Find real part of messy complex fraction?












-3












$begingroup$


I have this messy complex fraction, where the LHS is real. But how can I find the real part of the RHS?



$$
frac{R277-X115+i(R115+X277)}{R+277+i(115+X)}=300,
$$



where $R, Xin mathbb R$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Well, $Re(300)=300$
    $endgroup$
    – gammatester
    Nov 13 '18 at 10:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does $R277$ mean the same thing as $277R?$ In any event, can't you multiply numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator?
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Nov 13 '18 at 10:43
















-3












$begingroup$


I have this messy complex fraction, where the LHS is real. But how can I find the real part of the RHS?



$$
frac{R277-X115+i(R115+X277)}{R+277+i(115+X)}=300,
$$



where $R, Xin mathbb R$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Well, $Re(300)=300$
    $endgroup$
    – gammatester
    Nov 13 '18 at 10:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does $R277$ mean the same thing as $277R?$ In any event, can't you multiply numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator?
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Nov 13 '18 at 10:43














-3












-3








-3





$begingroup$


I have this messy complex fraction, where the LHS is real. But how can I find the real part of the RHS?



$$
frac{R277-X115+i(R115+X277)}{R+277+i(115+X)}=300,
$$



where $R, Xin mathbb R$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have this messy complex fraction, where the LHS is real. But how can I find the real part of the RHS?



$$
frac{R277-X115+i(R115+X277)}{R+277+i(115+X)}=300,
$$



where $R, Xin mathbb R$.







complex-numbers






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 13 '18 at 10:36









JDoeDoeJDoeDoe

7851616




7851616












  • $begingroup$
    Well, $Re(300)=300$
    $endgroup$
    – gammatester
    Nov 13 '18 at 10:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does $R277$ mean the same thing as $277R?$ In any event, can't you multiply numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator?
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Nov 13 '18 at 10:43


















  • $begingroup$
    Well, $Re(300)=300$
    $endgroup$
    – gammatester
    Nov 13 '18 at 10:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Does $R277$ mean the same thing as $277R?$ In any event, can't you multiply numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator?
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Nov 13 '18 at 10:43
















$begingroup$
Well, $Re(300)=300$
$endgroup$
– gammatester
Nov 13 '18 at 10:39




$begingroup$
Well, $Re(300)=300$
$endgroup$
– gammatester
Nov 13 '18 at 10:39




1




1




$begingroup$
Does $R277$ mean the same thing as $277R?$ In any event, can't you multiply numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 13 '18 at 10:43




$begingroup$
Does $R277$ mean the same thing as $277R?$ In any event, can't you multiply numerator and denominator by the complex conjugate of the denominator?
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
Nov 13 '18 at 10:43










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

I believe that R=resistance and X=impedance.



So:



$R277−X115+i(R115+X277) = 300 (R+277+i(115+X))$



begin{cases}
R277−X115 = 300 (R+277) \
R115+X277 = 300 (115+X) \
end{cases}



begin{cases}
R277−X115 = 300R+300*277 \
R115+X277 = 300*115+300X \
end{cases}



begin{cases}
R277-300R-X115 = 300*277 \
R115+X277-300X = 300*115 \
end{cases}



begin{cases}
-23R-115X = 300*277 = 83100 \
115R+577X = 300*115 = 34500 \
end{cases}



begin{cases}
R=-1128613 \
X= 225000 \
end{cases}



But R is negative! Can anybody verify ?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    I'm assuming that you flipped right and left (since the real part of $300$ is clearly $300$). In general, to put a complex fraction in standard $x+yi$ form, you can multiply both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator (as saulspatz said in their comment) In symbols:



    $$ frac{a+bi}{c+di} ~~=~~ frac{a+bi}{c+di} cdot frac{c-di}{c-di} ~~=~~ frac{ac+bd + (bc-ad)i}{c^2+d^2}.$$



    Therefore, the real part of this fraction is



    $$ frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}. $$



    In your case:




    • $a=R277-X115$

    • $b=R115+X277$

    • $c=R+277$

    • $d=X+115$


    Plugging these into the formula above, we get



    $$frac{[R^2277-RX115+R277^2-X(277cdot115)]+[RX115+X^2277+R115^2+X(277cdot115)]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$



    Cancelling terms in the numerator gives



    $$=frac{[R^2277+R277^2]+[X^2277+R115^2]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$



    This is still a mess, but it doesn't seem like you can do much better except to write out some of the numbers e.g. $115^2=13225$, and so on.





    In the other answer, cgiovanardi assumed that your ultimate goal was to solve this equation, in which case their idea is a lot better. Rather than getting an explicit form for the real and imaginary part of the LHS as a fraction, you can multiply the denominator through to both sides first.



    The resulting system is best solved by machine: here's the computation in WolframAlpha.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996581%2ffind-real-part-of-messy-complex-fraction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0












      $begingroup$

      I believe that R=resistance and X=impedance.



      So:



      $R277−X115+i(R115+X277) = 300 (R+277+i(115+X))$



      begin{cases}
      R277−X115 = 300 (R+277) \
      R115+X277 = 300 (115+X) \
      end{cases}



      begin{cases}
      R277−X115 = 300R+300*277 \
      R115+X277 = 300*115+300X \
      end{cases}



      begin{cases}
      R277-300R-X115 = 300*277 \
      R115+X277-300X = 300*115 \
      end{cases}



      begin{cases}
      -23R-115X = 300*277 = 83100 \
      115R+577X = 300*115 = 34500 \
      end{cases}



      begin{cases}
      R=-1128613 \
      X= 225000 \
      end{cases}



      But R is negative! Can anybody verify ?






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        0












        $begingroup$

        I believe that R=resistance and X=impedance.



        So:



        $R277−X115+i(R115+X277) = 300 (R+277+i(115+X))$



        begin{cases}
        R277−X115 = 300 (R+277) \
        R115+X277 = 300 (115+X) \
        end{cases}



        begin{cases}
        R277−X115 = 300R+300*277 \
        R115+X277 = 300*115+300X \
        end{cases}



        begin{cases}
        R277-300R-X115 = 300*277 \
        R115+X277-300X = 300*115 \
        end{cases}



        begin{cases}
        -23R-115X = 300*277 = 83100 \
        115R+577X = 300*115 = 34500 \
        end{cases}



        begin{cases}
        R=-1128613 \
        X= 225000 \
        end{cases}



        But R is negative! Can anybody verify ?






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          I believe that R=resistance and X=impedance.



          So:



          $R277−X115+i(R115+X277) = 300 (R+277+i(115+X))$



          begin{cases}
          R277−X115 = 300 (R+277) \
          R115+X277 = 300 (115+X) \
          end{cases}



          begin{cases}
          R277−X115 = 300R+300*277 \
          R115+X277 = 300*115+300X \
          end{cases}



          begin{cases}
          R277-300R-X115 = 300*277 \
          R115+X277-300X = 300*115 \
          end{cases}



          begin{cases}
          -23R-115X = 300*277 = 83100 \
          115R+577X = 300*115 = 34500 \
          end{cases}



          begin{cases}
          R=-1128613 \
          X= 225000 \
          end{cases}



          But R is negative! Can anybody verify ?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I believe that R=resistance and X=impedance.



          So:



          $R277−X115+i(R115+X277) = 300 (R+277+i(115+X))$



          begin{cases}
          R277−X115 = 300 (R+277) \
          R115+X277 = 300 (115+X) \
          end{cases}



          begin{cases}
          R277−X115 = 300R+300*277 \
          R115+X277 = 300*115+300X \
          end{cases}



          begin{cases}
          R277-300R-X115 = 300*277 \
          R115+X277-300X = 300*115 \
          end{cases}



          begin{cases}
          -23R-115X = 300*277 = 83100 \
          115R+577X = 300*115 = 34500 \
          end{cases}



          begin{cases}
          R=-1128613 \
          X= 225000 \
          end{cases}



          But R is negative! Can anybody verify ?







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 22 '18 at 21:06









          cgiovanardicgiovanardi

          764411




          764411























              0












              $begingroup$

              I'm assuming that you flipped right and left (since the real part of $300$ is clearly $300$). In general, to put a complex fraction in standard $x+yi$ form, you can multiply both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator (as saulspatz said in their comment) In symbols:



              $$ frac{a+bi}{c+di} ~~=~~ frac{a+bi}{c+di} cdot frac{c-di}{c-di} ~~=~~ frac{ac+bd + (bc-ad)i}{c^2+d^2}.$$



              Therefore, the real part of this fraction is



              $$ frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}. $$



              In your case:




              • $a=R277-X115$

              • $b=R115+X277$

              • $c=R+277$

              • $d=X+115$


              Plugging these into the formula above, we get



              $$frac{[R^2277-RX115+R277^2-X(277cdot115)]+[RX115+X^2277+R115^2+X(277cdot115)]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$



              Cancelling terms in the numerator gives



              $$=frac{[R^2277+R277^2]+[X^2277+R115^2]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$



              This is still a mess, but it doesn't seem like you can do much better except to write out some of the numbers e.g. $115^2=13225$, and so on.





              In the other answer, cgiovanardi assumed that your ultimate goal was to solve this equation, in which case their idea is a lot better. Rather than getting an explicit form for the real and imaginary part of the LHS as a fraction, you can multiply the denominator through to both sides first.



              The resulting system is best solved by machine: here's the computation in WolframAlpha.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                I'm assuming that you flipped right and left (since the real part of $300$ is clearly $300$). In general, to put a complex fraction in standard $x+yi$ form, you can multiply both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator (as saulspatz said in their comment) In symbols:



                $$ frac{a+bi}{c+di} ~~=~~ frac{a+bi}{c+di} cdot frac{c-di}{c-di} ~~=~~ frac{ac+bd + (bc-ad)i}{c^2+d^2}.$$



                Therefore, the real part of this fraction is



                $$ frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}. $$



                In your case:




                • $a=R277-X115$

                • $b=R115+X277$

                • $c=R+277$

                • $d=X+115$


                Plugging these into the formula above, we get



                $$frac{[R^2277-RX115+R277^2-X(277cdot115)]+[RX115+X^2277+R115^2+X(277cdot115)]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$



                Cancelling terms in the numerator gives



                $$=frac{[R^2277+R277^2]+[X^2277+R115^2]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$



                This is still a mess, but it doesn't seem like you can do much better except to write out some of the numbers e.g. $115^2=13225$, and so on.





                In the other answer, cgiovanardi assumed that your ultimate goal was to solve this equation, in which case their idea is a lot better. Rather than getting an explicit form for the real and imaginary part of the LHS as a fraction, you can multiply the denominator through to both sides first.



                The resulting system is best solved by machine: here's the computation in WolframAlpha.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  I'm assuming that you flipped right and left (since the real part of $300$ is clearly $300$). In general, to put a complex fraction in standard $x+yi$ form, you can multiply both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator (as saulspatz said in their comment) In symbols:



                  $$ frac{a+bi}{c+di} ~~=~~ frac{a+bi}{c+di} cdot frac{c-di}{c-di} ~~=~~ frac{ac+bd + (bc-ad)i}{c^2+d^2}.$$



                  Therefore, the real part of this fraction is



                  $$ frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}. $$



                  In your case:




                  • $a=R277-X115$

                  • $b=R115+X277$

                  • $c=R+277$

                  • $d=X+115$


                  Plugging these into the formula above, we get



                  $$frac{[R^2277-RX115+R277^2-X(277cdot115)]+[RX115+X^2277+R115^2+X(277cdot115)]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$



                  Cancelling terms in the numerator gives



                  $$=frac{[R^2277+R277^2]+[X^2277+R115^2]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$



                  This is still a mess, but it doesn't seem like you can do much better except to write out some of the numbers e.g. $115^2=13225$, and so on.





                  In the other answer, cgiovanardi assumed that your ultimate goal was to solve this equation, in which case their idea is a lot better. Rather than getting an explicit form for the real and imaginary part of the LHS as a fraction, you can multiply the denominator through to both sides first.



                  The resulting system is best solved by machine: here's the computation in WolframAlpha.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I'm assuming that you flipped right and left (since the real part of $300$ is clearly $300$). In general, to put a complex fraction in standard $x+yi$ form, you can multiply both the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator (as saulspatz said in their comment) In symbols:



                  $$ frac{a+bi}{c+di} ~~=~~ frac{a+bi}{c+di} cdot frac{c-di}{c-di} ~~=~~ frac{ac+bd + (bc-ad)i}{c^2+d^2}.$$



                  Therefore, the real part of this fraction is



                  $$ frac{ac+bd}{c^2+d^2}. $$



                  In your case:




                  • $a=R277-X115$

                  • $b=R115+X277$

                  • $c=R+277$

                  • $d=X+115$


                  Plugging these into the formula above, we get



                  $$frac{[R^2277-RX115+R277^2-X(277cdot115)]+[RX115+X^2277+R115^2+X(277cdot115)]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$



                  Cancelling terms in the numerator gives



                  $$=frac{[R^2277+R277^2]+[X^2277+R115^2]}{R^2+2R277+277^2+X^2+2X115+115^2}$$



                  This is still a mess, but it doesn't seem like you can do much better except to write out some of the numbers e.g. $115^2=13225$, and so on.





                  In the other answer, cgiovanardi assumed that your ultimate goal was to solve this equation, in which case their idea is a lot better. Rather than getting an explicit form for the real and imaginary part of the LHS as a fraction, you can multiply the denominator through to both sides first.



                  The resulting system is best solved by machine: here's the computation in WolframAlpha.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 23 '18 at 4:57









                  aleph_twoaleph_two

                  27412




                  27412






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2996581%2ffind-real-part-of-messy-complex-fraction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                      How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...