Frechet distance decomposability- Can we do a divide and conquer approach for Frechet?












0












$begingroup$


Given a dataset of Polygonal Lines which are partitioned using equal-sized grid cells. Suppose two Lines P and Q which are segmented at cell boundaries and each of which is converted to two subsequences residing in the corresponding cells. If the distance between sub-sequences in each cell is less than epsilon, can we conclude that the distance of the whole Lines (not segmented ones) is also less than the epsilon.
In mathematical words, suppose the two P and Q lines each one partitioned into 2 subsequences at the point indicated by star and discrete Frechet Distance function dF.



I'm not good in mathematics. In the figure you can see that the distance dF(P1, Q1)=d1 and dF(P2, Q2)=d2, and dF(P, Q)=d2.
Does dF(P1, Q1) < e and dF(P2, Q2) < e imply that dF(P,Q) < e? If yes, how can I prove this?



I guess it does not imply, because if there is max length coupling that crosses the boundary of grids, it will be missed in the partitioned computation of Discrete Frechet distance.



The figure










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Given a dataset of Polygonal Lines which are partitioned using equal-sized grid cells. Suppose two Lines P and Q which are segmented at cell boundaries and each of which is converted to two subsequences residing in the corresponding cells. If the distance between sub-sequences in each cell is less than epsilon, can we conclude that the distance of the whole Lines (not segmented ones) is also less than the epsilon.
    In mathematical words, suppose the two P and Q lines each one partitioned into 2 subsequences at the point indicated by star and discrete Frechet Distance function dF.



    I'm not good in mathematics. In the figure you can see that the distance dF(P1, Q1)=d1 and dF(P2, Q2)=d2, and dF(P, Q)=d2.
    Does dF(P1, Q1) < e and dF(P2, Q2) < e imply that dF(P,Q) < e? If yes, how can I prove this?



    I guess it does not imply, because if there is max length coupling that crosses the boundary of grids, it will be missed in the partitioned computation of Discrete Frechet distance.



    The figure










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Given a dataset of Polygonal Lines which are partitioned using equal-sized grid cells. Suppose two Lines P and Q which are segmented at cell boundaries and each of which is converted to two subsequences residing in the corresponding cells. If the distance between sub-sequences in each cell is less than epsilon, can we conclude that the distance of the whole Lines (not segmented ones) is also less than the epsilon.
      In mathematical words, suppose the two P and Q lines each one partitioned into 2 subsequences at the point indicated by star and discrete Frechet Distance function dF.



      I'm not good in mathematics. In the figure you can see that the distance dF(P1, Q1)=d1 and dF(P2, Q2)=d2, and dF(P, Q)=d2.
      Does dF(P1, Q1) < e and dF(P2, Q2) < e imply that dF(P,Q) < e? If yes, how can I prove this?



      I guess it does not imply, because if there is max length coupling that crosses the boundary of grids, it will be missed in the partitioned computation of Discrete Frechet distance.



      The figure










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Given a dataset of Polygonal Lines which are partitioned using equal-sized grid cells. Suppose two Lines P and Q which are segmented at cell boundaries and each of which is converted to two subsequences residing in the corresponding cells. If the distance between sub-sequences in each cell is less than epsilon, can we conclude that the distance of the whole Lines (not segmented ones) is also less than the epsilon.
      In mathematical words, suppose the two P and Q lines each one partitioned into 2 subsequences at the point indicated by star and discrete Frechet Distance function dF.



      I'm not good in mathematics. In the figure you can see that the distance dF(P1, Q1)=d1 and dF(P2, Q2)=d2, and dF(P, Q)=d2.
      Does dF(P1, Q1) < e and dF(P2, Q2) < e imply that dF(P,Q) < e? If yes, how can I prove this?



      I guess it does not imply, because if there is max length coupling that crosses the boundary of grids, it will be missed in the partitioned computation of Discrete Frechet distance.



      The figure







      geometry hausdorff-distance






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 19 '18 at 15:13









      user302787user302787

      11




      11






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046486%2ffrechet-distance-decomposability-can-we-do-a-divide-and-conquer-approach-for-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046486%2ffrechet-distance-decomposability-can-we-do-a-divide-and-conquer-approach-for-fr%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

          How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...