Why is this integral (that looks complicated) so easy to evaluate?
I encounter the following integral during Statistics lecture and the professor quickly solved it as if he assumed we know that this integral is easy so solve:
$$ int_{0}^{infty} xe^{-(1-t)x} dx = frac{1}{(1-t)^2}$$
I suspect that this involves a probability distribution but I do not know which. Why is this integral so easy to solve? I know I must have been missing something.
integration probability-theory probability-distributions improper-integrals
add a comment |
I encounter the following integral during Statistics lecture and the professor quickly solved it as if he assumed we know that this integral is easy so solve:
$$ int_{0}^{infty} xe^{-(1-t)x} dx = frac{1}{(1-t)^2}$$
I suspect that this involves a probability distribution but I do not know which. Why is this integral so easy to solve? I know I must have been missing something.
integration probability-theory probability-distributions improper-integrals
2
If all else fails, the integral is quite easily solved using integration by parts.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 25 '18 at 10:26
The solution holds only as long as $t<1$.
– Alecos Papadopoulos
Nov 26 '18 at 1:57
add a comment |
I encounter the following integral during Statistics lecture and the professor quickly solved it as if he assumed we know that this integral is easy so solve:
$$ int_{0}^{infty} xe^{-(1-t)x} dx = frac{1}{(1-t)^2}$$
I suspect that this involves a probability distribution but I do not know which. Why is this integral so easy to solve? I know I must have been missing something.
integration probability-theory probability-distributions improper-integrals
I encounter the following integral during Statistics lecture and the professor quickly solved it as if he assumed we know that this integral is easy so solve:
$$ int_{0}^{infty} xe^{-(1-t)x} dx = frac{1}{(1-t)^2}$$
I suspect that this involves a probability distribution but I do not know which. Why is this integral so easy to solve? I know I must have been missing something.
integration probability-theory probability-distributions improper-integrals
integration probability-theory probability-distributions improper-integrals
edited Nov 25 '18 at 10:31
José Carlos Santos
150k22121221
150k22121221
asked Nov 25 '18 at 10:24
hephaes
1729
1729
2
If all else fails, the integral is quite easily solved using integration by parts.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 25 '18 at 10:26
The solution holds only as long as $t<1$.
– Alecos Papadopoulos
Nov 26 '18 at 1:57
add a comment |
2
If all else fails, the integral is quite easily solved using integration by parts.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 25 '18 at 10:26
The solution holds only as long as $t<1$.
– Alecos Papadopoulos
Nov 26 '18 at 1:57
2
2
If all else fails, the integral is quite easily solved using integration by parts.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 25 '18 at 10:26
If all else fails, the integral is quite easily solved using integration by parts.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 25 '18 at 10:26
The solution holds only as long as $t<1$.
– Alecos Papadopoulos
Nov 26 '18 at 1:57
The solution holds only as long as $t<1$.
– Alecos Papadopoulos
Nov 26 '18 at 1:57
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
For each $lambda<0$,begin{align}int_0^infty xe^{lambda x},mathrm dx&=left[xfrac{e^{lambda x}}lambdaright]_{x=0}^{x=infty}-int_0^inftyfrac{e^{lambda x}}lambda,mathrm dx\&=-left[frac{e^{lambda x}}{lambda^2}right]_{x=0}^{x=infty}\&=frac1{lambda^2}.end{align}
How can the mean of exponential rv be negative
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
Thank you for the answer! May I also know why can we be sure $xe^{-lambda x} $ always converges to some number as $x$ tends to infinity?
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
By the rule of lhopitals
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:34
@Neymar I see. Thanks.
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:35
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012664%2fwhy-is-this-integral-that-looks-complicated-so-easy-to-evaluate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
For each $lambda<0$,begin{align}int_0^infty xe^{lambda x},mathrm dx&=left[xfrac{e^{lambda x}}lambdaright]_{x=0}^{x=infty}-int_0^inftyfrac{e^{lambda x}}lambda,mathrm dx\&=-left[frac{e^{lambda x}}{lambda^2}right]_{x=0}^{x=infty}\&=frac1{lambda^2}.end{align}
How can the mean of exponential rv be negative
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
Thank you for the answer! May I also know why can we be sure $xe^{-lambda x} $ always converges to some number as $x$ tends to infinity?
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
By the rule of lhopitals
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:34
@Neymar I see. Thanks.
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:35
add a comment |
For each $lambda<0$,begin{align}int_0^infty xe^{lambda x},mathrm dx&=left[xfrac{e^{lambda x}}lambdaright]_{x=0}^{x=infty}-int_0^inftyfrac{e^{lambda x}}lambda,mathrm dx\&=-left[frac{e^{lambda x}}{lambda^2}right]_{x=0}^{x=infty}\&=frac1{lambda^2}.end{align}
How can the mean of exponential rv be negative
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
Thank you for the answer! May I also know why can we be sure $xe^{-lambda x} $ always converges to some number as $x$ tends to infinity?
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
By the rule of lhopitals
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:34
@Neymar I see. Thanks.
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:35
add a comment |
For each $lambda<0$,begin{align}int_0^infty xe^{lambda x},mathrm dx&=left[xfrac{e^{lambda x}}lambdaright]_{x=0}^{x=infty}-int_0^inftyfrac{e^{lambda x}}lambda,mathrm dx\&=-left[frac{e^{lambda x}}{lambda^2}right]_{x=0}^{x=infty}\&=frac1{lambda^2}.end{align}
For each $lambda<0$,begin{align}int_0^infty xe^{lambda x},mathrm dx&=left[xfrac{e^{lambda x}}lambdaright]_{x=0}^{x=infty}-int_0^inftyfrac{e^{lambda x}}lambda,mathrm dx\&=-left[frac{e^{lambda x}}{lambda^2}right]_{x=0}^{x=infty}\&=frac1{lambda^2}.end{align}
answered Nov 25 '18 at 10:30
José Carlos Santos
150k22121221
150k22121221
How can the mean of exponential rv be negative
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
Thank you for the answer! May I also know why can we be sure $xe^{-lambda x} $ always converges to some number as $x$ tends to infinity?
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
By the rule of lhopitals
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:34
@Neymar I see. Thanks.
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:35
add a comment |
How can the mean of exponential rv be negative
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
Thank you for the answer! May I also know why can we be sure $xe^{-lambda x} $ always converges to some number as $x$ tends to infinity?
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
By the rule of lhopitals
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:34
@Neymar I see. Thanks.
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:35
How can the mean of exponential rv be negative
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
How can the mean of exponential rv be negative
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
Thank you for the answer! May I also know why can we be sure $xe^{-lambda x} $ always converges to some number as $x$ tends to infinity?
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
Thank you for the answer! May I also know why can we be sure $xe^{-lambda x} $ always converges to some number as $x$ tends to infinity?
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:33
By the rule of lhopitals
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:34
By the rule of lhopitals
– Neymar
Nov 25 '18 at 10:34
@Neymar I see. Thanks.
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:35
@Neymar I see. Thanks.
– hephaes
Nov 25 '18 at 10:35
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3012664%2fwhy-is-this-integral-that-looks-complicated-so-easy-to-evaluate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
If all else fails, the integral is quite easily solved using integration by parts.
– MisterRiemann
Nov 25 '18 at 10:26
The solution holds only as long as $t<1$.
– Alecos Papadopoulos
Nov 26 '18 at 1:57