Single word to change groups












5















In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.



I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".



Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.

    – Chaim
    2 days ago






  • 2





    If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!

    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack

    – Davo
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.

    – Reed
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Does it have to be English? Some languages already come dangerously close to the CamelCase approach with their compound words (I'm looking at you, German). Otherwise it'll be fairly hard to target a specific third party, as most verbs you'd use for that in English would expect a subject. (p.s.: mutiny?)

    – A C
    2 days ago


















5















In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.



I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".



Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1





    A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.

    – Chaim
    2 days ago






  • 2





    If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!

    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack

    – Davo
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.

    – Reed
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Does it have to be English? Some languages already come dangerously close to the CamelCase approach with their compound words (I'm looking at you, German). Otherwise it'll be fairly hard to target a specific third party, as most verbs you'd use for that in English would expect a subject. (p.s.: mutiny?)

    – A C
    2 days ago
















5












5








5








In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.



I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".



Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.



I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".



Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?







single-word-requests






share|improve this question







New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









ReedReed

1284




1284




New contributor




Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1





    A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.

    – Chaim
    2 days ago






  • 2





    If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!

    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack

    – Davo
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.

    – Reed
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Does it have to be English? Some languages already come dangerously close to the CamelCase approach with their compound words (I'm looking at you, German). Otherwise it'll be fairly hard to target a specific third party, as most verbs you'd use for that in English would expect a subject. (p.s.: mutiny?)

    – A C
    2 days ago
















  • 1





    A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.

    – Chaim
    2 days ago






  • 2





    If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!

    – FumbleFingers
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack

    – Davo
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.

    – Reed
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Does it have to be English? Some languages already come dangerously close to the CamelCase approach with their compound words (I'm looking at you, German). Otherwise it'll be fairly hard to target a specific third party, as most verbs you'd use for that in English would expect a subject. (p.s.: mutiny?)

    – A C
    2 days ago










1




1





A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.

– Chaim
2 days ago





A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.

– Chaim
2 days ago




2




2





If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!

– FumbleFingers
2 days ago





If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!

– FumbleFingers
2 days ago




1




1





Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack

– Davo
2 days ago





Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack

– Davo
2 days ago




1




1





@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.

– Reed
2 days ago





@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.

– Reed
2 days ago




1




1





Does it have to be English? Some languages already come dangerously close to the CamelCase approach with their compound words (I'm looking at you, German). Otherwise it'll be fairly hard to target a specific third party, as most verbs you'd use for that in English would expect a subject. (p.s.: mutiny?)

– A C
2 days ago







Does it have to be English? Some languages already come dangerously close to the CamelCase approach with their compound words (I'm looking at you, German). Otherwise it'll be fairly hard to target a specific third party, as most verbs you'd use for that in English would expect a subject. (p.s.: mutiny?)

– A C
2 days ago












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















14














Defect! might work:




1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology

// a former KGB agent who defected to America




(source: Merriam-Webster)



and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:




: to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)




(source: Merriam-Webster)



but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.





Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.






share|improve this answer
























  • "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    2 days ago








  • 3





    How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

    – Barmar
    2 days ago











  • The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.

    – Richard
    yesterday



















6














The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:




  1. Be your ally.


  2. Be their enemy.



1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).



However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:




: to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL




And here's the also-good choice of rebel:




: to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government




In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.






share|improve this answer































    3














    Collude (origin per M-W):




    ...based on the Latin verb ludere, meaning "to play." Collude dates
    back to 1525 and combines ludere and the prefix col-, meaning "with"
    or "together." The verb is younger than the related noun collusion,
    which appeared sometime in the 14th century with the specific meaning
    "secret agreement or cooperation." Despite their playful history,
    collude and collusion have always suggested deceit or trickery rather
    than good-natured fun.




    Example sentence:




    The two companies had colluded to fix prices.




    So, it could mean rivals (former or present) joining forces to pursue a common interest.



    I think that's what you meant. I was really good at Centipede and Q*Bert (because even Sears had an arcade back then, really). With that in mind, I offer defy as a backup (because it's easy to yell quickly and loudly...if that matters at all). That's the best I can do without a trackball or joystick. YW. Enjoy.






    share|improve this answer

































      1














      Betray
      Convert
      Realign
      Turn
      Forsake
      Spurn
      Revolt



      All these basically mean leave one side and join another.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.
















      • 1





        These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

        – Davo
        2 days ago






      • 2





        This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

        – Reed
        2 days ago











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490231%2fsingle-word-to-change-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      14














      Defect! might work:




      1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology

      // a former KGB agent who defected to America




      (source: Merriam-Webster)



      and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:




      : to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)




      (source: Merriam-Webster)



      but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.





      Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.






      share|improve this answer
























      • "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

        – TaliesinMerlin
        2 days ago








      • 3





        How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

        – Barmar
        2 days ago











      • The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.

        – Richard
        yesterday
















      14














      Defect! might work:




      1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology

      // a former KGB agent who defected to America




      (source: Merriam-Webster)



      and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:




      : to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)




      (source: Merriam-Webster)



      but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.





      Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.






      share|improve this answer
























      • "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

        – TaliesinMerlin
        2 days ago








      • 3





        How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

        – Barmar
        2 days ago











      • The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.

        – Richard
        yesterday














      14












      14








      14







      Defect! might work:




      1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology

      // a former KGB agent who defected to America




      (source: Merriam-Webster)



      and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:




      : to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)




      (source: Merriam-Webster)



      but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.





      Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.






      share|improve this answer













      Defect! might work:




      1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology

      // a former KGB agent who defected to America




      (source: Merriam-Webster)



      and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:




      : to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)




      (source: Merriam-Webster)



      but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.





      Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 2 days ago









      GlorfindelGlorfindel

      8,349103842




      8,349103842













      • "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

        – TaliesinMerlin
        2 days ago








      • 3





        How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

        – Barmar
        2 days ago











      • The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.

        – Richard
        yesterday



















      • "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

        – TaliesinMerlin
        2 days ago








      • 3





        How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

        – Barmar
        2 days ago











      • The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.

        – Richard
        yesterday

















      "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

      – TaliesinMerlin
      2 days ago







      "Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.

      – TaliesinMerlin
      2 days ago






      3




      3





      How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

      – Barmar
      2 days ago





      How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric

      – Barmar
      2 days ago













      The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.

      – Richard
      yesterday





      The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.

      – Richard
      yesterday













      6














      The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:




      1. Be your ally.


      2. Be their enemy.



      1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).



      However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:




      : to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL




      And here's the also-good choice of rebel:




      : to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government




      In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.






      share|improve this answer




























        6














        The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:




        1. Be your ally.


        2. Be their enemy.



        1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).



        However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:




        : to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL




        And here's the also-good choice of rebel:




        : to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government




        In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.






        share|improve this answer


























          6












          6








          6







          The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:




          1. Be your ally.


          2. Be their enemy.



          1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).



          However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:




          : to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL




          And here's the also-good choice of rebel:




          : to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government




          In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.






          share|improve this answer













          The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:




          1. Be your ally.


          2. Be their enemy.



          1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).



          However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:




          : to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL




          And here's the also-good choice of rebel:




          : to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government




          In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin

          5,8541127




          5,8541127























              3














              Collude (origin per M-W):




              ...based on the Latin verb ludere, meaning "to play." Collude dates
              back to 1525 and combines ludere and the prefix col-, meaning "with"
              or "together." The verb is younger than the related noun collusion,
              which appeared sometime in the 14th century with the specific meaning
              "secret agreement or cooperation." Despite their playful history,
              collude and collusion have always suggested deceit or trickery rather
              than good-natured fun.




              Example sentence:




              The two companies had colluded to fix prices.




              So, it could mean rivals (former or present) joining forces to pursue a common interest.



              I think that's what you meant. I was really good at Centipede and Q*Bert (because even Sears had an arcade back then, really). With that in mind, I offer defy as a backup (because it's easy to yell quickly and loudly...if that matters at all). That's the best I can do without a trackball or joystick. YW. Enjoy.






              share|improve this answer






























                3














                Collude (origin per M-W):




                ...based on the Latin verb ludere, meaning "to play." Collude dates
                back to 1525 and combines ludere and the prefix col-, meaning "with"
                or "together." The verb is younger than the related noun collusion,
                which appeared sometime in the 14th century with the specific meaning
                "secret agreement or cooperation." Despite their playful history,
                collude and collusion have always suggested deceit or trickery rather
                than good-natured fun.




                Example sentence:




                The two companies had colluded to fix prices.




                So, it could mean rivals (former or present) joining forces to pursue a common interest.



                I think that's what you meant. I was really good at Centipede and Q*Bert (because even Sears had an arcade back then, really). With that in mind, I offer defy as a backup (because it's easy to yell quickly and loudly...if that matters at all). That's the best I can do without a trackball or joystick. YW. Enjoy.






                share|improve this answer




























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  Collude (origin per M-W):




                  ...based on the Latin verb ludere, meaning "to play." Collude dates
                  back to 1525 and combines ludere and the prefix col-, meaning "with"
                  or "together." The verb is younger than the related noun collusion,
                  which appeared sometime in the 14th century with the specific meaning
                  "secret agreement or cooperation." Despite their playful history,
                  collude and collusion have always suggested deceit or trickery rather
                  than good-natured fun.




                  Example sentence:




                  The two companies had colluded to fix prices.




                  So, it could mean rivals (former or present) joining forces to pursue a common interest.



                  I think that's what you meant. I was really good at Centipede and Q*Bert (because even Sears had an arcade back then, really). With that in mind, I offer defy as a backup (because it's easy to yell quickly and loudly...if that matters at all). That's the best I can do without a trackball or joystick. YW. Enjoy.






                  share|improve this answer















                  Collude (origin per M-W):




                  ...based on the Latin verb ludere, meaning "to play." Collude dates
                  back to 1525 and combines ludere and the prefix col-, meaning "with"
                  or "together." The verb is younger than the related noun collusion,
                  which appeared sometime in the 14th century with the specific meaning
                  "secret agreement or cooperation." Despite their playful history,
                  collude and collusion have always suggested deceit or trickery rather
                  than good-natured fun.




                  Example sentence:




                  The two companies had colluded to fix prices.




                  So, it could mean rivals (former or present) joining forces to pursue a common interest.



                  I think that's what you meant. I was really good at Centipede and Q*Bert (because even Sears had an arcade back then, really). With that in mind, I offer defy as a backup (because it's easy to yell quickly and loudly...if that matters at all). That's the best I can do without a trackball or joystick. YW. Enjoy.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited yesterday

























                  answered yesterday









                  KannEKannE

                  1,378215




                  1,378215























                      1














                      Betray
                      Convert
                      Realign
                      Turn
                      Forsake
                      Spurn
                      Revolt



                      All these basically mean leave one side and join another.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      • 1





                        These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

                        – Davo
                        2 days ago






                      • 2





                        This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

                        – Reed
                        2 days ago
















                      1














                      Betray
                      Convert
                      Realign
                      Turn
                      Forsake
                      Spurn
                      Revolt



                      All these basically mean leave one side and join another.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      • 1





                        These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

                        – Davo
                        2 days ago






                      • 2





                        This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

                        – Reed
                        2 days ago














                      1












                      1








                      1







                      Betray
                      Convert
                      Realign
                      Turn
                      Forsake
                      Spurn
                      Revolt



                      All these basically mean leave one side and join another.






                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.










                      Betray
                      Convert
                      Realign
                      Turn
                      Forsake
                      Spurn
                      Revolt



                      All these basically mean leave one side and join another.







                      share|improve this answer








                      New contributor




                      user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer






                      New contributor




                      user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                      answered 2 days ago









                      user340641user340641

                      191




                      191




                      New contributor




                      user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                      New contributor





                      user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                      user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                      Check out our Code of Conduct.








                      • 1





                        These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

                        – Davo
                        2 days ago






                      • 2





                        This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

                        – Reed
                        2 days ago














                      • 1





                        These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

                        – Davo
                        2 days ago






                      • 2





                        This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

                        – Reed
                        2 days ago








                      1




                      1





                      These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

                      – Davo
                      2 days ago





                      These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.

                      – Davo
                      2 days ago




                      2




                      2





                      This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

                      – Reed
                      2 days ago





                      This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.

                      – Reed
                      2 days ago










                      Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490231%2fsingle-word-to-change-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Plaza Victoria

                      Puebla de Zaragoza

                      Musa