Limit points of infinite subsets of closed sets
$begingroup$
Is the following statement true or false?
If $F$ is an infinite subset of a closed set $E$, then $F$ has a limit point in $E$?
The original one is: if $E$ is an infinite subset of a compact set $K$, then $E$ has a limit point in $K$. This statement is proved in Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis. However, I just use the closing property of $K$ in my proof, so I'm not sure of the statemet above.
general-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is the following statement true or false?
If $F$ is an infinite subset of a closed set $E$, then $F$ has a limit point in $E$?
The original one is: if $E$ is an infinite subset of a compact set $K$, then $E$ has a limit point in $K$. This statement is proved in Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis. However, I just use the closing property of $K$ in my proof, so I'm not sure of the statemet above.
general-topology
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
What about if you consider $mathbb N subset [0, infty)$, where all are considered as subspaces of $mathbb R$ with the usual topology?
$endgroup$
– vociferous_rutabaga
Aug 21 '14 at 5:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is the following statement true or false?
If $F$ is an infinite subset of a closed set $E$, then $F$ has a limit point in $E$?
The original one is: if $E$ is an infinite subset of a compact set $K$, then $E$ has a limit point in $K$. This statement is proved in Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis. However, I just use the closing property of $K$ in my proof, so I'm not sure of the statemet above.
general-topology
$endgroup$
Is the following statement true or false?
If $F$ is an infinite subset of a closed set $E$, then $F$ has a limit point in $E$?
The original one is: if $E$ is an infinite subset of a compact set $K$, then $E$ has a limit point in $K$. This statement is proved in Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis. However, I just use the closing property of $K$ in my proof, so I'm not sure of the statemet above.
general-topology
general-topology
edited Aug 21 '14 at 10:12
Meta-мета-μετα-meta-мета-μετα
4,724927
4,724927
asked Aug 21 '14 at 5:15
Tien Kha PhamTien Kha Pham
1,717922
1,717922
2
$begingroup$
What about if you consider $mathbb N subset [0, infty)$, where all are considered as subspaces of $mathbb R$ with the usual topology?
$endgroup$
– vociferous_rutabaga
Aug 21 '14 at 5:17
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
What about if you consider $mathbb N subset [0, infty)$, where all are considered as subspaces of $mathbb R$ with the usual topology?
$endgroup$
– vociferous_rutabaga
Aug 21 '14 at 5:17
2
2
$begingroup$
What about if you consider $mathbb N subset [0, infty)$, where all are considered as subspaces of $mathbb R$ with the usual topology?
$endgroup$
– vociferous_rutabaga
Aug 21 '14 at 5:17
$begingroup$
What about if you consider $mathbb N subset [0, infty)$, where all are considered as subspaces of $mathbb R$ with the usual topology?
$endgroup$
– vociferous_rutabaga
Aug 21 '14 at 5:17
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Compactness is key. For the real line, keep in mind the Heine-Borel theorem which says a set is compact iff it is closed and bounded. As a counterexample then, take an unbounded closed set $mathbb{R}$ (in the space $mathbb{R}$), and take $mathbb{Z}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f904740%2flimit-points-of-infinite-subsets-of-closed-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Compactness is key. For the real line, keep in mind the Heine-Borel theorem which says a set is compact iff it is closed and bounded. As a counterexample then, take an unbounded closed set $mathbb{R}$ (in the space $mathbb{R}$), and take $mathbb{Z}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Compactness is key. For the real line, keep in mind the Heine-Borel theorem which says a set is compact iff it is closed and bounded. As a counterexample then, take an unbounded closed set $mathbb{R}$ (in the space $mathbb{R}$), and take $mathbb{Z}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Compactness is key. For the real line, keep in mind the Heine-Borel theorem which says a set is compact iff it is closed and bounded. As a counterexample then, take an unbounded closed set $mathbb{R}$ (in the space $mathbb{R}$), and take $mathbb{Z}$.
$endgroup$
Compactness is key. For the real line, keep in mind the Heine-Borel theorem which says a set is compact iff it is closed and bounded. As a counterexample then, take an unbounded closed set $mathbb{R}$ (in the space $mathbb{R}$), and take $mathbb{Z}$.
answered Aug 21 '14 at 5:55
Alex R.Alex R.
25.2k12452
25.2k12452
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f904740%2flimit-points-of-infinite-subsets-of-closed-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
What about if you consider $mathbb N subset [0, infty)$, where all are considered as subspaces of $mathbb R$ with the usual topology?
$endgroup$
– vociferous_rutabaga
Aug 21 '14 at 5:17