Windows Firewall Block Inbound External IP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}
I am trying to block 1 ip address from connecting to my computer. However I am confused by this screen: 
If the rule is set to block ip, but I cannot get a way to allow local ips. Is there a way to chose under "which local Ip addresses does this rule apply to" and chose none?
windows-7 windows firewall ip
asked Mar 15 '13 at 0:46
agzagz
3,471155599
add a comment |
I am trying to block 1 ip address from connecting to my computer. However I am confused by this screen:
If the rule is set to block ip, but I cannot get a way to allow local ips. Is there a way to chose under "which local Ip addresses does this rule apply to" and chose none?
windows-7 windows firewall ip
asked Mar 15 '13 at 0:46
agzagz
3,471155599
Anything that is not explicitly blocked is permitted with a block rule. Blocking a single IP means only that IP will be blocked. Am I misunderstanding your question?
– Paul
Mar 15 '13 at 1:30
Im just confused by the phrase "Any IP Address". If the rule is for blocking, does the "Any IP address" under the local ip section mean ALL ips or no ips?
– agz
Mar 15 '13 at 18:16
add a comment |
I am trying to block 1 ip address from connecting to my computer. However I am confused by this screen:
If the rule is set to block ip, but I cannot get a way to allow local ips. Is there a way to chose under "which local Ip addresses does this rule apply to" and chose none?
windows-7 windows firewall ip
asked Mar 15 '13 at 0:46
agzagz
3,471155599
I am trying to block 1 ip address from connecting to my computer. However I am confused by this screen:
If the rule is set to block ip, but I cannot get a way to allow local ips. Is there a way to chose under "which local Ip addresses does this rule apply to" and chose none?
windows-7 windows firewall ip
windows-7 windows firewall ip
asked Mar 15 '13 at 0:46
agzagz
3,471155599
asked Mar 15 '13 at 0:46
agzagz
3,471155599
asked Mar 15 '13 at 0:46
agzagz
3,471155599
asked Mar 15 '13 at 0:46
agzagz
3,471155599
asked Mar 15 '13 at 0:46
agzagz
3,471155599
3,471155599
Anything that is not explicitly blocked is permitted with a block rule. Blocking a single IP means only that IP will be blocked. Am I misunderstanding your question?
– Paul
Mar 15 '13 at 1:30
Im just confused by the phrase "Any IP Address". If the rule is for blocking, does the "Any IP address" under the local ip section mean ALL ips or no ips?
– agz
Mar 15 '13 at 18:16
add a comment |
Anything that is not explicitly blocked is permitted with a block rule. Blocking a single IP means only that IP will be blocked. Am I misunderstanding your question?
– Paul
Mar 15 '13 at 1:30
Im just confused by the phrase "Any IP Address". If the rule is for blocking, does the "Any IP address" under the local ip section mean ALL ips or no ips?
– agz
Mar 15 '13 at 18:16
Anything that is not explicitly blocked is permitted with a block rule. Blocking a single IP means only that IP will be blocked. Am I misunderstanding your question?
– Paul
Mar 15 '13 at 1:30
Anything that is not explicitly blocked is permitted with a block rule. Blocking a single IP means only that IP will be blocked. Am I misunderstanding your question?
– Paul
Mar 15 '13 at 1:30
Im just confused by the phrase "Any IP Address". If the rule is for blocking, does the "Any IP address" under the local ip section mean ALL ips or no ips?
– agz
Mar 15 '13 at 18:16
Im just confused by the phrase "Any IP Address". If the rule is for blocking, does the "Any IP address" under the local ip section mean ALL ips or no ips?
– agz
Mar 15 '13 at 18:16
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
When thinking about firewall rules, you always consider the rule as a whole, not its parts.
So in the above, we are saying
All Local IP addresses
AND
Remote Address 1.1.1.1
So to translate into English, "If the remote address is 1.1.1.1 and the local address is any IP, then block, otherwise permit."
So the consequence is that if the remote address is not 1.1.1.1 then this rule will not be matched, and so not block. Any address that is not 1.1.1.1 will be implicitly permitted.
answered Mar 15 '13 at 21:43
PaulPaul
48.7k14122150
So how would I be able to allow any local ip and block only 1.1.1.1?
– agz
Mar 25 '13 at 2:21
@agovizer That seems to be the same as my sentence above, have I misunderstood?
– Paul
Mar 25 '13 at 2:31
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f566189%2fwindows-firewall-block-inbound-external-ip%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
When thinking about firewall rules, you always consider the rule as a whole, not its parts.
So in the above, we are saying
All Local IP addresses
AND
Remote Address 1.1.1.1
So to translate into English, "If the remote address is 1.1.1.1 and the local address is any IP, then block, otherwise permit."
So the consequence is that if the remote address is not 1.1.1.1 then this rule will not be matched, and so not block. Any address that is not 1.1.1.1 will be implicitly permitted.
answered Mar 15 '13 at 21:43
PaulPaul
48.7k14122150
So how would I be able to allow any local ip and block only 1.1.1.1?
– agz
Mar 25 '13 at 2:21
@agovizer That seems to be the same as my sentence above, have I misunderstood?
– Paul
Mar 25 '13 at 2:31
add a comment |
When thinking about firewall rules, you always consider the rule as a whole, not its parts.
So in the above, we are saying
All Local IP addresses
AND
Remote Address 1.1.1.1
So to translate into English, "If the remote address is 1.1.1.1 and the local address is any IP, then block, otherwise permit."
So the consequence is that if the remote address is not 1.1.1.1 then this rule will not be matched, and so not block. Any address that is not 1.1.1.1 will be implicitly permitted.
answered Mar 15 '13 at 21:43
PaulPaul
48.7k14122150
So how would I be able to allow any local ip and block only 1.1.1.1?
– agz
Mar 25 '13 at 2:21
@agovizer That seems to be the same as my sentence above, have I misunderstood?
– Paul
Mar 25 '13 at 2:31
add a comment |
When thinking about firewall rules, you always consider the rule as a whole, not its parts.
So in the above, we are saying
All Local IP addresses
AND
Remote Address 1.1.1.1
So to translate into English, "If the remote address is 1.1.1.1 and the local address is any IP, then block, otherwise permit."
So the consequence is that if the remote address is not 1.1.1.1 then this rule will not be matched, and so not block. Any address that is not 1.1.1.1 will be implicitly permitted.
answered Mar 15 '13 at 21:43
PaulPaul
48.7k14122150
When thinking about firewall rules, you always consider the rule as a whole, not its parts.
So in the above, we are saying
All Local IP addresses
AND
Remote Address 1.1.1.1
So to translate into English, "If the remote address is 1.1.1.1 and the local address is any IP, then block, otherwise permit."
So the consequence is that if the remote address is not 1.1.1.1 then this rule will not be matched, and so not block. Any address that is not 1.1.1.1 will be implicitly permitted.
answered Mar 15 '13 at 21:43
PaulPaul
48.7k14122150
answered Mar 15 '13 at 21:43
PaulPaul
48.7k14122150
answered Mar 15 '13 at 21:43
PaulPaul
48.7k14122150
answered Mar 15 '13 at 21:43
PaulPaul
48.7k14122150
48.7k14122150
So how would I be able to allow any local ip and block only 1.1.1.1?
– agz
Mar 25 '13 at 2:21
@agovizer That seems to be the same as my sentence above, have I misunderstood?
– Paul
Mar 25 '13 at 2:31
add a comment |
So how would I be able to allow any local ip and block only 1.1.1.1?
– agz
Mar 25 '13 at 2:21
@agovizer That seems to be the same as my sentence above, have I misunderstood?
– Paul
Mar 25 '13 at 2:31
So how would I be able to allow any local ip and block only 1.1.1.1?
– agz
Mar 25 '13 at 2:21
So how would I be able to allow any local ip and block only 1.1.1.1?
– agz
Mar 25 '13 at 2:21
@agovizer That seems to be the same as my sentence above, have I misunderstood?
– Paul
Mar 25 '13 at 2:31
@agovizer That seems to be the same as my sentence above, have I misunderstood?
– Paul
Mar 25 '13 at 2:31
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f566189%2fwindows-firewall-block-inbound-external-ip%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Anything that is not explicitly blocked is permitted with a block rule. Blocking a single IP means only that IP will be blocked. Am I misunderstanding your question?
– Paul
Mar 15 '13 at 1:30
Im just confused by the phrase "Any IP Address". If the rule is for blocking, does the "Any IP address" under the local ip section mean ALL ips or no ips?
– agz
Mar 15 '13 at 18:16