Are there any sets that are not complete metric spaces under all possible metrics?












0












$begingroup$


I don't have any particular set in mind but this seemed interesthing since completeness depends on the metric.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you really mean set here, or topological space? That is, do you want to consider any metric on a given set, or only those compatible with a given topology?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Kruckman
    Dec 19 '18 at 18:27










  • $begingroup$
    @AlexKruckman First one but I forgot about the discrete metric and Balloon's answer wrapped things up. Now, I think it would be better to talk of a norm, rather than a metric.
    $endgroup$
    – 2chromatic
    Dec 19 '18 at 18:31
















0












$begingroup$


I don't have any particular set in mind but this seemed interesthing since completeness depends on the metric.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you really mean set here, or topological space? That is, do you want to consider any metric on a given set, or only those compatible with a given topology?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Kruckman
    Dec 19 '18 at 18:27










  • $begingroup$
    @AlexKruckman First one but I forgot about the discrete metric and Balloon's answer wrapped things up. Now, I think it would be better to talk of a norm, rather than a metric.
    $endgroup$
    – 2chromatic
    Dec 19 '18 at 18:31














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I don't have any particular set in mind but this seemed interesthing since completeness depends on the metric.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I don't have any particular set in mind but this seemed interesthing since completeness depends on the metric.







general-topology metric-spaces complete-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 19 '18 at 14:42









2chromatic2chromatic

1829




1829












  • $begingroup$
    Do you really mean set here, or topological space? That is, do you want to consider any metric on a given set, or only those compatible with a given topology?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Kruckman
    Dec 19 '18 at 18:27










  • $begingroup$
    @AlexKruckman First one but I forgot about the discrete metric and Balloon's answer wrapped things up. Now, I think it would be better to talk of a norm, rather than a metric.
    $endgroup$
    – 2chromatic
    Dec 19 '18 at 18:31


















  • $begingroup$
    Do you really mean set here, or topological space? That is, do you want to consider any metric on a given set, or only those compatible with a given topology?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Kruckman
    Dec 19 '18 at 18:27










  • $begingroup$
    @AlexKruckman First one but I forgot about the discrete metric and Balloon's answer wrapped things up. Now, I think it would be better to talk of a norm, rather than a metric.
    $endgroup$
    – 2chromatic
    Dec 19 '18 at 18:31
















$begingroup$
Do you really mean set here, or topological space? That is, do you want to consider any metric on a given set, or only those compatible with a given topology?
$endgroup$
– Alex Kruckman
Dec 19 '18 at 18:27




$begingroup$
Do you really mean set here, or topological space? That is, do you want to consider any metric on a given set, or only those compatible with a given topology?
$endgroup$
– Alex Kruckman
Dec 19 '18 at 18:27












$begingroup$
@AlexKruckman First one but I forgot about the discrete metric and Balloon's answer wrapped things up. Now, I think it would be better to talk of a norm, rather than a metric.
$endgroup$
– 2chromatic
Dec 19 '18 at 18:31




$begingroup$
@AlexKruckman First one but I forgot about the discrete metric and Balloon's answer wrapped things up. Now, I think it would be better to talk of a norm, rather than a metric.
$endgroup$
– 2chromatic
Dec 19 '18 at 18:31










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Since every set can be given the discrete metric $d(x,y)=left{begin{array}{ll} 1 & text{if $xneq y$}\0 &text{if $x = y$}end{array}right.$, and that for this metric every Cauchy sequence is stationnary and so convergent, you can't find a such example.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Yes, the set of rationals $mathbb{Q}$ in its usual topology is not a Baire space, so whatever compatible metric you put on it, it will be non-complete.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      This depends on what the question is asking, precisely. If we view $mathbb{Q}$ just as a set then obviously we can make it a complete metric space (and I think this is how the question leans, but I'm not certain).
      $endgroup$
      – Noah Schweber
      Dec 19 '18 at 14:48














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046458%2fare-there-any-sets-that-are-not-complete-metric-spaces-under-all-possible-metric%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    Since every set can be given the discrete metric $d(x,y)=left{begin{array}{ll} 1 & text{if $xneq y$}\0 &text{if $x = y$}end{array}right.$, and that for this metric every Cauchy sequence is stationnary and so convergent, you can't find a such example.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      6












      $begingroup$

      Since every set can be given the discrete metric $d(x,y)=left{begin{array}{ll} 1 & text{if $xneq y$}\0 &text{if $x = y$}end{array}right.$, and that for this metric every Cauchy sequence is stationnary and so convergent, you can't find a such example.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        Since every set can be given the discrete metric $d(x,y)=left{begin{array}{ll} 1 & text{if $xneq y$}\0 &text{if $x = y$}end{array}right.$, and that for this metric every Cauchy sequence is stationnary and so convergent, you can't find a such example.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Since every set can be given the discrete metric $d(x,y)=left{begin{array}{ll} 1 & text{if $xneq y$}\0 &text{if $x = y$}end{array}right.$, and that for this metric every Cauchy sequence is stationnary and so convergent, you can't find a such example.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 19 '18 at 14:45









        BalloonBalloon

        4,710822




        4,710822























            2












            $begingroup$

            Yes, the set of rationals $mathbb{Q}$ in its usual topology is not a Baire space, so whatever compatible metric you put on it, it will be non-complete.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              This depends on what the question is asking, precisely. If we view $mathbb{Q}$ just as a set then obviously we can make it a complete metric space (and I think this is how the question leans, but I'm not certain).
              $endgroup$
              – Noah Schweber
              Dec 19 '18 at 14:48


















            2












            $begingroup$

            Yes, the set of rationals $mathbb{Q}$ in its usual topology is not a Baire space, so whatever compatible metric you put on it, it will be non-complete.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              This depends on what the question is asking, precisely. If we view $mathbb{Q}$ just as a set then obviously we can make it a complete metric space (and I think this is how the question leans, but I'm not certain).
              $endgroup$
              – Noah Schweber
              Dec 19 '18 at 14:48
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Yes, the set of rationals $mathbb{Q}$ in its usual topology is not a Baire space, so whatever compatible metric you put on it, it will be non-complete.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Yes, the set of rationals $mathbb{Q}$ in its usual topology is not a Baire space, so whatever compatible metric you put on it, it will be non-complete.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 19 '18 at 14:44









            Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma

            115k349125




            115k349125












            • $begingroup$
              This depends on what the question is asking, precisely. If we view $mathbb{Q}$ just as a set then obviously we can make it a complete metric space (and I think this is how the question leans, but I'm not certain).
              $endgroup$
              – Noah Schweber
              Dec 19 '18 at 14:48




















            • $begingroup$
              This depends on what the question is asking, precisely. If we view $mathbb{Q}$ just as a set then obviously we can make it a complete metric space (and I think this is how the question leans, but I'm not certain).
              $endgroup$
              – Noah Schweber
              Dec 19 '18 at 14:48


















            $begingroup$
            This depends on what the question is asking, precisely. If we view $mathbb{Q}$ just as a set then obviously we can make it a complete metric space (and I think this is how the question leans, but I'm not certain).
            $endgroup$
            – Noah Schweber
            Dec 19 '18 at 14:48






            $begingroup$
            This depends on what the question is asking, precisely. If we view $mathbb{Q}$ just as a set then obviously we can make it a complete metric space (and I think this is how the question leans, but I'm not certain).
            $endgroup$
            – Noah Schweber
            Dec 19 '18 at 14:48




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046458%2fare-there-any-sets-that-are-not-complete-metric-spaces-under-all-possible-metric%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...