If restricted morphism of ringed spaces are equal, then they are actually equal












1












$begingroup$


Given any two ringed spaces $(X, mathcal O_X)$ and $(Y, mathcal O_Y)$, let ${ U_lambda}_{lambda in Lambda}$ be an open covering of the topological space $X$. If $$f,g: (X, mathcal O_X) to (Y, mathcal O_Y)$$ are morphism of ringed spaces such that $$f|_{lambda} = g|_{lambda}, forall lambda in Lambda,$$ then prove that $$f=g.$$



I'm stuck after writing definitions in detail. Any help or hint will be appreciated.






sheaf-theory ringed-spaces







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Given any two ringed spaces $(X, mathcal O_X)$ and $(Y, mathcal O_Y)$, let ${ U_lambda}_{lambda in Lambda}$ be an open covering of the topological space $X$. If $$f,g: (X, mathcal O_X) to (Y, mathcal O_Y)$$ are morphism of ringed spaces such that $$f|_{lambda} = g|_{lambda}, forall lambda in Lambda,$$ then prove that $$f=g.$$



    I'm stuck after writing definitions in detail. Any help or hint will be appreciated.






    sheaf-theory ringed-spaces







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Given any two ringed spaces $(X, mathcal O_X)$ and $(Y, mathcal O_Y)$, let ${ U_lambda}_{lambda in Lambda}$ be an open covering of the topological space $X$. If $$f,g: (X, mathcal O_X) to (Y, mathcal O_Y)$$ are morphism of ringed spaces such that $$f|_{lambda} = g|_{lambda}, forall lambda in Lambda,$$ then prove that $$f=g.$$



      I'm stuck after writing definitions in detail. Any help or hint will be appreciated.






      sheaf-theory ringed-spaces







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Given any two ringed spaces $(X, mathcal O_X)$ and $(Y, mathcal O_Y)$, let ${ U_lambda}_{lambda in Lambda}$ be an open covering of the topological space $X$. If $$f,g: (X, mathcal O_X) to (Y, mathcal O_Y)$$ are morphism of ringed spaces such that $$f|_{lambda} = g|_{lambda}, forall lambda in Lambda,$$ then prove that $$f=g.$$



      I'm stuck after writing definitions in detail. Any help or hint will be appreciated.






      sheaf-theory ringed-spaces




      sheaf-theory ringed-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 30 '18 at 18:53









      Armando j18eos

      2,63511328




      2,63511328










      asked Nov 30 '18 at 18:00







      user621469





























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          First, I should hope its clear that if two maps of topological spaces agree on an open cover then they are equal (since maps of topological spaces are functions, so if they agree on any cover of their domain, they are equal as functions).



          Thus the key part is to show that $f^sharp=g^sharp$ as morphisms from $newcommandcalO{mathcal{O}}calO_Yto f_*calO_X=g_*calO_X$.



          Let $V$ be an open subset of $Y$. Let $aincalO_Y(V)$. Let $newcommandinv{^{-1}}U=finv(V)=ginv(V)$. Then $f^sharp(a),g^sharp(a)in calO_X(U)$ by definition. Then ${U_lambdacap U}_{lambdainLambda}$ gives an open cover of $U$, and since $f|_{U_lambda}=g|_{U_lambda}$, we have that $f^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}=g^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}$. Then since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf. Thus since $a$ and $V$ were arbitrary, $f^sharp=g^sharp$.



          Edit in response to comment:



          To clarify why $f^sharp(a)$ agreeing with $g^sharp(a)$ on an open cover of $U$ implies that they are equal, this is one of the axioms of sheaves. On wiki, this is the locality axiom. The axiom says that if $F$ is a sheaf, and $a,bin F(U)$, and ${U_i}$ is a cover of $U$, then if $a|_{U_i}=b|_{U_i}$ for all $i$, then $a=b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
            $endgroup$
            – user621469
            Dec 1 '18 at 22:45











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020413%2fif-restricted-morphism-of-ringed-spaces-are-equal-then-they-are-actually-equal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          First, I should hope its clear that if two maps of topological spaces agree on an open cover then they are equal (since maps of topological spaces are functions, so if they agree on any cover of their domain, they are equal as functions).



          Thus the key part is to show that $f^sharp=g^sharp$ as morphisms from $newcommandcalO{mathcal{O}}calO_Yto f_*calO_X=g_*calO_X$.



          Let $V$ be an open subset of $Y$. Let $aincalO_Y(V)$. Let $newcommandinv{^{-1}}U=finv(V)=ginv(V)$. Then $f^sharp(a),g^sharp(a)in calO_X(U)$ by definition. Then ${U_lambdacap U}_{lambdainLambda}$ gives an open cover of $U$, and since $f|_{U_lambda}=g|_{U_lambda}$, we have that $f^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}=g^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}$. Then since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf. Thus since $a$ and $V$ were arbitrary, $f^sharp=g^sharp$.



          Edit in response to comment:



          To clarify why $f^sharp(a)$ agreeing with $g^sharp(a)$ on an open cover of $U$ implies that they are equal, this is one of the axioms of sheaves. On wiki, this is the locality axiom. The axiom says that if $F$ is a sheaf, and $a,bin F(U)$, and ${U_i}$ is a cover of $U$, then if $a|_{U_i}=b|_{U_i}$ for all $i$, then $a=b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
            $endgroup$
            – user621469
            Dec 1 '18 at 22:45
















          2












          $begingroup$

          First, I should hope its clear that if two maps of topological spaces agree on an open cover then they are equal (since maps of topological spaces are functions, so if they agree on any cover of their domain, they are equal as functions).



          Thus the key part is to show that $f^sharp=g^sharp$ as morphisms from $newcommandcalO{mathcal{O}}calO_Yto f_*calO_X=g_*calO_X$.



          Let $V$ be an open subset of $Y$. Let $aincalO_Y(V)$. Let $newcommandinv{^{-1}}U=finv(V)=ginv(V)$. Then $f^sharp(a),g^sharp(a)in calO_X(U)$ by definition. Then ${U_lambdacap U}_{lambdainLambda}$ gives an open cover of $U$, and since $f|_{U_lambda}=g|_{U_lambda}$, we have that $f^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}=g^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}$. Then since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf. Thus since $a$ and $V$ were arbitrary, $f^sharp=g^sharp$.



          Edit in response to comment:



          To clarify why $f^sharp(a)$ agreeing with $g^sharp(a)$ on an open cover of $U$ implies that they are equal, this is one of the axioms of sheaves. On wiki, this is the locality axiom. The axiom says that if $F$ is a sheaf, and $a,bin F(U)$, and ${U_i}$ is a cover of $U$, then if $a|_{U_i}=b|_{U_i}$ for all $i$, then $a=b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
            $endgroup$
            – user621469
            Dec 1 '18 at 22:45














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          First, I should hope its clear that if two maps of topological spaces agree on an open cover then they are equal (since maps of topological spaces are functions, so if they agree on any cover of their domain, they are equal as functions).



          Thus the key part is to show that $f^sharp=g^sharp$ as morphisms from $newcommandcalO{mathcal{O}}calO_Yto f_*calO_X=g_*calO_X$.



          Let $V$ be an open subset of $Y$. Let $aincalO_Y(V)$. Let $newcommandinv{^{-1}}U=finv(V)=ginv(V)$. Then $f^sharp(a),g^sharp(a)in calO_X(U)$ by definition. Then ${U_lambdacap U}_{lambdainLambda}$ gives an open cover of $U$, and since $f|_{U_lambda}=g|_{U_lambda}$, we have that $f^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}=g^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}$. Then since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf. Thus since $a$ and $V$ were arbitrary, $f^sharp=g^sharp$.



          Edit in response to comment:



          To clarify why $f^sharp(a)$ agreeing with $g^sharp(a)$ on an open cover of $U$ implies that they are equal, this is one of the axioms of sheaves. On wiki, this is the locality axiom. The axiom says that if $F$ is a sheaf, and $a,bin F(U)$, and ${U_i}$ is a cover of $U$, then if $a|_{U_i}=b|_{U_i}$ for all $i$, then $a=b$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          First, I should hope its clear that if two maps of topological spaces agree on an open cover then they are equal (since maps of topological spaces are functions, so if they agree on any cover of their domain, they are equal as functions).



          Thus the key part is to show that $f^sharp=g^sharp$ as morphisms from $newcommandcalO{mathcal{O}}calO_Yto f_*calO_X=g_*calO_X$.



          Let $V$ be an open subset of $Y$. Let $aincalO_Y(V)$. Let $newcommandinv{^{-1}}U=finv(V)=ginv(V)$. Then $f^sharp(a),g^sharp(a)in calO_X(U)$ by definition. Then ${U_lambdacap U}_{lambdainLambda}$ gives an open cover of $U$, and since $f|_{U_lambda}=g|_{U_lambda}$, we have that $f^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}=g^sharp(a)|_{Ucap U_lambda}$. Then since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf. Thus since $a$ and $V$ were arbitrary, $f^sharp=g^sharp$.



          Edit in response to comment:



          To clarify why $f^sharp(a)$ agreeing with $g^sharp(a)$ on an open cover of $U$ implies that they are equal, this is one of the axioms of sheaves. On wiki, this is the locality axiom. The axiom says that if $F$ is a sheaf, and $a,bin F(U)$, and ${U_i}$ is a cover of $U$, then if $a|_{U_i}=b|_{U_i}$ for all $i$, then $a=b$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 1 '18 at 22:59

























          answered Nov 30 '18 at 18:13









          jgonjgon

          13.5k22041




          13.5k22041












          • $begingroup$
            Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
            $endgroup$
            – user621469
            Dec 1 '18 at 22:45


















          • $begingroup$
            Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
            $endgroup$
            – user621469
            Dec 1 '18 at 22:45
















          $begingroup$
          Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
          $endgroup$
          – user621469
          Dec 1 '18 at 22:45




          $begingroup$
          Why "since $f^sharp(a)$ and $g^sharp(a)$ are equal on an open cover of $U$, we must have that $f^sharp(a)=g^sharp(a)$ since $calO_X$ is a sheaf" holds automatic? I couldn't say this impliance from the definition of the sheaf.
          $endgroup$
          – user621469
          Dec 1 '18 at 22:45


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020413%2fif-restricted-morphism-of-ringed-spaces-are-equal-then-they-are-actually-equal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Image
          Plaza Victoria Plaza Victoria en 2017 Otros nombres Plaza de La Victoria Localización El Almendral, Valparaíso, Chile Vías adyacentes Chacabuco, Molina, Plaza Victoria y Edwards Creación 1841 Metro Bellavista Ubicación 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 Coordenadas: 33°02′46″S 71°37′11″O  /  -33.04624167, -71.61980833 [editar datos en Wikidata] La Plaza Victoria , también llamada Plaza de la Victoria , [ 1 ] ​ es una plaza ubicada en el sector El Almendral del plan de la ciudad de Valparaíso, Chile, de importancia patrimonial, que incluye valiosas estatuas y especies vegetales. [ 2 ] ​ La plaza se creó como tal en la primera mitad del siglo XIX, tomando previamente los nombres de Plaza Nueva y Plaza de Orrego . Si bien desde sus inicios tuvo relevancia histórica, no fue sino a partir de fines de los años 1860 cuando comenzó a cobrar mayor importancia y se convirtió en uno de los principales centros sociales de l
          Read more

          In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

          Image
          .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box; } 2 OneNote has two useful keyboard shortcuts for bulleted and numbered lists, namely Ctrl + . and Ctrl + - . Is there something similar for PowerPoint where the work with lists is also very common? Haven't found anything here: Use keyboard shortcuts in PowerPoint. keyboard-shortcuts microsoft-powerpoint share | improve this question edited Aug 14 '14 at 14:49 Linger 2,826 10 28 40
          Read more

          How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...

          Image
          1 0 I want to put 3 images in LateX such as 2 figures are side by side horizotally and 3rd figure below these 2 side by side figures but in middle. I have following code: begin{figure}[H] centering begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.50linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8010_AP.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8010 AP} label{fig:Genelec 8010} end{minipage}% begin{minipage}{.5textwidth} centering includegraphics[width=.69linewidth]{Text/Images/Genelec_8020_CPM.jpg} captionof{figure}{Genelec 8020 CPM} label{fig:Genelec 8020} end{minipage}% end{figure} %%Here is my 3rd picture code begin{figure} centering includegraphics[width=5cm]{Text/Images/Genelec_8030_BPM.jpg} caption{Genelec 8030 BPM} label{fig:Genelec 8030} end{figure} I want to ask ho
          Read more