Finding degree of a finite field extension
$begingroup$
Let $x=sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}+ldots+sqrt{n}, ngeq 2$. I want to show that $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{phi(n)}$, where $phi$ is Euler's totient function.
I know that if $p_1,ldots,p_n$ are pairwise relatively prime then $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{p_1}+ldots+sqrt{p_n}):mathbb{Q}]=2^n$. But how to proceed in the above case? I could not apply induction also. Any help is appreciated.
The assertion is false. Actually $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{pi(n)}$, where $pi(n)$ is the number of prime numbers less than or equal to $n$.
abstract-algebra galois-theory extension-field
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $x=sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}+ldots+sqrt{n}, ngeq 2$. I want to show that $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{phi(n)}$, where $phi$ is Euler's totient function.
I know that if $p_1,ldots,p_n$ are pairwise relatively prime then $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{p_1}+ldots+sqrt{p_n}):mathbb{Q}]=2^n$. But how to proceed in the above case? I could not apply induction also. Any help is appreciated.
The assertion is false. Actually $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{pi(n)}$, where $pi(n)$ is the number of prime numbers less than or equal to $n$.
abstract-algebra galois-theory extension-field
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is this a conjecture or a thm?
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Apr 13 at 15:18
$begingroup$
This is a theorem.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 15:23
1
$begingroup$
Why not $2^{pi(n)}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Apr 13 at 15:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $x=sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}+ldots+sqrt{n}, ngeq 2$. I want to show that $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{phi(n)}$, where $phi$ is Euler's totient function.
I know that if $p_1,ldots,p_n$ are pairwise relatively prime then $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{p_1}+ldots+sqrt{p_n}):mathbb{Q}]=2^n$. But how to proceed in the above case? I could not apply induction also. Any help is appreciated.
The assertion is false. Actually $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{pi(n)}$, where $pi(n)$ is the number of prime numbers less than or equal to $n$.
abstract-algebra galois-theory extension-field
$endgroup$
Let $x=sqrt{2}+sqrt{3}+ldots+sqrt{n}, ngeq 2$. I want to show that $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{phi(n)}$, where $phi$ is Euler's totient function.
I know that if $p_1,ldots,p_n$ are pairwise relatively prime then $[mathbb{Q}(sqrt{p_1}+ldots+sqrt{p_n}):mathbb{Q}]=2^n$. But how to proceed in the above case? I could not apply induction also. Any help is appreciated.
The assertion is false. Actually $[mathbb{Q}(x):mathbb{Q}]=2^{pi(n)}$, where $pi(n)$ is the number of prime numbers less than or equal to $n$.
abstract-algebra galois-theory extension-field
abstract-algebra galois-theory extension-field
edited Apr 13 at 16:41
Anupam
asked Apr 13 at 15:05
AnupamAnupam
2,5791925
2,5791925
$begingroup$
Is this a conjecture or a thm?
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Apr 13 at 15:18
$begingroup$
This is a theorem.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 15:23
1
$begingroup$
Why not $2^{pi(n)}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Apr 13 at 15:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is this a conjecture or a thm?
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Apr 13 at 15:18
$begingroup$
This is a theorem.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 15:23
1
$begingroup$
Why not $2^{pi(n)}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Apr 13 at 15:40
$begingroup$
Is this a conjecture or a thm?
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Apr 13 at 15:18
$begingroup$
Is this a conjecture or a thm?
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Apr 13 at 15:18
$begingroup$
This is a theorem.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 15:23
$begingroup$
This is a theorem.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 15:23
1
1
$begingroup$
Why not $2^{pi(n)}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Apr 13 at 15:40
$begingroup$
Why not $2^{pi(n)}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Apr 13 at 15:40
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .
Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$
Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ {pi (n)} -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ and hence we get $$ 2^ {pi (n)} -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
$$ implies pi (n) leq m $$
And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ {pi(n)} $$
Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ {pi (n)} $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ { sqrt {p_i }, sqrt {p_ip_j},... } $ and hence $N= L$
So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j ) |_ {mathbb Q} right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ {pi (n)} $$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 16:45
$begingroup$
@Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
$endgroup$
– nguyen quang do
Apr 14 at 7:28
$begingroup$
OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
$endgroup$
– Ignorant Mathematician
Apr 14 at 7:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is false...take n=5 for instance
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/{mathbf Q^*}^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$ being just a product ${bar 2}^{epsilon_2}...{bar n}^{epsilon_n}$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3186343%2ffinding-degree-of-a-finite-field-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .
Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$
Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ {pi (n)} -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ and hence we get $$ 2^ {pi (n)} -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
$$ implies pi (n) leq m $$
And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ {pi(n)} $$
Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ {pi (n)} $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ { sqrt {p_i }, sqrt {p_ip_j},... } $ and hence $N= L$
So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j ) |_ {mathbb Q} right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ {pi (n)} $$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 16:45
$begingroup$
@Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
$endgroup$
– nguyen quang do
Apr 14 at 7:28
$begingroup$
OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
$endgroup$
– Ignorant Mathematician
Apr 14 at 7:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .
Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$
Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ {pi (n)} -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ and hence we get $$ 2^ {pi (n)} -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
$$ implies pi (n) leq m $$
And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ {pi(n)} $$
Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ {pi (n)} $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ { sqrt {p_i }, sqrt {p_ip_j},... } $ and hence $N= L$
So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j ) |_ {mathbb Q} right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ {pi (n)} $$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 16:45
$begingroup$
@Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
$endgroup$
– nguyen quang do
Apr 14 at 7:28
$begingroup$
OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
$endgroup$
– Ignorant Mathematician
Apr 14 at 7:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .
Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$
Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ {pi (n)} -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ and hence we get $$ 2^ {pi (n)} -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
$$ implies pi (n) leq m $$
And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ {pi(n)} $$
Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ {pi (n)} $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ { sqrt {p_i }, sqrt {p_ip_j},... } $ and hence $N= L$
So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j ) |_ {mathbb Q} right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ {pi (n)} $$
$endgroup$
Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .
Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$
Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ {pi (n)} -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ { sqrt p : p prime p leq n } $ and hence we get $$ 2^ {pi (n)} -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
$$ implies pi (n) leq m $$
And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ {pi(n)} $$
Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ {pi (n)} $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ { sqrt {p_i }, sqrt {p_ip_j},... } $ and hence $N= L$
So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _{j=1} ^n sqrt j ) |_ {mathbb Q} right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ {pi (n)} $$
edited Apr 13 at 19:04
answered Apr 13 at 15:36
Ignorant MathematicianIgnorant Mathematician
1,850114
1,850114
$begingroup$
Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 16:45
$begingroup$
@Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
$endgroup$
– nguyen quang do
Apr 14 at 7:28
$begingroup$
OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
$endgroup$
– Ignorant Mathematician
Apr 14 at 7:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 16:45
$begingroup$
@Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
$endgroup$
– nguyen quang do
Apr 14 at 7:28
$begingroup$
OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
$endgroup$
– Ignorant Mathematician
Apr 14 at 7:37
$begingroup$
Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 16:45
$begingroup$
Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 16:45
$begingroup$
@Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
$endgroup$
– nguyen quang do
Apr 14 at 7:28
$begingroup$
@Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of {$sqrt {p_i},sqrt {p_ip_j},...$}", which I think is the cumbersome point.
$endgroup$
– nguyen quang do
Apr 14 at 7:28
$begingroup$
OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
$endgroup$
– Ignorant Mathematician
Apr 14 at 7:37
$begingroup$
OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt { p_i } : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
$endgroup$
– Ignorant Mathematician
Apr 14 at 7:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is false...take n=5 for instance
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is false...take n=5 for instance
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is false...take n=5 for instance
$endgroup$
This is false...take n=5 for instance
answered Apr 13 at 15:49
Sagnik DuttaSagnik Dutta
542
542
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/{mathbf Q^*}^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$ being just a product ${bar 2}^{epsilon_2}...{bar n}^{epsilon_n}$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/{mathbf Q^*}^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$ being just a product ${bar 2}^{epsilon_2}...{bar n}^{epsilon_n}$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/{mathbf Q^*}^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$ being just a product ${bar 2}^{epsilon_2}...{bar n}^{epsilon_n}$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.
$endgroup$
I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/{mathbf Q^*}^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod ${mathbf Q^*}^2$ being just a product ${bar 2}^{epsilon_2}...{bar n}^{epsilon_n}$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.
answered Apr 14 at 7:33
nguyen quang donguyen quang do
9,2241724
9,2241724
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3186343%2ffinding-degree-of-a-finite-field-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Is this a conjecture or a thm?
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Apr 13 at 15:18
$begingroup$
This is a theorem.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 15:23
1
$begingroup$
Why not $2^{pi(n)}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Apr 13 at 15:40