Extension of order-preserving bijection from rationals to reals.












2












$begingroup$


If $f:mathbb{Q}rightarrowmathbb{Q}$ is order-preserving bijection. Prove that $f$ can be extended to an order-preserving homeomorphism $F:mathbb{R}rightarrowmathbb{R}$.



Attempt for Proof:The inverse of the given function is also order preserving and bijective. Lets define the extension first. Given a real number $x$, pick a sequence of rationals converging to $x$ from below, call them $a(n)$. Similarly, pick $b(n)$ that converges from above. Then we look at the images of these points. Now we use the fact that $f$ preserves order and conclude (how?) that there is a unique number between all $f[a(n)]$ and $f[b(n)]$. Define it to be the image of x.



Next we would need to prove such an extension is continuous and continuous inverse?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Dedekind cuts${}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 19 '18 at 18:07
















2












$begingroup$


If $f:mathbb{Q}rightarrowmathbb{Q}$ is order-preserving bijection. Prove that $f$ can be extended to an order-preserving homeomorphism $F:mathbb{R}rightarrowmathbb{R}$.



Attempt for Proof:The inverse of the given function is also order preserving and bijective. Lets define the extension first. Given a real number $x$, pick a sequence of rationals converging to $x$ from below, call them $a(n)$. Similarly, pick $b(n)$ that converges from above. Then we look at the images of these points. Now we use the fact that $f$ preserves order and conclude (how?) that there is a unique number between all $f[a(n)]$ and $f[b(n)]$. Define it to be the image of x.



Next we would need to prove such an extension is continuous and continuous inverse?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Dedekind cuts${}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 19 '18 at 18:07














2












2








2





$begingroup$


If $f:mathbb{Q}rightarrowmathbb{Q}$ is order-preserving bijection. Prove that $f$ can be extended to an order-preserving homeomorphism $F:mathbb{R}rightarrowmathbb{R}$.



Attempt for Proof:The inverse of the given function is also order preserving and bijective. Lets define the extension first. Given a real number $x$, pick a sequence of rationals converging to $x$ from below, call them $a(n)$. Similarly, pick $b(n)$ that converges from above. Then we look at the images of these points. Now we use the fact that $f$ preserves order and conclude (how?) that there is a unique number between all $f[a(n)]$ and $f[b(n)]$. Define it to be the image of x.



Next we would need to prove such an extension is continuous and continuous inverse?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




If $f:mathbb{Q}rightarrowmathbb{Q}$ is order-preserving bijection. Prove that $f$ can be extended to an order-preserving homeomorphism $F:mathbb{R}rightarrowmathbb{R}$.



Attempt for Proof:The inverse of the given function is also order preserving and bijective. Lets define the extension first. Given a real number $x$, pick a sequence of rationals converging to $x$ from below, call them $a(n)$. Similarly, pick $b(n)$ that converges from above. Then we look at the images of these points. Now we use the fact that $f$ preserves order and conclude (how?) that there is a unique number between all $f[a(n)]$ and $f[b(n)]$. Define it to be the image of x.



Next we would need to prove such an extension is continuous and continuous inverse?







real-analysis order-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 19 '18 at 19:52









Andrés E. Caicedo

65.8k8160252




65.8k8160252










asked Dec 19 '18 at 18:02









ershersh

438113




438113








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Dedekind cuts${}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 19 '18 at 18:07














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Dedekind cuts${}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Dec 19 '18 at 18:07








2




2




$begingroup$
Dedekind cuts${}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 19 '18 at 18:07




$begingroup$
Dedekind cuts${}$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Dec 19 '18 at 18:07










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

My first idea was to prove that $f$ is locally uniformly continuous to extend it by completeness of $mathbb{R}$ (using this). But even though is easy to prove that $f$ is continuous I didn't figure out how to prove that it is uniformly continuous.



Here is another approach using Lord Shark the Unknown natural idea.



Given $xin mathbb{R}$ define $F:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ by
$$F(x):=sup left ( f((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})right )$$
Then





  • $Fmid_mathbb{Q}=f$: This is just the identity $f(-infty,a)=(-infty,f(a))$ for $ain mathbb{Q}$.


  • $F$ is monotone: This came from $x<y implies f((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})subseteq f((-infty,y) cap mathbb{Q})$


  • $F$ is continuous: Take $xin mathbb{R}$ and $varepsilon>0$. Take $ain (f(x),f(x)+varepsilon)cap mathbb{Q}$ an define $b=f^{-1}(a)$. Then $delta=b-x$ is such that $f(x,x+delta)subseteq (f(x),f(x)+varepsilon)$. This prove upper semicontinuity at $x$, similarly we can prove the lower semicontinuity at $x$ and so $f$ is continuous.


Now we can define in a similar way for $g:=f^{-1}$ the function $$G(x):=sup left ( g((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})right )$$
and prove the three properties above.



As $Fcirc Gmid_mathbb{Q}=Gcirc Fmid_mathbb{Q}=text{Id}_mathbb{Q}$ we deduce that $G=F^{-1}$ by continuity and so $F$ is a monotone homeomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046686%2fextension-of-order-preserving-bijection-from-rationals-to-reals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    My first idea was to prove that $f$ is locally uniformly continuous to extend it by completeness of $mathbb{R}$ (using this). But even though is easy to prove that $f$ is continuous I didn't figure out how to prove that it is uniformly continuous.



    Here is another approach using Lord Shark the Unknown natural idea.



    Given $xin mathbb{R}$ define $F:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ by
    $$F(x):=sup left ( f((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})right )$$
    Then





    • $Fmid_mathbb{Q}=f$: This is just the identity $f(-infty,a)=(-infty,f(a))$ for $ain mathbb{Q}$.


    • $F$ is monotone: This came from $x<y implies f((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})subseteq f((-infty,y) cap mathbb{Q})$


    • $F$ is continuous: Take $xin mathbb{R}$ and $varepsilon>0$. Take $ain (f(x),f(x)+varepsilon)cap mathbb{Q}$ an define $b=f^{-1}(a)$. Then $delta=b-x$ is such that $f(x,x+delta)subseteq (f(x),f(x)+varepsilon)$. This prove upper semicontinuity at $x$, similarly we can prove the lower semicontinuity at $x$ and so $f$ is continuous.


    Now we can define in a similar way for $g:=f^{-1}$ the function $$G(x):=sup left ( g((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})right )$$
    and prove the three properties above.



    As $Fcirc Gmid_mathbb{Q}=Gcirc Fmid_mathbb{Q}=text{Id}_mathbb{Q}$ we deduce that $G=F^{-1}$ by continuity and so $F$ is a monotone homeomorphism.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      My first idea was to prove that $f$ is locally uniformly continuous to extend it by completeness of $mathbb{R}$ (using this). But even though is easy to prove that $f$ is continuous I didn't figure out how to prove that it is uniformly continuous.



      Here is another approach using Lord Shark the Unknown natural idea.



      Given $xin mathbb{R}$ define $F:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ by
      $$F(x):=sup left ( f((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})right )$$
      Then





      • $Fmid_mathbb{Q}=f$: This is just the identity $f(-infty,a)=(-infty,f(a))$ for $ain mathbb{Q}$.


      • $F$ is monotone: This came from $x<y implies f((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})subseteq f((-infty,y) cap mathbb{Q})$


      • $F$ is continuous: Take $xin mathbb{R}$ and $varepsilon>0$. Take $ain (f(x),f(x)+varepsilon)cap mathbb{Q}$ an define $b=f^{-1}(a)$. Then $delta=b-x$ is such that $f(x,x+delta)subseteq (f(x),f(x)+varepsilon)$. This prove upper semicontinuity at $x$, similarly we can prove the lower semicontinuity at $x$ and so $f$ is continuous.


      Now we can define in a similar way for $g:=f^{-1}$ the function $$G(x):=sup left ( g((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})right )$$
      and prove the three properties above.



      As $Fcirc Gmid_mathbb{Q}=Gcirc Fmid_mathbb{Q}=text{Id}_mathbb{Q}$ we deduce that $G=F^{-1}$ by continuity and so $F$ is a monotone homeomorphism.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        My first idea was to prove that $f$ is locally uniformly continuous to extend it by completeness of $mathbb{R}$ (using this). But even though is easy to prove that $f$ is continuous I didn't figure out how to prove that it is uniformly continuous.



        Here is another approach using Lord Shark the Unknown natural idea.



        Given $xin mathbb{R}$ define $F:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ by
        $$F(x):=sup left ( f((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})right )$$
        Then





        • $Fmid_mathbb{Q}=f$: This is just the identity $f(-infty,a)=(-infty,f(a))$ for $ain mathbb{Q}$.


        • $F$ is monotone: This came from $x<y implies f((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})subseteq f((-infty,y) cap mathbb{Q})$


        • $F$ is continuous: Take $xin mathbb{R}$ and $varepsilon>0$. Take $ain (f(x),f(x)+varepsilon)cap mathbb{Q}$ an define $b=f^{-1}(a)$. Then $delta=b-x$ is such that $f(x,x+delta)subseteq (f(x),f(x)+varepsilon)$. This prove upper semicontinuity at $x$, similarly we can prove the lower semicontinuity at $x$ and so $f$ is continuous.


        Now we can define in a similar way for $g:=f^{-1}$ the function $$G(x):=sup left ( g((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})right )$$
        and prove the three properties above.



        As $Fcirc Gmid_mathbb{Q}=Gcirc Fmid_mathbb{Q}=text{Id}_mathbb{Q}$ we deduce that $G=F^{-1}$ by continuity and so $F$ is a monotone homeomorphism.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        My first idea was to prove that $f$ is locally uniformly continuous to extend it by completeness of $mathbb{R}$ (using this). But even though is easy to prove that $f$ is continuous I didn't figure out how to prove that it is uniformly continuous.



        Here is another approach using Lord Shark the Unknown natural idea.



        Given $xin mathbb{R}$ define $F:mathbb{R}rightarrow mathbb{R}$ by
        $$F(x):=sup left ( f((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})right )$$
        Then





        • $Fmid_mathbb{Q}=f$: This is just the identity $f(-infty,a)=(-infty,f(a))$ for $ain mathbb{Q}$.


        • $F$ is monotone: This came from $x<y implies f((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})subseteq f((-infty,y) cap mathbb{Q})$


        • $F$ is continuous: Take $xin mathbb{R}$ and $varepsilon>0$. Take $ain (f(x),f(x)+varepsilon)cap mathbb{Q}$ an define $b=f^{-1}(a)$. Then $delta=b-x$ is such that $f(x,x+delta)subseteq (f(x),f(x)+varepsilon)$. This prove upper semicontinuity at $x$, similarly we can prove the lower semicontinuity at $x$ and so $f$ is continuous.


        Now we can define in a similar way for $g:=f^{-1}$ the function $$G(x):=sup left ( g((-infty,x) cap mathbb{Q})right )$$
        and prove the three properties above.



        As $Fcirc Gmid_mathbb{Q}=Gcirc Fmid_mathbb{Q}=text{Id}_mathbb{Q}$ we deduce that $G=F^{-1}$ by continuity and so $F$ is a monotone homeomorphism.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 19 '18 at 19:33

























        answered Dec 19 '18 at 19:15









        yamete kudasaiyamete kudasai

        1,160818




        1,160818






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046686%2fextension-of-order-preserving-bijection-from-rationals-to-reals%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Plaza Victoria

            Puebla de Zaragoza

            Musa