counting the number of non-negative integer pairs of $a+2b+3c+4d=100$












1












$begingroup$


I thought partition number $P(n,4)$ is equal with
the number of non-negative integer pairs $a+2b+3c+4d=n-4$



so....



how do I count the number of integer pairs satisfying $a+2b+3c+4d=100$ over $a,b,c,d geq 0$ ??



I really wonder this problem!



thank you for sharing your knowledge.



please don't use a computer










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I won't call $(a,b,c,d)$ a pair, anyway you just need a coefficient in the Maclaurin series of $$frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}=sum_{ngeq 0}a_n x^n,$$ and due to the pole of order $4$ at $x=1$, $$a_napprox frac{1}{24}binom{n+3}{3}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 21 '18 at 17:11












  • $begingroup$
    Since $x=-1$ is a double pole, there is a significative (linear) perturbation due to the parity of $n$. The other poles contribute with a bounded arithmetic perturbation.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 21 '18 at 17:14










  • $begingroup$
    The estimate by @JackD'Aurizio comes out to $approx7369$ for $n=100.$ Counting with a python script gives $8037.$ So, about a $10%$ error.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Dec 21 '18 at 17:47












  • $begingroup$
    If you expand Jack D'Aurizio's generating function by partial fractions you could get an expression something like $a_n = c_1 + c_2 n + c_3 n^2 + c_4 n^3 + c_5 (-1)^n + c_6 n (-1)^n + c_7 cos(2 pi n/3) + c_8 sin(2 pi n/3) + c_9 cos(pi n/2) + c_{10} sin(pi n/2)$. Quite a bit of work to do by hand, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:04










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielSchepler: not so much, just done.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:14
















1












$begingroup$


I thought partition number $P(n,4)$ is equal with
the number of non-negative integer pairs $a+2b+3c+4d=n-4$



so....



how do I count the number of integer pairs satisfying $a+2b+3c+4d=100$ over $a,b,c,d geq 0$ ??



I really wonder this problem!



thank you for sharing your knowledge.



please don't use a computer










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I won't call $(a,b,c,d)$ a pair, anyway you just need a coefficient in the Maclaurin series of $$frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}=sum_{ngeq 0}a_n x^n,$$ and due to the pole of order $4$ at $x=1$, $$a_napprox frac{1}{24}binom{n+3}{3}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 21 '18 at 17:11












  • $begingroup$
    Since $x=-1$ is a double pole, there is a significative (linear) perturbation due to the parity of $n$. The other poles contribute with a bounded arithmetic perturbation.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 21 '18 at 17:14










  • $begingroup$
    The estimate by @JackD'Aurizio comes out to $approx7369$ for $n=100.$ Counting with a python script gives $8037.$ So, about a $10%$ error.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Dec 21 '18 at 17:47












  • $begingroup$
    If you expand Jack D'Aurizio's generating function by partial fractions you could get an expression something like $a_n = c_1 + c_2 n + c_3 n^2 + c_4 n^3 + c_5 (-1)^n + c_6 n (-1)^n + c_7 cos(2 pi n/3) + c_8 sin(2 pi n/3) + c_9 cos(pi n/2) + c_{10} sin(pi n/2)$. Quite a bit of work to do by hand, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:04










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielSchepler: not so much, just done.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:14














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


I thought partition number $P(n,4)$ is equal with
the number of non-negative integer pairs $a+2b+3c+4d=n-4$



so....



how do I count the number of integer pairs satisfying $a+2b+3c+4d=100$ over $a,b,c,d geq 0$ ??



I really wonder this problem!



thank you for sharing your knowledge.



please don't use a computer










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I thought partition number $P(n,4)$ is equal with
the number of non-negative integer pairs $a+2b+3c+4d=n-4$



so....



how do I count the number of integer pairs satisfying $a+2b+3c+4d=100$ over $a,b,c,d geq 0$ ??



I really wonder this problem!



thank you for sharing your knowledge.



please don't use a computer







combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 21 '18 at 17:11









postmortes

2,29531422




2,29531422










asked Dec 21 '18 at 16:56









뭘꼬나바뭘꼬나바

82




82








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I won't call $(a,b,c,d)$ a pair, anyway you just need a coefficient in the Maclaurin series of $$frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}=sum_{ngeq 0}a_n x^n,$$ and due to the pole of order $4$ at $x=1$, $$a_napprox frac{1}{24}binom{n+3}{3}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 21 '18 at 17:11












  • $begingroup$
    Since $x=-1$ is a double pole, there is a significative (linear) perturbation due to the parity of $n$. The other poles contribute with a bounded arithmetic perturbation.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 21 '18 at 17:14










  • $begingroup$
    The estimate by @JackD'Aurizio comes out to $approx7369$ for $n=100.$ Counting with a python script gives $8037.$ So, about a $10%$ error.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Dec 21 '18 at 17:47












  • $begingroup$
    If you expand Jack D'Aurizio's generating function by partial fractions you could get an expression something like $a_n = c_1 + c_2 n + c_3 n^2 + c_4 n^3 + c_5 (-1)^n + c_6 n (-1)^n + c_7 cos(2 pi n/3) + c_8 sin(2 pi n/3) + c_9 cos(pi n/2) + c_{10} sin(pi n/2)$. Quite a bit of work to do by hand, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:04










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielSchepler: not so much, just done.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:14














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I won't call $(a,b,c,d)$ a pair, anyway you just need a coefficient in the Maclaurin series of $$frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}=sum_{ngeq 0}a_n x^n,$$ and due to the pole of order $4$ at $x=1$, $$a_napprox frac{1}{24}binom{n+3}{3}.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 21 '18 at 17:11












  • $begingroup$
    Since $x=-1$ is a double pole, there is a significative (linear) perturbation due to the parity of $n$. The other poles contribute with a bounded arithmetic perturbation.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 21 '18 at 17:14










  • $begingroup$
    The estimate by @JackD'Aurizio comes out to $approx7369$ for $n=100.$ Counting with a python script gives $8037.$ So, about a $10%$ error.
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Dec 21 '18 at 17:47












  • $begingroup$
    If you expand Jack D'Aurizio's generating function by partial fractions you could get an expression something like $a_n = c_1 + c_2 n + c_3 n^2 + c_4 n^3 + c_5 (-1)^n + c_6 n (-1)^n + c_7 cos(2 pi n/3) + c_8 sin(2 pi n/3) + c_9 cos(pi n/2) + c_{10} sin(pi n/2)$. Quite a bit of work to do by hand, though.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schepler
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:04










  • $begingroup$
    @DanielSchepler: not so much, just done.
    $endgroup$
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    Dec 21 '18 at 18:14








1




1




$begingroup$
I won't call $(a,b,c,d)$ a pair, anyway you just need a coefficient in the Maclaurin series of $$frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}=sum_{ngeq 0}a_n x^n,$$ and due to the pole of order $4$ at $x=1$, $$a_napprox frac{1}{24}binom{n+3}{3}.$$
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 21 '18 at 17:11






$begingroup$
I won't call $(a,b,c,d)$ a pair, anyway you just need a coefficient in the Maclaurin series of $$frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}=sum_{ngeq 0}a_n x^n,$$ and due to the pole of order $4$ at $x=1$, $$a_napprox frac{1}{24}binom{n+3}{3}.$$
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 21 '18 at 17:11














$begingroup$
Since $x=-1$ is a double pole, there is a significative (linear) perturbation due to the parity of $n$. The other poles contribute with a bounded arithmetic perturbation.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 21 '18 at 17:14




$begingroup$
Since $x=-1$ is a double pole, there is a significative (linear) perturbation due to the parity of $n$. The other poles contribute with a bounded arithmetic perturbation.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 21 '18 at 17:14












$begingroup$
The estimate by @JackD'Aurizio comes out to $approx7369$ for $n=100.$ Counting with a python script gives $8037.$ So, about a $10%$ error.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 21 '18 at 17:47






$begingroup$
The estimate by @JackD'Aurizio comes out to $approx7369$ for $n=100.$ Counting with a python script gives $8037.$ So, about a $10%$ error.
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Dec 21 '18 at 17:47














$begingroup$
If you expand Jack D'Aurizio's generating function by partial fractions you could get an expression something like $a_n = c_1 + c_2 n + c_3 n^2 + c_4 n^3 + c_5 (-1)^n + c_6 n (-1)^n + c_7 cos(2 pi n/3) + c_8 sin(2 pi n/3) + c_9 cos(pi n/2) + c_{10} sin(pi n/2)$. Quite a bit of work to do by hand, though.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Dec 21 '18 at 18:04




$begingroup$
If you expand Jack D'Aurizio's generating function by partial fractions you could get an expression something like $a_n = c_1 + c_2 n + c_3 n^2 + c_4 n^3 + c_5 (-1)^n + c_6 n (-1)^n + c_7 cos(2 pi n/3) + c_8 sin(2 pi n/3) + c_9 cos(pi n/2) + c_{10} sin(pi n/2)$. Quite a bit of work to do by hand, though.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schepler
Dec 21 '18 at 18:04












$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler: not so much, just done.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 21 '18 at 18:14




$begingroup$
@DanielSchepler: not so much, just done.
$endgroup$
– Jack D'Aurizio
Dec 21 '18 at 18:14










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Expanding my comment: if we consider the partial fraction decomposition of $f(z)=frac{1}{(1-z)(1-z^2)(1-z^3)(1-z^4)}=sum_{ngeq 0}a_n z^n$ we have that the pole at $z=1$ contributes with



$$ frac{1}{24(1-z)^4}+frac{1}{8(1-z)^3}+frac{59}{288(1-z)^2}+frac{17}{72(1-z)} $$
to $f(z)$, hence it contributes with
$$ frac{2n^3+30n^2+135n+175}{288}$$
to $a_n$. The pole at $z=-1$ contributes with
$$ (-1)^n frac{n+5}{32} $$
and the other poles provide bounded contributions, since they are simple. It follows that for even values of $n$
$$ a_n approx frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+22)}{144} $$
and for $n=100$ the ceiling of the RHS is exactly $a_{100}$, i.e. $8037$. The error of this approximation is bounded by twice the sum of the absolute values of the real parts of the residues at the simple poles, i.e. $frac{2}{9}<frac{1}{2}$. In particular




If $n$ is even $a_n=[x^n]frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}$ is the closest integer to $frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+22)}{144}.$

If $n$ is odd $a_n=[x^n]frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}$ is the closest integer to $frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+13)}{144}.$







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    3












    $begingroup$

    I claim that the number of such tuples is equal to the number of partitions of 100 into 4 nonnegative integers.



    Indeed, let $S={(a,b,c,d): a+2b+3c+4d=100}$, and let $S'={(A,B,C,D): A+B+C+D=100, Age Bge Cge D}$.



    I claim that $S$ and $S'$ are in bijection. To see this, we will define two inverse maps between the two sets.



    Given $(a,b,c,d)in S$, we obtain $(A,B,C,D)in S'$ by taking
    $A=a+b+c+d$,$B=b+c+d$, $C=c+d$ and $D=d$. Conversely, given $(A,B,C,D)in S'$, we have $(a,b,c,d)in S$ where $d=D, c=D-C, b=B-C, a=A-B$, and it is readily verified that these are inverse assignments.



    In particular, the number of tuples you wish to count is equal to the cardinatlity of $S'$.



    Note that $S'$ is in bijection with the set of partitions of $100$ into 4 nonnegative integers. The cardinality can be expressed in terms of the partition function $p(n,k)=$ number of partitions of n into k positive integers. Indeed, the tuple (A,B,C,D) may have 0,1,2, or 3 terms equal to 0, so we have $|S'|=p(100,4)+p(100,3)+p(100,2)+p(100,1)$. The function $p(n,k)$ satisfies various recurrence relations that can be found on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_(number_theory).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048692%2fcounting-the-number-of-non-negative-integer-pairs-of-a2b3c4d-100%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      Expanding my comment: if we consider the partial fraction decomposition of $f(z)=frac{1}{(1-z)(1-z^2)(1-z^3)(1-z^4)}=sum_{ngeq 0}a_n z^n$ we have that the pole at $z=1$ contributes with



      $$ frac{1}{24(1-z)^4}+frac{1}{8(1-z)^3}+frac{59}{288(1-z)^2}+frac{17}{72(1-z)} $$
      to $f(z)$, hence it contributes with
      $$ frac{2n^3+30n^2+135n+175}{288}$$
      to $a_n$. The pole at $z=-1$ contributes with
      $$ (-1)^n frac{n+5}{32} $$
      and the other poles provide bounded contributions, since they are simple. It follows that for even values of $n$
      $$ a_n approx frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+22)}{144} $$
      and for $n=100$ the ceiling of the RHS is exactly $a_{100}$, i.e. $8037$. The error of this approximation is bounded by twice the sum of the absolute values of the real parts of the residues at the simple poles, i.e. $frac{2}{9}<frac{1}{2}$. In particular




      If $n$ is even $a_n=[x^n]frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}$ is the closest integer to $frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+22)}{144}.$

      If $n$ is odd $a_n=[x^n]frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}$ is the closest integer to $frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+13)}{144}.$







      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$

        Expanding my comment: if we consider the partial fraction decomposition of $f(z)=frac{1}{(1-z)(1-z^2)(1-z^3)(1-z^4)}=sum_{ngeq 0}a_n z^n$ we have that the pole at $z=1$ contributes with



        $$ frac{1}{24(1-z)^4}+frac{1}{8(1-z)^3}+frac{59}{288(1-z)^2}+frac{17}{72(1-z)} $$
        to $f(z)$, hence it contributes with
        $$ frac{2n^3+30n^2+135n+175}{288}$$
        to $a_n$. The pole at $z=-1$ contributes with
        $$ (-1)^n frac{n+5}{32} $$
        and the other poles provide bounded contributions, since they are simple. It follows that for even values of $n$
        $$ a_n approx frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+22)}{144} $$
        and for $n=100$ the ceiling of the RHS is exactly $a_{100}$, i.e. $8037$. The error of this approximation is bounded by twice the sum of the absolute values of the real parts of the residues at the simple poles, i.e. $frac{2}{9}<frac{1}{2}$. In particular




        If $n$ is even $a_n=[x^n]frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}$ is the closest integer to $frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+22)}{144}.$

        If $n$ is odd $a_n=[x^n]frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}$ is the closest integer to $frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+13)}{144}.$







        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Expanding my comment: if we consider the partial fraction decomposition of $f(z)=frac{1}{(1-z)(1-z^2)(1-z^3)(1-z^4)}=sum_{ngeq 0}a_n z^n$ we have that the pole at $z=1$ contributes with



          $$ frac{1}{24(1-z)^4}+frac{1}{8(1-z)^3}+frac{59}{288(1-z)^2}+frac{17}{72(1-z)} $$
          to $f(z)$, hence it contributes with
          $$ frac{2n^3+30n^2+135n+175}{288}$$
          to $a_n$. The pole at $z=-1$ contributes with
          $$ (-1)^n frac{n+5}{32} $$
          and the other poles provide bounded contributions, since they are simple. It follows that for even values of $n$
          $$ a_n approx frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+22)}{144} $$
          and for $n=100$ the ceiling of the RHS is exactly $a_{100}$, i.e. $8037$. The error of this approximation is bounded by twice the sum of the absolute values of the real parts of the residues at the simple poles, i.e. $frac{2}{9}<frac{1}{2}$. In particular




          If $n$ is even $a_n=[x^n]frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}$ is the closest integer to $frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+22)}{144}.$

          If $n$ is odd $a_n=[x^n]frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}$ is the closest integer to $frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+13)}{144}.$







          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Expanding my comment: if we consider the partial fraction decomposition of $f(z)=frac{1}{(1-z)(1-z^2)(1-z^3)(1-z^4)}=sum_{ngeq 0}a_n z^n$ we have that the pole at $z=1$ contributes with



          $$ frac{1}{24(1-z)^4}+frac{1}{8(1-z)^3}+frac{59}{288(1-z)^2}+frac{17}{72(1-z)} $$
          to $f(z)$, hence it contributes with
          $$ frac{2n^3+30n^2+135n+175}{288}$$
          to $a_n$. The pole at $z=-1$ contributes with
          $$ (-1)^n frac{n+5}{32} $$
          and the other poles provide bounded contributions, since they are simple. It follows that for even values of $n$
          $$ a_n approx frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+22)}{144} $$
          and for $n=100$ the ceiling of the RHS is exactly $a_{100}$, i.e. $8037$. The error of this approximation is bounded by twice the sum of the absolute values of the real parts of the residues at the simple poles, i.e. $frac{2}{9}<frac{1}{2}$. In particular




          If $n$ is even $a_n=[x^n]frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}$ is the closest integer to $frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+22)}{144}.$

          If $n$ is odd $a_n=[x^n]frac{1}{(1-x)(1-x^2)(1-x^3)(1-x^4)}$ is the closest integer to $frac{(n+5)(n^2+10n+13)}{144}.$








          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 21 '18 at 18:21

























          answered Dec 21 '18 at 18:13









          Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio

          292k33284673




          292k33284673























              3












              $begingroup$

              I claim that the number of such tuples is equal to the number of partitions of 100 into 4 nonnegative integers.



              Indeed, let $S={(a,b,c,d): a+2b+3c+4d=100}$, and let $S'={(A,B,C,D): A+B+C+D=100, Age Bge Cge D}$.



              I claim that $S$ and $S'$ are in bijection. To see this, we will define two inverse maps between the two sets.



              Given $(a,b,c,d)in S$, we obtain $(A,B,C,D)in S'$ by taking
              $A=a+b+c+d$,$B=b+c+d$, $C=c+d$ and $D=d$. Conversely, given $(A,B,C,D)in S'$, we have $(a,b,c,d)in S$ where $d=D, c=D-C, b=B-C, a=A-B$, and it is readily verified that these are inverse assignments.



              In particular, the number of tuples you wish to count is equal to the cardinatlity of $S'$.



              Note that $S'$ is in bijection with the set of partitions of $100$ into 4 nonnegative integers. The cardinality can be expressed in terms of the partition function $p(n,k)=$ number of partitions of n into k positive integers. Indeed, the tuple (A,B,C,D) may have 0,1,2, or 3 terms equal to 0, so we have $|S'|=p(100,4)+p(100,3)+p(100,2)+p(100,1)$. The function $p(n,k)$ satisfies various recurrence relations that can be found on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_(number_theory).






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                3












                $begingroup$

                I claim that the number of such tuples is equal to the number of partitions of 100 into 4 nonnegative integers.



                Indeed, let $S={(a,b,c,d): a+2b+3c+4d=100}$, and let $S'={(A,B,C,D): A+B+C+D=100, Age Bge Cge D}$.



                I claim that $S$ and $S'$ are in bijection. To see this, we will define two inverse maps between the two sets.



                Given $(a,b,c,d)in S$, we obtain $(A,B,C,D)in S'$ by taking
                $A=a+b+c+d$,$B=b+c+d$, $C=c+d$ and $D=d$. Conversely, given $(A,B,C,D)in S'$, we have $(a,b,c,d)in S$ where $d=D, c=D-C, b=B-C, a=A-B$, and it is readily verified that these are inverse assignments.



                In particular, the number of tuples you wish to count is equal to the cardinatlity of $S'$.



                Note that $S'$ is in bijection with the set of partitions of $100$ into 4 nonnegative integers. The cardinality can be expressed in terms of the partition function $p(n,k)=$ number of partitions of n into k positive integers. Indeed, the tuple (A,B,C,D) may have 0,1,2, or 3 terms equal to 0, so we have $|S'|=p(100,4)+p(100,3)+p(100,2)+p(100,1)$. The function $p(n,k)$ satisfies various recurrence relations that can be found on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_(number_theory).






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  I claim that the number of such tuples is equal to the number of partitions of 100 into 4 nonnegative integers.



                  Indeed, let $S={(a,b,c,d): a+2b+3c+4d=100}$, and let $S'={(A,B,C,D): A+B+C+D=100, Age Bge Cge D}$.



                  I claim that $S$ and $S'$ are in bijection. To see this, we will define two inverse maps between the two sets.



                  Given $(a,b,c,d)in S$, we obtain $(A,B,C,D)in S'$ by taking
                  $A=a+b+c+d$,$B=b+c+d$, $C=c+d$ and $D=d$. Conversely, given $(A,B,C,D)in S'$, we have $(a,b,c,d)in S$ where $d=D, c=D-C, b=B-C, a=A-B$, and it is readily verified that these are inverse assignments.



                  In particular, the number of tuples you wish to count is equal to the cardinatlity of $S'$.



                  Note that $S'$ is in bijection with the set of partitions of $100$ into 4 nonnegative integers. The cardinality can be expressed in terms of the partition function $p(n,k)=$ number of partitions of n into k positive integers. Indeed, the tuple (A,B,C,D) may have 0,1,2, or 3 terms equal to 0, so we have $|S'|=p(100,4)+p(100,3)+p(100,2)+p(100,1)$. The function $p(n,k)$ satisfies various recurrence relations that can be found on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_(number_theory).






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I claim that the number of such tuples is equal to the number of partitions of 100 into 4 nonnegative integers.



                  Indeed, let $S={(a,b,c,d): a+2b+3c+4d=100}$, and let $S'={(A,B,C,D): A+B+C+D=100, Age Bge Cge D}$.



                  I claim that $S$ and $S'$ are in bijection. To see this, we will define two inverse maps between the two sets.



                  Given $(a,b,c,d)in S$, we obtain $(A,B,C,D)in S'$ by taking
                  $A=a+b+c+d$,$B=b+c+d$, $C=c+d$ and $D=d$. Conversely, given $(A,B,C,D)in S'$, we have $(a,b,c,d)in S$ where $d=D, c=D-C, b=B-C, a=A-B$, and it is readily verified that these are inverse assignments.



                  In particular, the number of tuples you wish to count is equal to the cardinatlity of $S'$.



                  Note that $S'$ is in bijection with the set of partitions of $100$ into 4 nonnegative integers. The cardinality can be expressed in terms of the partition function $p(n,k)=$ number of partitions of n into k positive integers. Indeed, the tuple (A,B,C,D) may have 0,1,2, or 3 terms equal to 0, so we have $|S'|=p(100,4)+p(100,3)+p(100,2)+p(100,1)$. The function $p(n,k)$ satisfies various recurrence relations that can be found on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_(number_theory).







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 21 '18 at 17:47









                  Mike HawkMike Hawk

                  1,593110




                  1,593110






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048692%2fcounting-the-number-of-non-negative-integer-pairs-of-a2b3c4d-100%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Brian Clough

                      Cáceres