Existence of Embedding












0












$begingroup$


I'm not sure how to solve the following task



Let $Ksubset L_{0} subset L$ be a tower field extension, $L$ is algebraic over $L_{0}$ and $Ksubset E$ is a field extension, $E$ is the algebraic closure of $K$. Let $theta_{0} : L_{0} to E$ be an embedding over K.



Show that there exists an embedding $theta : L to E$ over $theta_{0}$.



These are the definitions which we used in the lecture but it doesn't make sense to me:



A field extension of a field $K$ is a ring homomorphism $a: K to N$, $N$ is also a field.



Let $K,M$ be fields. The ring homomorphism $b: K to M$ is called embedding.



Let $b: K to M$ and $c:K to L$ be two embeddings then the ring homomorphism $d: Lto M$ with $dcirc b=c$ is called embedding over $c$.



$c$ is an embedding over $K$ if the two embeddings $b: K to M$ and $c:K to L$ satisfy $Ksubset M$ and $Ksubset L$.



Many thanks for any help in advance.



Edit: Definitions










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    As you've formulated it, this isn't true. For all you know, $theta_0$ may be surjective and $L/L_0$ not trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:29












  • $begingroup$
    I'll ask my professor if there's a missing condition, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Anzu
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, no sorry. I had missed the fact that $E$ is not any extension, but an algebraic closure of $K$. Then, it's ok.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:36












  • $begingroup$
    That was my bad, I just edited that. Sorry about that
    $endgroup$
    – Anzu
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:37
















0












$begingroup$


I'm not sure how to solve the following task



Let $Ksubset L_{0} subset L$ be a tower field extension, $L$ is algebraic over $L_{0}$ and $Ksubset E$ is a field extension, $E$ is the algebraic closure of $K$. Let $theta_{0} : L_{0} to E$ be an embedding over K.



Show that there exists an embedding $theta : L to E$ over $theta_{0}$.



These are the definitions which we used in the lecture but it doesn't make sense to me:



A field extension of a field $K$ is a ring homomorphism $a: K to N$, $N$ is also a field.



Let $K,M$ be fields. The ring homomorphism $b: K to M$ is called embedding.



Let $b: K to M$ and $c:K to L$ be two embeddings then the ring homomorphism $d: Lto M$ with $dcirc b=c$ is called embedding over $c$.



$c$ is an embedding over $K$ if the two embeddings $b: K to M$ and $c:K to L$ satisfy $Ksubset M$ and $Ksubset L$.



Many thanks for any help in advance.



Edit: Definitions










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    As you've formulated it, this isn't true. For all you know, $theta_0$ may be surjective and $L/L_0$ not trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:29












  • $begingroup$
    I'll ask my professor if there's a missing condition, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Anzu
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, no sorry. I had missed the fact that $E$ is not any extension, but an algebraic closure of $K$. Then, it's ok.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:36












  • $begingroup$
    That was my bad, I just edited that. Sorry about that
    $endgroup$
    – Anzu
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:37














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm not sure how to solve the following task



Let $Ksubset L_{0} subset L$ be a tower field extension, $L$ is algebraic over $L_{0}$ and $Ksubset E$ is a field extension, $E$ is the algebraic closure of $K$. Let $theta_{0} : L_{0} to E$ be an embedding over K.



Show that there exists an embedding $theta : L to E$ over $theta_{0}$.



These are the definitions which we used in the lecture but it doesn't make sense to me:



A field extension of a field $K$ is a ring homomorphism $a: K to N$, $N$ is also a field.



Let $K,M$ be fields. The ring homomorphism $b: K to M$ is called embedding.



Let $b: K to M$ and $c:K to L$ be two embeddings then the ring homomorphism $d: Lto M$ with $dcirc b=c$ is called embedding over $c$.



$c$ is an embedding over $K$ if the two embeddings $b: K to M$ and $c:K to L$ satisfy $Ksubset M$ and $Ksubset L$.



Many thanks for any help in advance.



Edit: Definitions










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm not sure how to solve the following task



Let $Ksubset L_{0} subset L$ be a tower field extension, $L$ is algebraic over $L_{0}$ and $Ksubset E$ is a field extension, $E$ is the algebraic closure of $K$. Let $theta_{0} : L_{0} to E$ be an embedding over K.



Show that there exists an embedding $theta : L to E$ over $theta_{0}$.



These are the definitions which we used in the lecture but it doesn't make sense to me:



A field extension of a field $K$ is a ring homomorphism $a: K to N$, $N$ is also a field.



Let $K,M$ be fields. The ring homomorphism $b: K to M$ is called embedding.



Let $b: K to M$ and $c:K to L$ be two embeddings then the ring homomorphism $d: Lto M$ with $dcirc b=c$ is called embedding over $c$.



$c$ is an embedding over $K$ if the two embeddings $b: K to M$ and $c:K to L$ satisfy $Ksubset M$ and $Ksubset L$.



Many thanks for any help in advance.



Edit: Definitions







abstract-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 6 '18 at 13:46







Anzu

















asked Dec 6 '18 at 0:26









AnzuAnzu

246




246












  • $begingroup$
    As you've formulated it, this isn't true. For all you know, $theta_0$ may be surjective and $L/L_0$ not trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:29












  • $begingroup$
    I'll ask my professor if there's a missing condition, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Anzu
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, no sorry. I had missed the fact that $E$ is not any extension, but an algebraic closure of $K$. Then, it's ok.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:36












  • $begingroup$
    That was my bad, I just edited that. Sorry about that
    $endgroup$
    – Anzu
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:37


















  • $begingroup$
    As you've formulated it, this isn't true. For all you know, $theta_0$ may be surjective and $L/L_0$ not trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:29












  • $begingroup$
    I'll ask my professor if there's a missing condition, thank you
    $endgroup$
    – Anzu
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:34










  • $begingroup$
    Ah, no sorry. I had missed the fact that $E$ is not any extension, but an algebraic closure of $K$. Then, it's ok.
    $endgroup$
    – Saucy O'Path
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:36












  • $begingroup$
    That was my bad, I just edited that. Sorry about that
    $endgroup$
    – Anzu
    Dec 6 '18 at 0:37
















$begingroup$
As you've formulated it, this isn't true. For all you know, $theta_0$ may be surjective and $L/L_0$ not trivial.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Dec 6 '18 at 0:29






$begingroup$
As you've formulated it, this isn't true. For all you know, $theta_0$ may be surjective and $L/L_0$ not trivial.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Dec 6 '18 at 0:29














$begingroup$
I'll ask my professor if there's a missing condition, thank you
$endgroup$
– Anzu
Dec 6 '18 at 0:34




$begingroup$
I'll ask my professor if there's a missing condition, thank you
$endgroup$
– Anzu
Dec 6 '18 at 0:34












$begingroup$
Ah, no sorry. I had missed the fact that $E$ is not any extension, but an algebraic closure of $K$. Then, it's ok.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Dec 6 '18 at 0:36






$begingroup$
Ah, no sorry. I had missed the fact that $E$ is not any extension, but an algebraic closure of $K$. Then, it's ok.
$endgroup$
– Saucy O'Path
Dec 6 '18 at 0:36














$begingroup$
That was my bad, I just edited that. Sorry about that
$endgroup$
– Anzu
Dec 6 '18 at 0:37




$begingroup$
That was my bad, I just edited that. Sorry about that
$endgroup$
– Anzu
Dec 6 '18 at 0:37










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027871%2fexistence-of-embedding%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3027871%2fexistence-of-embedding%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Plaza Victoria

In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...