Vector triple product in 4 dimensions












0












$begingroup$


I have rewritten an equation in 3 dimensions
$$ vec{f} + nabla a + b nabla c = vec{0} $$
where $a,b,c$ are unknown functions to be determined and $vec{f}$ is a known vector by taking the curl
$$nabla times vec{f} + nabla b times nabla c = vec{0}$$
and using the the property of the triple product $vec{u} cdot (vec{u} times vec{v}) = 0$ to give 3 first-order linear partial differential equations, 1 for each of the unknown functions
$$ nabla b cdot (nabla times vec{f}) = 0 \ nabla c cdot (nabla times vec{f}) = 0 \ nabla a cdot (nabla times vec{f}) + vec{f} cdot (nabla times vec{f}) = 0 ; .$$
The 1st-order PDE's allowed me to reduce the number of independent variables to 2.





I am now faced with the same problem in 4 dimensions.



Question:



Is there a way of applying a similar method to derive 1st-order PDE's for each of the unknown functions?



Addendum:



I am thinking that this can be solved more easily using index notation. If the original equation is
$$ f_{k} + partial_{k} a + b partial_{k} c = 0_k $$
then one can perform the following steps (to obtain an equation for $b$)
$$ partial_j b , partial_l left( f_{k} + partial_{k} a + b partial_{k} c right) varepsilon^{i j k l} textbf{1}_i = 0 $$
where $textbf{1}_i$ is supposed to mean a vector of ones and $varepsilon^{i j k l}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol in 4 dimensions. Some terms drop out and and we are left with
$$ partial_j b , partial_l f_{k} varepsilon^{i j k l} textbf{1}_i = 0 ; .$$



Do you think this is correct?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I have rewritten an equation in 3 dimensions
    $$ vec{f} + nabla a + b nabla c = vec{0} $$
    where $a,b,c$ are unknown functions to be determined and $vec{f}$ is a known vector by taking the curl
    $$nabla times vec{f} + nabla b times nabla c = vec{0}$$
    and using the the property of the triple product $vec{u} cdot (vec{u} times vec{v}) = 0$ to give 3 first-order linear partial differential equations, 1 for each of the unknown functions
    $$ nabla b cdot (nabla times vec{f}) = 0 \ nabla c cdot (nabla times vec{f}) = 0 \ nabla a cdot (nabla times vec{f}) + vec{f} cdot (nabla times vec{f}) = 0 ; .$$
    The 1st-order PDE's allowed me to reduce the number of independent variables to 2.





    I am now faced with the same problem in 4 dimensions.



    Question:



    Is there a way of applying a similar method to derive 1st-order PDE's for each of the unknown functions?



    Addendum:



    I am thinking that this can be solved more easily using index notation. If the original equation is
    $$ f_{k} + partial_{k} a + b partial_{k} c = 0_k $$
    then one can perform the following steps (to obtain an equation for $b$)
    $$ partial_j b , partial_l left( f_{k} + partial_{k} a + b partial_{k} c right) varepsilon^{i j k l} textbf{1}_i = 0 $$
    where $textbf{1}_i$ is supposed to mean a vector of ones and $varepsilon^{i j k l}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol in 4 dimensions. Some terms drop out and and we are left with
    $$ partial_j b , partial_l f_{k} varepsilon^{i j k l} textbf{1}_i = 0 ; .$$



    Do you think this is correct?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I have rewritten an equation in 3 dimensions
      $$ vec{f} + nabla a + b nabla c = vec{0} $$
      where $a,b,c$ are unknown functions to be determined and $vec{f}$ is a known vector by taking the curl
      $$nabla times vec{f} + nabla b times nabla c = vec{0}$$
      and using the the property of the triple product $vec{u} cdot (vec{u} times vec{v}) = 0$ to give 3 first-order linear partial differential equations, 1 for each of the unknown functions
      $$ nabla b cdot (nabla times vec{f}) = 0 \ nabla c cdot (nabla times vec{f}) = 0 \ nabla a cdot (nabla times vec{f}) + vec{f} cdot (nabla times vec{f}) = 0 ; .$$
      The 1st-order PDE's allowed me to reduce the number of independent variables to 2.





      I am now faced with the same problem in 4 dimensions.



      Question:



      Is there a way of applying a similar method to derive 1st-order PDE's for each of the unknown functions?



      Addendum:



      I am thinking that this can be solved more easily using index notation. If the original equation is
      $$ f_{k} + partial_{k} a + b partial_{k} c = 0_k $$
      then one can perform the following steps (to obtain an equation for $b$)
      $$ partial_j b , partial_l left( f_{k} + partial_{k} a + b partial_{k} c right) varepsilon^{i j k l} textbf{1}_i = 0 $$
      where $textbf{1}_i$ is supposed to mean a vector of ones and $varepsilon^{i j k l}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol in 4 dimensions. Some terms drop out and and we are left with
      $$ partial_j b , partial_l f_{k} varepsilon^{i j k l} textbf{1}_i = 0 ; .$$



      Do you think this is correct?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have rewritten an equation in 3 dimensions
      $$ vec{f} + nabla a + b nabla c = vec{0} $$
      where $a,b,c$ are unknown functions to be determined and $vec{f}$ is a known vector by taking the curl
      $$nabla times vec{f} + nabla b times nabla c = vec{0}$$
      and using the the property of the triple product $vec{u} cdot (vec{u} times vec{v}) = 0$ to give 3 first-order linear partial differential equations, 1 for each of the unknown functions
      $$ nabla b cdot (nabla times vec{f}) = 0 \ nabla c cdot (nabla times vec{f}) = 0 \ nabla a cdot (nabla times vec{f}) + vec{f} cdot (nabla times vec{f}) = 0 ; .$$
      The 1st-order PDE's allowed me to reduce the number of independent variables to 2.





      I am now faced with the same problem in 4 dimensions.



      Question:



      Is there a way of applying a similar method to derive 1st-order PDE's for each of the unknown functions?



      Addendum:



      I am thinking that this can be solved more easily using index notation. If the original equation is
      $$ f_{k} + partial_{k} a + b partial_{k} c = 0_k $$
      then one can perform the following steps (to obtain an equation for $b$)
      $$ partial_j b , partial_l left( f_{k} + partial_{k} a + b partial_{k} c right) varepsilon^{i j k l} textbf{1}_i = 0 $$
      where $textbf{1}_i$ is supposed to mean a vector of ones and $varepsilon^{i j k l}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol in 4 dimensions. Some terms drop out and and we are left with
      $$ partial_j b , partial_l f_{k} varepsilon^{i j k l} textbf{1}_i = 0 ; .$$



      Do you think this is correct?







      pde partial-derivative vector-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 20 '18 at 22:37







      Crenguta

















      asked Dec 19 '18 at 18:57









      CrengutaCrenguta

      456




      456






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046745%2fvector-triple-product-in-4-dimensions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046745%2fvector-triple-product-in-4-dimensions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Plaza Victoria

          In PowerPoint, is there a keyboard shortcut for bulleted / numbered list?

          How to put 3 figures in Latex with 2 figures side by side and 1 below these side by side images but in...