Relationship between compact operators and coefficients tending to zero












2












$begingroup$


While reading the solutions of an exercise, I found the following statement:



proof



Where $d$ is some operator and $I$ is the identity operator from $L^2$ to $L^2$. I managed to get the formula for $(I-dd^*)g$ that is written below, however, I couldn't draw the same conclusion.
I checked in the lecture notes and I couldn't find any reference regarding the relationship between Fourier coefficients of a function in the image of an operator, and the operator being compact. If it helps, It is pretty easy to show that this operator is bounded.



Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    There is quite a definition : $T$ is compact iff there is a sequence of finite dimensional operators $T_n$ such that $|T g - T_n g | < A_n|g|$ and $A_n to 0$. Now that $Tg = sum_k c_k langle g,e_k rangle e_k$ with $c_k to 0$ and $(e_k)$ orthonormal implies $|Tg - T_ng| = |sum_{|k| > n} c_k langle g,e_k rangle e_k | < ...$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 19 '18 at 14:59












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns thanks for your comment! Can you please cite any theorem and / or give me any link to it?
    $endgroup$
    – Euler_Salter
    Dec 19 '18 at 15:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can take it as the definition of compact operators. The other definitions are more abstract and the proof they are equivalent are not hard. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_operator_on_Hilbert_space
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 19 '18 at 15:57












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns Thanks! Do you mind writing up an answer and expanding a bit more your solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Euler_Salter
    Dec 19 '18 at 16:05
















2












$begingroup$


While reading the solutions of an exercise, I found the following statement:



proof



Where $d$ is some operator and $I$ is the identity operator from $L^2$ to $L^2$. I managed to get the formula for $(I-dd^*)g$ that is written below, however, I couldn't draw the same conclusion.
I checked in the lecture notes and I couldn't find any reference regarding the relationship between Fourier coefficients of a function in the image of an operator, and the operator being compact. If it helps, It is pretty easy to show that this operator is bounded.



Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    There is quite a definition : $T$ is compact iff there is a sequence of finite dimensional operators $T_n$ such that $|T g - T_n g | < A_n|g|$ and $A_n to 0$. Now that $Tg = sum_k c_k langle g,e_k rangle e_k$ with $c_k to 0$ and $(e_k)$ orthonormal implies $|Tg - T_ng| = |sum_{|k| > n} c_k langle g,e_k rangle e_k | < ...$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 19 '18 at 14:59












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns thanks for your comment! Can you please cite any theorem and / or give me any link to it?
    $endgroup$
    – Euler_Salter
    Dec 19 '18 at 15:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can take it as the definition of compact operators. The other definitions are more abstract and the proof they are equivalent are not hard. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_operator_on_Hilbert_space
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 19 '18 at 15:57












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns Thanks! Do you mind writing up an answer and expanding a bit more your solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Euler_Salter
    Dec 19 '18 at 16:05














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


While reading the solutions of an exercise, I found the following statement:



proof



Where $d$ is some operator and $I$ is the identity operator from $L^2$ to $L^2$. I managed to get the formula for $(I-dd^*)g$ that is written below, however, I couldn't draw the same conclusion.
I checked in the lecture notes and I couldn't find any reference regarding the relationship between Fourier coefficients of a function in the image of an operator, and the operator being compact. If it helps, It is pretty easy to show that this operator is bounded.



Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




While reading the solutions of an exercise, I found the following statement:



proof



Where $d$ is some operator and $I$ is the identity operator from $L^2$ to $L^2$. I managed to get the formula for $(I-dd^*)g$ that is written below, however, I couldn't draw the same conclusion.
I checked in the lecture notes and I couldn't find any reference regarding the relationship between Fourier coefficients of a function in the image of an operator, and the operator being compact. If it helps, It is pretty easy to show that this operator is bounded.



Any ideas?







real-analysis complex-analysis functional-analysis operator-theory hilbert-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 19 '18 at 14:55









Euler_SalterEuler_Salter

2,0601337




2,0601337












  • $begingroup$
    There is quite a definition : $T$ is compact iff there is a sequence of finite dimensional operators $T_n$ such that $|T g - T_n g | < A_n|g|$ and $A_n to 0$. Now that $Tg = sum_k c_k langle g,e_k rangle e_k$ with $c_k to 0$ and $(e_k)$ orthonormal implies $|Tg - T_ng| = |sum_{|k| > n} c_k langle g,e_k rangle e_k | < ...$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 19 '18 at 14:59












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns thanks for your comment! Can you please cite any theorem and / or give me any link to it?
    $endgroup$
    – Euler_Salter
    Dec 19 '18 at 15:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can take it as the definition of compact operators. The other definitions are more abstract and the proof they are equivalent are not hard. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_operator_on_Hilbert_space
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 19 '18 at 15:57












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns Thanks! Do you mind writing up an answer and expanding a bit more your solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Euler_Salter
    Dec 19 '18 at 16:05


















  • $begingroup$
    There is quite a definition : $T$ is compact iff there is a sequence of finite dimensional operators $T_n$ such that $|T g - T_n g | < A_n|g|$ and $A_n to 0$. Now that $Tg = sum_k c_k langle g,e_k rangle e_k$ with $c_k to 0$ and $(e_k)$ orthonormal implies $|Tg - T_ng| = |sum_{|k| > n} c_k langle g,e_k rangle e_k | < ...$
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 19 '18 at 14:59












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns thanks for your comment! Can you please cite any theorem and / or give me any link to it?
    $endgroup$
    – Euler_Salter
    Dec 19 '18 at 15:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can take it as the definition of compact operators. The other definitions are more abstract and the proof they are equivalent are not hard. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_operator_on_Hilbert_space
    $endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 19 '18 at 15:57












  • $begingroup$
    @reuns Thanks! Do you mind writing up an answer and expanding a bit more your solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Euler_Salter
    Dec 19 '18 at 16:05
















$begingroup$
There is quite a definition : $T$ is compact iff there is a sequence of finite dimensional operators $T_n$ such that $|T g - T_n g | < A_n|g|$ and $A_n to 0$. Now that $Tg = sum_k c_k langle g,e_k rangle e_k$ with $c_k to 0$ and $(e_k)$ orthonormal implies $|Tg - T_ng| = |sum_{|k| > n} c_k langle g,e_k rangle e_k | < ...$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 19 '18 at 14:59






$begingroup$
There is quite a definition : $T$ is compact iff there is a sequence of finite dimensional operators $T_n$ such that $|T g - T_n g | < A_n|g|$ and $A_n to 0$. Now that $Tg = sum_k c_k langle g,e_k rangle e_k$ with $c_k to 0$ and $(e_k)$ orthonormal implies $|Tg - T_ng| = |sum_{|k| > n} c_k langle g,e_k rangle e_k | < ...$
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 19 '18 at 14:59














$begingroup$
@reuns thanks for your comment! Can you please cite any theorem and / or give me any link to it?
$endgroup$
– Euler_Salter
Dec 19 '18 at 15:14




$begingroup$
@reuns thanks for your comment! Can you please cite any theorem and / or give me any link to it?
$endgroup$
– Euler_Salter
Dec 19 '18 at 15:14




1




1




$begingroup$
You can take it as the definition of compact operators. The other definitions are more abstract and the proof they are equivalent are not hard. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_operator_on_Hilbert_space
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 19 '18 at 15:57






$begingroup$
You can take it as the definition of compact operators. The other definitions are more abstract and the proof they are equivalent are not hard. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_operator_on_Hilbert_space
$endgroup$
– reuns
Dec 19 '18 at 15:57














$begingroup$
@reuns Thanks! Do you mind writing up an answer and expanding a bit more your solution?
$endgroup$
– Euler_Salter
Dec 19 '18 at 16:05




$begingroup$
@reuns Thanks! Do you mind writing up an answer and expanding a bit more your solution?
$endgroup$
– Euler_Salter
Dec 19 '18 at 16:05










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space with orthonormal basis ${ e_k }_{k=-infty}^{infty}$. Your operator is the same as the diagonal operator $D$ given by
$$
Df = sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}langle f,e_krangle e_k.
$$



To show that $D$ is compact, let ${ f_n }_{n=1}^{infty}$ be bounded sequence in $mathcal{H}$ with bound $M$; it must be shown that ${ Df_n }_{n=1}^{infty}$ has a convergent subsequence.



Every coordinate sequence ${ langle f_n,e_krangle}_{n=1}^{infty}$ is bounded by $M$; this bound holds for all $k$. Using Cantor diagonalization, there is a subsequence ${ f_{n_m} }_{m=1}^{infty}$ such that $lim_{m}langle f_{n_m},e_krangle$ converges for every $k$ to some limit $alpha_{k}$. The sequence ${alpha_k}$ is uniformly bounded by $M$; therefore $y=sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{alpha_k}{1+k^2} e_k in mathcal{H}$. And,
$$
left|Df_{n_m}-yright|^2
= sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}|langle f_{n_m},e_krangle-alpha_k|^2
$$

converges to $0$ as $mrightarrowinfty$. (You can apply the Lebesgue dominated convergence Theorem applied to a discrete measure, or you can argue directly.) Hence,
$$
lim_{mrightarrowinfty}Df_{n_m}=sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}alpha_k e_k
$$

So $D$ is compact.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046472%2frelationship-between-compact-operators-and-coefficients-tending-to-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space with orthonormal basis ${ e_k }_{k=-infty}^{infty}$. Your operator is the same as the diagonal operator $D$ given by
    $$
    Df = sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}langle f,e_krangle e_k.
    $$



    To show that $D$ is compact, let ${ f_n }_{n=1}^{infty}$ be bounded sequence in $mathcal{H}$ with bound $M$; it must be shown that ${ Df_n }_{n=1}^{infty}$ has a convergent subsequence.



    Every coordinate sequence ${ langle f_n,e_krangle}_{n=1}^{infty}$ is bounded by $M$; this bound holds for all $k$. Using Cantor diagonalization, there is a subsequence ${ f_{n_m} }_{m=1}^{infty}$ such that $lim_{m}langle f_{n_m},e_krangle$ converges for every $k$ to some limit $alpha_{k}$. The sequence ${alpha_k}$ is uniformly bounded by $M$; therefore $y=sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{alpha_k}{1+k^2} e_k in mathcal{H}$. And,
    $$
    left|Df_{n_m}-yright|^2
    = sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}|langle f_{n_m},e_krangle-alpha_k|^2
    $$

    converges to $0$ as $mrightarrowinfty$. (You can apply the Lebesgue dominated convergence Theorem applied to a discrete measure, or you can argue directly.) Hence,
    $$
    lim_{mrightarrowinfty}Df_{n_m}=sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}alpha_k e_k
    $$

    So $D$ is compact.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space with orthonormal basis ${ e_k }_{k=-infty}^{infty}$. Your operator is the same as the diagonal operator $D$ given by
      $$
      Df = sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}langle f,e_krangle e_k.
      $$



      To show that $D$ is compact, let ${ f_n }_{n=1}^{infty}$ be bounded sequence in $mathcal{H}$ with bound $M$; it must be shown that ${ Df_n }_{n=1}^{infty}$ has a convergent subsequence.



      Every coordinate sequence ${ langle f_n,e_krangle}_{n=1}^{infty}$ is bounded by $M$; this bound holds for all $k$. Using Cantor diagonalization, there is a subsequence ${ f_{n_m} }_{m=1}^{infty}$ such that $lim_{m}langle f_{n_m},e_krangle$ converges for every $k$ to some limit $alpha_{k}$. The sequence ${alpha_k}$ is uniformly bounded by $M$; therefore $y=sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{alpha_k}{1+k^2} e_k in mathcal{H}$. And,
      $$
      left|Df_{n_m}-yright|^2
      = sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}|langle f_{n_m},e_krangle-alpha_k|^2
      $$

      converges to $0$ as $mrightarrowinfty$. (You can apply the Lebesgue dominated convergence Theorem applied to a discrete measure, or you can argue directly.) Hence,
      $$
      lim_{mrightarrowinfty}Df_{n_m}=sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}alpha_k e_k
      $$

      So $D$ is compact.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space with orthonormal basis ${ e_k }_{k=-infty}^{infty}$. Your operator is the same as the diagonal operator $D$ given by
        $$
        Df = sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}langle f,e_krangle e_k.
        $$



        To show that $D$ is compact, let ${ f_n }_{n=1}^{infty}$ be bounded sequence in $mathcal{H}$ with bound $M$; it must be shown that ${ Df_n }_{n=1}^{infty}$ has a convergent subsequence.



        Every coordinate sequence ${ langle f_n,e_krangle}_{n=1}^{infty}$ is bounded by $M$; this bound holds for all $k$. Using Cantor diagonalization, there is a subsequence ${ f_{n_m} }_{m=1}^{infty}$ such that $lim_{m}langle f_{n_m},e_krangle$ converges for every $k$ to some limit $alpha_{k}$. The sequence ${alpha_k}$ is uniformly bounded by $M$; therefore $y=sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{alpha_k}{1+k^2} e_k in mathcal{H}$. And,
        $$
        left|Df_{n_m}-yright|^2
        = sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}|langle f_{n_m},e_krangle-alpha_k|^2
        $$

        converges to $0$ as $mrightarrowinfty$. (You can apply the Lebesgue dominated convergence Theorem applied to a discrete measure, or you can argue directly.) Hence,
        $$
        lim_{mrightarrowinfty}Df_{n_m}=sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}alpha_k e_k
        $$

        So $D$ is compact.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Let $mathcal{H}$ be a Hilbert space with orthonormal basis ${ e_k }_{k=-infty}^{infty}$. Your operator is the same as the diagonal operator $D$ given by
        $$
        Df = sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}langle f,e_krangle e_k.
        $$



        To show that $D$ is compact, let ${ f_n }_{n=1}^{infty}$ be bounded sequence in $mathcal{H}$ with bound $M$; it must be shown that ${ Df_n }_{n=1}^{infty}$ has a convergent subsequence.



        Every coordinate sequence ${ langle f_n,e_krangle}_{n=1}^{infty}$ is bounded by $M$; this bound holds for all $k$. Using Cantor diagonalization, there is a subsequence ${ f_{n_m} }_{m=1}^{infty}$ such that $lim_{m}langle f_{n_m},e_krangle$ converges for every $k$ to some limit $alpha_{k}$. The sequence ${alpha_k}$ is uniformly bounded by $M$; therefore $y=sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{alpha_k}{1+k^2} e_k in mathcal{H}$. And,
        $$
        left|Df_{n_m}-yright|^2
        = sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}|langle f_{n_m},e_krangle-alpha_k|^2
        $$

        converges to $0$ as $mrightarrowinfty$. (You can apply the Lebesgue dominated convergence Theorem applied to a discrete measure, or you can argue directly.) Hence,
        $$
        lim_{mrightarrowinfty}Df_{n_m}=sum_{k=-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{1+k^2}alpha_k e_k
        $$

        So $D$ is compact.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 21 '18 at 3:37









        DisintegratingByPartsDisintegratingByParts

        60.3k42681




        60.3k42681






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046472%2frelationship-between-compact-operators-and-coefficients-tending-to-zero%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa