LaTeX: Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands?












3















Finding out that I can have an environment named env2, but no command cmd2, I read Why are some characters not allowed in command sequences, but still I wonder:



Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands? In my understanding digits delimit command names (inherited from plain TeX), but why doesn't that restriction apply to environments? Wouldn't it have been more consistent to forbid digits in environment names as well?










share|improve this question























  • You actually can use numbers in commands. If you do expandafterdefcsname mycommandwithanumber123456endcsname{} you'll define a command mycommandwithanumber123456. The environments are created using the csname...endcsname pair, so it's fine.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    Apr 5 at 22:36











  • expandafterdefcsname macro2endcsname{command output} is valid syntax. You then must use it via csname macro2endcsname.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Apr 5 at 22:36













  • So the answer is "There are not forbidden, but they have to be used in a special way. Still it's recommended not to use them."?

    – U. Windl
    Apr 5 at 22:41
















3















Finding out that I can have an environment named env2, but no command cmd2, I read Why are some characters not allowed in command sequences, but still I wonder:



Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands? In my understanding digits delimit command names (inherited from plain TeX), but why doesn't that restriction apply to environments? Wouldn't it have been more consistent to forbid digits in environment names as well?










share|improve this question























  • You actually can use numbers in commands. If you do expandafterdefcsname mycommandwithanumber123456endcsname{} you'll define a command mycommandwithanumber123456. The environments are created using the csname...endcsname pair, so it's fine.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    Apr 5 at 22:36











  • expandafterdefcsname macro2endcsname{command output} is valid syntax. You then must use it via csname macro2endcsname.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Apr 5 at 22:36













  • So the answer is "There are not forbidden, but they have to be used in a special way. Still it's recommended not to use them."?

    – U. Windl
    Apr 5 at 22:41














3












3








3


1






Finding out that I can have an environment named env2, but no command cmd2, I read Why are some characters not allowed in command sequences, but still I wonder:



Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands? In my understanding digits delimit command names (inherited from plain TeX), but why doesn't that restriction apply to environments? Wouldn't it have been more consistent to forbid digits in environment names as well?










share|improve this question














Finding out that I can have an environment named env2, but no command cmd2, I read Why are some characters not allowed in command sequences, but still I wonder:



Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands? In my understanding digits delimit command names (inherited from plain TeX), but why doesn't that restriction apply to environments? Wouldn't it have been more consistent to forbid digits in environment names as well?







macros environments






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 5 at 22:32









U. WindlU. Windl

1718




1718













  • You actually can use numbers in commands. If you do expandafterdefcsname mycommandwithanumber123456endcsname{} you'll define a command mycommandwithanumber123456. The environments are created using the csname...endcsname pair, so it's fine.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    Apr 5 at 22:36











  • expandafterdefcsname macro2endcsname{command output} is valid syntax. You then must use it via csname macro2endcsname.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Apr 5 at 22:36













  • So the answer is "There are not forbidden, but they have to be used in a special way. Still it's recommended not to use them."?

    – U. Windl
    Apr 5 at 22:41



















  • You actually can use numbers in commands. If you do expandafterdefcsname mycommandwithanumber123456endcsname{} you'll define a command mycommandwithanumber123456. The environments are created using the csname...endcsname pair, so it's fine.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    Apr 5 at 22:36











  • expandafterdefcsname macro2endcsname{command output} is valid syntax. You then must use it via csname macro2endcsname.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Apr 5 at 22:36













  • So the answer is "There are not forbidden, but they have to be used in a special way. Still it's recommended not to use them."?

    – U. Windl
    Apr 5 at 22:41

















You actually can use numbers in commands. If you do expandafterdefcsname mycommandwithanumber123456endcsname{} you'll define a command mycommandwithanumber123456. The environments are created using the csname...endcsname pair, so it's fine.

– Phelype Oleinik
Apr 5 at 22:36





You actually can use numbers in commands. If you do expandafterdefcsname mycommandwithanumber123456endcsname{} you'll define a command mycommandwithanumber123456. The environments are created using the csname...endcsname pair, so it's fine.

– Phelype Oleinik
Apr 5 at 22:36













expandafterdefcsname macro2endcsname{command output} is valid syntax. You then must use it via csname macro2endcsname.

– Steven B. Segletes
Apr 5 at 22:36







expandafterdefcsname macro2endcsname{command output} is valid syntax. You then must use it via csname macro2endcsname.

– Steven B. Segletes
Apr 5 at 22:36















So the answer is "There are not forbidden, but they have to be used in a special way. Still it's recommended not to use them."?

– U. Windl
Apr 5 at 22:41





So the answer is "There are not forbidden, but they have to be used in a special way. Still it's recommended not to use them."?

– U. Windl
Apr 5 at 22:41










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8














The restriction is in the scanner, tex's "eyes" in the texbook terminology. Any sequence of characters may be used as a command name, however after a character of catcode 0 (normally ) then tex scans the next non-letter (character of catcode other than 11) or a contiguous sequence of letters, and tokenizes it as a single csname token.



This means that foo123 normally parses as the token foo followed by the three tokens 1, 2, 3. Unless you make digits catcode 11. Similarly section* is normally the token section followed by the token *.



environment names use do not require to parse the name via the escape character, (they use the csname primitive but that's an implementation detail so begin{tabular} accesses tabular but begin{tabular*} accesses the command with name tabular* (not the two tokens that would normally be generated by parsing tabular*).



So technically it would be quite hard to not allow digits (or other characters) in environment names, especially when latex was designed there was not the memory available to add that kind of character-by-character check.






share|improve this answer


























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483440%2flatex-why-are-digits-allowed-in-environments-but-forbidden-in-commands%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    The restriction is in the scanner, tex's "eyes" in the texbook terminology. Any sequence of characters may be used as a command name, however after a character of catcode 0 (normally ) then tex scans the next non-letter (character of catcode other than 11) or a contiguous sequence of letters, and tokenizes it as a single csname token.



    This means that foo123 normally parses as the token foo followed by the three tokens 1, 2, 3. Unless you make digits catcode 11. Similarly section* is normally the token section followed by the token *.



    environment names use do not require to parse the name via the escape character, (they use the csname primitive but that's an implementation detail so begin{tabular} accesses tabular but begin{tabular*} accesses the command with name tabular* (not the two tokens that would normally be generated by parsing tabular*).



    So technically it would be quite hard to not allow digits (or other characters) in environment names, especially when latex was designed there was not the memory available to add that kind of character-by-character check.






    share|improve this answer






























      8














      The restriction is in the scanner, tex's "eyes" in the texbook terminology. Any sequence of characters may be used as a command name, however after a character of catcode 0 (normally ) then tex scans the next non-letter (character of catcode other than 11) or a contiguous sequence of letters, and tokenizes it as a single csname token.



      This means that foo123 normally parses as the token foo followed by the three tokens 1, 2, 3. Unless you make digits catcode 11. Similarly section* is normally the token section followed by the token *.



      environment names use do not require to parse the name via the escape character, (they use the csname primitive but that's an implementation detail so begin{tabular} accesses tabular but begin{tabular*} accesses the command with name tabular* (not the two tokens that would normally be generated by parsing tabular*).



      So technically it would be quite hard to not allow digits (or other characters) in environment names, especially when latex was designed there was not the memory available to add that kind of character-by-character check.






      share|improve this answer




























        8












        8








        8







        The restriction is in the scanner, tex's "eyes" in the texbook terminology. Any sequence of characters may be used as a command name, however after a character of catcode 0 (normally ) then tex scans the next non-letter (character of catcode other than 11) or a contiguous sequence of letters, and tokenizes it as a single csname token.



        This means that foo123 normally parses as the token foo followed by the three tokens 1, 2, 3. Unless you make digits catcode 11. Similarly section* is normally the token section followed by the token *.



        environment names use do not require to parse the name via the escape character, (they use the csname primitive but that's an implementation detail so begin{tabular} accesses tabular but begin{tabular*} accesses the command with name tabular* (not the two tokens that would normally be generated by parsing tabular*).



        So technically it would be quite hard to not allow digits (or other characters) in environment names, especially when latex was designed there was not the memory available to add that kind of character-by-character check.






        share|improve this answer















        The restriction is in the scanner, tex's "eyes" in the texbook terminology. Any sequence of characters may be used as a command name, however after a character of catcode 0 (normally ) then tex scans the next non-letter (character of catcode other than 11) or a contiguous sequence of letters, and tokenizes it as a single csname token.



        This means that foo123 normally parses as the token foo followed by the three tokens 1, 2, 3. Unless you make digits catcode 11. Similarly section* is normally the token section followed by the token *.



        environment names use do not require to parse the name via the escape character, (they use the csname primitive but that's an implementation detail so begin{tabular} accesses tabular but begin{tabular*} accesses the command with name tabular* (not the two tokens that would normally be generated by parsing tabular*).



        So technically it would be quite hard to not allow digits (or other characters) in environment names, especially when latex was designed there was not the memory available to add that kind of character-by-character check.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 5 at 23:24









        Phelype Oleinik

        25.1k54690




        25.1k54690










        answered Apr 5 at 23:19









        David CarlisleDavid Carlisle

        499k4111451894




        499k4111451894






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483440%2flatex-why-are-digits-allowed-in-environments-but-forbidden-in-commands%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

            How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...