Finding degree of a finite field extension












5












$begingroup$


Let $x=sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}+ldots+sqrt{n}, ngeq 2$. I want to show that $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{phi(n)}$, where $phi$ is Euler's totient function.



I know that if $p_1,ldots,p_n$ are pairwise relatively prime then $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{p_1}+ldots+sqrt{p_n}):mathbb{Q}]=2^n$. But how to proceed in the above case? I could not apply induction also. Any help is appreciated.




The assertion is false. Actually $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{pi(n)}$, where $pi(n)$ is the number of prime numbers less than or equal to $n$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is this a conjecture or a thm?
    $endgroup$
    – Wuestenfux
    Apr 13 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    This is a theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Anupam
    Apr 13 at 15:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why not $2^{pi(n)}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Apr 13 at 15:40
















5












$begingroup$


Let $x=sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}+ldots+sqrt{n}, ngeq 2$. I want to show that $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{phi(n)}$, where $phi$ is Euler's totient function.



I know that if $p_1,ldots,p_n$ are pairwise relatively prime then $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{p_1}+ldots+sqrt{p_n}):mathbb{Q}]=2^n$. But how to proceed in the above case? I could not apply induction also. Any help is appreciated.




The assertion is false. Actually $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{pi(n)}$, where $pi(n)$ is the number of prime numbers less than or equal to $n$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is this a conjecture or a thm?
    $endgroup$
    – Wuestenfux
    Apr 13 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    This is a theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Anupam
    Apr 13 at 15:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why not $2^{pi(n)}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Apr 13 at 15:40














5












5








5


3



$begingroup$


Let $x=sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}+ldots+sqrt{n}, ngeq 2$. I want to show that $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{phi(n)}$, where $phi$ is Euler's totient function.



I know that if $p_1,ldots,p_n$ are pairwise relatively prime then $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{p_1}+ldots+sqrt{p_n}):mathbb{Q}]=2^n$. But how to proceed in the above case? I could not apply induction also. Any help is appreciated.




The assertion is false. Actually $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{pi(n)}$, where $pi(n)$ is the number of prime numbers less than or equal to $n$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $x=sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}+ldots+sqrt{n}, ngeq 2$. I want to show that $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{phi(n)}$, where $phi$ is Euler's totient function.



I know that if $p_1,ldots,p_n$ are pairwise relatively prime then $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{p_1}+ldots+sqrt{p_n}):mathbb{Q}]=2^n$. But how to proceed in the above case? I could not apply induction also. Any help is appreciated.




The assertion is false. Actually $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{pi(n)}$, where $pi(n)$ is the number of prime numbers less than or equal to $n$.








abstract-algebra galois-theory extension-field






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 13 at 16:41







Anupam

















asked Apr 13 at 15:05









AnupamAnupam

2,5791925




2,5791925












  • $begingroup$
    Is this a conjecture or a thm?
    $endgroup$
    – Wuestenfux
    Apr 13 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    This is a theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Anupam
    Apr 13 at 15:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why not $2^{pi(n)}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Apr 13 at 15:40


















  • $begingroup$
    Is this a conjecture or a thm?
    $endgroup$
    – Wuestenfux
    Apr 13 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    This is a theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Anupam
    Apr 13 at 15:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why not $2^{pi(n)}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Apr 13 at 15:40
















$begingroup$
Is this a conjecture or a thm?
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Apr 13 at 15:18




$begingroup$
Is this a conjecture or a thm?
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Apr 13 at 15:18












$begingroup$
This is a theorem.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 15:23




$begingroup$
This is a theorem.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 15:23




1




1




$begingroup$
Why not $2^{pi(n)}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Apr 13 at 15:40




$begingroup$
Why not $2^{pi(n)}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Apr 13 at 15:40










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .



Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$



Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ {pi (n)} -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ and hence we get $$ 2^ {pi (n)} -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
$$ implies pi (n) leq m $$



And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ {pi(n)} $$



Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ {pi (n)} $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ { sqrt {p_i }, sqrt {p_ip_j},... } $ and hence $N= L$



So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j ) |_ {mathbb Q} right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ {pi (n)} $$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Anupam
    Apr 13 at 16:45










  • $begingroup$
    @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
    $endgroup$
    – nguyen quang do
    Apr 14 at 7:28












  • $begingroup$
    OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
    $endgroup$
    – Ignorant Mathematician
    Apr 14 at 7:37





















1












$begingroup$

This is false...take n=5 for instance






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/{mathbf Q^*}^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$ being just a product ${bar 2}^{epsilon_2}...{bar n}^{epsilon_n}$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3186343%2ffinding-degree-of-a-finite-field-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .



      Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$



      Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ {pi (n)} -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ and hence we get $$ 2^ {pi (n)} -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
      $$ implies pi (n) leq m $$



      And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ {pi(n)} $$



      Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ {pi (n)} $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ { sqrt {p_i }, sqrt {p_ip_j},... } $ and hence $N= L$



      So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j ) |_ {mathbb Q} right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ {pi (n)} $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
        $endgroup$
        – Anupam
        Apr 13 at 16:45










      • $begingroup$
        @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
        $endgroup$
        – nguyen quang do
        Apr 14 at 7:28












      • $begingroup$
        OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
        $endgroup$
        – Ignorant Mathematician
        Apr 14 at 7:37


















      4












      $begingroup$

      Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .



      Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$



      Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ {pi (n)} -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ and hence we get $$ 2^ {pi (n)} -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
      $$ implies pi (n) leq m $$



      And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ {pi(n)} $$



      Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ {pi (n)} $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ { sqrt {p_i }, sqrt {p_ip_j},... } $ and hence $N= L$



      So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j ) |_ {mathbb Q} right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ {pi (n)} $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
        $endgroup$
        – Anupam
        Apr 13 at 16:45










      • $begingroup$
        @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
        $endgroup$
        – nguyen quang do
        Apr 14 at 7:28












      • $begingroup$
        OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
        $endgroup$
        – Ignorant Mathematician
        Apr 14 at 7:37
















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$

      Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .



      Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$



      Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ {pi (n)} -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ and hence we get $$ 2^ {pi (n)} -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
      $$ implies pi (n) leq m $$



      And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ {pi(n)} $$



      Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ {pi (n)} $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ { sqrt {p_i }, sqrt {p_ip_j},... } $ and hence $N= L$



      So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j ) |_ {mathbb Q} right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ {pi (n)} $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .



      Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$



      Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ {pi (n)} -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ and hence we get $$ 2^ {pi (n)} -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
      $$ implies pi (n) leq m $$



      And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ {pi(n)} $$



      Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ {pi (n)} $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ { sqrt {p_i }, sqrt {p_ip_j},... } $ and hence $N= L$



      So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j ) |_ {mathbb Q} right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ {pi (n)} $$







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited Apr 13 at 19:04

























      answered Apr 13 at 15:36









      Ignorant MathematicianIgnorant Mathematician

      1,850114




      1,850114












      • $begingroup$
        Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
        $endgroup$
        – Anupam
        Apr 13 at 16:45










      • $begingroup$
        @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
        $endgroup$
        – nguyen quang do
        Apr 14 at 7:28












      • $begingroup$
        OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
        $endgroup$
        – Ignorant Mathematician
        Apr 14 at 7:37




















      • $begingroup$
        Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
        $endgroup$
        – Anupam
        Apr 13 at 16:45










      • $begingroup$
        @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
        $endgroup$
        – nguyen quang do
        Apr 14 at 7:28












      • $begingroup$
        OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
        $endgroup$
        – Ignorant Mathematician
        Apr 14 at 7:37


















      $begingroup$
      Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Anupam
      Apr 13 at 16:45




      $begingroup$
      Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Anupam
      Apr 13 at 16:45












      $begingroup$
      @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
      $endgroup$
      – nguyen quang do
      Apr 14 at 7:28






      $begingroup$
      @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
      $endgroup$
      – nguyen quang do
      Apr 14 at 7:28














      $begingroup$
      OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
      $endgroup$
      – Ignorant Mathematician
      Apr 14 at 7:37






      $begingroup$
      OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
      $endgroup$
      – Ignorant Mathematician
      Apr 14 at 7:37













      1












      $begingroup$

      This is false...take n=5 for instance






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        This is false...take n=5 for instance






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          This is false...take n=5 for instance






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This is false...take n=5 for instance







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Apr 13 at 15:49









          Sagnik DuttaSagnik Dutta

          542




          542























              1












              $begingroup$

              I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/{mathbf Q^*}^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$ being just a product ${bar 2}^{epsilon_2}...{bar n}^{epsilon_n}$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/{mathbf Q^*}^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$ being just a product ${bar 2}^{epsilon_2}...{bar n}^{epsilon_n}$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/{mathbf Q^*}^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$ being just a product ${bar 2}^{epsilon_2}...{bar n}^{epsilon_n}$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/{mathbf Q^*}^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$ being just a product ${bar 2}^{epsilon_2}...{bar n}^{epsilon_n}$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 14 at 7:33









                  nguyen quang donguyen quang do

                  9,2241724




                  9,2241724






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3186343%2ffinding-degree-of-a-finite-field-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                      How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...