be a compact injection. Then $f$ is continuous.
To show that $f$ is continuous, it suffices to show its restriction to any compact subset of $X$ is continuous. So, let $Ksubseteq X$ be compact. Then the restriction of $f$ to $K$ is a closed map, since $Y$ is Hausdorff. This means that the inverse of the restriction $g:f(K)to K$ is a continuous bijection. Since $f(K)$ is compact and $K$ is Hausdorff, this implies $g$ is a homeomorphism. Thus $f|_K=g^{-1}$ is continuous, as desired.
Here are some quick examples to show each of the hypotheses above are needed.
$X$ needs to be compactly generated: If $X$ is the 1-point Lindelöfification of an uncountable discrete space and $Y$ is the same set with the discrete topology, then $X$ and $Y$ are Hausdorff and the identity map $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$X$ needs to be Hausdorff: If $X$ is a 2-point indiscrete space and $Y$ is a 2-point discrete space, then $X$ is compactly generated, $Y$ is Hausdorff, and a bijection $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
$Y$ needs to be Hausdorff: If $X=[0,1]$ with the usual topology and $Y=[0,1]$ with the topology that the only nontrivial open set is ${0}$, then $X$ is compactly generated and Hausdorff and the identity map $Xto Y$ is compact but not continuous.
edited Dec 18 '18 at 4:14
answered Dec 18 '18 at 3:56
Eric WofseyEric Wofsey
190k14216348
190k14216348
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044647%2fmust-compact-bijections-be-continuous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Generally no. Finite spaces are necessarily compact so all these notions become vacuous. And it’s not true that all bijections between finite spaces are continuous.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 18 '18 at 0:41
$begingroup$
Related questions: question 1 and question 2
$endgroup$
– jgon
Dec 18 '18 at 0:44
2
$begingroup$
@Randall Thank you. This rules out the case for general topological spaces, although I believe for metric spaces, the only finite metric spaces are those with a discrete metric, and we certainly have continuity then.
$endgroup$
– MathematicsStudent1122
Dec 18 '18 at 0:46
$begingroup$
Incidentally, I had a vague feeling that I had answered this question before, but I believe I was instead thinking of this tangentially related question which is another neat result along these lines.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 18 '18 at 4:02