Asymptotic solution












1












$begingroup$


I am looking for asymptotic solutions to the equation
$$alpha^{-1}x+sqrt{pi}frac{sqrt{x}}{2}text{erf}left(frac{sqrt{x}}{2}right)=beta^{-1}e^{-x/4},qquad alphall1,betagg1.$$ When $alpha$ is large and the first term is negligible, this is easy to do, but I don't know how to proceed with the opposite case.



What I've tried for now is the following: For $alpha,beta^{-1}=0$, which is the limiting case, I get $x=0$, hence I have to introduce a scaling $x=epsilonhat x$, where $epsilon=epsilon(alpha,beta)ll1$. Introducing this into the equation above allows me to simplify terms and reduce the equation (if I'm not wrong) to
$$epsilon(1color{red}{+}alpha/2)hat x=alphabeta^{-1},$$ therefore I can balance the equation by choosing $epsilon=alphabeta^{-1}$ and finally $$hat xapproxcolor{red}{2/(2+alpha)}qquadRightarrowqquad xapproxalphabeta^{-1}.$$



Is this correct? Any hints or help on this?



Thanks in advance!



$color{red}{text{Edit: The leading order term had a mistake, I have corrected it.}}$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I am looking for asymptotic solutions to the equation
    $$alpha^{-1}x+sqrt{pi}frac{sqrt{x}}{2}text{erf}left(frac{sqrt{x}}{2}right)=beta^{-1}e^{-x/4},qquad alphall1,betagg1.$$ When $alpha$ is large and the first term is negligible, this is easy to do, but I don't know how to proceed with the opposite case.



    What I've tried for now is the following: For $alpha,beta^{-1}=0$, which is the limiting case, I get $x=0$, hence I have to introduce a scaling $x=epsilonhat x$, where $epsilon=epsilon(alpha,beta)ll1$. Introducing this into the equation above allows me to simplify terms and reduce the equation (if I'm not wrong) to
    $$epsilon(1color{red}{+}alpha/2)hat x=alphabeta^{-1},$$ therefore I can balance the equation by choosing $epsilon=alphabeta^{-1}$ and finally $$hat xapproxcolor{red}{2/(2+alpha)}qquadRightarrowqquad xapproxalphabeta^{-1}.$$



    Is this correct? Any hints or help on this?



    Thanks in advance!



    $color{red}{text{Edit: The leading order term had a mistake, I have corrected it.}}$










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I am looking for asymptotic solutions to the equation
      $$alpha^{-1}x+sqrt{pi}frac{sqrt{x}}{2}text{erf}left(frac{sqrt{x}}{2}right)=beta^{-1}e^{-x/4},qquad alphall1,betagg1.$$ When $alpha$ is large and the first term is negligible, this is easy to do, but I don't know how to proceed with the opposite case.



      What I've tried for now is the following: For $alpha,beta^{-1}=0$, which is the limiting case, I get $x=0$, hence I have to introduce a scaling $x=epsilonhat x$, where $epsilon=epsilon(alpha,beta)ll1$. Introducing this into the equation above allows me to simplify terms and reduce the equation (if I'm not wrong) to
      $$epsilon(1color{red}{+}alpha/2)hat x=alphabeta^{-1},$$ therefore I can balance the equation by choosing $epsilon=alphabeta^{-1}$ and finally $$hat xapproxcolor{red}{2/(2+alpha)}qquadRightarrowqquad xapproxalphabeta^{-1}.$$



      Is this correct? Any hints or help on this?



      Thanks in advance!



      $color{red}{text{Edit: The leading order term had a mistake, I have corrected it.}}$










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am looking for asymptotic solutions to the equation
      $$alpha^{-1}x+sqrt{pi}frac{sqrt{x}}{2}text{erf}left(frac{sqrt{x}}{2}right)=beta^{-1}e^{-x/4},qquad alphall1,betagg1.$$ When $alpha$ is large and the first term is negligible, this is easy to do, but I don't know how to proceed with the opposite case.



      What I've tried for now is the following: For $alpha,beta^{-1}=0$, which is the limiting case, I get $x=0$, hence I have to introduce a scaling $x=epsilonhat x$, where $epsilon=epsilon(alpha,beta)ll1$. Introducing this into the equation above allows me to simplify terms and reduce the equation (if I'm not wrong) to
      $$epsilon(1color{red}{+}alpha/2)hat x=alphabeta^{-1},$$ therefore I can balance the equation by choosing $epsilon=alphabeta^{-1}$ and finally $$hat xapproxcolor{red}{2/(2+alpha)}qquadRightarrowqquad xapproxalphabeta^{-1}.$$



      Is this correct? Any hints or help on this?



      Thanks in advance!



      $color{red}{text{Edit: The leading order term had a mistake, I have corrected it.}}$







      asymptotics






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Feb 1 at 10:34







      Marc

















      asked Dec 21 '18 at 10:20









      MarcMarc

      44139




      44139






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Let $tilde beta = 1/beta$. Multiplying by $alpha$ and getting rid of the square roots, we can rewrite the equation as
          $$x - alpha tilde beta e^{-x/4} +
          alpha x int_0^{1/2} e^{-x t^2} d t = 0.$$

          Now we can look for $x$ in the form $sum c_{i,j} alpha^i tilde beta {}^j$ by substituting the sum into the equation and taking the bivariate Taylor expansion around $alpha = 0, ,tilde beta = 0$.



          Taking $x = alpha tilde beta + sum_{i = 0}^3 c_{i, 3 - i} alpha^i tilde beta {}^{3 - i}$ gives
          $$c_{3, 0} alpha^3 +
          left( c_{2, 1} + frac 1 2 right) alpha^2 tilde beta +
          c_{1, 2} alpha tilde beta {}^2 +
          c_{0, 3} tilde beta {}^3 = 0,$$

          therefore we get one third-order term $-alpha^2 tilde beta/2$.



          On the next step we get two fourth-order terms, which gives the approximation
          $$x approx frac alpha beta -frac {alpha^2} {2 beta} +
          frac {alpha^3} {4 beta} - frac {alpha^2} {4 beta^2}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048369%2fasymptotic-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Let $tilde beta = 1/beta$. Multiplying by $alpha$ and getting rid of the square roots, we can rewrite the equation as
            $$x - alpha tilde beta e^{-x/4} +
            alpha x int_0^{1/2} e^{-x t^2} d t = 0.$$

            Now we can look for $x$ in the form $sum c_{i,j} alpha^i tilde beta {}^j$ by substituting the sum into the equation and taking the bivariate Taylor expansion around $alpha = 0, ,tilde beta = 0$.



            Taking $x = alpha tilde beta + sum_{i = 0}^3 c_{i, 3 - i} alpha^i tilde beta {}^{3 - i}$ gives
            $$c_{3, 0} alpha^3 +
            left( c_{2, 1} + frac 1 2 right) alpha^2 tilde beta +
            c_{1, 2} alpha tilde beta {}^2 +
            c_{0, 3} tilde beta {}^3 = 0,$$

            therefore we get one third-order term $-alpha^2 tilde beta/2$.



            On the next step we get two fourth-order terms, which gives the approximation
            $$x approx frac alpha beta -frac {alpha^2} {2 beta} +
            frac {alpha^3} {4 beta} - frac {alpha^2} {4 beta^2}.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Let $tilde beta = 1/beta$. Multiplying by $alpha$ and getting rid of the square roots, we can rewrite the equation as
              $$x - alpha tilde beta e^{-x/4} +
              alpha x int_0^{1/2} e^{-x t^2} d t = 0.$$

              Now we can look for $x$ in the form $sum c_{i,j} alpha^i tilde beta {}^j$ by substituting the sum into the equation and taking the bivariate Taylor expansion around $alpha = 0, ,tilde beta = 0$.



              Taking $x = alpha tilde beta + sum_{i = 0}^3 c_{i, 3 - i} alpha^i tilde beta {}^{3 - i}$ gives
              $$c_{3, 0} alpha^3 +
              left( c_{2, 1} + frac 1 2 right) alpha^2 tilde beta +
              c_{1, 2} alpha tilde beta {}^2 +
              c_{0, 3} tilde beta {}^3 = 0,$$

              therefore we get one third-order term $-alpha^2 tilde beta/2$.



              On the next step we get two fourth-order terms, which gives the approximation
              $$x approx frac alpha beta -frac {alpha^2} {2 beta} +
              frac {alpha^3} {4 beta} - frac {alpha^2} {4 beta^2}.$$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Let $tilde beta = 1/beta$. Multiplying by $alpha$ and getting rid of the square roots, we can rewrite the equation as
                $$x - alpha tilde beta e^{-x/4} +
                alpha x int_0^{1/2} e^{-x t^2} d t = 0.$$

                Now we can look for $x$ in the form $sum c_{i,j} alpha^i tilde beta {}^j$ by substituting the sum into the equation and taking the bivariate Taylor expansion around $alpha = 0, ,tilde beta = 0$.



                Taking $x = alpha tilde beta + sum_{i = 0}^3 c_{i, 3 - i} alpha^i tilde beta {}^{3 - i}$ gives
                $$c_{3, 0} alpha^3 +
                left( c_{2, 1} + frac 1 2 right) alpha^2 tilde beta +
                c_{1, 2} alpha tilde beta {}^2 +
                c_{0, 3} tilde beta {}^3 = 0,$$

                therefore we get one third-order term $-alpha^2 tilde beta/2$.



                On the next step we get two fourth-order terms, which gives the approximation
                $$x approx frac alpha beta -frac {alpha^2} {2 beta} +
                frac {alpha^3} {4 beta} - frac {alpha^2} {4 beta^2}.$$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Let $tilde beta = 1/beta$. Multiplying by $alpha$ and getting rid of the square roots, we can rewrite the equation as
                $$x - alpha tilde beta e^{-x/4} +
                alpha x int_0^{1/2} e^{-x t^2} d t = 0.$$

                Now we can look for $x$ in the form $sum c_{i,j} alpha^i tilde beta {}^j$ by substituting the sum into the equation and taking the bivariate Taylor expansion around $alpha = 0, ,tilde beta = 0$.



                Taking $x = alpha tilde beta + sum_{i = 0}^3 c_{i, 3 - i} alpha^i tilde beta {}^{3 - i}$ gives
                $$c_{3, 0} alpha^3 +
                left( c_{2, 1} + frac 1 2 right) alpha^2 tilde beta +
                c_{1, 2} alpha tilde beta {}^2 +
                c_{0, 3} tilde beta {}^3 = 0,$$

                therefore we get one third-order term $-alpha^2 tilde beta/2$.



                On the next step we get two fourth-order terms, which gives the approximation
                $$x approx frac alpha beta -frac {alpha^2} {2 beta} +
                frac {alpha^3} {4 beta} - frac {alpha^2} {4 beta^2}.$$







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jan 6 at 22:35

























                answered Dec 27 '18 at 22:12









                MaximMaxim

                6,2731221




                6,2731221






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048369%2fasymptotic-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Plaza Victoria

                    In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

                    How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...