Inverting homotopy groups of spectra












7












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a spectrum. Is there a canonical construction/functor that would associate to this spectrum, an inverse spectrum $X'$, in the sense that $$pi_*(X)cong pi_{-*}(X')?$$



To be more precise, such a spectrum $X'$ can always be constructed by attaching cells to produce the right homotopy groups, but is there a more conceptual way of creating it?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    7












    $begingroup$


    Let $X$ be a spectrum. Is there a canonical construction/functor that would associate to this spectrum, an inverse spectrum $X'$, in the sense that $$pi_*(X)cong pi_{-*}(X')?$$



    To be more precise, such a spectrum $X'$ can always be constructed by attaching cells to produce the right homotopy groups, but is there a more conceptual way of creating it?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      7












      7








      7


      2



      $begingroup$


      Let $X$ be a spectrum. Is there a canonical construction/functor that would associate to this spectrum, an inverse spectrum $X'$, in the sense that $$pi_*(X)cong pi_{-*}(X')?$$



      To be more precise, such a spectrum $X'$ can always be constructed by attaching cells to produce the right homotopy groups, but is there a more conceptual way of creating it?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $X$ be a spectrum. Is there a canonical construction/functor that would associate to this spectrum, an inverse spectrum $X'$, in the sense that $$pi_*(X)cong pi_{-*}(X')?$$



      To be more precise, such a spectrum $X'$ can always be constructed by attaching cells to produce the right homotopy groups, but is there a more conceptual way of creating it?







      at.algebraic-topology stable-homotopy






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 22 '18 at 18:24









      David White

      11.5k460101




      11.5k460101










      asked Dec 22 '18 at 16:56









      user09127user09127

      3888




      3888






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          15












          $begingroup$

          Not exactly what you asked for, but there is the Brown-Comenetz dual of $X$, $I_{mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z}}X$, which has the property that its homotopy groups are Pontryagin dual to the homotopy groups of $X$ (in the negative degree):



          $pi_{-ast}(I_{mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z}}X) simeq Hom(pi_ast(X),mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z})$



          So, if the homotopy groups of $X$ are all finite, then the Pontragin dual groups will be (non-canonically) isomorphic and this will have the required property.



          See here for more details






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            There's a question that always bothered me. Maybe you know the answer. How canonical is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$? More precisely, is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$ a functor from the $infty$-groupoid of spectra to itself? It's obviously a functor at the level of the homotopy category. But what about at the $infty$-groupoid level?
            $endgroup$
            – André Henriques
            Dec 23 '18 at 21:42








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @AndréHenriques I've probably misunderstood your question, but does this answer it? If $I_mathbf{Q/Z} := I_mathbf{Q/Z}(S^0)$ denotes the Brown-Comenetz dualizing spectrum, then $I_mathbf{Q/Z}(X) = F(X, I_mathbf{Q/Z})$, and this is functorial in $X$.
            $endgroup$
            – skd
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:47








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @skd. Yes, of course... that does answers my question. But I now realise that I haden't asked the right question. Here's the right question: what is $I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}$? More precisely, is there a way to define it up to contractible space of choices?
            $endgroup$
            – André Henriques
            Dec 24 '18 at 16:18











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f319293%2finverting-homotopy-groups-of-spectra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          15












          $begingroup$

          Not exactly what you asked for, but there is the Brown-Comenetz dual of $X$, $I_{mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z}}X$, which has the property that its homotopy groups are Pontryagin dual to the homotopy groups of $X$ (in the negative degree):



          $pi_{-ast}(I_{mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z}}X) simeq Hom(pi_ast(X),mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z})$



          So, if the homotopy groups of $X$ are all finite, then the Pontragin dual groups will be (non-canonically) isomorphic and this will have the required property.



          See here for more details






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            There's a question that always bothered me. Maybe you know the answer. How canonical is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$? More precisely, is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$ a functor from the $infty$-groupoid of spectra to itself? It's obviously a functor at the level of the homotopy category. But what about at the $infty$-groupoid level?
            $endgroup$
            – André Henriques
            Dec 23 '18 at 21:42








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @AndréHenriques I've probably misunderstood your question, but does this answer it? If $I_mathbf{Q/Z} := I_mathbf{Q/Z}(S^0)$ denotes the Brown-Comenetz dualizing spectrum, then $I_mathbf{Q/Z}(X) = F(X, I_mathbf{Q/Z})$, and this is functorial in $X$.
            $endgroup$
            – skd
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:47








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @skd. Yes, of course... that does answers my question. But I now realise that I haden't asked the right question. Here's the right question: what is $I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}$? More precisely, is there a way to define it up to contractible space of choices?
            $endgroup$
            – André Henriques
            Dec 24 '18 at 16:18
















          15












          $begingroup$

          Not exactly what you asked for, but there is the Brown-Comenetz dual of $X$, $I_{mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z}}X$, which has the property that its homotopy groups are Pontryagin dual to the homotopy groups of $X$ (in the negative degree):



          $pi_{-ast}(I_{mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z}}X) simeq Hom(pi_ast(X),mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z})$



          So, if the homotopy groups of $X$ are all finite, then the Pontragin dual groups will be (non-canonically) isomorphic and this will have the required property.



          See here for more details






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            There's a question that always bothered me. Maybe you know the answer. How canonical is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$? More precisely, is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$ a functor from the $infty$-groupoid of spectra to itself? It's obviously a functor at the level of the homotopy category. But what about at the $infty$-groupoid level?
            $endgroup$
            – André Henriques
            Dec 23 '18 at 21:42








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @AndréHenriques I've probably misunderstood your question, but does this answer it? If $I_mathbf{Q/Z} := I_mathbf{Q/Z}(S^0)$ denotes the Brown-Comenetz dualizing spectrum, then $I_mathbf{Q/Z}(X) = F(X, I_mathbf{Q/Z})$, and this is functorial in $X$.
            $endgroup$
            – skd
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:47








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @skd. Yes, of course... that does answers my question. But I now realise that I haden't asked the right question. Here's the right question: what is $I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}$? More precisely, is there a way to define it up to contractible space of choices?
            $endgroup$
            – André Henriques
            Dec 24 '18 at 16:18














          15












          15








          15





          $begingroup$

          Not exactly what you asked for, but there is the Brown-Comenetz dual of $X$, $I_{mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z}}X$, which has the property that its homotopy groups are Pontryagin dual to the homotopy groups of $X$ (in the negative degree):



          $pi_{-ast}(I_{mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z}}X) simeq Hom(pi_ast(X),mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z})$



          So, if the homotopy groups of $X$ are all finite, then the Pontragin dual groups will be (non-canonically) isomorphic and this will have the required property.



          See here for more details






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Not exactly what you asked for, but there is the Brown-Comenetz dual of $X$, $I_{mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z}}X$, which has the property that its homotopy groups are Pontryagin dual to the homotopy groups of $X$ (in the negative degree):



          $pi_{-ast}(I_{mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z}}X) simeq Hom(pi_ast(X),mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z})$



          So, if the homotopy groups of $X$ are all finite, then the Pontragin dual groups will be (non-canonically) isomorphic and this will have the required property.



          See here for more details







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 23 '18 at 12:15

























          answered Dec 22 '18 at 17:37









          Sam GunninghamSam Gunningham

          4,3922029




          4,3922029








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            There's a question that always bothered me. Maybe you know the answer. How canonical is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$? More precisely, is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$ a functor from the $infty$-groupoid of spectra to itself? It's obviously a functor at the level of the homotopy category. But what about at the $infty$-groupoid level?
            $endgroup$
            – André Henriques
            Dec 23 '18 at 21:42








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @AndréHenriques I've probably misunderstood your question, but does this answer it? If $I_mathbf{Q/Z} := I_mathbf{Q/Z}(S^0)$ denotes the Brown-Comenetz dualizing spectrum, then $I_mathbf{Q/Z}(X) = F(X, I_mathbf{Q/Z})$, and this is functorial in $X$.
            $endgroup$
            – skd
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:47








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @skd. Yes, of course... that does answers my question. But I now realise that I haden't asked the right question. Here's the right question: what is $I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}$? More precisely, is there a way to define it up to contractible space of choices?
            $endgroup$
            – André Henriques
            Dec 24 '18 at 16:18














          • 1




            $begingroup$
            There's a question that always bothered me. Maybe you know the answer. How canonical is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$? More precisely, is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$ a functor from the $infty$-groupoid of spectra to itself? It's obviously a functor at the level of the homotopy category. But what about at the $infty$-groupoid level?
            $endgroup$
            – André Henriques
            Dec 23 '18 at 21:42








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @AndréHenriques I've probably misunderstood your question, but does this answer it? If $I_mathbf{Q/Z} := I_mathbf{Q/Z}(S^0)$ denotes the Brown-Comenetz dualizing spectrum, then $I_mathbf{Q/Z}(X) = F(X, I_mathbf{Q/Z})$, and this is functorial in $X$.
            $endgroup$
            – skd
            Dec 24 '18 at 5:47








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @skd. Yes, of course... that does answers my question. But I now realise that I haden't asked the right question. Here's the right question: what is $I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}$? More precisely, is there a way to define it up to contractible space of choices?
            $endgroup$
            – André Henriques
            Dec 24 '18 at 16:18








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          There's a question that always bothered me. Maybe you know the answer. How canonical is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$? More precisely, is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$ a functor from the $infty$-groupoid of spectra to itself? It's obviously a functor at the level of the homotopy category. But what about at the $infty$-groupoid level?
          $endgroup$
          – André Henriques
          Dec 23 '18 at 21:42






          $begingroup$
          There's a question that always bothered me. Maybe you know the answer. How canonical is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$? More precisely, is the assignment $Xmapsto I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}X$ a functor from the $infty$-groupoid of spectra to itself? It's obviously a functor at the level of the homotopy category. But what about at the $infty$-groupoid level?
          $endgroup$
          – André Henriques
          Dec 23 '18 at 21:42






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @AndréHenriques I've probably misunderstood your question, but does this answer it? If $I_mathbf{Q/Z} := I_mathbf{Q/Z}(S^0)$ denotes the Brown-Comenetz dualizing spectrum, then $I_mathbf{Q/Z}(X) = F(X, I_mathbf{Q/Z})$, and this is functorial in $X$.
          $endgroup$
          – skd
          Dec 24 '18 at 5:47






          $begingroup$
          @AndréHenriques I've probably misunderstood your question, but does this answer it? If $I_mathbf{Q/Z} := I_mathbf{Q/Z}(S^0)$ denotes the Brown-Comenetz dualizing spectrum, then $I_mathbf{Q/Z}(X) = F(X, I_mathbf{Q/Z})$, and this is functorial in $X$.
          $endgroup$
          – skd
          Dec 24 '18 at 5:47






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @skd. Yes, of course... that does answers my question. But I now realise that I haden't asked the right question. Here's the right question: what is $I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}$? More precisely, is there a way to define it up to contractible space of choices?
          $endgroup$
          – André Henriques
          Dec 24 '18 at 16:18




          $begingroup$
          @skd. Yes, of course... that does answers my question. But I now realise that I haden't asked the right question. Here's the right question: what is $I_{mathbb Q/mathbb Z}$? More precisely, is there a way to define it up to contractible space of choices?
          $endgroup$
          – André Henriques
          Dec 24 '18 at 16:18


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f319293%2finverting-homotopy-groups-of-spectra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          Puebla de Zaragoza

          Musa